Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2018, Vol. 456 Issue (6): 1-21    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
“双重赤字”联动的政府债务作用
林峰, 邓可斌
华南理工大学经济与贸易学院/广东省供应链金融工程技术研究中心,广东广州 510006
Identifying the Role of Government Debt on Twin Deficits
LIN Feng, DENG Kebin
School of Economics and Commerce/ Research Center on Supply-Chain Finance Engineering of Guangdong Province, South China University of Technology
下载:  PDF (1958KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 政府债务是否影响“双重赤字”联动是国际经济学研究的重要问题。囿于财政赤字与经常账户赤字间往往存在严重的内生性,已有经验研究并未得到与理论研究一致的结论。本文引入义务教育年限作为财政赤字的有效工具变量,采用包括发达经济体、新兴市场和发展中经济体在内的150个国家(地区)2000-2014年的面板数据,得到了与理论预期一致且稳健的政府债务作用证据:(1)“双重赤字”联动倾向随着政府债务水平的提高会趋于减弱,但不会消失;(2)“双重赤字”的政府债务作用主要体现在发展中经济体,在发达经济体稍弱但亦显著;(3)对于中国这样的低债务水平发展中经济体,扩张性财政政策会引致经常账户盈余的显著减少。而对于已经处于高债务水平的发达经济体,通过紧缩性财政政策来调节经常账户失衡的策略要特别注意货币政策和贸易条件等因素的配合。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
林峰
邓可斌
关键词:  政府债务  财政政策  经常账户  双重赤字    
Abstract:  Whether the government debt affects the twin deficits is an important issue in the international trade research. Due to the serious endogeneity between the fiscal deficit and the current account deficit, empirical research has not been concluded in agreement with theoretical research. This paper introduces the duration of education as an effective instrument variable for fiscal deficit to solve this problem. Using panel data from 150 countries in 2000 to 2014, including developed countries, emerging markets and developing countries, the empirical evidence is in line with theoretical expectations. Firstly, with a increase in government debt, the twin deficits tend to weaken. Secondly, the twin deficits in high-debt countries tend to be weaker than low-debt countries, but sill significant. Thirdly, the role of government debt on twin deficits is mainly reflected in developing countries, while which is relatively vague in developed countries due to endogeneity concerns and other disturbances including monetary policy. It is found that expansionary fiscal policy would lead to a significant reduction in current account surpluses for developing countries with low government debt such as China. For developed countries that are already at a high government debt, strategies to regulate current account imbalances through tight fiscal policy should play with proper monetary policy and be independent from the reverse impact of current account imbalances on fiscal policy.
Key words:  Government Debt    Fiscal Policy    Current Account    Twin Deficits
JEL分类号:  F14   F17   E62  
基金资助: 本文感谢国家社会科学重大项目(15ZDA013)、广东省自然科学基金项目(2017A030310025,2016A030310431)、中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(XMS03)的资助。
作者简介:  林 峰,经济学博士,讲师,华南理工大学经济与贸易学院,Email:fenglin@scut.edu.cn.
邓可斌(通讯作者),经济学博士,教授,华南理工大学广东省供应链金融工程技术研究中心,Email:ecdengkb@scut.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
林峰, 邓可斌. “双重赤字”联动的政府债务作用[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 456(6): 1-21.
LIN Feng, DENG Kebin. Identifying the Role of Government Debt on Twin Deficits. Journal of Financial Research, 2018, 456(6): 1-21.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2018/V456/I6/1
[1] 郭步超和王博,2014,《政府债务与经济增长:基于资本回报率的门槛效应分析》,《世界经济》第9期,第95~118页。
[2] 李兵和任远,2015,《人口结构是怎样影响经常账户不平衡的?——以第二次世界大战为工具变量的经验证据》,《经济研究》第10期,第119~133页。
[3] 刘伟、胡兵和李传昭,2007,《财政赤字、实际有效汇率与贸易收支——基于中国数据的实证检验》,《管理世界》第4期,第32~39页。
[4] 王文甫和王子成,2012,《积极财政政策与净出口:挤入还是挤出——基于中国的经验与解释》,《管理世界》第10期,第31~45页。
[5] 许雄奇、张宗益和康季,2006,《财政赤字与贸易收支不平衡:来自中国经济的经验证据》,《世界经济》第2期,第41~45页。
[6] 朱超和张林杰,2012,《人口结构能解释经常账户平衡吗》,《金融研究》第5期,第30~44页。
[7] 张琳琬和吴卫星,2016,《风险态度与居民财富——来自中国微观调查的新探究》,《金融研究》第4期,第115~127页。
[8] Afonso, A. and J. Jalles. 2013. “Growth and Productivity: The Role of Government Debt.” International Review of Economics & Finance, (25): 384~407.
[9] Arin, K. and F. Koray. 2009. “International Transmission of Fiscal Shocks: An Empirical Investigation.” Open Economies Review, 17(22): 425~434.
[10] Beetsma, R., M. Giuliodori and F. Klaassen. 2008. “The Effects of Public Spending Shocks on Trade Balances and Budget Deficits in the European Union.” Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(2): 414~423.
[11] Bénétrix, A. S. and P. R. Lane. 2013. “Fiscal Shocks and the Real Exchange Rate.” International Journal of Central Banking, 9(3): 6~37.
[12] Bergstrand, J. and P. Egger. 2007. “A Knowledge-and-Physical-Capital Model of International Trade Flows, Foreign Direct Investment, and Multinational Enterprises.” Journal of International Economics, 73(2): 278~308.
[13] Bianchi, P., B. Deschamps and K. Kiani. 2015. “Fiscal Balance and Current Account in Professional Forecasts.” Review of International Economics, 23(2): 361~378.
[14] Blanchard, O. and F. Giavazzi. 2002. “Current Account Deficits in the Euro Area the End of the Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, (2): 147~186.
[15] Brady, G. L. and C. Magazzino. 2017. “The Sustainability of Italian Public Debt and Deficit.” International Advances in Economic Research, 23(1): 9~20.
[16] Corsetti, G. and G. J. Müller. 2006. “Twin Deficits: Squaring Theory, Evidence and Common Sense.” Economic Policy, 21(48): 597~638.
[17] Corsetti, G. and G. J. Müller. 2008. “Twin Deficits, Openness, and the Business Cycle.” Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(2): 404~413.
[18] Evans, P. 1988. “Are Consumers Ricardian? Evidence for the United States.” Journal of Political Economy, 96(5): 983~1004.
[19] Evans, P. and I. Hasan. 1994. “Are Consumers Ricardian? Evidence for Canada.” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 34(1): 25~40.
[20] Faraglia, E., A. Marcet and A. Scott. 2008. “Fiscal Insurance and Debt Management in OECD Economies.” The Economic Journal, 118(527): 363~386.
[21] Francois, J. and M. Manchin. 2013. “Institutions, Infrastructure, and Trade.” World Development, 46: 165~175.
[22] Giavazzi, F. and M. Pagano. 1996. “Non-Keynesian Effects of Fiscal Policy Changes: International Evidence and the Swedish Experience.” Swedish Economic Policy Review, 3(4): 67~103.
[23] Giavazzi, F., T. Jappelli and M. Pagano. 2000. “Searching for Non-linear Effects of Fiscal Policy: Evidence from Industrial and Developing Countries.” European Economic Review, 44(7): 1259~1289.
[24] Glick, R. and K. Rogoff, 1995. “Global Versus Country-Specific Productivity Shocks and the Current Account.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 35(1): 159~192.
[25] Harberger, A. 1950. “Currency Depreciation, Income, and the Balance of Trade.” Journal of Political Economy, 58(1): 47~60.
[26] Hürtgen, P. and R. Rühmkorf. 2014. “Sovereign Default Risk and State-dependent Twin Deficits.” Journal of International Money and Finance, 48(1): 357~382.
[27] Kaufmann, S., J. Scharler and G. Winckler. 2002. “The Austrian Current Account Deficit: Driven by Twin Deficits or by Intertemporal Expenditure Allocation.” Empirical Economics, 27(3): 529~542.
[28] Kim, S. and N. Roubini. 2008. “Twin Deficit or Twin Divergence? Fiscal Policy, Current Account, and Real Exchange Rate in the US.” Journal of International Economics, 74(2): 362~383.
[29] Kumhof, M. and D. Laxton. 2013. “Fiscal Deficits and Current Account Deficits.”Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 37(10): 2062~2082.
[30] Lane, P. and G. Milesi-Ferretti. 2012. “External Adjustment and the Global Crisis.” Journal of International Economics, 88(2): 252~265.
[31] Laursen, S. and L. Metzler. 1950. “Flexible Exchange Rates and the Theory of Employment.”Review of Economics and Statistics, 32(4): 281~299.
[32] Marcet, A. and A. Scott. 2009. “Debt and Deficit Fluctuations and the Structure of Bond Markets.” Journal of Economic Theory, 144(2): 473~501.
[33] Mohammadi, H. 2004. “Budget Deficits and the Current Account Balance: New Evidence from Panel Data.” Journal of Economics and Finance, 28(1): 39~45.
[34] Neaime, S. 2015. “Sustainability of Budget Deficits and Public Debts in Selected European Union Countries.” Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 12(1): 1~21.
[35] Nickel, C. and I. Vansteenkiste. 2008. “Fiscal Policies, the Current Account and Ricardian Equivalence.” European Central Bank Working Paper, No. 935.
[36] Nickel, C. and A. Tudyka. 2014. “Fiscal Stimulus in Times of High Debt: Reconsidering Multipliers and Twin Deficits.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 46(7): 1313~1344.
[37] Reinhart, M. and K. Rogoff. 2010. “Growth in a Time of Debt.” American Economic Review, 100(2): 573~578.
[38] Summers, L. 1988. “Tax Policy and International Competitiveness”, In J. Frenkel(Ed.), International Aspects of Fiscal Policies. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
[1] 冀云阳, 付文林, 束磊. 地区竞争、支出责任下移与地方政府债务扩张[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 463(1): 128-147.
[2] 毛捷, 黄春元. 地方债务、区域差异与经济增长——基于中国地级市数据的验证[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 455(5): 1-19.
[3] 李丹, 庞晓波, 方红生. 财政空间与中国政府债务可持续性[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 1-17.
[4] 姜子叶, 胡育蓉. 财政分权、预算软约束与地方政府债务[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 428(2): 198-206.
[5] 刘红忠, 秦泰. 相对价格、收入预期与中国的经常账户波动——基于两部门跨期消费视角的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 423(9): 34-49.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1