Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2020, Vol. 484 Issue (10): 150-169    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
兼并收购可以促进劳动力结构优化升级吗?
赵烁, 施新政, 陆瑶, 刘心悦
清华大学经济管理学院,北京 100084;
北京大学汇丰商学院,广东深圳 518000
Can M&As Promote the Optimization and Upgrading of Labor Structures?
ZHAO Shuo, SHI Xinzheng, LU Yao, LIU Xinyue
School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University;
HSBC Business School, Peking University
下载:  PDF (838KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文使用2000-2016年我国沪深A股上市公司数据,实证研究了公司被并购对其劳动力结构的影响。研究发现,公司被并购带来公司的劳动力结构优化升级,即公司会增加非常规高技能劳动力占比和高学历劳动力占比,降低常规低技能劳动力占比。渠道检验发现,并购会通过降低企业融资约束,促进企业生产技术升级来促进企业的劳动力结构优化升级。异质性分析发现并购对劳动力结构优化升级的影响在非完全换股并购和低绩效企业中更为显著。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
赵烁
施新政
陆瑶
刘心悦
关键词:  兼并收购  创新  技术投资  劳动力结构优化升级    
Summary:  The impact of new technologies and automation on the optimization and upgrading of labor structures has received significant attention in academic circles. Studies indicate that the upgrade of production technology (including the introduction of technology and technological innovation) is closely related to changes in the labor structure (Ning and Lin, 2014; Kim et al., 2019). As the upgrade of production technology is inseparable from the demand for capital, the capital market affects the technical composition of the labor force through firms' investment and financing behaviors. At the same time, M&As are an important resource allocation activity of the capital market that receives a lot of attention from academia, industry, and government. Some studies, including Chen et al. (2015), Zhang et al. (2017), and Xian and Ming (2018), examine the relationship between M&As and technological upgrading. If M&As affect firms' technological upgrading and technological upgrading affects firms' demand for labor, how do M&As affect firms' technical labor demand? This issue is important both for academia and for practice. However, it has not received adequate attention in the literature. This paper fills this research gap by examining the effect of M&As on the labor force.
This paper investigates the impact of M&As on target firms' labor structure upgrades. Using panel data from Chinese A-share firms listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen exchanges from 2000 to 2016, we find that after controlling for firm, regional, industry, and other factors as well as labor-related policies and firm and year fixed effects, M&As significantly increase the percentages of non-routine skilled and highly educated employees in firms and significantly decrease the percentages of routine skilled employees. Furthermore, we find that M&As reduce firms' financial constraints and promote production technology upgrades, thereby accelerating firms' labor technology upgrades.
Heterogeneous tests show that M&As have a stronger impact on labor technology upgrading for firms whose payment includes cash, and firms with low performance before the M&A. These findings suggest that M&As play an important role in promoting firms' technological upgrading of labor skills. Our results are robust to using instrumental variables, PSM-DID, and shortening the M&A window.
This paper makes the following contributions to the literature. First, it belongs to the interdisciplinary field of finance and labor economics, its research topic currently being a frontier in this field.
Second, the literature on M&As mainly examines their effect on “narrow stakeholders” (such as shareholders or management) and other corporate governance behaviors, whereas there is little research on how M&As affect “broad stakeholders” (such as the labor force). In addition, the literature on the effect of M&As on Chinese firms is limited to the effect of foreign M&As, and previous research on the effect of M&As on technological upgrading mainly focuses on the technological innovation of firms. Our sample includes both foreign and domestic M&As. And we find that the optimization and upgrading of the labor force structure is caused by the upgrade of production technology, and production technology upgrading includes not only technological innovation but also the purchase of advanced technology and equipment and the introduction of technology-related intangible assets (such as patents, advanced system software, etc.), which means that our sample is more comprehensive and our conclusions are more universal. Moreover, most studies on the demand for labor and technology focus on population and regional factors. This paper examines the effect of M&As on the capital market and fills a gap in the relevant literature.
Finally, as described by Cheng et al. (2019), the amount of intelligent equipment used for production in China is increasing year by year, so it is of great practical significance to study the technological upgrade of China's labor market.
Keywords:  M&As    Innovation    Technological Investment    Labor Structure Upgrading
JEL分类号:  G34   J21   J24  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家自然科学基金面上项目(批准号:71673155);国家自然科学基金优秀青年基金(批准号:71722001);清华大学中国现代国有企业研究院课题(编号:iSOEYB202006; iSOEYB202008)的支持。
通讯作者:  陆瑶,经济学博士,教授,清华大学经济管理学院,清华大学产业创新与金融研究院,E-mail:luyao@sem.tsinghua.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  赵烁,博士研究生,清华大学经济管理学院,E-mail:zhaosh3.16@sem.tsinghua.edu.cn.施新政,经济学博士,副教授,清华大学经济管理学院, E-mail:shixz@sem.tsinghua.edu.cn.刘心悦,硕士研究生,北京大学汇丰商学院, E-mail:liuxy.14@pku.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
赵烁, 施新政, 陆瑶, 刘心悦. 兼并收购可以促进劳动力结构优化升级吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 484(10): 150-169.
ZHAO Shuo, SHI Xinzheng, LU Yao, LIU Xinyue. Can M&As Promote the Optimization and Upgrading of Labor Structures?. Journal of Financial Research, 2020, 484(10): 150-169.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2020/V484/I10/150
[1] 陈玉罡、蔡海彬、刘子健和程瑜, 2015,《外资并购促进了科技创新吗?》,《会计研究》第9期, 第68~73页。
[2] 郭凯明、余靖雯和龚六堂, 2013,《人口政策、劳动力结构与经济增长》,《世界经济》第11期,第72~92页。
[3] 傅颀、汪祥耀和路军,2014,《管理层权力、高管薪酬变动与公司并购行为分析》,《会计研究》第11期,第30~37页。
[4] 贺菊煌,1993,《产业结构的地区差异及衡量》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第8期,第32~35页。
[5] 洪道麟、刘力和熊德华,2006,《多元化并购、企业长期绩效损失及其选择动因》,《经济科学》第5期,第63~73页。
[6] 洪联英、陈思和韩峰,2015,《海外并购、组织控制与投资方式选择——基于我国的经验证据》,《管理世界》第10期,第40~53页。
[7] 李卫兵和张凯霞,2019,《空气污染对企业生产率的影响——来自中国工业企业的证据》,《管理世界》第10期,第95~112页。
[8] 李小荣、万钟和陆瑶,2019,《劳动力市场与公司金融关系研究进展》,《经济学动态》第3期,第120~133页。
[9] 刘行和赵晓阳,2019,《最低工资标准的上涨是否会加剧企业避税?》,《经济研究》第10期,第121~135页。
[10] 陆瑶、施新政和刘璐瑶,2017, 《劳动力保护与盈余管理—基于最低工资政策变动的实证分析》,《管理世界》第1期,第146~158页。
[11] 陆瑶、张叶青、贾睿和李健航,2017,《“辛迪加”风险投资与企业创新》,《金融研究》第6期,第159~175页。
[12] 宁光杰和林子亮,2014,《信息技术应用、企业组织变革与劳动力技能需求变化》,《经济研究》第8期,第79~92页。
[13] 彭国华,2015,《技术能力匹配、劳动力流动与我国地区差距》,《经济研究》第1期,第99~110页。
[14] 孙文杰,2013,《承接国际外包、价值链升级与我国高技能劳动力就业——基于工业行业的面板门槛模型》,《产业经济研究》第5期,第74~83页。
[15] 王跃堂和倪婷婷,2015,《增值税转型、产权特征与企业劳动力需求》,《管理科学学报》第4期,第18~37页。
[16] 冼国明和明秀楠,2018,《海外并购与企业创新》,《金融研究》第8期,第155~171页。
[17] 杨蕙馨和李春梅,2013,《中国信息产业技术进步对劳动力就业及工资差距的影响》,《中国工业经济》第1期,第51~63页。
[18] 张新,2003,《并购重组是否创造价值?——我国证券市场的理论与实证研究》,《经济研究》第6期,第20~29页。
[19] 张学勇、柳依依、罗丹和陈锐,2017,《创新能力对上市公司并购业绩的影响》,《金融研究》第3期,第159~175页。
[20] 赵颖,2012,《工资粘性、技能分化与劳动者工资的决定》,《经济研究》第2期,第56~68页。
[21] Acemoglu, D., 1998,“Why Do New Technologies Complement Skills? Directed Technical Change and Wage Inequality”The Quarterly Journal of Economics,113( 4):1055~1089.
[22] Acemoglu, D., 2002,“Technical Change,Inequality and the Labor Market” Journal of Economic Literature,40( 1):7~72.
[23] Acemoglu, D., 2003, “Patterns of Skill Premia” Review of Economic Studies, 70(2): 199~230.
[24] Acemoglu, D. and P. Restrepo, 2019, “Artificial Intelligence, Automation and Work”in Ajay Agrawal, Joshua Gans, and Avi Goldfarb, eds.: The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda(The University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
[25] Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch, 1988, “Audretsch.Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis”The American Economic Review, 78(4): 678~690.
[26] Ansoff, H. L., 1965, “Corporate strategy: An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion”. Penguin Books, New York.
[27] Autor, David H., F. Levy and Richard J. Murnane, 2003, “The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration”The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4): 1279~1333.
[28] Bertrand, O. and P. Zuniga, 2006, “R&D and M&A: Are Cross-Border M&A Different? An Investigation on OECD Countries” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(2):401~423.
[29] Borjas, George, J. 2005. “The Labor-Market Impact of High-Skill Immigration”, The American Economic Review, 95(2): 56~60.
[30] Chemmanur,Thomas J.,E. Loutskina,and X. Tian, 2014. “Corporate Venture Capital,Value Creation,and Innovation”Review of Financial Studies,27(8): 2434~2473.
[31] Cheng, H., R. Jia, D. Li, and H. Li, 2019, “The Rise of Robots in China”Journal of Economic Perspectives,33(2): 71~88.
[32] Erel, I., Y. Jang and Michael S. Weisbach, 2015, “Do Acquisitions Relieve Target Firms' Financial Constraints?” The Journal of Finance, 70(1): 289~328.
[33] Flug, K. and Z. Hercowitz, 2000, “Equipment Investment and the Relative Demand for Skilled Labor: International Evidence”Review of Economic Dynamics, 3(3): 461~485.
[34] Goldin, C. and Lawrence F. Katz, 1998, “The Origins of Technology-Skill Complementarity”The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3): 693~732.
[35] Katz, Lawrence F. and Robert A. Margo, 2014, “Technical Change and the Relative Demand for Skilled Labor: The United States in Historical Perspective”. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
[36] Kim, E. Han, Bruce Y. Li, Y. Lu and X. Shi, 2019, “How Seasoned Equity Offerings Affect Firms: Evidence on Technology, Employment, and Performance”Working Paper.
[37] Lin, C., Micah S. Officer and X. Zhan, 2014, “Does Competition Affect Earnings Management? Evidence from a Natural Experiment”Working Paper.
[38] Midrigan, V., and Daniel Y. Xu, 2014. “Finance and Misallocation: Evidence from Plant-Level Data” The American Economic Review, 104(2): 422~58.
[39] Nicole, W., and S. Joel, , 2020, “M&As, Investment and Financing Constraints”International Journal of the Economics of Business 27(1):49~92.
[1] 陈经伟, 姜能鹏. 中国OFDI技术创新效应的传导机制——基于资本要素市场扭曲视角的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 482(8): 74-92.
[2] 张盼盼, 张胜利, 陈建国. 融资约束、金融市场化与制造业企业出口国内增加值率[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 478(4): 48-69.
[3] 庄毓敏, 储青青, 马勇. 金融发展、企业创新与经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 478(4): 11-30.
[4] 郝项超. 委托理财导致上市公司脱实向虚吗?——基于企业创新的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 477(3): 152-168.
[5] 孙天阳, 成丽红. 协同创新网络与企业出口绩效——基于社会网络和企业异质性的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 477(3): 96-114.
[6] 戴静, 杨筝, 刘贯春, 许传华. 银行业竞争、创新资源配置和企业创新产出——基于中国工业企业的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 476(2): 51-70.
[7] 姜军, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 企业创新效率研究——来自股权质押的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 476(2): 128-146.
[8] 胡珺, 黄楠, 沈洪涛. 市场激励型环境规制可以推动企业技术创新吗?——基于中国碳排放权交易机制的自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 475(1): 171-189.
[9] 段白鸽, 王永钦, 夏梦嘉. 金融创新如何缓解信任品市场失灵?——中国食品安全责任强制保险的自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 471(9): 75-93.
[10] 徐细雄, 李万利. 儒家传统与企业创新:文化的力量[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 471(9): 112-130.
[11] 江轩宇, 朱琳, 伊志宏, 于上尧. 工薪所得税筹划与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 469(7): 135-154.
[12] 江伟, 底璐璐, 胡玉明. 改进型创新抑或突破型创新——基于客户集中度的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 469(7): 155-173.
[13] 卞元超, 吴利华, 白俊红. 高铁开通是否促进了区域创新?[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 468(6): 132-149.
[14] 杨薇, 孔东民. 企业内部薪酬差距与人力资本结构调整[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 468(6): 150-168.
[15] 张可. 经济集聚与区域创新的交互影响及空间溢出[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 467(5): 96-114.
[1] 郭凯明, 余靖雯. 工资增长、生育率差异与人力资本积累——基于内生生育和退休的动态一般均衡研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 1 -15 .
[2] 张学勇, 柳依依, 罗丹, 陈锐. 创新能力对上市公司并购业绩的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 159 -175 .
[3] 蒋冠宏. 我国企业跨国并购真的失败了吗?——基于企业效率的再讨论[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 442(4): 46 -60 .
[4] 盛丹, 陆毅. 国有企业改制降低了劳动者的工资议价能力吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 439(1): 69 -82 .
[5] 张三峰, 张 伟. 融资约束、金融发展与企业雇佣——来自中国企业调查数据的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 436(10): 111 -126 .
[6] 郭凯明, 余靖雯, 龚六堂. 计划生育政策、城镇化与经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 425(11): 47 -63 .
[7] 杨威, 赵仲匡, 宋敏. 多元化并购溢价与企业转型[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 467(5): 115 -131 .
[8] 陈运森, 黄健峤. 股票市场开放与企业投资效率——基于“沪港通”的准自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 470(8): 151 -170 .
[9] 肖欣荣, 马梦璇. 信息共享还是利益冲突?——基于买方单独调研与买卖双方联合调研的实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 470(8): 171 -188 .
[10] 寇宗来, 毕睿罡, 陈晓波. 基金业绩如何影响风格漂移和经理离职?——理论与经验分析[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 483(9): 172 -189 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1