Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2018, Vol. 460 Issue (10): 123-140    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
政府补贴能否促进高新技术企业的自主创新?——来自中关村的证据
章元, 程郁, 佘国满
复旦大学中国社会主义市场经济研究中心,上海 200433;
国务院发展研究中心农村经济研究部,北京 100010;
香港科技大学商学院,香港
Can Government Subsidy Improve High-tech Firms’ Independent Innovation? Evidence from Zhongguancun Firm Panel Data
ZHANG Yuan, CHENG Yu, SHE Guoman
China Center for Economic Studies, Fudan University;
Research Department of Rural Economy, Development Research Center of the State Council;
Business School, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
下载:  PDF (1616KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 中国政府对高新技术企业投入了大量补贴以激励它们创新,但是对补贴效果的研究并未达成一致结论。基于中关村3万多个高新技术企业2001-2012年的观察值,本文同时采用PSM与DID法对政府补贴的效果进行了研究,结果发现:第一,整体而言,政府补贴显著提高了创新经费支出、新产品销售收入和专利申请数量;第二,进一步将创新细分为自主创新和购买引进新技术之后发现,政府补贴存在“挤出效应”:被补贴企业的自主创新明显下降,而购买引进新技术显著增加;第三,政府补贴对企业的短期创新激励有显著的促进作用,但是对长期创新激励的促进作用不显著。本文对高新技术企业的补贴效果提供了实证绩效评估,所得出的结论有助于政府优化和调整激励创新政策。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
章元
程郁
佘国满
关键词:  政府补贴  自主创新  长期激励  中关村    
Abstract:  Chinese government invested a huge number of subside onto high-tech firms in order to boost the innovation level of them.However, present literature does not arrive at the same conclusion.Using a panel of about 30,000 high-tech firms in Zhongguancun from 2001 to 2012, this paper adopts Propensity Score Matching and Difference in Difference to re-evaluate the effect of government subsidy on innovation, and arrive at the following conclusions: first, generally speaking, government subsidy significantly improves high-tech firms’ innovation expenditures, new products sales and application for patents; second, government subsidy has spill-over effect - it improves the purchased new technology at expense of significant reduction of independent innovation; third, government subsidy has significant effect on improving high-tech firms’ short-term innovation, but no significant effect on long-term innovation; These conclusions shed light on the adjustment of government policies to optimize the effect of subsidy on firm innovation.
Key words:  Government Subsidy    Independent Innovation    Long-term Incentive    Zhongguancun
JEL分类号:  O33   H32   D21  
基金资助: 本文属于国家自然科学基金项目《创新经济体内生发展机制的理论与经验研究》(项目批准号:71373258)的阶段性成果。同时感谢教育部重点研究基地十三五规划课题《结构变迁、城市发展与中国经济增长》(17JJD790005)、教育部“创新团队发展计划”、国家自然科学基金(批准号:71273057、71841008、71833003)和复旦大学经济学院“经济理论学高峰计划”学术前沿项目的资助
作者简介:  章 元,经济学博士,教授,复旦大学中国社会主义市场经济研究中心,Email:zhangyuanfd@fudan.edu.cn.
程 郁,管理学博士,研究员,国务院发展研究中心农村经济研究部,Email: Cheng_uu@126.com.
佘国满,博士生,香港科技大学商学院,Email: gshe@connect.ust.hk
引用本文:    
章元, 程郁, 佘国满. 政府补贴能否促进高新技术企业的自主创新?——来自中关村的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 460(10): 123-140.
ZHANG Yuan, CHENG Yu, SHE Guoman. Can Government Subsidy Improve High-tech Firms’ Independent Innovation? Evidence from Zhongguancun Firm Panel Data. Journal of Financial Research, 2018, 460(10): 123-140.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2018/V460/I10/123
[1]白俊红和李婧,2011,《政府R&D资助与企业技术创新——基于效率视角的实证分析》,《金融研究》,第6期181~193页。
[2]黎文靖和郑曼妮,2016,《实质性创新还是策略性创新?——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响》,《经济研究》,第4期60~73页。
[3]李汇东、唐跃军和左晶晶,2013,《用自己的钱还是用别人的钱创新?——基于中国上市公司融资结构与公司创新的研究》,《金融研究》,第2期170~183页。
[4]秦雪征、尹志锋和周建波,2012,《国家科技计划与中小型企业创新:基于匹配模型的分析》,《管理世界》,第4期70~81页。
[5]邵敏和包群,2012,《政府补贴与企业生产率—基于我国工业企业的经验分析》,《中国工业经济》,第7期70~82页。
[6]解维敏、唐清泉和陆姗姗,2009,《政府R&D资助,企业R&D支出与自主创新——来自中国上市公司的经验证据》,《金融研究》,第6期86~99页。
[7]杨洋、魏江和罗来军,2015,《谁在利用政府补贴进行创新?——所有制和要素市场扭曲的联合调节效应》,《管理世界》第1期,75~86+98页。
[8]岳书敬,2008,《中国区域研发效率差异及其影响因素——基于省级区域面板数据的经验研究》,《科研管理》,第5期173~179页。
[9]朱平芳和徐伟民,2003,《政府的科技激励政策对大中型工业企业 R&D 投入及其专利产出的影响——上海市的实证研究》,《经济研究》,第6期45~53页。
[10]赵付民、苏盛安和邹珊刚,2006,《我国政府科技投入对大中型工业企业 R&D 投入的影响分析》,《研究与发展管理》,第18卷第2期78~84页。
[11]郑绪涛和柳剑平,2008,《促进 R&D 活动的税收和补贴政策工具的有效搭配》,《产业经济研究》,第1期26~36页。
[12]詹宇波、刘荣华和刘畅,2010,《中国内资企业的技术创新是如何实现的?——来自大中型工业企业的省级面板证据》,《世界经济文汇》,第1期50~63页。
[13]张辉、刘佳颖和何宗辉,2016,《政府补贴对企业研发投入的影响——基于中国工业企业数据库的门槛分析》,《经济学动态》,第12期28~38页。
[14]周亚虹、蒲余路、陈诗一和方芳,2015,《政府扶持与新型产业发展——以新能源为例》,《经济研究》,第6期147~161页。
[15]Acs,Zoltan J., and David B.Audretsch, 2003, Innovation and Technological Change, Springer USA..
[16]Aghion,Philippe, and Peter Howitt, 1990, “A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction,” NBER Working Paper, No.3223.
[17]Almus,Matthias, and Dirk Czarnitzki, 2003, “The Effects of Public R&D Subsidies on Firms' Innovation Activities: The Case of Eastern Germany,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 21(2): 226-236.
[18]Arrow,Kenneth, 1962, “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention,” in R.Nelson(ed.) The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Princeton University Press, pp.609~626.
[19]Blanes,J.Vicente, and Isabel Busom, 2004, “Who Participates in R&D Subsidy Programs? The Case of Spanish Manufacturing Firms,” Research Policy, 33(10): 1459-1476.
[20]Blundell,Richard, and Monica Costa Dias, 2000, “Evaluation Methods for Non-experimental Data,” Fiscal Studies, 21(4): 427~468.
[21]Busom,Isabel, 2000, “An Empirical Evaluation of the Effects of R&D Subsidies,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 9(2): 111~148.
[22]Clausen,Tommy Høyvarde, 2007, “Access (not) Granted: What Kinds of Firms Participate in Technology Programs?” Working Paper of Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo, No.20070612.
[23]Catozzella,Alessandra, and Marco Vivarelli, 2015, “Beyond Additionality: Are Innovation Subsidies Conterproductive?” IZA Discussion Paper, No.5746.
[24]Cohen,Wesley M., and Daniel A.Levinthal, 1989, “Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D,” The Economic Journal, 99(397):569~596.
[25]Czarnitzki,Dirk, and Katrin Hussinger, 2004, “The Link between R&D Subsidies, R&D Spending and Technological Performance,” Discussion Paper of ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research, No.04-056.
[26]David,Paul A., Bronwyn H.Hall, and Andrew A.Toole, 2000, “Is Public R&D A Complement or Substitute for Private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence,” Research Policy, 29(4): 497~529.
[27]Duguet,Emmanuel, 2004, “Are R&D Subsidies A Substitute or A Complement to Privately Funded R&D? Evidence from France Using Propensity Score Methods for Non-experimental Data,” Revue d’Economie Politique, 114(2):263~292.
[28]Goolsbee,Austan, 1998, “Does Government R&D Policy Mainly Benefit Scientists and Engineers?” NBER Working Paper, No.w6532.
[29]Griliches,Zvi, 1979, “Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth,” The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1): 92~116.
[30]Guo,Di, Yan Guo, and Kun Jiang, 2015, “Government Subsided R&D and Innovation Outputs: An Empirical Analysis on China’s Innofund Program,” Stanford Center for International Development Working Paper No.494.
[31]Hall,Bronwyn H., 2002a, “The Assessment: Technology Policy,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1):1~9.
[32]Hall,Bronwyn H., 2002b, “The Financing of Research and Development,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1): 35~51.
[33]Holger,Görg, and Eric Strobl, 2007, “The Effect of R&D Subsidies on Private R&D,” Economica, 74(294):215~234.
[34]Hussinger,Katrin, 2008, “R&D and Subsidies at the Firm Level: An Application of Parametric and Semiparametric Two-step Selection Models,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(6): 729~747.
[35]Jaffe,Adam B., 2002, “Building Program Evaluation into the Design of Public Research Support Programs,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1):22~34.
[36]Jaffe,Adam B., and Trinh Le, 2015, “The Impact of R&D Subsidy on Innovation: A Study of New Zealand Firms,” NBER Working Paper, No.21479.
[37]Klette,Tor Jakob, Jarle Møen, and Zvi Griliches, 2000, “Do Subsidies to Commercial R&D Reduce Market Failures? Microeconometric Evaluation Studies,” Research Policy, 29(4):471~495.
[38]Lach,Saul, 2002, “Do R&D Subsidies Stimulate or Displace Private R&D? Evidence from Israel,” The Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(4): 369~390.
[39]Lerner,Josh, 2000, “The Government as Venture Capitalist: The Long-run Impact of the SBIR Program,” The Journal of Private Equity, 3(2): 55~78.
[40]Levin,Richard C., Wesley M.Cohen and David C.Mowery, 1985, “R&D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure: New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian Hypotheses,” The American Economic Review, 75(2): 20~24.
[41]Levin,Richard, and Peter C.Reiss, 1984, “Tests of A Schumpeterian Model of R&D and Market Structure,” NBER Chapters in R&D, Patents, and Productivity, pp.175~208, University of Chicago Press.
[42]Leyden,Dennis Patrick, and Albert N.Link, 1991, “Why Are Governmental R&D and Private R&D Complements?” Applied Economics, 23(10): 1673~1681.
[43]Mansfield,Edwin, and Lorne Switzer, 1984, “Effects of Federal Support on Company-financed R&D: The Case of Energy,” Management Science, 30(5): 562~571.
[44]Nelson,Richard R., 1959, “The Economics of Invention: A Survey of the Literature,” The Journal of Business, 32(2): 101~127.
[45]Romer,Paul M., 1990, “Endogenous Technological Change,” Journal of Political Economy, 98(3):71~102.
[46]Qu,Jiaan, Jie Gao, Xinting Wang, Jiexin Tang, and James O.Bukenya, 2017, “Political Connections, Government Subsidies and Technical Innovation of Wind Energy Companies in China,” Sustainability,” 9(10): pp.1~13.
[47]Wallsten,Scott J., 2000, “The Effects of Government-industry R&D Programs on Private R&D: the Case of the Small Business Innovation Research Program,” The RAND Journal of Economics, 31(1): 82~100.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1