Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2020, Vol. 479 Issue (5): 151-169    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
理性预期与能源投资——基于中国碳减排承诺的自然实验
谢里, 郑新业
湖南大学经济与贸易学院,湖南长沙 410079;中国人民大学应用经济学院,北京 100872
Rational Expectations and Energy Investment:A Natural Experiment Based on China's Commitment to Carbon Dioxide Emissions Abatement
XIE Li, ZHENG Xinye
School of Trade and Economics, Hunan University; School of Applied Economics, Renmin University of China
下载:  PDF (598KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 引入宏观经济学的理性预期分析框架来评估未来碳减排承诺如何影响当期的能源投资行为具有重要意义。能源项目投资规模大、持续时间长、不可逆性强,使得投资者在决策时会尽可能地纳入影响未来收益和成本的信息。本文将中国碳排放权交易市场试点政策与发电行业投资行为相结合,理论分析和实证检验了政府规划和实施的碳排放权交易市场试点政策如何影响企业的理性预期作用于当期发电技术项目投资,结果表明,碳排放权交易市场试点政策在规划期会促使企业相对提高试点地区低排放发电技术项目投资,特别是相对提高了这些地区低排放火力发电技术项目投资。碳排放权交易试点政策正式实施之后,企业降低了政策试点地区的高排放发电技术项目投资的实际利用水平。这一发现说明环境管制政策在正式实施之前的规划期,会对企业的投资行为产生预期管理效应,通过释放减排政策信号,促使企业先验地调整能源投资决策,以适应未来减排承诺目标。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
谢里
郑新业
关键词:  理性预期  投资行为  碳排放权交易市场    
Summary:  At the G20 Summit in Hangzhou, China, in 2016, China submitted its instrument of ratification of the Paris Agreement to the UN, and made a solemn commitment to the international community to meet its voluntary emission reduction targets, as follows: “China will reach its peak in carbon dioxide emission before 2030 and its intensity of carbon dioxide emission will decrease by 60% to 65% in 2030 compared to that in 2005.” To achieve this goal, the Chinese government has not only dynamically adjusted its energy conservation and emission reduction policies, but also tried to establish a carbon-trading market. However, the development of enterprises entails considerable pollution, and corporate energy projects are characterized by a large investment scale, long cycles, and strong irreversibility; thus the effect of carbon emission reduction policy tools is limited.
Due to constraints on the selection of cases, sample data, and research methods, research is still lacking on how to introduce rational expectation to investment behavior in corporate energy projects. As an important policy tool for the government to realize carbon dioxide emission reductions, China's pilot carbon-trading market offers a concrete natural experimental setting to test whether corporate rational expectations affect energy investment behavior. In late 2011, the Chinese government approved regional pilots for a carbon-trading market in seven provinces and cities by the end of 2013, including Beijing and Shanghai, thus sending an important signal to the market. It means that corporate investment in or operation of high carbon emission projects may increase carbon-permit costs in the future, which may encourage enterprises to adjust investment decisions and operations in relation to high-and low-emission energy projects. At the same time, the power generation industry is not only the largest consumer of energy, especially fossil energy, but also the main source of carbon dioxide and other pollutants.
Therefore, this paper investigates the effect of China's carbon-trading market pilot policy on the investment behavior of power generation projects in China. By dividing power generation investment projects into high-emission and low-emission categories, the installation capacity of power generation technology or the average utilization hours of power generation projects and other physical measures are used to reflect enterprises' actual investment in power generation projects or effective utilization of the investment. On this basis, it is possible to construct a theoretical model of the investment behavior of inter-period enterprise power generation projects. The difference-in-differences method is adopted to empirically test how the government's carbon-permit market pilot policy affects enterprises' application of rational expectations to investment in power generation projects. The results show that companies have rational expectations of the carbon-trading market pilot to be implemented by the government in the future. In the pilot regions, enterprises began to adjust their investment in high-emission and low-emission power generation technology when the government issued the plan, which significantly reduced investment in high-emission power generation projects and increased investment in low-emission power generation projects. In particular, they significantly increased investment in thermal power generation projects with low-emission characteristics.
This study broadens research on the application of rational expectation to energy project investment, and demonstrates the existence of rational expectation in the investment behavior of energy projects. Even more importantly, it indicates that the planning period before the formal implementation of environmental regulation policy by the government will have the expected management effect on the investment behavior of enterprises. By signaling its emission reduction policies to promote enterprises' prior adjustment, the government can better meet its emission reduction commitments.
Keywords:  Rational Expectations    Investment Behavior    Carbon-permit Market
JEL分类号:  E22   L94   Q43  
基金资助: * 本文得到了国家自然科学基金面上项目(71573074和71774165)的支持。
作者简介:  谢 里,经济学博士,教授,湖南大学经济与贸易学院,E-mail:xiexan@163.com.
郑新业(通讯作者),经济学博士,教授,中国人民大学应用经济学院,E-mail:zhengxinye@ruc.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
谢里, 郑新业. 理性预期与能源投资——基于中国碳减排承诺的自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 479(5): 151-169.
XIE Li, ZHENG Xinye. Rational Expectations and Energy Investment:A Natural Experiment Based on China's Commitment to Carbon Dioxide Emissions Abatement. Journal of Financial Research, 2020, 479(5): 151-169.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2020/V479/I5/151
[1] 何建坤,2015,《推动能源革命实现国家自主决定贡献目标》,《光明日报》2015年7月2日。
[2] 林伯强,2006,《中国电力发展:提高电价和限电的经济影响》,《经济研究》第5期,第115~126页。
[3] 林伯强和牟敦果,2009,《高级能源经济学》,中国财政经济出版社。
[4] 林毅夫 、蔡昉和李周,1999,《中国的奇迹 : 发展战略与经济改革》(修订版),上海三联书店和上海人民出版社。
[5] 莫建雷、段宏波、范英和汪寿阳,2018,《〈巴黎协定〉中我国能源和气候政策目标:综合评估与政策选择》,《经济研究》第9期,第168~181页。
[6] 田国强、赵禹朴和宫汝凯,2016,《利率市场化、存款保险制度与银行挤兑》,《经济研究》第3期,第96~109页。
[7] 俞乔和刘家鹏,2013,《系统性风险控制与动态逆势投资研究》,《经济研究》第2期,第68~82页。
[8] 庄子罐、崔小勇、龚六堂和邹恒甫,2012,《预期与经济波动——预期冲击是驱动中国经济波动的主要力量吗?》,《经济研究》第6期,第46~59页。
[9] Arellano, María-Soledad and Serra Pablo.2007.“A Model Of Market Power In Electricity Industries Subject To Peak Load Pricing”,Energy Policy, 35(10):5130~5135.
[10] Aumann Robert J. and Jacoues H. Dreze.2008.“Rational Expectations in Games”,American Economic Review,98(1):72~86.
[11] Bai J. and Perron P.1998.“Estimating And Testing Linear Models With Multiple Structural Changes”,Econometrica,66(1):47~78.
[12] BP.2019.“Statistical Review of World Energy”,UK,London.
[13] Brauneis Alexander, Roland Mestel and Stefan Palan.2013.“Inducing Low-Carbon Investment In The Electric Power Industry Through A Price Floor For Emissions Trading”,Energy Policy,53(C):190~204.
[14] Bonenti Francesca,Oggioni Giorgia,Allevi Elisabetta and Marangioni Giacomo.2013.“Evaluating the EU ETS Impacts on Profits,Investments and Prices of the Italian Electricity Market”,Energy Policy, 59(8):242~256.
[15] Brown P. David.2018.“Capacity Payment Mechannisms and Investment Incentives in Restructured Electricity Markets”,Energy Economics,74(8):131~142.
[16] Dong Feng,Dai Yuanju, Zhang Shengnan,Zhang Xiaoyun and Long Ruyin.2019.“Can A Carbon Emission Trading Scheme Generate The Porter Effect? Evidence From Pilot Areas in China”, Science of The Total Environment, 653(2):565~577.
[17] Duan, H. B.,G.P. Zhang,L. Zhu,Y. Fan and S. Y. Wang.2016.“How will Diffusion of PV Solar Contirbute to China's Emission-peaking and Climate Response?”Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53(1):1076~1085.
[18] Friedman, M..1968.“The Role of Monetary Policy”, American Economic Review, 58(1):1-17
[19] Hall, C.A.S., Lambert, J.G. and Balogh, S.G..2014.“EROI of Different Fuels and The Implications for Society”, Energy Policy, 64(1):141~152.
[20] Hiloidhari Moonmoon,Kathleen Araújo,Shilpi Kumari,D. C.Baruah,T. V. Ramachandra,Rupam Kataki and I. S. Thakura.2018.“Bioelectricity From Sugarcane Bagasse Co-generation In India?An Assessment Of Resource Potential, Policies And Market Mobilization Opportunity For The Case Of Uttar Pradesh”,Journal of Cleaner Production, 182(1):1012~1023.
[21] Hodge,D..2017.“The Remarkable Persistence Of The Rational Expectations Hypothesis”,Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics, 2017,47(2):19~44.
[22] Huber, Matthias and Weissbart, Christoph.2015.“On The Optimal Mix of Wind and Solar Generation In The Future Chinese Power System”, Energy, 90(10):235~243.
[23] Laurikka H and Koljonen T..2006.“Emissions Trading And Investment Decisions In The Power Sector—A Case Study In Finland”, Energy Policy, 34(9):1063~1074.
[24] Li Feifei, Xu Zhe and Ma Hui.2018.“Can China Achieve its CO2 Emissions Peak By 2030?”,Ecological Indicators , 84(1):337~344.
[25] Li Jifeng, Ma Zhongyu, Zhang Yaxiong and Wen Zhichao.2018.“Analysis on Energy Demand and CO2 Emissions in China Following the Energy Production and Consumption Revolution Strategy and China Dream Target”,Advances in Climate Change Research, 9(1):16~26.
[26] Li Mingquan and Patiño-Echeverri Dalia.2017.“Estimating Benefits and Costs of Policies Proposed in the 13th FYP to Improve Energy Efficiency and Reduce Air Emissions of China's Electric Power Sector”,Energy Policy, 111(12):222~234.
[27] Lucas, Robert E. Jr..1998.“Optimal Investment with Rational Expectations”,in R. Lucas and T. Sargent(eds.)”, Rational Expectations and Econometric practice”,Minneapolis,University of Minnesota Press.
[28] Lucas, R.E..1973.“Some International Evidence on Inflation-output Tradeoffs”,American Economic Review, 63(3): 326~334.
[29] Lucas R.E..1976.“Econometric Policy Evaluation:A Critique”,In Brunner K. and Meltzer A. H.(eds)”,Stablization Of The Domestic and International Economy”,Amsterdam and New York,North-Holland,Carnegie-Rochester Series on Public Policy.
[30] Luis Uzeda and Callum Jones.2013.“Detection Of Anticipated Structural Changes In A Rational Expectations Environment”,Applied Economics Letter, 20(14):1322~1327.
[31] Muth J. F..1961.“Rational Expectations And The Theory Of Price Movements”,Econometrica,29(3):315~335.
[32] Rddy B. Sudhakara.2018.“Economic Dynamics and Technology Diffusion in Indian Power Sector”,Energy Policy,120(6):425~435.
[33] Szolgayova J. and Fuss S. Obersteiner M..2008.“Assessing The Effects of CO2 Price Caps On Electricity Investments—A Real Options Analysis”,Energy Policy, 36(10):3974~3981.
[34] Tong Dan,Zhang Qiang,Davis J. Steven,Liu Fie,Zheng Bo,Geng Guannan,Xue Tao,Li Meng,Hong Chaopeng,Lu Zifeng,Streets G.David,Guan Dabo and He Kebin.2018.“Targeted Emission Reductions From Global Super-Polluting Power Plant Units”,Nature Sustainability,1(1):59~68.
[35] Wallis F. Kenneth.1980.“Econometric Implications Of the Rational Expectations Hypothesis”,Econometrica, 48(1):329~354.
[36] Wang B., Liu L., Huang G. H.,Li W. and Xie L. Y..2018.“Effects Of Carbon And Environmental Tax On Power Mix Planning-A Case Study Of Hebei Province, China”,Energy, 143(1):645~657.
[37] Zhang YueJun, Peng Yulu, Ma Chaoqun and Shen Bo,2017,“Can environmental innovation facilitate carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China”, Energy Policy, 2017,100(1):18~28.
[38] Zhang Xu, Qi Tianyu, Ou Xunmin and Zhang Xiliang.2015.“Research on the Energy and Economic Impacts of Multi-region Linked Emissions Trading System”,Energy Procedia, 75(8):2495~2503.
[39] Zhao Xiaoli ,Zhao Yue , Zeng Saixing and Zhang Sufang.2015.“Corporate Behavior And Competitiveness: Impact Of Environmental Regulation On Chinese Firms.”Journal of Cleaner Production,86(1):311~322.
[1] 武佳薇, 汪昌云, 陈紫琳, Jie Michael Guo. 中国个人投资者处置效应研究——一个非理性信念的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 476(2): 147-166.
[2] 徐飞, 花冯涛, 李强谊. 投资者理性预期、流动性约束与股价崩盘传染研究[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 468(6): 169-187.
[3] 周光友, 罗素梅. 互联网金融资产的多目标投资组合研究[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 472(10): 135-151.
[4] 黎文靖, 路晓燕. 机构投资者关注企业的环境绩效吗?——来自我国重污染行业上市公司的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 426(12): 97-112.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1