Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2025, Vol. 546 Issue (12): 95-113    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
普惠小微信贷供给与小微企业进入——来自小微支行设立的证据
王贤彬, 许婷君, 严祥起
暨南大学经济学院/中观经济学研究中心,广东广州 510632;
广东省社会科学院财政金融研究所,广东广州 510635
Inclusive Small and Micro Credit Supply and Entry of Small and Micro Enterprises: Evidence from the Establishment of Small and Micro Banks
WANG Xianbin, XU Tingjun, YAN Xiangqi
School of Economics/ Center for Madhyamaka Economics Research, Jinan University;
Institute of Public Finance and Banking, Guangdong Academy of Social Sciences
下载:  PDF (865KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 完善多层次、广覆盖、可持续的普惠金融体系,纾解小微企业面临的融资约束与成本压力,是推动我国经济实现高质量发展的重要支撑。本文构建包含融资约束和融资成本的企业进入理论模型,基于小微支行设立的准自然实验,使用交错双重差分法,考察小微支行设立对小微企业进入及地区就业的影响。研究发现,小微支行设立显著促进小微企业进入,设立县区相比未设立县区小微企业进入率上升25.44%。机制分析表明,小微支行设立通过缓解融资约束、降低融资成本,促进小微企业进入。进一步分析表明,小微支行设立对小微企业的进入效应在发展质量较高企业、高启动资金和技术密集行业以及东部和低财政分权地区更为明显。拓展性分析表明,小微支行增强小微企业吸纳就业能力,进而提高地区就业规模。本研究揭示了小微信贷供给与企业进入的联系,为激发创业活力、提升经济韧性提供了理论依据与政策参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王贤彬
许婷君
严祥起
关键词:  普惠金融  小微支行  企业进入  融资约束    
Summary:  In recent years, small and micro enterprises (SMEs) have faced sustained pressure on their production and operations due to multiple domestic and international factors, including reduced orders, intensifying competition, and rising costs. Inclusive finance, as a key institutional arrangement for promoting the development of the real economy and safeguarding the survival and growth of small and micro enterprises, has drawn considerable attention to its policy effectiveness. To alleviate the financing difficulties of SMEs, the Chinese government has introduced a series of policies centered on inclusive SME credit. Based on this, this paper constructs a panel dataset covering the period from 2009 to 2021 to examine the impact of inclusive micro and small business lending on the market entry behavior of these enterprises. It then proposes policy recommendations from an inclusive finance perspective to enhance the entrepreneurial vitality and operational resilience of micro and small businesses, providing empirical support for a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of inclusive micro and small business lending policies.
First, this paper constructs a theoretical model of enterprise market entry incorporating financing constraints and costs, systematically analyzing the specific mechanisms through which the establishment of micro-enterprise branches influences SME market entry. Second, empirical tests using a staggered difference-in-difference (DID) method reveal that the establishment of small and micro branches (SMBs) significantly promotes SMEs market entry: counties or districts with SMBs exhibit a roughly 25.44% higher SMEs market entry rate than those without. Mechanism tests indicate that SMBs alleviate SMEs' financing constraints and reduce their financing costs, forming a transmission pathway that facilitates market entry. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that this promotional effect is more pronounced in enterprises with higher quality, greater initial capital requirements, and technology-intensive industries, as well as in eastern regions and areas with lower fiscal decentralization. Additional analysis further confirms that the establishment of SMBs significantly enhances the employment absorption capacity of SMEs thereby effectively increasing the regional employment scale.
Compared with existing research, the marginal contributions of this study are primarily reflected in three aspects: First, at the theoretical level, it systematically explains the impact of inclusive microcredit on SMEs market entry and its underlying mechanisms by integrating theoretical models with empirical evidence. This research addresses the insufficient focus on SMEs “market entry” behavior of existing literature, enriching the theoretical framework of SMEs credit while responding to academic debates and skepticism regarding the effectiveness of inclusive microcredit policies. It provides robust empirical evidence from the Chinese context supporting the proposition that “inclusive finance empowers SMEs”. Second, at the methodological level, given the gradual establishment of MSME branches, the study employs a staggered DID approach. By appropriately controlling various fixed effects and exogenous variables, and integrating econometric methods such as instrumental variables and double machine learning, it effectively mitigates endogeneity issues. This provides more robust causal identification evidence for how inclusive micro credit promotes SME market entry. Third, at the data level, we collected and compiled micro data from the EPS China Industrial and Commercial Enterprise Database to measure SME market entry. This data selection avoids sample selection bias potentially encountered in questionnaire-based datasets like the China SMEs Survey or National Tax Survey, while also overcoming measurement errors arising from using SMEs Board or ChiNext-listed companies as proxies for micro and small enterprises. It enables accurate and comprehensive depiction of the spatiotemporal evolution of SMEs across Chinese counties before and after the establishment of SMBs at a finer granularity.
Based on research findings, this paper proposes the following policy recommendations. First, strengthen SMEs financial services within small and medium financial institutions and deepen the development of specialized institutions. Building on the “localized and specialized” positioning of small and medium financial institutions, encourage them to increase the deployment of specialized institutions for micro and small enterprises, reversing the tendency to favor large clients. Second, improve the mechanism for coordinated government and market efforts to establish a long-term micro and small enterprise financial mechanism characterized by “willingness to lend, ability to lend, and expertise in lending”. Simultaneously, deepen rural financial reforms to bridge the “last mile” of policy implementation, achieving an organic integration of an “effective government” and an “efficient market”. Third, implement targeted financial support strategies to optimize credit resource allocation. Financial resource deployment should balance inclusiveness and structural focus, ensuring basic coverage while prioritizing sectors aligned with national strategic priorities, such as technological innovation and manufacturing, and underdeveloped regions.
Keywords:  Inclusive Finance    Small and Micro Branch    Enterprises Entry    Financing Constraints
JEL分类号:  D21   G21   G28  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家自然科学基金面上项目(72273052)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  许婷君,经济学博士,助理研究员,广东省社会科学院财政金融研究所,E-mail:xu_ting_n@163.com.   
作者简介:  王贤彬,经济学博士,教授,暨南大学经济学院/中观经济学研究中心,E-mail:wangxianbin123@163.com.严祥起,经济学博士,暨南大学经济学院,E-mail:evariste910@163.com.
引用本文:    
王贤彬, 许婷君, 严祥起. 普惠小微信贷供给与小微企业进入——来自小微支行设立的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 546(12): 95-113.
WANG Xianbin, XU Tingjun, YAN Xiangqi. Inclusive Small and Micro Credit Supply and Entry of Small and Micro Enterprises: Evidence from the Establishment of Small and Micro Banks. Journal of Financial Research, 2025, 546(12): 95-113.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2025/V546/I12/95
[1] 蔡栋梁、王海军、黄金和黄宇虹,2024,《银行数字化转型对小微企业自主创新的影响——兼论数字金融的协同作用》,《南开管理评论》第3期,第39~51页。
[2] 范琳琳和周铭山,2023,《风险投资经验、投资行为与初创科技企业存活——基于风险投资税收优惠的准自然试验》,《管理科学学报》第12期,第135~154页。
[3] 郭沛瑶和尹志超,2022,《小微企业自主创新驱动力——基于数字普惠金融视角的证据》,《经济学动态》第2期,第85~104页。
[4] 李昊然、刘诗源和康润琦,2023,《普惠金融与小微企业破产风险——来自小微支行设立的准自然实验》,《经济研究》第11期,第153~171页。
[5] 李华民和吴非,2015,《谁在为小微企业融资:一个经济解释》,《财贸经济》第5期,第48~58页。
[6] 卢盛峰和张浩天,2024,《政府邻近、公共投资与县域经济发展》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第6期,第111~128页。
[7] 莫怡青和李力行,2022,《零工经济对创业的影响——以外卖平台的兴起为例》,《管理世界》第2期,第31~45页。
[8] 盛天翔和范从来,2020,《金融科技、最优银行业市场结构与小微企业信贷供给》,《金融研究》第6期,第114~132页。
[9] 宋昌耀、李涛和李国平,2021,《地理距离对中国民营企业银行贷款的影响》,《地理学报》第8期,第1835~1847页。
[10] 宋凌云和王贤彬,2013,《重点产业政策、资源重置与产业生产率》,《管理世界》第12期,第63~77页。
[11] 王小鲁、樊纲和胡李鹏,2020,《中国分省企业经营环境指数2020年报告》,社会科学文献出版社。
[12] 肖兴志、张伟广和朝镛,2019,《僵尸企业与就业增长:保护还是排挤?》,《管理世界》第8期,第69~83页。
[13] 谢绚丽、沈艳、张皓星和郭峰,2018,《数字金融能促进创业吗?——来自中国的证据》,《经济学(季刊)》第4期,第1557~1580页。
[14] 徐丽鹤、王冉冉、王睿新、李炳昭和田楚齐,2023,《中国中小微企业发展——数据与新发现》,《经济科学》第1期,第5~26页。
[15] 喻微锋、康琦和周永锋,2020,《商业银行设立普惠金融事业部能提高小微企业信贷可得性吗?——基于PSM-DID模型的实证检验》,《国际金融研究》第11期,第77~86页。
[16] 张光利、薛慧丽和林嵩,2022,《IPO事件对地区创业活动的影响研究》,《财经研究》第5期,第125~139页。
[17] 张建华和程文,2019,《服务业供给侧结构性改革与跨越中等收入陷阱》,《中国社会科学》第3期,第39~61页。
[18] 张铭心、谢申祥、强皓凡和郑乐凯,2022,《数字普惠金融与小微企业出口:雪中送炭还是锦上添花》,《世界经济》第1期,第30~59页。
[19] 赵家琪、江弘毅、胡诗云和沈艳,2023,《数字普惠金融下的小微信贷与风险——基于银行数字化转型的视角》,《经济学(季刊)》第5期,第1686~1703页。
[20] 郑录军、韩庆潇和王兆旭,2023,《金融科技、目标相容与小微信贷供给——基于区域问卷调查的微观银行证据》,《国际金融研究》第3期,第50~60页。
[21] 中国企业创新创业调查2018年课题组、张晓波、王冉冉和徐丽鹤,2022,《中国企业创新创业的特征事实及企业家画像》,《产业经济评论》第1期,第38~57页。
[22] 朱民、张龙梅和彭道菊,2020,《中国产业结构转型与潜在经济增长率》,《中国社会科学》第11期,第149~171页。
[23] Adelino, M., Schoar, A., and Severino, F., 2015, “House Prices, Collateral, and Self-employment”, Journal of Financial Economics, 117(2), pp. 288~306.
[24] Attanasio, O., Augsburg, B., and De Haas, R., 2019, “Microcredit Contracts, Risk Diversification and Loan Take-up”, Journal of the European Economic Association, 17(6), pp. 1797~1842.
[25] Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., and Kinnan, C., 2015, “The Miracle of Microfinance? Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation”, American Economic Journal: Applied economics, 7(1), pp. 22~53.
[26] Bazzi, S., Muendler, M. A., Oliveira, R. F., and Rauch, J. E., 2023, “Credit Supply Shocks and Firm Dynamics: Evidence from Brazil”, National Bureau of Economic Research.
[27] Beck, Thorsten, Ross Levine, and Alexey Levkov. “Big bad banks? The winners and losers from bank deregulation in the United States”, The Journal of Finance 65.5 (2010), pp. 1637~1667.
[28] Chen, Donghua, Oliver Zhen Li, and Fu Xin., 2017, “Five-year plans, China finance and their consequences”, China Journal of Accounting Research, 10(3), pp. 189~230.
[29] Cornille D, Rycx F, Tojerow I., 2019, “Heterogeneous Effects of Credit Constraints on SMEs’Employment: Evidence from the European Sovereign Debt Crisis”, Journal of Financial Stability, 41, pp. 1~13.
[30] Dixit, Avinash K., and Joseph E. Stiglitz. 1977, “Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity”, The American Economic Review, 67(3), pp. 297~308.
[31] Duflo, E., 2001, “Schooling and Labor Market Consequences of School Construction in Indonesia: Evidence from an Unusual Policy Experiment”, American Economic Review, 91(4), pp. 795~813.
[32] Evans, D. S., and Jovanovic, B., 1989, “An Estimated Model of Entrepreneurial Choice Under Liquidity Constraints”, Journal of Political Economy, 97(4), pp. 808~827.
[33] Ioannidou, V., Pavanini, N., and Peng, Y., 2022, “Collateral and Asymmetric Information in Lending Markets”, Journal of Financial Economics, 144(1), pp. 93~121.
[34] Melitz, M. J., 2003, “The Impact of Trade on Intra‐industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity”, Econometrica, 71(6), pp. 1695~1725.
[35] Nitani, M., and Legendre, N., 2021, “Cooperative Lenders and the Performance of Small Business Loans”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 128: 106125.
[36] Rajan, R. G., and Zingales, L., 1998, “Power in a Theory of the Firm”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2), pp. 387~432.
[37] Wette, H. C., 1983, “Collateral in Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information: Note”, The American Economic Review, 73(3), pp. 442~445.
[1] 谢贞发, 朱东霞. 政府投资基金的产业带动效应——来自企业进入的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 542(8): 113-131.
[2] 熊鹏翀, 纪洋, 朱孟楠. 市场化征信机构与中小企业融资约束——来自世界银行企业调查数据的微观证据[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 541(7): 39-56.
[3] 张龙耀, 李渊, 郜栋玺. 提低扩中:普惠金融能否实现益贫式增长?[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 539(5): 21-38.
[4] 万晓莉, 叶芸绮, 方芳. 从抵押物到现金流:间接融资如何支持创新型企业?[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 537(3): 58-75.
[5] 何昊楠, 彭玲玲, 李劢, 陈泽丰, 刘晓蕾. 金融基础设施数字化建设与普惠金融发展——基于应收账款融资的微观证据[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 537(3): 94-112.
[6] 刘晓玲, 陈胜蓝, 马慧, 王鹏程. 环境保护税、企业进入决策与产业体系绿色转型[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 537(3): 113-130.
[7] 王慧强, 邵新建. 新股发行定价、融资约束与公司内部收入不平等[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 544(10): 151-169.
[8] 王剑锋, 倪丹丹, 王骜然, 马太超. 加入合作社与农户信贷可得性——基于合作社发展质量的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 530(8): 169-187.
[9] 徐枫, 吕纤, 郑耀东. 银行竞争、卖空机制与企业融资约束[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 528(6): 132-150.
[10] 方颖, 汪怀, 郭晔. 贷款市场化定价、企业融资成本与信贷配置效率[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 526(4): 38-55.
[11] 夏俊杰, 邓尚沅, 徐铭梽. 中小企业发展与银行结构——基于进出口经营权改革的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 533(11): 76-93.
[12] 许锐, 王艳艳, 于李胜. 专利质押贷款的创新激励效应[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 532(10): 58-75.
[13] 吕勇斌, 李志生, 郭懿晨. 逆风前行:台风灾害与银行风险行为[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 523(1): 19-37.
[14] 吴翌琳, 张旻, 于鸿君. 融资方式与企业二元创新路径选择——基于技术创新与非技术创新视角[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 523(1): 38-55.
[15] 黄卓, 陶云清, 王帅. 社会信用环境改善降低了企业违规吗?——来自“中国社会信用体系建设”的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 515(5): 96-114.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[4] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[5] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[6] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[7] 孙淑伟, 梁上坤, 阮刚铭, 付宇翔. 高管减持、信息压制与股价崩盘风险[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 175 -190 .
[8] 王攀娜, 罗宏. 放松卖空管制对分析师预测行为的影响——来自中国准自然实验的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 191 -206 .
[9] 王丽艳, 马光荣. 帆随风动、人随财走?——财政转移支付对人口流动的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 18 -34 .
[10] 潘彬, 王去非, 金雯雯. 时变视角下非正规借贷利率的货币政策反应研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 52 -67 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1