Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2019, Vol. 465 Issue (3): 149-167    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
信用卡、风险应对与城镇家庭股市参与
徐丽鹤, 吕佳玮, 何青
广东外语外贸大学广东国际战略研究院,广东广州 510420;
暨南大学经济与社会研究院,广东广州 510632;
西南财经大学中国家庭金融调查与研究中心,四川成都 611130
Credit Cards,Risk Coping,and Stock Market Participation in Urban Households
XU Lihe, LYU Jiawei, HE Qing
Guangdong Institute for International Strategies, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies;
Institute for Economic and Social Research, Jinan University;
Survey and Research Center for China Household Finance,Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
下载:  PDF (1848KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 信用卡市场的发展有利于家庭平滑消费,但是否会影响家庭的投资决策尚缺少事实检验。基于中国家庭金融调查(CHFS)2011和2013年的调查数据,本文首次检验了信用卡对城镇家庭股市投资的影响。研究发现:(1)控制家庭财富、融资渠道、社会资本等特征,持有信用卡在边际上促进了家庭的股市参与率,股市投资额取决于信用额度。(2)中国信用卡市场的发展,并未像流动性约束理论预测的可以平滑消费,反而刺激了家庭风险性资产的配置,最终提高了储蓄率。原因在于,中国家庭更多地将信用卡作为应对未来短期突发性风险的金融工具,从而在当期将更多资产配置在风险资产上,以实现资本积累。使用信用卡数目、信用额度等多种衡量方式,并采用工具变量法(IV)和面板数据固定效应模型等解决内生性问题后,该结论稳健。该研究有助于理解信用卡在中国家庭投资决策的作用,并为流动性约束或有限股市参与假说提供中国经验。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
徐丽鹤
吕佳玮
何青
关键词:  信用卡  股市参与  风险应对    
Summary:  According to the precautionary savings or liquidity constraints theory, households with liquidity constraints will use savings to cope with risk. The emergence of credit cards has reduced liquidity constraints and consequently improved household consumption. Based on the household choice to consume, save, or invest, the development of credit cards is likely to affect investment decisions. However, few studies have explored this effect.
According to the Chinese Household Finance Survey (CHFS) data for 2013, the percentage of urban households in China with credit cards surged from 0.5 percent in 2000 to 24 percent in 2012. Meanwhile, the percentage of households participating in the stock market rose from less than 1 percent in 2000 to 11.5 percent in 2012, showing the same upward trend as the credit card market. Theoretically, there are two possible channels: first, credit cards can reduce liquidity constraints, and second, they can be considered as financial tools for coping with risk. This study uses Chinese household microdata to investigate the relationship between credit cards and household investment, including the mechanisms behind this effect. It contributes to our understanding about the effect of credit card markets development in China on household investment decisions, and it reveals empirical evidence for the hypothesis of liquidity constraints and limited stock participation.
The Chinese Household Finance Survey (CHFS) was conducted by Southwestern University of Finance and Economics in China. It provides representative financial panel data at the household and individual level, including financial and non-financial assets, liabilities, credit cards, credit constraints, income, consumption, demographic characteristics, and payment habits. This comprehensive and systematic household panel survey focused on the Chinese financial system and covered 8,438 households in 2011 and 28,143 during the second wave in 2013. Among these samples, 6,847 households could be followed up, comprising 66.7 percent of urban households.
This study conducts an empirical analysis using not only cross-sectional pool data but also panel data that could be followed up. The findings are as follows. First, credit card holders in urban China are more likely than non-holders to participate in the stock market. The total investment value also increases with the enhancement of the credit line. Second, the credit card is considered to be a financial tool for coping with short-term income risk. By keeping consumption level constant, households can allocate more to stock assets instead of holding cash and fixed savings deposits. This study also finds that the more credit cards households hold, the more they participate in the stock market, and the investment value in the stock market depends mainly on the credit line.
To avoid measurement errors generated by reverse causality and omitted variables, we apply the instrumental variable method of estimation using the 2SLS-Probilt model. Specifically, the instrumental variable of whether the household holds a credit card is measured by whether there are promotions in the household's community. To exclude the impact of omitted variables, we perform numerous robustness checks, including applying the fixed effect model using panel data that could be followed from 2011 to 2013. Furthermore, we use relatively exogenous proxy variables such as the number of credit cards and the credit line to estimate the effect of credit cards on stock market investment. In addition to proxy variables, we consider the sequence of credit card holding and stock holding to avoid reverse causality problems. The results of these variant methods all support our conclusion.
Although there is international empirical evidence that credit cards can boost consumption, consistent with the prediction of precautionary savings theory, the development of the Chinese credit card market has not reduced the household savings rate or increased consumption as previously concluded. On the contrary, Chinese households prefer to use credit cards as financing tools to respond to short-term income risks, and increase risky investments by cutting back non-risk assets (cash or fixed deposits) with little reduction in savings on average. To sum up, further research is needed to establish whether the development of credit cards enhances consumption or investment.
Keywords:  Credit Card    Stock Market Participation    Risk Coping
JEL分类号:  D14   G11   R2  
基金资助: 本文感谢高等学校学科创新引智计划项目(B16040)的资助
作者简介:  徐丽鹤,金融学博士,副教授,广东外语外贸大学广东国际战略研究院,E-mail:xulihe@gdufs.edu.cn.
吕佳玮,硕士研究生,暨南大学经济与社会研究院,E-mail:jiaweilv@foxmail.com.
何 青(通讯作者),经济学博士,讲师,西南财经大学中国家庭金融调查与研究中心,E-mail:heqing@chfs.cn.
引用本文:    
徐丽鹤, 吕佳玮, 何青. 信用卡、风险应对与城镇家庭股市参与[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 465(3): 149-167.
XU Lihe, LYU Jiawei, HE Qing. Credit Cards,Risk Coping,and Stock Market Participation in Urban Households. Journal of Financial Research, 2019, 465(3): 149-167.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2019/V465/I3/149
[1]甘犁、尹志超、贾男、徐舒和马双, 2013,《中国家庭资产状况及住房需求分析》,《金融研究》第4期,第1~20页。
[2]郭士祺和梁平汉,2014,《社会互动、信息渠道与家庭股市参与—基于2011年中国家庭金融调查的实证研究》,《经济研究》增1期,第116~131页。
[3]李锐和李宁辉,2004,《农户借贷行为及其福利效果分析》,《经济研究》第12期,第96~10页。
[4]马光荣和杨恩艳,2011,《社会网络、非正规金融与创业》,《经济研究》第3期,第83~94页。
[5]裴春霞和孙世重,2004,《流动性约束条件下的中国居民预防性储蓄行为分析》,《金融研究》第10期,第26~32页。
[6]万广华、张茵和牛建高,2001,《流动性约束,不确定性与中国居民消费》,《经济研究》第11期,第35~44页。
[7]吴卫星和吕学梁,2013,《中国城镇家庭资产配置及国际比较——基于微观数据的分析》,《国际金融研究》第10期,第45~57页。
[8]熊伟,2014,《短期消费流动性与居民消费:基于信用卡余额代偿的研究》,《经济研究》增1期,第156~167页。
[9]易行健、张波、杨汝岱和杨碧云,2012,《家庭社会网络与农户储蓄行为:基于中国农村的实证研究》,《管理世界》第5期,第43~51页。
[10]朱光伟、杜在超和张林,2014,《关系、股市参与和股市回报》,《经济研究》第11期,第87~101页。
[11]Basnet, H.C. and F. Donou-Adonsou, 2016, “Internet, Consumer Spending, and Credit Card Balance: Evidence from US Consumers”, Review of Financial Economics, 30:11~22.
[12]Brown, J.R., Z.Ivkovic', P. A. Smith and S. Weisbenner, 2008, “Neighbors Matter: Causal Community Effects and Stock Market Participation”, The Journal of Finance, 63(3):1509~1531.
[13]Chatterji, A. K. and R. C. Seamans,2012, “Entrepreneurial Finance, Credit Cards, and Race”, Journal of Financial Economics, 106(1):182~195.
[14]Deaton, A., 1991, “Saving and Liquidity Constraints”, Econometrica, 59(5):1221~1248.
[15]Deidda, M. 2014, “Precautionary Saving under Liquidity Constraints: Evidence from Italy”, Empirical Economics, 46(1):329~360.
[16]Fafchamps, M. and F. Gubert, 2007, “The Formation of Risk Sharing Networks”, Journal of Development Economics, 83(2):326~350.
[17]Flavin, M., 1985, “Excess Sensitivity of Consumption to Current Income - Liquidity Constraints or Myopia”, The Canadian Journal of Economics, 18(1):117~136.
[18]Galor, O. and J.Zeira, 1993, “Income Distribution and Macroeconomics”, The Review of Economic Studies, 60 (1):35~52.
[19]Jalan, J. and M. Ravallion, 1999, “Are the Poor Less Well Insured? Evidence on Vulnerability to Income Risk in Rural China”, Journal of Development Economics, 58(1):61~81.
[20]Karlan, D., 2007, “Social Connections and Group Banking”, The Economic Journal, 117(517):F52~F84.
[21]Karlan, D., R. Osei, I. Oseiakoto and C. Udry, 2012,“Agricultural Decisions after Relaxing Credit and Risk Constraints”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129 (2):597~652.
[22]Kim, H. and S. A.DeVaney, 2001, “The Determinants of Outstanding Balances among Credit Card Revolvers”, Financial Counseling and Planning, 12(1):67~78.
[23]Kinsey, J., 1981, “Determinants of Credit Card Accounts: An Application of Tobit Analysis”, Journal of Consumer Research, 8:172~182.
[24]Norvilitis, J. M., M. M. Merwin, M. T. Osberg, V. Patricia, V. P. Roehling, P. Young, and M. M. Kamas, 2006, “Personality Factors, Money Attitudes, Financial Knowledge, and Credit-card Debt in College Students”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(6):1395~1413.
[25]Robb, C. A. and D. L. Sharpe, 2009, “Effect of Personal Financial Knowledge on College Students' Credit Card Behavior”, Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 20(1):25~43.
[26]Rossi, M. and S. Trucchi, 2016, “Liquidity Constraints and Labor Supply”, European Economic Review, 87:176~193.
[27]Scott, R. H., III, 2010, “Credit Card Ownership among American High School Seniors: 1997–2008”, Journal of Family and Economic, 31:151~160.
[28]Shoji, M., K. Aoyagi and R.J. Kasahara, Y. Sawada and M. Ueyama, 2012, “Social Capital Formation and Credit Access: Evidence from Sri Lanka”, World Development, 40(12):2522~2536.
[29]Wang, L. W. Lu and N.K. Malhotra, 2011, “Demographics, Attitude, Personality and Credit Card Features Correlate with Credit Card Debt: A View from China”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 32:179~193.
[30]Yuan, Y. and L. Xu, 2015, “Are Poor Able to Access the Informal Credit Market? Evidence from Rural Households in China”, China Economic Review, 33(1):232~246.
[1] 李丁, 丁俊菘, 马双. 社会互动对家庭商业保险参与的影响——来自中国家庭金融调查(CHFS)数据的实证分析[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 469(7): 96-114.
[2] 周广肃, 王雅琦. 住房价格、房屋购买与中国家庭杠杆率[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 468(6): 1-19.
[3] 周弘, 张成思, 何启志. 中国居民资产配置效率的门限效应研究:金融约束视角[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 460(10): 55-71.
[4] 云妍, 陈志武, 林展. 清代官绅家庭资产结构一般特征初探——以抄产档案为中心的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 452(2): 61-81.
[5] 徐佳, 谭娅. 中国家庭金融资产配置及动态调整[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 438(12): 95-110.
[6] 王正位, 邓颖惠, 廖理. 知识改变命运:金融知识与微观收入流动性[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 438(12): 111-127.
[7] 张琳琬, 吴卫星. 风险态度与居民财富——来自中国微观调查的新探究[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 430(4): 115-127.
[8] 吴卫星, 沈涛. 学历的年代效应与股票市场投资者参与[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 422(8): 175-190.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1