Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2019, Vol. 468 Issue (6): 150-168    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
企业内部薪酬差距与人力资本结构调整
杨薇,孔东民
华东理工大学商学院,上海 200237;
中南财经政法大学金融学院,湖北武汉 430073;
华中科技大学经济学院,湖北武汉 430074
The Intra-Firm Pay Gap and the Adjustment of Human Capital
YANG Wei,KONG Dongmin
School of Business, East China University of Science and Technology;
School of Finance, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law;
School of Economics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
下载:  PDF (1599KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文考察薪酬差距如何影响企业内部的人力资本结构变动。基于员工不同教育程度划分人力资本层次,本文研究发现:(1)薪酬差距的增加显著降低了大学学历员工的比例,同时提升了高中及以下学历员工的比例;(2)通过构造工具变量和基于全球性经济危机的场景设定,我们发现薪酬差距和人力资本结构之间存在显著的因果关系;(3)在薪酬差距水平较高的情况下,薪酬差距的增加显著吸引了更有可能进入企业中高层的高学历员工。在薪酬差距水平较低的情况下,扩大薪酬差距显著提升(降低)了高中及以下学历(大学学历)员工比例,一个可能原因在于不同学历员工的议价能力存在差异。(4)薪酬差距与人力资本结构变化之间的相关性主要体现在规模较大、管理者平均年龄较低的企业。(5)人力资本结构在薪酬差距影响创新的过程中发挥了显著的中介效应,薪酬差距提升了研究生和本科学历员工比例,促进了企业创新。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
杨薇
孔东民
关键词:  薪酬差距  人力资本  学历  创新    
Summary:  Summary: Although human capital theory was a revolutionary and controversial concept when it was first proposed in the 1960s, it has evolved into one of the most universally accepted research objects in economics and other social sciences.The research on human capital and economic consumption has mainly been conducted at the theoretical or macro levelusingfactors such as economic growth, the wage contract, and life cycle. In contrast, studies from a micro perspective focus on the returns from investments in private education and health. As a result, little firm level research is available. Moreover, in recent years, the pay gap between executives and employees has attracted significant attention from the media, the public, and the government. For example, in January 1, 2015, the Chinese government implemented a salary reform scheme for central enterprise principals, targeting around 200 executives from 72 SOEs.This reform reducedthe executive-worker pay ratio to about eight times. However, further research is needed on the economic consequences of the intra-firm pay gap between executives and employees.
   In this paper, we examine the impact of the pay gap between executives and employees on the human capital structure of firms. Research has shown that the intra-firm pay gap has a significant influence on firm performance and productivity, and that this influence originates from the incentive effect of the pay gap on different levels of employees.We argue that the firm pay gap can affect the human capital structure of a firm by altering the incentives of both managers and employees. We use two competing theories to describe the economic incentives of pay gaps: tournament theory and comparison theory.In addition, we usethe economic theories of matching and managerial talent to explain some of our results. Practically, firms match the various abilities of managers by designing different pay policies. Moreover, different compensation contracts provide different choices for employees with different levels of education. Therefore, it is important to investigate how the pay gap affects the human capital structure of firms.
   We manually collect education data on the employees of Chinese listed firms from 2000 to 2015. Specifically, we classify human capital into three types: high education employees, medium education employees, and low education employees. We use the ratio of the average managers' compensation to the average employees' salary to measure the intra-firm pay gap. We obtain financial data and corporate governance information about the listed firms from the China Stock Market and Accounting Research (CSMAR) database and the WIND database. We also exclude firms from the financial industry.Our analyses generate the following findings. First, a firm's pay gap reduces the ratio of bachelor degree employees, and increases the ratio of employees with low education. Second,using an instrumental variable approach and a scenario analysis of the global economic crisis, we find that the pay gap has a causal impact on the human capital structure of firms. Third, for firms with a small pay gap,enlarging a firm's pay gap significantly increases the ratio of employees with a low education, whereas it reduces the ratio of employees with a mid-level education. A possible explanation for this is that employees with different levels of education have different degrees of bargaining power. However, for the firms with a high pay gap, increasing the pay gap has a positive effect in attracting employees with a high level of education who maybe future managers. Fourth,the relation between a firm's pay gap and the changes in the human capital structure are more salient in firms that are large or employ young executives. Finally,human capital has a significant mediating effect on the relationship between a firm's pay gap and innovation, which suggests thata high pay gap increases the ratio of highly educated employees and thus leads to more innovation.
   This paper makes three contributions to the literature. First, we measure firms' human capital using their employees' educational data, and thus are able to provide direct evidence of firms' human capital. Second, we examine the effects of the intra-firm pay dispersion on the structure of human capitalat the firm level, which provides a relatively new angle for uncovering the economic consequences of the intra-firm pay gap. Third, our findings provide clear policy implications by showing the relationship between the pay gap and a firm's human capital structure.To match the human capital structure to the development of firms, policy makers need to designan effective compensation system.
Keywords:  Pay Gap    Human Capital    Education Degree    Innovation
JEL分类号:  G30   J41   M52  
基金资助: * 本文感谢中国博士后科学基金项目“人力资本特征与企业行为及其经济后果的研究”(N100-5R-1816),华东理工大学基本科研业务费专项基金“薪酬公平性与人力资本结构的关系及其对企业行为的影响”(WN1824004),国家自然科学基金面上项目“公司事件、信息优势与投资者交易”(71772178)以及国家社科基金重大项目“基于结构性数据分析的我国系统性金融风险防范体系研究”(17ZDA073)。
作者简介:  杨 薇,经济学博士,博士后,华东理工大学商学院,E-mail:wyang@ecust.edu.cn.
孔东民(通讯作者),管理学博士,教授,中南财经政法大学金融学院,华中科技大学经济学院,E-mail:kongdm@hust.edu.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
杨薇, 孔东民. 企业内部薪酬差距与人力资本结构调整[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 468(6): 150-168.
YANG Wei, KONG Dongmin. The Intra-Firm Pay Gap and the Adjustment of Human Capital. Journal of Financial Research, 2019, 468(6): 150-168.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2019/V468/I6/150
[1] 步丹璐和王晓艳,2014,《政府补助, 软约束与薪酬差距》,《南开管理评论》第2期,第 23~33页。
[2] 陈冬华、范从来和沈永建,2015,《高管与员工: 激励有效性之比较与互动》,《管理世界》第5期,第160~171页。
[3] 程新生、刘建梅和陈靖涵,2015,《才能信号抑或薪酬辩护: 超额薪酬与战略信息披露》,《金融研究》第12期,第 146~161页。
[4] 孔东民、徐茗丽和孔高文,2017,《企业内部薪酬差距与创新》,《经济研究》第10期,第144~156页。
[5] 李海峥、梁赟玲、刘智强和王小军,2010,《中国人力资本测度与指数构建》,《经济研究》第10期,第42~54页。
[6] 黎文靖和胡玉明,2012,《国企内部薪酬差距激励了谁?》,《经济研究》第12期,第125~136页。
[7] 黎文靖和郑曼妮,2016,《实质性创新还是策略性创新?》,《经济研究》第4期,第60~73页。
[8] 梁上坤和陈冬华,2014,《业绩波动性与高管薪酬契约选择》,《金融研究》第1期,第167~179页。
[9] 刘春和孙亮,2010,《薪酬差距与企业绩效: 来自国企上市公司的经验证据》,《南开管理评论》第2期,第30~39页。
[10] 缪毅和胡奕明,2016,《内部收入差距, 辩护动机与高管薪酬辩护》,《南开管理评论》第2期,第32~41页。
[11] 谢德仁、林乐和陈运森,2012,《薪酬委员会独立性与更高的经理人报酬-业绩敏感度——基于薪酬辩护假说的分析和检验》,《管理世界》第1期,第121~140页。
[12] 杨志强和王华,2014,《公司内部薪酬差距, 股权集中度与盈余管理行为》,《会计研究》第6期,第57~65页。
[13] 温忠麟、张雷、侯杰泰和刘红云,2004,《中介效应检验程序及其应用》,《心理学报》第5期,第614~620页。
[14] Abdel-Khalik, A. R. 2003.“Self-sorting, Incentive Compensation and Human-capital Assets” European Accounting Review, 12(4): 661~697.
[15] Abowd, J. M. 1990. “Does Performance-based Managerial Compensation Affect Corporate Performance” ILR Review, 43(3): 52~73.
[16] Alesina, A., R. Di Tella, and R. MacCulloch. 2004. “Inequality and Happiness: are Europeans and Americans Different?” Journal of Public Economics, 88(9):2009~2042.
[17] Banker, R. D., D. Bu, and M. N. Mehta. 2016. “Pay Gap and Performance in China” Abacus, 52(3), 501~531.
[18] Bebchuk L., and Y. Grinstein. 2005. “Firm Expansion and CEO Pay” National Bureau of Economic Research.
[19] Becker, G. S. 1962. “Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis” Journal of Political Economy, 70(5, Part 2), 9~49.
[20] Becker, G. S., and Chiswick B. R. 1966. “Education and the Distribution of Earnings”The American Economic Review, 56(1/2):358~369.
[21] Belloc, F. 2012. “Corporate Governance and Innovation: A Survey” Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(5):835~864.
[22] Cauchie, G., and N. G. Vaillant. 2016. “New Firm Survival: Isolating the Role of Founders' Human Capital in Accounting for Firm Longevity” Journal of Human Capital, 10(2):186~211.
[23] Chen C X., and T. Sandino. 2012. “Can Wages Buy Honesty? The Relationship between Relative Wages and Employee Theft” Journal of Accounting Research, 50(4): 967~1000.
[24] Dai, Y., D. Kong, and J. Xu. 2017. “Does Fairness Breed Efficiency? Pay Gap and Firm Productivity in China” International Review of Economics & Finance, 48: 406~422.
[25] Denison, E. F. 1962. “The Sources of Economic Growth in the United States” Committee for Economic Development, New York.
[26] Faleye, O., E. Reis, and A. Venkateswaran. 2013. “The Determinants and Effects of CEO–employee Pay Ratios” Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(8):3258~3272.
[27] Firth, M., T. Y., Leung, O. M. Rui. and C. Na. 2015. “Relative Pay and its Effects on Firm Efficiency in a Transitional Economy”Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 110: 59~77.
[28] Fisher C D, X Y. Yuan. 1998. “What Motivates Employees? A Comparison of US and Chinese Responses” International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(3): 516~528.
[29] Gabaix X, A. Landier. 2008. “Why has CEO Pay Increased so Much?” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(1): 49~100.
[30] Heckman, J. 1974. “Life Cycle Consumption and Labor Supply: An Explanation of the Relationship between Income and Consumption over the Life Cycle” American Economic Review, 64(1): 188~194.
[31] Ionescu, F. 2011. “Risky Human Capital and Alternative Bankruptcy Regimes for Student Loans” Journal of Human Capital, 5(2), 153~206.
[32] Jung B, W. J. Lee, and D. P. Weber. 2014. “Financial Reporting Quality and Labor Investment Efficiency” Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(4): 1047~1076.
[33] Kindermann, F. 2012. “Welfare Effects of Privatizing Public Education when Human Capital Investments are Risky” Journal of Human Capital, 6(2), 87~123.
[34] Lazear, E. P., and S., Rosen. 1981. “Rank-order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts” Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 841~864.
[35] Mincer, J. 1958. “Investment in human Capital and Personal Income Distribution” Journal of Political Economy, 66(4): 281~302.
[36] Mincer, J. 1974. “Schooling, Experience, and Earnings” Human Behavior & Social Institutions , No. 2.
[37] Pfeffer, J., and N. Langton. 1993. “The Effect of Wage Dispersion on Satisfaction, Productivity, and Working Collaboratively: Evidence from College and University Faculty” Administrative Science Quarterly, 382~407.
[38] Schultz, T. W. 1959. “Investment in man: An Economist's View” Social Service Review, 33(2): 109~117.
[39] Schultz, T. W. 1961. “Investment in Human Capital” American Economic Review, 51(1): 1~17.
[40] Shue K., and R. R. Townsend. 2017. “Growth Through Rigidity: An Explanation for the Rise in CEO Pay” Journal of Financial Economics,123(1): 1~21.
[41] Siegel P. A., and D. C. Hambrick. 2005. “Pay Disparities within Top Management Groups: Evidence of Harmful Effects on Performance of High-technology Firms” Organization Science,16(3): 259~274.
[42] Sjaastad L. A. 1962. “The Costs and Returns of Human Migration” Journal of Political Economy, 70 (5): 80~93.
[43] Solow, R. M. 1956. “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1):65~94.
[44] Tan, Y., X. Tian, X. Zhang, and H. Zhao. 2015. “The Real Effects of Privatization: Evidence from China's Split Share Structure Reform” working paper.
[45] Waldinger F. 2016. “Bombs, Brains, and Science: The Role of Human and Physical Capital for the Creation of Scientific Knowledge” Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(5): 811~831.
[46] Wright, P. M., T. M. Gardner, and L. M. Moynihan. 2005. “The Relationship between HR Practices and Firm Performance: Examining Causal Order” Personnel Psychology, 58(2): 409~446.
[47] Xu, M., G. Kong, and D. Kong. 2017. “Does Wage Justice Hamper Creativity? Pay Gap and Firm Innovation in China” China Economic Review, 44: 186~202.
[1] 徐细雄, 李万利. 儒家传统与企业创新:文化的力量[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 471(9): 112-130.
[2] 段白鸽, 王永钦, 夏梦嘉. 金融创新如何缓解信任品市场失灵?——中国食品安全责任强制保险的自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 471(9): 75-93.
[3] 江伟, 底璐璐, 胡玉明. 改进型创新抑或突破型创新——基于客户集中度的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 469(7): 155-173.
[4] 江轩宇, 朱琳, 伊志宏, 于上尧. 工薪所得税筹划与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 469(7): 135-154.
[5] 卞元超, 吴利华, 白俊红. 高铁开通是否促进了区域创新?[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 468(6): 132-149.
[6] 张可. 经济集聚与区域创新的交互影响及空间溢出[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 467(5): 96-114.
[7] 黄宇虹, 黄霖. 金融知识与小微企业创新意识、创新活力——基于中国小微企业调查(CMES)的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 466(4): 149-167.
[8] 梁上坤, 张宇, 王彦超. 内部薪酬差距与公司价值——基于生命周期理论的新探索[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 466(4): 188-206.
[9] 余明桂, 钟慧洁, 范蕊. 民营化、融资约束与企业创新——来自中国工业企业的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 466(4): 75-91.
[10] 潘健平, 潘越, 马奕涵. 以“合”为贵?合作文化与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 463(1): 148-167.
[11] 毛其淋. 外资进入自由化 如何影响了中国本土企业创新?[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 463(1): 72-90.
[12] 魏浩, 巫俊. 知识产权保护、进口贸易与创新型领军企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 459(9): 91-106.
[13] 龙小宁, 易巍, 林志帆. 知识产权保护的价值有多大?——来自中国上市公司专利数据的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 458(8): 120-136.
[14] 冼国明, 明秀南. 海外并购与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 458(8): 155-171.
[15] 李常青, 李宇坤, 李茂良. 控股股东股权质押与企业创新投入[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 457(7): 143-157.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1