Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2020, Vol. 475 Issue (1): 150-170    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
上山下乡经历与家庭风险金融资产投资——基于断点回归的证据
周广肃, 边晓宇, 吴清军
中国人民大学劳动人事学院,北京 100872;香港中文大学经济系,香港
Personal Early Experience and Household Investment on Risky Financial Assets: An Empirical Analysis Based on the “Going Up to the Mountains and Down to the Countryside” Movement in China
ZHOU Guangsu, BIAN Xiaoyu, WU Qingjun
School of Labor and Human Resources, Renmin University of China; Department of Economics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
下载:  PDF (1457KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文使用中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)2010年家庭和个人层面数据,考察了户主的上山下乡经历对于家庭风险金融资产投资决策的影响。结果表明,上山下乡经历显著提高了家庭对于股票及广义风险金融资产的投资概率和投资规模。机制分析表明,此经历主要通过提升家庭投资的风险偏好和投资能力来影响家庭的风险金融资产投资。分样本讨论结果表明,上山下乡经历对家庭风险金融投资产生的正向影响在高人力资本、高收入和高社会资本群体中更为显著。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
周广肃
边晓宇
吴清军
关键词:  风险金融投资  上山下乡  风险偏好    
Summary:  According to data from the China Securities Depository & Clearing Statistical Yearbook, as of the end of 2016, registered natural investors accounted for 99.85% of all investors. The proportion of elderly investors had also steadily increased, exceeding 10%. This phenomenon is worthy of researchers' attention. Different from young and middle-aged investors, most elderly investors have low risk tolerance, and they will suffer great negative impacts on their pension assets and health status once they encounter problems with financial risk. The above is not only directly related to residents' asset security and everyday stability but also concerns the healthy development of the capital market in China.
The literature analyzes the issue from the perspectives of the personal characteristics of investors and the economic and social environment. This paper concludes that investors' experiences during adolescence may have a significant impact on their future venture capital investment. Psychological research points out that an individual's early life experiences have long-term effects on their behavior (Kendler et al., 2002), especially catastrophic experiences, which can cause personal psychological trauma. Early life experiences affect people's long-term risk perceptions, personal preferences, and beliefs (Shi Kan, 2010), all of which are closely related to individuals' behavioral decisions. Household risky financial assets investment is an important financial decision. It is directly related to individual psychological factors, such as risk awareness and risk appetite. Therefore, this paper concludes that individuals' early experiences affect their future household risky financial investment. However, there is a lack of quantitative research on this issue .
This paper uses micro-data from the 2010 China Family Panel Studies to match financial asset investment data at the household level with personal data from the Going up to the Mountains and Down to the Countryside experience. Furthermore, it adopts fuzzy regression discontinuity method (Fuzzy RD) to estimate impacts of the Going up to the Mountains and Down to the Countryside experience on investment in family risky financial assets. The estimation results show that the experience significantly increases the probability of household investment in financial assets and the corresponding investment scale. The probabilities of households with such experience participating in stock investment and general risky financial assets are 50.4% and 53.7%, higher than those of the households without such experience, respectively. As for scales of stock investment and general risky financial assets investment, people with the experience is higher than those without it by 5.9% and 5.7%, respectively. Finally, the sub-sample heterogeneity discussion shows that the positive impact of the experience on family investment in risky financial assets is more obvious among well-educated, high income, and high social capital demographic groups.
This paper makes contributions in at least three aspects. First, it uses for the first time survey data at the household level (collected from Chinese families) to explore the impacts of the Going up to the Mountains and Down to the Countryside experience on investment decisions involving family risky financial assets. Second, this paper uses Fuzzy RD to minimize the bias of the estimation results caused by the potential endogeneity problems that may exist in the key variable, the Going up to the Mountains and Down to the Countryside experience. Third, it explores two possible mechanisms that prove that the Going up to the Mountains and Down to the Countryside experience affects family investment behavior by influencing risk appetite of investors and per capita income of family.
This paper's conclusions indicate that early personal experience has a certain impact on the development of personal characteristics, which affect people's future economic decisions. Analysis from this perspective provides a new perspective for understanding the special structure of participants in China's stock market and provides a new entry point for understanding the investment behavior of individual investors. Therefore, to enhance the effectiveness of the policy, it is necessary to consider personal characteristics, common experiences, and specific histories of people when formulating relevant policies.
Keywords:  Risky Financial Investment    Going Up to the Mountains and Down to the Countryside Movement    Risk Preference
JEL分类号:  D14   G11   G14  
基金资助: * 本文为中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目成果(项目号:19XNF015)
通讯作者:  边晓宇,经济学博士在读,香港中文大学经济系,E-mail:m18202282870@163.com.   
作者简介:  周广肃,经济学博士,副教授,中国人民大学劳动人事学院,E-mail:zhouguangsu@ruc.edu.cn.吴清军,社会学博士,教授,中国人民大学劳动人事学院,E-mail:wqjruc@163.com.
引用本文:    
周广肃, 边晓宇, 吴清军. 上山下乡经历与家庭风险金融资产投资——基于断点回归的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 475(1): 150-170.
ZHOU Guangsu, BIAN Xiaoyu, WU Qingjun. Personal Early Experience and Household Investment on Risky Financial Assets: An Empirical Analysis Based on the “Going Up to the Mountains and Down to the Countryside” Movement in China. Journal of Financial Research, 2020, 475(1): 150-170.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2020/V475/I1/150
[1]曹树基,2005,《1959~1961年中国的人口死亡及其成因》,《中国人口科学》第1期14~28页。
[2]程令国和张晔,2011,《早年的饥荒经历影响了人们的储蓄行为吗?——对我国居民高储蓄率的一个新解释》,《经济研究》第8期119~132页。
[3]付超奇,2015,《资本结构、公司治理行为与CEO生活经历》,《投资研究》第2期112~127页。
[4]雷晓燕、谭力和赵耀辉,2010,《退休会影响健康吗?》,《经济学》(季刊)第9卷第4期1539~1558页。
[5]彭树宏,2016,《上山下乡经历对知青收入和幸福感的影响》,《劳动经济研究》第1期106~122页。
[6]时勘,2010,《灾难心理学》,科学出版社。
[7]汪小圈、张红和刘冲,2015,《幼年饥荒经历对个人自雇选择的影响》,《金融研究》第5期18~33页。
[8]王渊、杨朝军和蔡明超,2016,《居民风险偏好水平对家庭资产结构的影响》,《经济与管理研究》第5期 50~57页。
[9]徐浩峰和侯宇,2012,《信息透明度与散户的交易选择——基于深圳交易所上市公司的实证研究》,《金融研究》第3期180~192页。
[10]薛晗,2015,《早年的饥荒经历影响人们的资产组合选择吗》,《时代金融》第7期。
[11]尹志超、吴雨和甘犁,2015,《金融可得性、金融市场参与和家庭资产选择》,《经济研究》第3期87~99页。
[12]赵民伟和晏艳阳,2015,《管理者早年大饥荒经历与公司财务政策》,《南方经济》第10期49~63页。
[13]周广肃、樊纲和李力行,2017,《收入差距、物质欲求与家庭风险金融资产投资》,《世界经济》第4期。
[14]Bernile, G., V. Bhagwat, and P. R. Rau, 2017, “ What Doesn't Kill You Will Only Make You More Risk-Loving: Early-Life Disasters and CEO Behavior”, The Journal of Finance, 72(1), pp.167~206.
[15]Becker, G. S., 1992, “Habits, Additions, and Traditions”, Kyklos, 45(3),pp.327~345.
[16]Berkowitz, M. K., and J. Qiu, 2006, “A Further Look at Household Portfolio Choice and Health Status”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(4), pp.1201~1217.
[17]Bertocchi, G., M. Brunetti and C. Torricelli, 2011, “Marriage and Other Risky Assets: A Portfolio Approach”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(11), pp.2902~2915.
[18]Bucciol, A. and L. Zarri, 2013, “ Financial Risk Aversion and Personal Life History”,Netspar Discussion Paper , 52(2).
[19]Fan, Y., 2017, “ Does Adversity Affect Long-Term Consumption and Financial Behaviour? Evidence from China's Rustication Programme” Reviewed Papers.
[20]Gong, J, Y. Lu, and H. Xie,2014,“Adolescent Adversity and Long-run Health.” Available at SSRN 2460350.
[21]Gong, J, Y. Lu, and H. Xie,2015,“Adolescent Environment and Noncognitive Skills.”Available at SSRN 2397046.
[22]Gutter, M. S., and A. Fontes, 2006, “Racial Differences in Risky Asset Ownership: A Two-stage Model of the Investment Decision-making Process”, Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 17(2),pp.64~78.
[23]Grinblatt, M., M. Keloharju, and J. Linnainmaa, 2011, “IQ and Stock Market Participation”, Journal of Finance, 66(6), pp.2121~2164.
[24]Kendler, K. S., J. Myers, and C. A. Prescott, 2002, “ The Etiology of Phobias: An Evaluation of the Stress-diathesis Model”, Archives of General Psychiatry, 59(3), pp.242~248.
[25]Lee, D. S., and T. Lemieux, 2010, “Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics”, Journal of Economic Literature,48(2),pp.281~355.
[26]Malmendier, U., and S. Nagel, 2011, “Depression Babies: Do Macroeconomic Experiences Affect Risk Taking?”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(1),pp. 373~416.
[27]Shum, P., and M. Faig, 2006, “What Explains Household Stock Holdings?”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(9), pp.2579~2597.
[28]Van Rooij, M., A. Lusardi and R. Alessie, 2011, “Financial Literacy and Stock Market Participation”, Journal of Financial Economics, 101(2), pp.449~472.
[29]Wansink, B., C. R. Payne, and K. V. Ittersum, 2008, “ Profiling the Heroic Leader: Empirical Lessons from Combat-decorated Veterans of World War II”,The Leadership Quarterly, 19(5), pp.547~555.
[30]Xie, Y., Y. Jiang, and E. Greenman, 2008, “ Did Send-down Experience Benefit Youth? A Reevaluation of the Social Consequences of Forced Urban-rural Migration during China's Cultural Revolution”, Social Science Research, 37(2), pp.686~700.
[31]Zhou, W., 2013, “How Does a Traumatic Experience during Youth Affect Life Later? The Long-term Impact of the Send-down Program during the Chinese Cultural Revolution”,Working Paper.No.2013~03.
[1] 刘冲, 杜通, 刘莉亚, 李明辉. 资本计量方法改革、商业银行风险偏好与信贷配置[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 469(7): 38-56.
[2] 周广肃, 梁琪. 互联网使用、市场摩擦与家庭风险金融资产投资[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 451(1): 84-101.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[5] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[6] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[7] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[8] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[9] 张晓宇, 徐龙炳. 限售股解禁、资本运作与股价崩盘风险[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 158 -174 .
[10] 李丹, 庞晓波, 方红生. 财政空间与中国政府债务可持续性[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 1 -17 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1