Investor Attention and Market Reaction: A Natural Experiment Based on Trading Information Disclosure from Stock Exchanges in China
LIU Jie, CHEN Jia, LIU Li
College of Economics, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University; New Era Research Institute, Peking University; Guanghua School of Management, Peking University
Summary:
The impact of investor attention on asset pricing is critically important for the functioning of stock markets. This paper examines the effects of a type of attention-grabbing event, Trading Information Disclosure from China's stock exchanges, on investors' trading behavior and stock price performance. It is difficult to empirically measure the impact of investor attention on stock prices because events that attract attention are often accompanied by the release of other valuable information on listed companies or special events related to them that contain information about the value of stocks. We use a natural experiment setting based on Trading Information Disclosure and upper price limits on China's stock exchanges. The natural experiment design eliminates confounding factors that occur simultaneously with attention-grabbing events and allows us to cleanly identify the impact of investor attention. The treatment sample includes all A-share listed stocks that hit the upper price limits and were disclosed by Trading Information Disclosure on the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges from 2007 to 2015. The control sample includes all other stocks that hit the upper price limits without being disclosed. The advantage of this setting is that it can eliminate the interference of other factors. The findings of this paper are threefold. (1) The treatment group has a significantly higher Baidu search index and excess turnover ratio during the event period, which indicates that the stocks disclosed under Trading Information Disclosure receive significantly more market attention than stocks in the control group. (2) Compared with the control group, the treatment group obtains more net inflows of small deals but fewer big deals. The treatment group also has lower excess return and idiosyncratic volatility in the short term and lower probability of price reversal in the long term. Further research also indicates that investor attention triggered by Trading Information Disclosure decreases the probability of price reversal by reducing market information asymmetry. (3) These effects are more significant for stocks bought by well-known security sales departments, which attract more market attention. The empirical results show that investor attention attracted by regulatory information disclosure reduces market information asymmetry and inhibits irrational price fluctuation. Overall, investor attention, as an important factor in investor trading behavior, has a significant impact on asset prices. This paper shows that Trading Information Disclosure improves market efficiency, reduces information asymmetry, and decreases excessive stock price volatility. Academics, market regulators, and financial industry practitioners should be aware of the importance of reducing the irrational component of asset prices and take action to reduce market information asymmetry, inhibit irrational market volatility, and improve market pricing efficiency by constructing standard and appropriate information disclosure systems and investor education systems. This paper contributes to the literature in three aspects. First, the natural experiment design allows us to more precisely observe the impact of investor attention on stock prices. Because random factors instead of stock fundamentals determine whether a stock that hits the upper price limits will be disclosed by Trading Information Disclosure, we can examine the impact of investor attention on stock prices more accurately. Second, the literature argues that attention-grabbing events increase the trading of noise investors, which reduces market efficiency. However, a few studies have argued that investor attention due to regulatory information disclosure can reduce information asymmetry and improve market efficiency. This paper finds that Trading Information Disclosure makes price fluctuations more efficient. This paper thus supplements the literature about the beneficial effects of investor attention on the market. Third, Trading Information Disclosure is an important part of the stock market information disclosure system in China. The information disclosed attracts the attention of a large number of institutional and individual investors because of its timeliness, authority, and unique value in trading. However, domestic researchers have not fully examined its effectiveness as an information disclosure system. This paper shows that Trading Information Disclosure achieves the role of reducing market information asymmetry and reducing excessive fluctuation of stock prices.
刘杰, 陈佳, 刘力. 投资者关注与市场反应——来自中国证券交易所交易公开信息的自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 473(11): 189-206.
LIU Jie, CHEN Jia, LIU Li. Investor Attention and Market Reaction: A Natural Experiment Based on Trading Information Disclosure from Stock Exchanges in China. Journal of Financial Research, 2019, 473(11): 189-206.
[1]岑维、李士好和童娜琼,2014,《 投资者关注度对股票收益与风险的影响——基于深市“互动易”平台数据的实证研究》,《 证券市场导报》第7期,第40～47页。 [2]方颖和郭俊杰,2018,《 中国环境信息披露政策是否有效:基于资本市场反应的研究》,《经济研究》第53卷第10期,第158～174页。 [3]冯旭南,2017,《注意力影响投资者的股票交易行为吗？——来自 “股票交易龙虎榜” 的证据》,《 经济学 (季刊)》第1期,第255～274页。 [4]金宇超、靳庆鲁和李晓雪,2017,《资本市场注意力总量是稀缺资源吗？》,《金融研究》第10期,第166～181页。 [5]李小晗和朱红军,2011,《投资者有限关注与信息解读》,《金融研究》第8期,第128～142页。 [6]李茁,2016,《证交所交易信息披露的信息含量研究——基于龙虎榜数据的实证》,《上海金融》第11期,第73～77页。 [7]彭叠峰、饶育蕾和雷湘媛,2015,《基于注意力传染机制的股市动量与反转模型研究》,《中国管理科学》第23卷第5期,第 32～40页。 [8]饶育蕾、彭叠峰和成大超,2010,《 媒体注意力会引起股票的异常收益吗？——来自中国股票市场的经验证据》,《系统工程理论与实践》第30卷第2期,第287～297页。 [9]于李胜和王艳艳,2010,《 信息竞争性披露、投资者注意力与信息传播效率》,《金融研究》第8期,第112～135页。 [10]Andrei D, Hasler M. 2015. “Investor Attention and Stock Market Volatility” Review of Financial Studies, 28(1): 33～72. [11]Barber B M, Odean T, and Zhu N. 2009. “Systematic Noise” Journal of Financial Markets,12(4):547～569. [12]Barber B M, Odean T.2008. “All That Glitters: The Effect of Attention and News on The Buying Behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors” Review of Financial Studies,21(2):785～818. [13]Barber B M, Zhu N. 2009. “Do Retail Trades Move Markets？” Review of Financial Studies, 22(1):151～186. [14]Baron R M, Kenny D A. 1986. “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 1173. [15]Chan W S. 2003. “Stock Price Reaction to News and No-news: Drift and Reversal after Headlines” Journal of Financial Economics, 70(2): 223～260. [16]Chemmanur T, Yan A. 2009. “Product Market Advertising and New Equity Issues” Journal of Financial Economics, 92(1): 40～65. [17]Foucault T, Sraer D, and Thesmar D J.2011. “Individual Investors and Volatility” The Journal of Finance, 66(4): 1369～1406. [18]Graham J R, Kumar A.2006. “Do Dividend Clienteles Exist？ Evidence on Dividend Preferences of Retail Investors” Journal of Finance, 61(3):1305～1336. [19]Hirshleifer D, Lim S S, and Teoh S H.2011. “Limited Investor Attention and Stock Market Misreactions to Accounting Information” The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 1(1): 35～73. [20]Jin L, Myers S C. 2006. “R 2 Around The World: New Theory and New Tests” Journal of Financial Economics, 79(2): 257～292. [21]Lee J, Yi C H. 2001. “Trade Size and Information-Motivated Trading in the Options and Stock Markets” Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 36(4):485～501. [22]Llorente G, Michaely R, Saar G, and Wang J.2001.“Dynamic Volume-Return Relation of Individual Stocks” Review of Financial Studies, 15(4):1005～1047. [23]Loh R K.2010.“Investor Inattention and the Under-reaction to Stock Recommendations” Financial Management, 39(3): 1223～1252. [24]Seasholes M S, Wu G.2007.“Predictable Behavior, Profits, and Attention” Journal of Empirical Finance, 14(5): 590～610. [25]Shefrin H, Statman M. 1985.“The Disposition to Sell Winners too Early and Ride Losers too Long: Theory and Evidence” The Journal of finance, 40(3): 777～790. [26]Wang B.2016.“The Causal Effect of Investor Attention”Working Paper. [27]Yuan Y.2015.“Market-wide Attention, Trading, and Stock Returns” Journal of Financial Economics, 116(3): 548～564.
