Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2016, Vol. 431 Issue (5): 173-190    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
公司名称、投资者认知与公司价值——基于公司名称评价指标体系的行为金融学研究
贾璐熙, 朱叶, 陈达飞
复旦大学经济学院,上海 200433
Company Names, Investor Recognition, and Firm Value:A Behavioral Finance Investigation Based on the Evaluation Index System of Company Names
JIA Luxi, ZHU Ye, CHEN Dafei
School of Economics, Fudan University
下载:  PDF (1549KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文梳理了公司名称影响投资者决策,进而影响公司价值的理论机制,结合我国投资者的思维模式和信息处理习惯,首次构建出一套反映我国投资者信息处理体验的公司名称评价体系,对我国A股1992-2009年间的上市公司名称进行了评分,并通过实证研究发现:简短、通顺、由常见字词组成以及蕴含良好寓意的公司名称更受投资者喜爱,这类公司的股东基数更大,股票流动性更好,投资者对公司的估值更高。公司名称既可以通过影响股票的需求曲线直接影响股票的均衡价格和公司价值,又可以通过影响公司股东基数和股票的流动性水平间接影响公司价值。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
贾璐熙
朱叶
陈达飞
关键词:  公司名称  投资者认知  公司价值  行为金融    
Abstract:  This paper proposes the mechanism that company names influence investors’ decisions and firm values, originally constructs an evaluation system of company names that reflects investors’ information processing experience by taking domestic investors’ thinking patterns and information processing habits into consideration, then evaluates the names of listed Chinese A shares firms during 1992 to 2009, and draws the following conclusions through empirical research. Short, fluent company names consisted of familiar words and carry auspiciousness are much more popular among investors. Hence these companies enjoy a larger investor base, see higher liquidity in their stocks, and get higher evaluations. Company names can not only affect the equilibrium stock prices and firm values directly through their influences on the demand curves of stocks, but also determine firm values indirectly via investor base and stock liquidity affected by them.
Key words:  Company Names    Investor Recognition    Firm Value    Behavioral Finance
JEL分类号:  G11   G12   G19  
作者简介:  贾璐熙,博士研究生,复旦大学经济学院,Email:13110680033@fudan.edu.cn;朱 叶,经济学博士,教授,复旦大学经济学院,Email:zhuye@fudan.edu.cn;陈达飞,博士研究生,复旦大学经济学院,Email:13110680004@fudan.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
贾璐熙, 朱叶, 陈达飞. 公司名称、投资者认知与公司价值——基于公司名称评价指标体系的行为金融学研究[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 431(5): 173-190.
JIA Luxi, ZHU Ye, CHEN Dafei. Company Names, Investor Recognition, and Firm Value:A Behavioral Finance Investigation Based on the Evaluation Index System of Company Names. Journal of Financial Research, 2016, 431(5): 173-190.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2016/V431/I5/173
[1] 陈辉、顾乃康和万小勇,2011,《股票流动性、股权分置改革与公司价值》,《管理科学》第3期,第43~55页。
[2] 李广子、唐国正和刘力,2011,《股票名称与股票价格非理性联动——中国A股市场的研究》,《管理世界》第1期,第40~51页。
[3] 李小晗和朱红军,2011,《投资者有限关注与信息解读》,《金融研究》第8期,第128~142页。
[4] 刘力和田雅静,2004,《没有信息,也有反应:中国A股市场股票名称变更事件的市场反应研究》,《世界经济》第1期,第44~50页。
[5] 刘亚琴,2008,《股价会受股票名称影响吗?——基于行为金融学的调查研究》,《南开经济研究》第1期,第45~56页。
[6] 俞庆进和张兵,2012,《投资者有限关注与股票收益——以百度指数作为关注度的一项实证研究》,《金融研究》第8期,第152~165页。
[7] Alter, Adam L., and Daniel M. Oppenheimer. 2006. “Predicting Short-term Stock Fluctuations by Using Processing Fluency” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(24): 9369~9372.
[8] Amihud, Yakov. 2002. “Illiquidity and Stock Returns: Cross-section and Time-series Effects” Journal of Financial Markets, 5(1): 31~56.
[9] Amihud, Yakov, and Haim Mendelson. 1986. “Asset Pricing and the Bid-ask Spread” Journal of Financial Economics, 17(2): 223~249.
[10] Bao, Yeqing, Alan T. Shao, and Drew Rivers. 2008. “Creating New Brand Names: Effects of Relevance, Connotation, and Pronunciation” Journal of Advertising Research, 48(1): 148~162.
[11] Chen, Honghui, Gregory Noronha, and Vijay Singal. 2004. “The Price Response to S&P 500 Index Additions and Deletions: Evidence of Asymmetry and a New Explanation” Journal of Finance, 59(4): 1901~1930.
[12] Chen, Zhiwu, and Peng Xiong. 2001. “Discounts on Illiquid Stocks: Evidence from China” Yale ICF Working Paper, No. 00~56.
[13] Coval, Joshua D., and Tobias J. Moskowitz. 1999. “Home Bias at Home: Local Equity Preference in Domestic Portfolios” Journal of Finance, 54(6): 2045~2073.
[14] Coval, Joshua D., and Tobias J. Moskowitz. 2001. “The Geography of Investment: Informed Trading and Asset Prices” Journal of Political Economy, 109(4): 811~841.
[15] Demsetz, Harold. 1968. “The Cost of Transacting” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82(1): 33~53.
[16] Fama, Eugene F., and James D. MacBeth. 1973. “Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests” Journal of Political Economy, 81(3): 607~636.
[17] Feng, Zhiwei. 2006. “Evolution and Present Situation of Corpus Research in China” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(2): 173~207.
[18] French, Kenneth R., and James M. Poterba. 1991. “Investor Diversification and International Equity Markets” American Economic Review, 81(2): 222~226.
[19] Gompers, Paul A., and Andrew Metrick. 2001. “Institutional Investors and Equity Prices” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1): 229~259.
[20] Green, Clifton T., and Russell Jame. 2013. “Company Name Fluency, Investor Recognition, and Firm Value” Journal of Financial Economics, 109(3): 813~834.
[21] Grullon, Gustavo, George Kanatas, and James P. Weston. 2004. “Advertising, Breadth of Ownership, and Liquidity” Review of Financial Studies, 17(2): 439~461.
[22] Hasbrouck, Joel. 2009. “Trading Costs and Returns for U.S. Equities: Estimating Effective Costs from Daily Data” Journal of Finance, 64(3): 1445~1477.
[23] Huberman, Gur. 2001. “Familiarity Breeds Investment” Review of Financial Studies, 14(3): 659~680.
[24] Kaul, Aditya, Vikas Mehrotra, and Randall Morck. 2000. “Demand Curves for Stocks Do Slope Down: New Evidence from an Index Weights Adjustment” Journal of Finance, 55(2): 893~912.
[25] Merton, Robert C. 1987. “A Simple Model of Capital Market Equilibrium with Incomplete Information” Journal of Finance, 42(3): 483~510.
[26] Oppenheimer, Daniel M. 2006. “Consequences of Erudite Vernacular Utilized Irrespective of Necessity: Problems with Using Long Words Needlessly” Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(2): 139~156.
[27] Shleifer, Andrei. 1986. “Do Demand Curves for Stocks Slope Down?” Journal of Finance, 41(3): 579~590.
[28] Song, Hyunjin, and Norbert Schwarz. 2009. “If It’s Difficult to Pronounce, It Must Be Risky: Fluency, Familiarity, and Risk Perception” Psychological Science, 20(2): 135~138.
[29] Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1973. “Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability” Cognitive Psychology, 5(2): 207~232.
[30] Zajonc, Robert B. 1980. “Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need No Inferences” American Psychologist, 35(2): 151~175.
[1] 唐松, 施文, 孙安其. 环境污染曝光与公司价值——理论机制与实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 470(8): 133-150.
[2] 梁上坤, 张宇, 王彦超. 内部薪酬差距与公司价值——基于生命周期理论的新探索[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 466(4): 188-206.
[3] 张倩倩, 周铭山, 董志勇. 研发支出资本化向市场传递了公司价值吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 444(6): 176-190.
[4] 钟腾, 汪昌云. 金融发展与企业创新产出——基于不同融资模式对比视角[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 450(12): 127-142.
[5] 朱凯, 林旭, 洪奕昕, 陈信元. 官员独董的多重功能与公司价值[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 438(12): 128-142.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1