Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2019, Vol. 468 Issue (6): 188-206    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
中国艺术品投资收益:离岸与在岸市场的特征和互动
黄隽,李越欣
中国人民大学应用经济学院, 北京 100872
Chinese Art as an Investment: Characteristics and Interactions in Offshore and Onshore Markets
HUANG Jun,LI Yuexin
School of Applied Economics, Renmin University of China
下载:  PDF (1933KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 文物艺术品既是一个国家的历史印记和文化瑰宝,也是情感资产和动产。本文基于2000-2017年全球艺术品核心市场——北京、香港、纽约和伦敦核心拍卖行中国书画的微观数据,使用特征价格法构建全球中国艺术品市场价格指数,展示全球中国艺术品拍卖市场发展的全貌,同时创新性地使用重复交易数据探讨离岸和在岸中国艺术品市场投资特征和互动关系。研究表明:北京和香港市场作为中国艺术品最大的在岸和离岸拍卖市场价格相互联动,走势基本一致;艺术品财务收益和精神回报是艺术品投资收藏和消费的主要原因,不同市场间财务收益和风险分散的差异是艺术品市场资产配置和资金流动的动力;纽约和伦敦市场中国艺术品投资收益率低于北京和香港,香港是全球中国艺术品投资收益率最高的地区,重复交易中的北京-香港交易策略占优,离岸香港市场得天独厚的环境优势使香港中国艺术品市场未来发展前景可期。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
黄隽
李越欣
关键词:  中国艺术品市场  离岸与在岸  投资收益  资产配置    
Summary:  Summary: In the past 20 years, Chinese art markets have become among the most important art auction markets globally. Since 2009, the turnover of Chinese art markets has been comparable in magnitude to those of the United States and the United Kingdom. According to statistics from the China Association of Auctioneers (CAA), the total turnover of Chinese art in mainland China and overseas regions accounted for 36% of the total global art auction turnover in 2017. The driving forces behind Chinese art markets' development are the abundant supply of Chinese cultural resources, rapid economic growth, and the growing wealth of collectors and investors. As art is an asset class and a consumption good, it derives both financial returns and aesthetic value. In addition, because artworks are not standardized assets and art markets are not transparent, risks and returns can both be very high. Amid the rise of China's wealthy population, art is often used as an asset allocation tool.
   Since the beginning of the 20th century, many Chinese cultural relics have flowed abroad, usually to prosperous areas. Chinese onshore art markets are mainly concentrated in Beijing, and the offshore markets are concentrated in Hong Kong, New York and London. Chinese art has attracted the attention of international investors, and overseas auction houses have increased the number of Chinese art auctions. The overseas offshore market has become an important source of Chinese art auctions. Due to differences in Eastern and Western tastes, however, painting and calligraphy are the major categories in mainland China, while antiquesantiques, porcelain and jade artworks are more popular overseas.
   This paper investigates the performances and characteristics of major offshore and onshore Chinese art markets, including the major art auction markets in Beijing, Hong Kong, New York and London. This paper applies the Artron AMMA database of global Chinese art auction observations from 2000 to 2017 and computes global Chinese art price indices for Beijing, Hong Kong, New York and London. A hedonic model is used to construct these indices, which cover over 300,000 auction observations of Chinese paintings and calligraphies in major auction markets. The results show that the Beijing and Hong Kong markets are the two largest onshore and offshore art auction markets, and they have similar price trends.
   In addition, repeat sales are used to investigate the flows of Chinese art in offshore and onshore markets. Returns in the New York and London markets are lower than those in Beijing and Hong Kong; investors received the highest returns when their artworks were bought in Beijing and later sold in Hong Kong. The premiums in Hong Kong attract investors and collectors to this region, the largest offshore Chinese art market. Hong Kong's mature and safe investment environment contributes to the prosperous art market.
   The main contributions of this paper are as follows: (1) Based on auction observations of the world's major Chinese art markets, a hedonic pricing model is used to construct onshore and offshore art price indices to offer a more complete picture of Chinese art auction markets. (2) In addition, this paper compares characteristics of Chinese art across offshore and onshore markets in Beijing, Hong Kong, New York and London. (3) This paper also uses repeat sales sample to investigate the motivations and preferences of Chinese buyers. (4) Lastly, it offers a new perspective on the dynamics of offshore and onshore markets.
   The paper is organized as follows. After an introductory first section, the second section reviews the literature. The third section introduces the methodology and data sources. The fourth section analyzes the price indices and returns of Chinese art. In the fifth section, the connection between offshore and onshore art markets is explored. The sixth section concludes.
Keywords:  Chinese Art Markets    Offshore and Onshore Markets    Risk and Return    Portfolio Diversification
JEL分类号:  G11   G12   Z11  
基金资助: * 本文感谢中国人民大学艺术品金融研究所年度研究报告课题资助(2018001)。
作者简介:  黄 隽,经济学博士,教授,中国人民大学应用经济学院,E-mail:huangjuan@ruc.edu.cn.
李越欣(通讯作者),博士研究生,中国人民大学应用经济学院,E-mail:lyxwys@163.com.
引用本文:    
黄隽, 李越欣. 中国艺术品投资收益:离岸与在岸市场的特征和互动[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 468(6): 188-206.
HUANG Jun, LI Yuexin. Chinese Art as an Investment: Characteristics and Interactions in Offshore and Onshore Markets. Journal of Financial Research, 2019, 468(6): 188-206.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2019/V468/I6/188
[1] 黄隽、李越欣和夏晓华,2017,《艺术品的金融属性:投资收益与资产配置》,《经济理论与经济管理》第4期,第60~71页。
[2] 石阳和李曜,2013,《中国艺术品投资收益:整体特征与杰作效应》,《金融研究》第12期,第194~206页。
[3] 雅昌艺术市场监测中心和Artprice,2018,《2017年度艺术市场报告》,雅昌艺术市场监测中心。
[4] 云妍、陈志武和林展,2018,《清代官绅家庭资产结构一般特征初探:以抄产档案为中心的研究》,《金融研究》第2期,第61~81页。
[5] 中国拍卖行业协会和Artnet,2017,《中国文物艺术品全球拍卖统计年报2016》,中国拍卖行业协会。
[6] 中国拍卖行业协会和Artnet,2018,《中国文物艺术品全球拍卖统计年报2017》,中国拍卖行业协会。
[7] Anderson, R. C., 1974, “Paintings as an Investment” Economic Inquiry, 12(1), pp.13~26.
[8] Ashenfelter, O. and K.Graddy, 2003, “Auctions and the Price of Art” Journal of Economic Literature, 41(3), pp.763~787.
[9] Baumol, W. J., 1986, “Unnatural Value: or Art Investment as Floating Crap Game” The American Economic Review, 76(2), pp.10~14.
[10] Case, K. E., & R. J. Shiller, 1987, “Prices of Single-Family Homes since 1970: New Indexes for Four Cities” New England Economic Review, (Sep), pp.45~56.
[11] Deloitte and ArtTactic, 2014, Art & Finance Report 2013.
[12] Deloitte and ArtTactic, 2018, Art & Finance Report 2017.
[13] Frey, B. S. and R. Eichenberger, 1995, “On the Rate of Return in the Art Market: Survey and Evaluation” European Economic Review, 39(3-4), pp.528~537.
[14] Frey, B. S. and W. W. Pommerehne, 1989, “Art Investment: an Empirical Inquiry” Southern Economic Journal, pp.396~409.
[15] Goetzmann, W. N., 1992, “The Accuracy of Real Estate Indices: Repeat Sale Estimators” The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 5(1), pp.5~53.
[16] Goetzmann, W. N., 1993, “Accounting for Taste: Art and the Financial Markets over Three Centuries”The American Economic Review, 83(5), pp.1370~1376.
[17] Mandel, B. R., 2009, “Art as an Investment and Conspicuous Consumption Good” American Economic Review, 99(4), pp.1653~1663.
[18] Mei, J. and M. Moses, 2002, “Art as an Investment and the Underperformance of Masterpieces” American Economic Review, 92(5), pp.1656~1668.
[19] Oosterlinck, K., 2017, “Art as a Wartime Investment: Conspicuous Consumption and Discretion” The Economic Journal, 127(607), pp.2665~2701.
[20] Pesando, J. E., 1993, “Art as an Investment: The Market for Modern Prints” The American Economic Review, pp.1075~1089.
[21] Pesando, J. E. and P. M. Shum, 2007, “The Law of One Price, Noise and Irrational Exuberance: the Auction Market for Picasso Prints” Journal of Cultural Economics, 31(4), pp.263~277.
[22] Renneboog, L. and C. Spaenjers, 2013, “Buying beauty: On Prices and Returns in the Art Market” Management Science, 59(1), pp.36~53.
[23] Worthington, A. C., and H. Higgs, 2004, “Art as an Investment: Risk, Return and Portfolio Diversification in Major Painting Markets” Accounting & Finance,44(2), pp.257~271.
[1] 王正位, 王新程, 廖理. 信任与欺骗:投资者为什么陷入庞氏骗局?——来自e租宝88.9万名投资者的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 470(8): 96-112.
[2] 陈国进, 丁杰, 赵向琴. “好”的不确定性、“坏”的不确定性与股票市场定价——基于中国股市高频数据分析[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 469(7): 174-190.
[3] 朱菲菲, 李惠璇, 徐建国, 李宏泰. 短期羊群行为的影响因素与价格效应——基于高频数据的实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 469(7): 191-206.
[4] 杨筝, 王红建, 戴静, 许传华. 放松利率管制、利润率均等化与实体企业“脱实向虚”[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 468(6): 20-38.
[5] 余静文, 姚翔晨. 人口年龄结构与金融结构——宏观事实与微观机制[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 466(4): 20-38.
[6] 徐丽鹤, 吕佳玮, 何青. 信用卡、风险应对与城镇家庭股市参与[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 465(3): 149-167.
[7] 余粤. 风险资产配置与货币政策规则——黏性价格均衡下的宏观资产配置模型初探[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 465(3): 111-128.
[8] 李志冰, 刘晓宇. 基金业绩归因与投资者行为[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 464(2): 188-205.
[9] 周弘, 张成思, 何启志. 中国居民资产配置效率的门限效应研究:金融约束视角[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 460(10): 55-71.
[10] 张小茜, 党春辉. 基于抵押物处置风险的不良贷款证券化研究——以某国有商业银行的个人住房贷款资产池为例[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 458(8): 102-119.
[11] 崔嵬. 审慎推进我国银行间债券市场两类回购改革[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 456(6): 47-55.
[12] 陈思翀, 刘静雅. 套息交易对中国短期资本流动的影响——基于动态资产组合理论的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 456(6): 73-90.
[13] 潘志远, 毛金龙, 周彬蕊. 高维的相关性建模及其在资产组合中的应用[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 452(2): 190-206.
[14] 周广肃, 梁琪. 互联网使用、市场摩擦与家庭风险金融资产投资[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 451(1): 84-101.
[15] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143-157.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1