Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2018, Vol. 455 Issue (5): 20-36    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
金融市场化进程是否改变了中国货币政策不同传导渠道的相对效应?
战明华, 李欢
广东外语外贸大学金融学院,广东广州 510006;
浙江理工大学材料与纺织学院,浙江杭州 310018
Does the Financial Liberalization Change the Independent Effect of Each Monetary Policy Transmission Channel in China?
ZHAN Minghua, LI Huan
GuangDong University of Foreign Studies, School of Finance;
ZheJiang SCI-TECH University, College of Materials and Textiles
下载:  PDF (1954KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文利用SVAR模型脉冲偏导分离技术,从利率市场化和影子银行两个维度测算了金融市场化进程对货币政策不同传导渠道相对地位的影响。实证结果揭示了中国货币政策传导的一些重要特征:第一,以信贷渠道为代表的数量化渠道效应要强于以利率和汇率渠道为代表的价格渠道,并且该结果没有因金融市场化的推进而改变。第二,利率市场化的推进主要强化了利率渠道的作用,但一定程度上弱化了其他渠道尤其是信贷渠道的作用。第三,影子银行的发展,强化了资产价格渠道的效应,而相对弱化了信贷渠道和利率渠道的效应。研究为在金融与实体经济市场仍存在一定程度摩擦的条件下,央行采用价格与数量货币政策调控方式有机结合的必要性与有效性,提供了实证支持。同时研究还表明,要充分发挥利率市场化改革完善货币政策价格传导机制的作用,既需要加强对各种形式金融创新的监管,还需要实体经济体系进一步市场化改革相配合。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
战明华
李欢
关键词:  货币政策传导渠道  SVAR  脉冲偏导分离技术    
Abstract:  This paper estimates the influence of the financial marketization process on the relative importance of the different transmission channels of monetary policy from the aspects of interest rate liberalization and shadow banking, by using the separation technology in the SVAR model. Results provide a reasonable empirical description of important features of Chinese monetary policy transmission. First, the quantitative channels represented by the credit channel are more important than the price channels like the interest rate and the exchange rate channel, which does not change along the progress of the financial marketization. Second, the process of the interest rate marketization mainly strengthens the effect of the interest rate channel, while weakens the other channels, especially the credit channel. Third, the development of shadow banking system relatively strengthens the asset price channel, and weakens the credit channel and the interest rate channel. This paper provides the empirical support for the necessity and effectiveness of the combination of price and quantity monetary policy regulation, under the condition that certain degree of friction still exists between financial and real economy markets. At the same time, it also shows thatin order to give full play to the interest rate liberalization reform and perfect price transmission mechanism of monetary policy, authorities not only need to strengthen the supervision of various forms of financial innovation, but also need for further market-oriented reform of the real economy.
Key words:  Monetary Policy Transmission Channels    SVAR    The Separate Technology in Partial Derivative
JEL分类号:  E42   E44   E52  
基金资助: 本文感谢国家自然科学基金面上项目(71673225)的资助。
作者简介:  战明华,教授,广东外语外贸大学金融学员、广州华南财富研究中心基地、浙江理工大学材料与纺织学院,Email:zhanmheco@163.com.
李欢(通讯作者),博士研究生,浙江理工大学材料与纺织学院、浙江省经济信息中心,Email: monkeyhuanli@sina.com.
引用本文:    
战明华, 李欢. 金融市场化进程是否改变了中国货币政策不同传导渠道的相对效应?[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 455(5): 20-36.
ZHAN Minghua, LI Huan. Does the Financial Liberalization Change the Independent Effect of Each Monetary Policy Transmission Channel in China?. Journal of Financial Research, 2018, 455(5): 20-36.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2018/V455/I5/20
[1] 巴曙松,2013,《应从金融结构演进角度客观评估影子银行》,《经济纵横》第4期,第27~30页。
[2] 金中夏、洪浩和李宏瑾,2013,《利率市场化对货币政策有效性和经济结构调整的影响》,《经济研究》第4期,第69~82页。
[3] 罗纳德.I.麦金农著,周庭煜等译,1997,《经济市场化的次序(第二版)》,上海三联出版社。
[4] 陆磊和杨骏,2016,《流动性、一般均衡与金融稳定的“不可能三角”》,《金融研究》第1期,第1~13页。
[5] 林仁文和杨熠,2014,《中国市场化改革与货币政策有效性演变》,《管理世界》第6期,第39~52页。
[6] 刘斌,2009,《物价水平的财政决定理论与实证研究》,《金融研究》第8期,第35~51页。
[7] 李波和伍戈,2011,《影子银行的信用创造功能及其对货币政策的挑战》,《金融研究》第12期,第77~84页。
[8] 盛松成和吴培新,2008,《中国货币政策的二元传导机制— “两中介目标,两调控对象”模式研究》,《经济研究》第10期37~51页。
[9] 姚余栋和李宏瑾,2013,《中国货币政策传导信贷渠道的经验研究:总量融资结构的新证据》,《世界经济》第3期,第3~32页。
[10] 于泽、陆怡舟和王闻达,2015,《货币政策执行模式、金融错配与我国企业投资约束》,《管理世界》第9期吗,第52~64页。
[11] 周小川,2015,《深化金融体制改革》,《中国金融》第22期,第58~61页。
[12] Aleem, A..2010. “Transmission Mechanism of Monetary Policy in India”, Journal of Asian Economics, Vol.21(2):186~197.
[13] Afrin, S, Wiemer C..2017.“Monetary Policy Transmission in Bangladesh: Exploring the Lending Channel”, Journal of Asian Economics,Vol.49.
[14] Bernanke, B. and Blinder A. S.1992.“The Federal Funds Rate and the Channels of Monetary Transmission”, American Economic Review, Vol.82(4):901~921.
[15] Bernanke, B S, Mihov I.1998. “Measuring Monetary Policy”. Working Papers in Applied Economic Theory, 113(3):869~902.
[16] Bernanke, and Gertle, 1999,“Monetary Policy and Asset Price Volatility”, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review, 84(September):77~128.
[17] David Dickinson and Jia Liu.2007.“The Real Effects of Monetary Policy in China: An Empirical Analysis”, China Economic Review, Vol.(18):87~111.
[18] Disyatat, P, Vongsinsirikul P..2003.“Monetary Policy and the Transmission Mechanism in Thailand”, Journal of Asian Economics, Vol.14(3):389~418.
[19] Funke, M, Mihaylovski P, Zhu H.,2015, “Monetary Policy Transmission in China: A DSGE Model With Parallel Shadow Banking and Interest Rate Control”, Social Science Electronic Publishing, BOFIT Discussion Papers 9.
[20] Gagnon, J E and Ihrig J..2004. “Monetary Policy and Exchange Rate Pass-through”, International Journal of Finance &Economics, Vol.9(4):315~338.
[21] James Morsink , Tamim Bayoumi.2001.“A Peek Inside the Black Box: The Monetary Transmission Mechanism in Japan”, IMF Staff Papers, 48(1):22~57.
[22] King, Robert G. ,Charles I. Plosser.1986. “Money as the Mechanism of Exchange”,Journal of Monetary Economics, (17):93~115.
[23] Lixin Sun, J.L. Ford, David G. Dickinson. 2010. “Bank Loans and the Effects of Monetary Policy in China: VAR/VECM Approach”, China Economic Review, Vol.(21):65~97.
[24] Mishkin, F S.,1996. “The Channels of Monetary Transmission: Lessons for Monetary Policy”. Nber Working Papers.
[25] Ramey, V..1993.“How Important Is the Credit Channel in the Transmission of Monetary Policy?”, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Vol.39 (Dec.):1~45.
[26] Richard Agénor, Peter J. Montiel. 2015.Development Macroeconomics (Fourth Edition), Published by Princeton University Press, ISBN 9780691130903.
[27] Sun, R..2013. “Does Monetary Policy Matter in China? A Narrative Approach”, China Economic Review, (26):56~74.
[28] Soyoung Kim, Nouriel Roubini. 2000.“Exchange Rate Anomalies in the Industrial Countries: A Solution With a Structural VAR Approach”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 45(3):561~586.
[29] Walsh, C. E.,2010, “Monetary Theory and Policy”, MIT Press, ISBN: 9780262013772.
[30] Wilbur John Coleman.1996.“Money and Output: A Test of Reverse Causation”, The American Economic Review, 86(1):90~111.
[1] 张翔, 刘璐, 李伦一. 国际大宗商品市场金融化与中国宏观经济波动[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 439(1): 35-51.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1