Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2020, Vol. 483 Issue (9): 1-19    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
中国实体企业金融化:货币扩张、资本逐利还是风险规避?
张成思, 郑宁
中国财政金融政策研究中心,中国人民大学财政金融学院,北京 100872
What Drives the Financialization of China's Real Sector: Monetary Expansion, Profit-Seeking Capital or Risk Aversion?
ZHANG Chengsi, ZHENG Ning
School of Finance,Renmin University of China
下载:  PDF (835KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文构建了一个刻画实体企业在流动性金融资产和固定资产之间进行权衡的投资组合选择模型,并创新性地将货币扩张的宏观因素引入微观模型,推演中国实业部门金融化的驱动逻辑。理论模型显示:货币扩张、资本逐利和风险规避本质上是宏观和微观两个不同层面的要素变量,但都卷入实业部门金融化的驱动机制中,然而驱动效应的表现形式要比已有文献的理论模型更加复杂。基于上市公司面板数据总体样本的实证结果表明:货币扩张、资本逐利和风险规避均是企业金融化的关键影响因素,但货币扩张表现为直接抑制和间接促进两种效应。进一步引入宏观风险因素和根据企业所有权性质划分样本的稳健性检验则给出了更为细致的信息:货币因素可能通过宏观风险因素间接作用于企业金融化;所有权性质不同的企业的金融化驱动机制也表现出明显的异质性:国有企业金融化主要受货币因素和风险规避因素影响;民营企业金融资产占比层面的金融化驱动因素是风险规避和资本逐利,而金融渠道获利占比层面的金融化则受到货币因素的显著影响;其他类型企业的金融化主要受货币因素的显著影响。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张成思
郑宁
关键词:  金融投资  金融化  货币扩张  投资风险    
Summary:  In recent years, studies have focused on the financialization trend among Chinese real sector firms and analyzed the factors driving the financialization of Chinese non-financial firms by establishing investment portfolio models. The relative risks of industrial investment dominate the financialization of Chinese real sector firms. However, the literature does not consider the possible impact of macro-monetary factors on the financialization of micro-firms. The analytical expressions of the theoretical models after including macro-factors would be more complicated and affect the interpretation of the mechanism driving the financialization of micro-enterprises.
This paper first considers the influence of monetary factors on firms' portfolio selection using a theoretical model. It then deduces firms' optimal financial asset ratio based on three factors, namely monetary expansion, profit-seeking capital and risk aversion. Finally, it conducts detailed empirical analysis and statistical testing based on 2007-2018 half-year panel data on non-financial firms listed in the China A-share stock market. The results of the benchmark model show that monetary expansion, profit-seeking capital and risk aversion are the key factors affecting non-financial firms' financialization. The influence of monetary expansion on the proportion of corporate financial assets has a direct suppression effect and an indirect promotion effect. However, the indirect promotion effect cannot offset the direct suppression effect. When using the financial channel profit ratio to measure the level of corporate financialization, risk aversion remains a significant driving factor and the profit-driven nature of capital no longer has a driving role.
This paper further investigates the benchmark regression from two perspectives. The first adds economic policy uncertainty to the benchmark model as a macro-risk factor. The second tests whether the financialization mechanism of firms driven by ownership is different and shows heterogeneity. The results of adding macro-risk factors show that after introducing economic policy uncertainty, the originally significant coefficient of the monetary factor variable is no longer significant or the absolute value decreases. This indicates that the role of macro-monetary factors in the financialization of non-financial firms may indeed realize an indirect impact through the macro-risk channel.
The empirical results of dividing the samples according to the nature of firms' ownership show that the financialization-driving mechanism of non-financial firms does demonstrate heterogeneity due to different ownership attributes. The financialization of state-owned enterprises is mainly affected by the monetary and risk aversion factors; it is also affected by asset size and leverage ratio. The proportion of private enterprises' financial assets is mainly driven by risk aversion and profit-seeking capital. The proportion of profits obtained through financial channels is mainly affected by monetary factors. The financialization of the other types of enterprises is significantly affected by monetary factors and risk aversion, but profit-seeking capital is not a main driving factor. The results of the model that incorporates economic policy uncertainty further show that for all types of enterprise, when the model contains macro-risk factors, the originally significant monetary factors are no longer significant or the absolute value is significantly reduced. This further demonstrates that monetary factors may affect the financialization of enterprises through economic policy uncertainty.
Regardless of whether the financial level of Chinese non-financial firms is measured in terms of financial investment motivation or financial investment results, risk aversion is the most critical driver of firms' financialization. Profit-seeking capital has a significant driving effect on the proportion of private enterprises' financial investment. Simultaneously, neither the benchmark model nor the robustness test results provide statistically significant evidence that monetary expansion drives firms from real to virtual. The results indicate that further research is needed to clarify the transmission channels through which macro-monetary policy can release funds and guide micro-enterprises to make correct investment decisions.
Keywords:  Financial Investment    Financialization    Monetary Expansion    Investment Risk
JEL分类号:  E33   E58   G30  
基金资助: * 本研究受中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金)资助(15XNI001)。
作者简介:  张成思,经济学博士,教授,中国人民大学中国财政金融政策研究中心,E-mail:zhangcs@ruc.edu.cn.
郑 宁(通讯作者),博士研究生,中国人民大学财政金融学院,E-mail:victor_zn@ruc.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
张成思, 郑宁. 中国实体企业金融化:货币扩张、资本逐利还是风险规避?[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 483(9): 1-19.
ZHANG Chengsi, ZHENG Ning. What Drives the Financialization of China's Real Sector: Monetary Expansion, Profit-Seeking Capital or Risk Aversion?. Journal of Financial Research, 2020, 483(9): 1-19.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2020/V483/I9/1
[1] 陈享光,2016,《金融化与现代金融资本的积累》,《当代经济研究》第1期,第5~15页。
[2] 成家军和成雨,2016,《从“舍本逐末”到“去实向虚”——论经济金融化趋势》,《清华金融评论》,第10期,第49~51页。
[3] 何其春和邹恒甫,2015,《信用膨胀、虚拟经济、资源配置与经济增长》,《经济研究》第4期,第36~49页。
[4] 刘津宇、王正位和朱武祥,2014,《产权性质、市场化改革与融资歧视——来自上市公司投资—现金流敏感性的证据》,《南开管理评论》第5期,第126~135页。
[5] 罗琦、肖文翀和夏新平,2007,《融资约束抑或过度投资——中国上市企业投资—现金流敏感度的经验证据》,《中国工业经济》第9期,第103~110页。
[6] 沈红波、廖冠民和曹军,2011,《金融发展、产权性质与上市公司担保融资》,《中国工业经济》第6期,第120~129页。
[7] 徐光伟和孙峥,2015,《货币政策信号、实际干预与企业投资行为》,《财经研究》第7期,第54~67页。
[8] 张成思,2019,《金融化的逻辑与反思》,《经济研究》第11期,第4~20页。
[9] 张成思和刘贯春,2018,《中国实业部门投融资决策机制研究——基于经济政策不确定性和融资约束异质性视角》,《经济研究》第12期,第51~67页。
[10] 张成思和张步昙,2016,《中国实业投资率下降之谜,经济金融化视角》,《经济研究》第12期,第32~46页。
[11] 张成思和郑宁,2018,《中国非金融企业的金融投资行为影响机制研究》,《世界经济》第12期,第3~24页。
[12] 张成思和郑宁,2019,《中国实业部门金融化的异质性》,《金融研究》第7期,第1~18页。
[13] 张敏、吴联生和王亚平,2010,《国有股权,公司业绩与投资行为》,《金融研究》第12期,第115~130页。
[14] 朱云来,“中国当前经济问题点评”,青岛中国财富论坛上的发言,2017年6月18日。
[15] Baker, S.R., N. Bloom, and S.J. Davis, 2016. “Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593~1636.
[16] Demir, F., 2009. “Financial Liberalization, Private Investment and Portfolio Choice:Financialization of Real Sectors in Emerging Markets”, Journal of Development Economics, 88(2), 314~324.
[17] Hansen, L. P., 1982. “Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators”, Econometrica, 50(4), 1029~1054.
[18] Kleibergen, F., and R. Paap, 2006. “Generalized Reduced Rank Rests Using the Singular Value Decomposition”, Journal of Econometrics, 133(1), 97~126.
[19] Krippner, G., 2005, “The Financialization of the American Economy”, Socio-Economic Review, 3(2), 173~208.
[1] 顾雷雷, 郭建鸾, 王鸿宇. 企业社会责任、融资约束与企业金融化[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 476(2): 109-127.
[2] 周广肃, 边晓宇, 吴清军. 上山下乡经历与家庭风险金融资产投资——基于断点回归的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 475(1): 150-170.
[3] 张成思, 郑宁. 中国实业部门金融化的异质性[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 469(7): 1-18.
[4] 杨筝, 王红建, 戴静, 许传华. 放松利率管制、利润率均等化与实体企业“脱实向虚”[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 468(6): 20-38.
[5] 周广肃, 梁琪. 互联网使用、市场摩擦与家庭风险金融资产投资[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 451(1): 84-101.
[6] 张翔, 刘璐, 李伦一. 国际大宗商品市场金融化与中国宏观经济波动[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 439(1): 35-51.
[7] 尹力博, 柳依依. 中国商品期货金融化了吗?—来自国际股票市场的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 429(3): 189-206.
[8] 毛 捷, 吉 黎, 赵忠秀. 亏损抵扣、风险分担与企业投资——“沉睡合伙人”假说的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 436(10): 174-189.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1