Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2019, Vol. 471 Issue (9): 188-207    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
卖空者与内幕交易——来自中国证券市场的证据
苏冬蔚, 彭松林
暨南大学经济学院,广东广州 510632;
广州农村商业银行,广东广州 510623
Short Sellers and Insider Trading: Evidence from the Chinese Securities Market
SU Dongwei, PENG Songlin
School of Economics, Jinan University;
Guangzhou Rural Commercial Bank
下载:  PDF (545KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文研究上市公司内部人减持、年报、诉讼、分析师评级、停复牌以及高送转等重大公告前后卖空交易行为的变化,系统考察卖空者是否参与内幕交易以及何种因素影响卖空者参与内幕交易,发现卖空率较高的股票具有较低的未来收益,表明卖空者拥有信息优势,属知情交易者;卖空者拥有非常精确的择时交易能力,在重大利空公告前显著增加卖空量,而在利好公告前则显著减少卖空头寸,表明卖空者作为知情交易者的信息优势源自内幕消息;公司内、外部投资者的信息不对称程度越低或公司所在地的法治水平越高,卖空者参与内幕交易的行为就越少。因此,监管机构应密切关注公司重大消息发布前后卖空量的异常变动,同时,完善信息披露规则、健全证券分析师制度并强化法律法规的执行力度,才能有效防范卖空者参与内幕交易。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
苏冬蔚
彭松林
关键词:  卖空者  知情交易者  内幕交易  信息不对称  证券市场    
Summary:  The research on short sales predominantly focuses on two areas. The first is the effect of short selling on the stability, liquidity, pricing efficiency, and price discovery of stock markets. The second is the effect of short selling on corporate financial decisions, such as capital structure, investment policy, earnings management, and firm innovations. The general findings indicate that short sales can reduce price bubbles, promote market stability, and improve pricing efficiency. They can also serve as an effective external corporate governance mechanism that improves the efficiency of corporate finance and investment, reduces earnings management, and enhances innovation expenditures and outputs. However, issues such as the source of short sellers' information and whether short selling leads to insider trading remain the subject of intense debate.
Using 2010 to 2015 data for all Chinese A shares, this article provides one of the first studies on the sources of short sellers' information advantage and how short selling affects stock market returns. In particular, it analyzes short selling behavior before and after major corporate announcements, including insider sales of restricted shares, annual reports, lawsuits, analyst upgrades or downgrades, suspension and resumption of trading, and stock dividends. This article sheds light on whether short sellers are involved in insider trading and what factors affect their involvement.
This article tests five hypotheses. First, stocks with a higher percentage of short sales have lower expected returns, indicating that short sellers are informed traders. Second, short sellers significantly increase (decrease) trading before the announcement of important negative (positive) corporate news. Third, short sellers are more likely to engage in insider trading in firms with lower market capitalization and fewer analyst recommendations because these firms suffer more information asymmetry. Fourth, short sellers are more likely to engage in insider trading in firms with more private equity holdings. Five, short sellers are more likely to engage in insider trading in regions where law enforcement is relatively weak.
This article finds that stocks with higher excess short-selling ratios have lower future returns, indicating that short sellers are not liquidity traders. In fact, short sellers possess information advantages and should be classified as informed traders.In addition, short sellers have very accurate market timing capabilities in that they are able to increase the amount of short selling significantly before major announcements of bad news and to reduce the amount of short selling significantly before major announcements of good news. This suggests that the information advantage of short sellers as informed traders is derived from insider information. Furthermore, short sellers are more likely to engage in insider trading if the degree of information asymmetry between internal and external investors is large or if local law enforcement is weak. Overall, the results suggest that to curb short sellers from participating in insider trading, securities regulators should pay close attention to unusual changes in the volume of short sales immediately before and after companies' major news announcements. At the same time, securities regulators should continue to reform rules on information disclosure, strengthen analyst coverage, and improve the implementation of laws and regulations.
This article makes three major contributions. First, it is one of the first to examine whether short sellers in Chinese A-share markets possess an information advantage, the source of the advantage, and the effect of the advantage on expected stock returns. Second, whereas studies on short sale activities usually focus on one type of corporate announcement, this article investigates six types, namely insider sales of restricted shares, annual reports, lawsuits, analyst upgrades or downgrades, suspension and resumption of trading, and stock dividends. This article finds strong evidence that short sellers engage in insider trading. Third, this article analyzes the factors that affect short sellers' engagement in insider trading, shedding new light on how securities regulators can monitor trading behavior in stock markets.
Keywords:  Short Seller    Informed Trader    Insider Trading    Information Asymmetry    Chinese Securities Market
JEL分类号:  G21   G28   G32  
基金资助: * 本文得到国家自然科学基金(71673110和71972087)、教育部人文社科基金(16YJA790044)和中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(19JNLH05)的研究资助
作者简介:  苏冬蔚,经济学博士,教授,暨南大学经济学院,E-mail:tdsu@jnu.edu.cn.
彭松林(通讯作者),经济学博士,广州农村商业银行,E-mail:422199799@qq.com.
引用本文:    
苏冬蔚, 彭松林. 卖空者与内幕交易——来自中国证券市场的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 471(9): 188-207.
SU Dongwei, PENG Songlin. Short Sellers and Insider Trading: Evidence from the Chinese Securities Market. Journal of Financial Research, 2019, 471(9): 188-207.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2019/V471/I9/188
[1] 陈晖丽和刘峰,2014,《融资融券的治理效应研究——基于公司盈余管理的视角》,《会计研究》第9期,第45~52页。
[2] 傅勇和谭松涛,2008,《股权分置改革中的机构合谋与内幕交易》,《金融研究》第3期,第101~108页。
[3] 罗煜、何青和薛畅,2016,《地区执法水平对中国区域金融发展的影响》,《经济研究》第7期,第118~131页。
[4] 潘越、戴亦一和林超群,2011:《信息不透明、分析师关注与个股暴跌风险》,《金融研究》第9期,第138~151页。
[5] 石美娟和童卫华,2009,《机构投资者提升公司价值吗?——来自后股改时期的经验证据》,《金融研究》第10期,第150~161页。
[6] 王苏生、许静霞和谢秉磊,2018,《卖空限制下知情交易的测度及识别研究》,《运筹与管理》第11期,第141~150页。
[7] 许年行、于上尧和伊志宏,2013,《机构投资者羊群行为与股价崩盘风险》,《管理世界》第7期,第31~43页。
[8] 薛健和窦超,2015,《并购重组过程中的信息泄露与财富转移》,《金融研究》第6期,第189~206页。
[9] 易志高、潘子成、茅宁和李心丹,2017,《策略性媒体披露与财富转移——来自公司高管减持期间的证据》,《经济研究》第4期,第168~182页。
[10] 曾庆生,2008,《公司内部人具有交易时机的选择能力吗?——来自中国上市公司内部人卖出股票的证据》,《金融研究》第10期,第117~135页。
[11] 张高擎和廉鹏,2009,《可转债融资与机构投资者侵占行为——基于华菱管线可转债案例研究》,《管理世界》第1期,第110~120页。
[12] 张俊瑞、白雪莲和孟祥展,2016,《启动融资融券助长内幕交易行为了吗?——来自我国上市公司的经验证据》,《金融研究》第6期,第176~192页。
[13] 朱茶芬、姚铮和李志文, 2011,《高管交易能预测未来股票收益吗?》,《管理世界》第9期,第141~152页。
[14] Asquith, P, Parag A. P., and J. R. Ritter, 2005, “Short Interest, Institutional Ownership, and Stock Returns”, Journal of Financial Economics 78(2): 243~276.
[15] Blau, B. M., and J. M. Pinegar, 2013, “Are Short Sellers Incrementally Informed Prior to Earnings Announcements?”, Journal of Empirical Finance 21(1): 142~155.
[16] Boehmer, E., Huszar, Z. R., and B. D. Jordan, 2010, “The Good News in Short Interest”, Journal of Financial Economics 96(1): 80~97.
[17] Boehmer, E., Jones, C. M., and X. Zhang, 2008, “Which Shorts are Informed?”, Journal of Finance 63(2): 491~527.
[18] Chang, E. C., Luo, Y., and J. Ren, 2014, “Short-selling, Margin-trading, and Price Efficiency: Evidence from the Chinese Market”, Journal of Banking and Finance 48(4): 411~424.
[19] Christophe, S. E., Ferri, M. G., and J. Hsieh, 2010, “Informed Trading Before Analyst Downgrades: Evidence from Short Sellers”, Journal of Financial Economics 95(1): 85~106.
[20] Christophe, S. E., Ferri, M. G., and J. J. Angel, 2004, “Short-selling Prior to Earnings Announcements”, Journal of Finance 59(4): 1845~1875.
[21] Diether, K. B., Lee, K. H., and I. M. Werner, 2009, “Short-sale Strategies and Return Predictability”, Review of Financial Studies 22(2): 575~607.
[22] Engelberg, J. E., Reed, A. V., and M. C. Ringgenberg, 2012, “How Are Shorts Informed? Short Sellers, News, and Information Processing”. Journal of Financial Economics 105(2): 260~278.
[23] Engelberg, J. E., Reed, A. V., and M. C. Ringgenberg, 2018, “Short Selling Risk.” Journal of Finance, forthcoming.
[24] Feng, X., and K. C. Chan, 2016, “Information Advantage, Short Sales, and Stock Returns: Evidence from Short Selling Reform in China”, Economic Modelling 59(4): 131~142.
[25] Frankel, R., and X. Li, 2004, “Characteristics of A Firm's Information Environment and the Information Asymmetry Between Insiders and Outsiders”, Journal of Accounting and Economics 37(2): 229~259.
[26] Gerard., B. and V. Nanda, 1993, “Trading and Manipulation around Seasoned Equity Offerings”, Journal of Finance 48(1): 213~245.
[27] Goldstein, I. and A. Guembel, 2008, “Manipulation and the Allocational Role of Prices”, Review of Economic Studies 75(1): 133~164.
[28] Karpoff, J. M., and X. Lou, 2010, “Short Sellers and Financial Misconduct”, Journal of Finance 65(5): 1879~1913.
[29] Khanna, N. and R. D. Mathews, 2012, “Doing Battle with Short Sellers: The Conflicted Role of Blockholders in Bear Raids”, Journal of Financial Economics 106(2): 229~246.
[30] Jones,C.M.,and O.A.Lamont,2002,“Short-sale Constraints and Stock Returns',”Journal of Financial Economics 66(2):207~239.
[31] Maffett, M., 2012, “Financial Reporting Opacity and Informed Trading by International Institutional Investors”, Journal of Accounting and Economics 54(2): 201~220.
[32] Meng, Q., Li, Y., Jiang, X., and K. C. Chan, 2017, “Informed or Speculative Trading? Evidence from Short Selling Before Star and Non-star Analysts' Downgrade Announcements in An Emerging Market”, Journal of Empirical Finance 42(1): 240~255.
[1] 杨青, 吉赟, 王亚男. 高铁能提升分析师盈余预测的准确度吗?——来自上市公司的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 465(3): 168-188.
[2] 魏志华, 曾爱民, 吴育辉, 李常青. IPO补税影响IPO抑价吗?——基于信息不对称理论视角[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 451(1): 191-206.
[3] 郭桂霞, 赵岳, 巫和懋. 我国“走出去”企业的最优融资模式选择——基于信息经济学的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 434(8): 111-126.
[4] 张俊瑞, 白雪莲, 孟祥展. 启动融资融券助长内幕交易行为了吗?——来自我国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 432(6): 176-192.
[5] 徐巍, 陈冬华. 自媒体披露的信息作用——来自新浪微博的实证证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 429(3): 157-173.
[6] 张晓玫, 宋卓霖. 保证担保、抵押担保与贷款风险缓释机制探究——来自非上市中小微企业的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 427(1): 83-98.
[7] 谢平, 邹传伟, 刘海二. 互联网金融的基础理论[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 422(8): 1-12.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1