Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2021, Vol. 489 Issue (3): 58-76    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
金融周期对房地产价格的影响——基于SV-TVP-VAR模型的实证研究
钱宗鑫, 王芳, 孙挺
中国人民大学财政金融学院/中国财政金融政策中心,北京 100872;
中信建投证券股份有限公司资本市场部,北京 100010
The Impact of Financial Cycle on Real Estate Prices: An Empirical Study Based on a SV-TVP-VAR Model
QIAN Zongxin, WANG Fang, SUN Ting
School of Finance, Renmin University of China;
China Securities
下载:  PDF (1910KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文利用2004-2016年的季度数据构建金融周期综合指数,用以描述金融市场景气程度;使用SV-TVP-VAR模型,围绕金融周期对我国房地产价格的影响进行实证研究。结果表明,金融周期对房地产价格的影响具有明显的时变性特征:2008年以前金融市场繁荣对房价有稳定推升作用,2008年后该影响持续弱化;与之类似,实体经济对房价的影响同样自2008年起逐渐减小。这意味着,在经济增长方式转变和经济结构调整的过程中,我国房地产价格对经济金融冲击的敏感度已经大幅下降,金融扩张可能难以再通过房地产市场有效带动实体经济的繁荣,相反,其反而可能导致银行贷款不良率的攀升,在金融系统内积累系统性风险。我国针对房地产的宏观调控政策不仅对控制贷款不良率的提高体现出积极作用,而且自2008年国际金融危机以来,产出及房价的随机波动率均呈显著下降趋势,风险得到有效控制。未来应更加重视房地产市场调控在宏观审慎政策框架中的重要地位,遏制房地产金融化泡沫化势头,防范房地产市场引发金融危机。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
钱宗鑫
王芳
孙挺
关键词:  金融周期  房地产价格  SV-TVP-VAR模型  宏观审慎政策    
Summary:  Many papers, when constructing indices of China's financial cycle, include indicators of real estate market conditions as components. However, although many researchers believe that China's real estate sector and financial sector are closely related, there has been little research on this dynamic relationship.In this paper, we attempt to fill this gap by studying the dynamic impact of China's financial cycle on the real estate price. We do this in two steps.
First, we construct an index of China's financial cycle that comprises five financial indicators: stock market performance, interest rate, capital flow, leverage, and money supply. We aggregate the five indicators as a simple average.
In the second step, we construct a three-variate vector autoregressive (VAR) model that includes an indicator of real activities, an indicator of real estate price, and our index of China's financial cycles. The VAR model has a few characteristics. First, we allow the regression coefficients to change over time. Second, we allow the size of the economic shocks to vary over time. Third, we use a recursive scheme to identify structural economic shocks. These characteristics are important for the following reasons. First, China's economy is continuously under reform. These reforms could cause structural changes in the dynamic relationship between the real estate and financial sectors, and omitting those structural changes could lead to misleading results. Allowing the coefficients of the VAR to vary over time should capture those structural changes. Second, due to the changing domestic and foreign economic environment, sources of economic uncertainty change over time. As a result, the size of the shocks to our endogenous variables might also change over time. Third, it is well known that simply interpreting the error terms of the reduced-form VAR as economic shocks omits contemporary correlations between endogenous variables, which can lead to misleading conclusions. Therefore, our VAR model is a structural vector autoregressive model with stochastic volatility and time-varying parameters. The variables in the model are entered in the following order: first, the indicator of real activities, second, the indicator of real estate price, and third, our index of China's financial cycle.
We estimate our model using quarterly data from 2004 to 2016. When constructing our index of China's financial cycles, we use the Shanghai stock market index as the indicator of stock market performance. We use the 7-day inter-bank market interest rate to represent interest rates; the ratio of fixed assets financed by credit to total fixed assets investment as the indicator of leverage; the ratio of the capital and financial account balance to GDP as the indicator of capital flow; and the year-on-year M2 growth rate as the indicator of money supply. Our indicator of real activities is the year-on-year GDP growth rate. Our indicator of real estate price is the China Quality-Controlled Housing Price Index.
The results show that the structural economic shocks to China's economy vary in size over time. The volatility of real activities reached its peak in 2009 and then gradually declined. This suggests that China's macroeconomic policies have helped to stabilize economic growth since the global financial crisis. The volatility of the real estate price also demonstrates a declining trend. However, the trend reversed in 2014 and the real estate price volatility increased until 2016. These results suggest that China's real estate market was developing stably. However, uncertainty has increased in recent years(2015-2016). The volatility of our index of financial cycles gradually increases, suggesting that financial risk during the sample period deserves more attention.
The impact of financial cycle on real estate prices has obvious time-varying characteristics. Before 2008, financial market expansion had a stable influence on the promotion of housing prices, but since 2008, the impact has gradually weakened. Similar to financial shocks, the impact of the real economy on housing prices has also gradually decreased since 2008. This shows that regulatory policies have helped to greatly reduce the sensitivity of real estate prices to economic and financial shocks. The finding that the impact of financial cycles on the real estate price has weakened has important policy implications. A finance-led real estate boom is less likely, which means that the transmission from financial expansion to economic growth through the real estate sector has become less effective since 2008; instead, excessive financial risk-taking accumulates systemic risk. Macro-prudential policies regarding the real estate market are necessary.
Keywords:  Financial Cycle    Real Estate Price    SV-TVP-VAR Model    Macro-prudential Policy
JEL分类号:  E44   R38  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家自然科学基金面上项目71773126、国家自然科学基金应急项目71850009的资助。感谢韩鸿晨同学的助研工作。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  王 芳,经济学博士,教授,中国人民大学财政金融学院,中国财政金融政策研究中心,E-mail:wangfruc@ruc.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  钱宗鑫,经济学博士,副教授,中国人民大学财政金融学院,中国财政金融政策研究中心,E-mail:qianzx@ruc.edu.cn.
孙 挺,经济学硕士,中信建投证券股份有限公司资本市场部,E-mail:suntingruc@126.com.
引用本文:    
钱宗鑫, 王芳, 孙挺. 金融周期对房地产价格的影响——基于SV-TVP-VAR模型的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 489(3): 58-76.
QIAN Zongxin, WANG Fang, SUN Ting. The Impact of Financial Cycle on Real Estate Prices: An Empirical Study Based on a SV-TVP-VAR Model. Journal of Financial Research, 2021, 489(3): 58-76.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2021/V489/I3/58
[1] 陈雨露、马勇和阮卓阳,2016,《金融周期和金融波动如何影响经济增长与金融稳定》,《金融研究》第2期,第1~22页。
[2] 范小云、袁梦怡和肖立晟,2017,《理解中国的金融周期:理论、测算与分析》,《国际金融研究》第1期,第28~38页。
[3] 方意、陈敏,2019,《经济波动、银行风险承担与中国金融周期》,《世界经济》第42卷,第2期,第3~25页。
[4] 高爱武,2018,《中国金融周期的测度及其风险阈值研究》,《上海金融》第3期,第1~10页。
[5] 韩艾、郑桂环和汪寿阳,2010,《广义动态因子模型在景气指数构建中的应用——中国金融周期景气分析》,《系统工程理论与实践》第5期,第803~811页。
[6] 雷霖,2018,《影子银行规模、房地产价格与金融稳定性》,《经济与管理研究》第11期,第107~117页。
[7] 李戎、钱宗鑫和孙挺,2017,《我国货币政策有效性及其与股票市场的交互影响——基于SVAR模型的实证研究》,《经济理论与经济管理》第3期,第48~60页。
[8] 马勇、张靖岚和陈雨露,2017,《金融周期与货币政策》,《金融研究》第3期,第33~53页。
[9] 马勇、冯心悦和田拓,2016,《金融周期与经济周期——基于中国的实证研究》,《国际金融研究》第10期,第3~14页。
[10] 苗文龙、钟世和和周潮,《金融周期、行业技术周期与经济结构优化》,《金融研究》第3期,第36~52页。
[11] 邱兆祥、王涛,2009,《我国房地产经济周期划分研究(1950—2008年)》,《经济研究参考》第71期,第3~11页。
[12] 羿建华、孙健和郭峰,2014,《房地产周期、货币扩张与经济增长的关联度分析》,《统计与决策》第24期,第141~145页。
[13] 伊楠、张斌,2016,《度量中国的金融周期》,《国际金融研究》第6期,第13~23页。
[14] 张晓晶、孙涛,2006,《中国房地产周期与金融稳定》,《经济研究》第1期,第23~33页。
[15] 张宗新、张秀秀,2019,《引入国债期货合约能否发挥现货市场稳定效应?——基于中国金融周期的研究视角》,《金融研究》第6期,第58~75页。
[16] 赵昕东,2010,《中国房地产价格波动与宏观经济——基于SVAR模型的研究》,《经济评论》第1期,第65~71页。
[17] 周建军、代支祥和龙娟,2011,《金融政策对中国房地产周期波动的影响》,《经济问题探索》第11期,第6~13页。
[18] 朱太辉、黄海晶,2018,《中国金融周期:指标、方法和实证》,《金融研究》第12期,第55~71页。
[19] Aikman D, Haldane A G and Nelson B D, 2015, “Curbing the Credit Cycle”, Economic Journal, 125(585): 1072~1109.
[20] Alessi L, Detken C, 2011, “Quasi Real Time Early Warning Indicators for Costly Asset Price Boom/Bust Cycles: A Role for Global Liquidity”, European Journal of Political Economy, 27(3):520~533.
[21] Arsenault M, Clayton J, Peng L, 2013, “Mortgage Fund Flows, Capital Appreciation, and Real Estate Cycles”, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 47(2):243~265.
[22] Bryan M F, Cecchetti S G, 1993, “Measuring Core Inflation”, Social & Economic Studies, 49(2/3):279~312.
[23] Carey, Mark S, 1990, “Feeding the Fad: the Federal Land Banks, Land Market Efficiency, and the Farm Credit Crises”, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
[24] Chan, J C C, Eisenstat E, 2018, “Bayesian Model Comparison for Time-varying Parameter VARs with Stochastic Volatility”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 33(4): 509~532.
[25] Davis E P , Zhu H, 2011, “Bank Lending and Commercial Property Cycles: Some Cross-country Evidence”, Journal of International Money & Finance, 30(1):0~21.
[26] Fang H, Gu Q, Xiong W, Zhou, L., 2016, “Demystifying the Chinese Housing Boom”, NBER Macroeconomic Annual, 30(1), 105~166.
[27] Geweke J F, 1977, “The Dynamic Factor Analysis of Economic Time Series Models”, SSRI workshop series. Social Systems Research Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
[28] Geweke, J., 1992, “Bayesian Statistics”, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[29] Goodhart, C., and Hofmann, B., 2000, “Do Asset Prices Help to Predict Consumer Price Inflation?”, The Manchester School, 68, Supplement: 122~140.
[30] Harris J C, 1989, “The Effect of Real Rates of Interest on Housing Prices”, The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2(1):47~60.
[31] Hatzius J, Hooper P and Mishkin F S, et al., 2010, “Financial Conditions Indexes: A Fresh Look After the Financial Crisis”, Nber Working Paper 16150.
[32] Kenny, Geoff, 2004, “Modelling the Demand and Supply Sides of the Housing Market: Evidence from Ireland”, Economic Modelling, 16(3):389~409.
[33] Koop G, Korobilis D, 2009, “Manual to Accompany MATLAB Package for Bayesian VAR Models”, unpublished manuscript.
[34] Nakajima J, 2011, “Time-varying Parameter VAR Model with Stochastic Volatility: An Overview of Methodology and Empirical Applications”, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan.
[35] Pavlov, A., & Wachter, S., 2009, “Mortgage Put Options and Real Estate Markets”, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 38(1), 89~103.
[36] Peng.R., Wheaton.W.C, 1994, “Effects of Restrictive of Land Supply on Housing in Hong Kong: An Econometric Analysis”, Journal of Housing Research, 5(2):263~291.
[37] Primiceri G E, 2005,“Time Varying Structural Vector Autoregressions and Monetary Policy”, The Review of Economic Studies, 72(3): 821~852.
[38] Sims C A, 1980, “Macroeconomics and Reality”, Econometrica, 48(1), 1~48.
[39] Stein, Jeremy, 1995, “Prices and Trading Volume in the Housing Market: A Model with Downpayment Constraints”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110 (May): 379~406.
[1] 单强, 吕进中, 王伟斌, 黄宁. 中国化泰勒规则的构建与规则利率的估算——基于考虑金融周期信息的潜在产出与自然利率的再估算[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 483(9): 20-39.
[2] 马勇, 付莉. “双支柱”调控、政策协调搭配与宏观稳定效应[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 482(8): 1-17.
[3] 张智富, 郭云喜, 张朝洋. 宏观审慎政策协调能否抑制国际性银行危机传染?——基于跨境金融关联视角的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 481(7): 21-37.
[4] 黄继承, 姚驰, 姜伊晴, 牟天琦. “双支柱”调控的微观稳定效应研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 481(7): 1-20.
[5] 张礼卿, 钟茜. 全球金融周期、美国货币政策与“三元悖论”[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 476(2): 15-33.
[6] 张宗新, 张秀秀. 引入国债期货合约能否发挥现货市场稳定效应?——基于中国金融周期的研究视角[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 468(6): 58-75.
[7] 方意, 王晏如, 黄丽灵, 和文佳. 宏观审慎与货币政策双支柱框架研究——基于系统性风险视角[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 106-124.
[8] 马骏, 何晓贝. 货币政策与宏观审慎政策的协调[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 58-69.
[9] 马勇. “双支柱”调控框架的理论与经验基础[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 18-37.
[10] 王信, 贾彦东. 货币政策和宏观审慎政策的关联及启示——基于英格兰银行的经验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 38-57.
[11] 李斌, 吴恒宇. 对货币政策和宏观审慎政策双支柱调控框架内在逻辑的思考[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 1-17.
[12] 黄益平, 曹裕静, 陶坤玉, 余昌华. 货币政策与宏观审慎政策共同支持宏观经济稳定[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 70-91.
[13] 司登奎, 葛新宇, 曾涛, 李小林. 房价波动、金融稳定与最优宏观审慎政策[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 473(11): 38-56.
[14] 郑挺国, 赵丽娟, 宋涛. 房地产价格失调与时变货币政策立场识别[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 459(9): 1-18.
[15] 苗文龙, 钟世和, 周潮. 金融周期、行业技术周期与经济结构优化[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 453(3): 36-52.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1