Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2025, Vol. 539 Issue (5): 1-20    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
估值效应对国际收支延迟调整能力的影响研究
李贺, 李婧, 姜雪晴
河北经贸大学金融学院,河北石家庄 050061;
首都经济贸易大学经济学院,北京 100070;
中国人民银行金融研究所,北京 100033
A Study on the Impact of Valuation Effect on the Ability to Delay Capacity of the Balance of Payments
LI He LI Jing JIANG Xueqing
School of Finance, Hebei University of Economics and Business;
School of Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business;
Research Institute, the People's Bank of China
下载:  PDF (961KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 国际收支平衡对于促进经济内部均衡具有重要意义。国际收支失衡的经济体面临调整压力。本文采用1990—2020年50个经济体的年度数据验证了估值效应对国际收支失衡及延迟调整能力的影响。研究发现,正估值效应有助于平滑负向外部失衡,提升延迟调整能力。分析表明,汇率和收益因素下资产价格变动引起的估值效应对延迟调整能力的影响更加显著,改善资产结构有助于提升国际收支延迟调整能力。当大规模跨境资本流动成为常态,金融调整渠道下的估值效应重要性愈发凸显,对延迟调整能力的提升作用更为显著;在低经济增长、高政治风险和高人口抚养比的国家,负估值效应会带来更大的外部失衡压力,降低其国际收支延迟调整能力。美国通过从新兴市场和中低收入国家吸收资本利得,增强自身经常项目韧性而削弱他国延迟调整能力,维系“无泪赤字”。可见,全球经济再平衡具有不对称性。为实现外部再平衡,建议新兴市场国家重视实体经济发展,同时改善官方储备资产结构,保持汇率基本稳定,完善金融体系。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李贺
李婧
姜雪晴
关键词:  外部失衡  经常项目赤字  估值效应  延迟调整能力    
Summary:  Balance of payments equilibrium as an essential objective of macroeconomics is of great significance for promoting internal and external economic balance, safeguarding national economic security, and ensuring financial stability. The United States. has sustained persistent “twin deficits” in its current account and fiscal balance without triggering a balance of payments crisis. The key to this puzzle lies in the delay capacity of balance of payments. Capital gains driven by valuation effects bolster the U.S. external solvency, relax its financial constraints, and enhance debt repayment capacity. This mechanism postpones necessary balance-of-payments adjustments, thereby reinforcing the exorbitant privilege of the U.S. dollar and perpetuating America's “BoP deficit without tears”, and the U.S. monetary policy adjustment will generate wide spillover effect to other countries.
In context of “two overall situations”, China is facing up challenges in achieving “dual circulation”. On the one hand, economic and trade frictions between the United States and China escalated, however, bilateral economic ties between the two countries are too connected to decouple. The changes in the U.S. balance-of-payment adjustment policies directly impact China's external economy. By analyzing how the valuation effects influence the delay capacity of balance of payments, a deeper understanding of the delayed privilege that the valuation effect confer on the United States under the current international monetary system, can facilitate accurate assessment of global economic trends and effectively, manage the spillover effects of the U.S. policy adjustments; On the other hand, China is at a critical stage in transferring to a mature creditor country, marked by significant structural shifts in its balance of payments. The decline in current account surplu may become normal in the future. Enhancing China's delay capacity of the balance of payments can help buffer against external risks, promote the domestic and international dual circulation, therefore achieve the internal and external balance.
This paper explores the theoretical modeling and empirical analysis to examine the logical relationships between valuation effects and external imbalances / delay capacity of balance of payments. Firstly, based on an intertemporal budget constraint framework, this paper demonstrates that positive valuation effects contribute to smoothing negative external imbalances and enhance a nation's delay capacity of balance of payments. Secondly, by utilizing macroeconomic data from the External Wealth of Nations Database, World Development Indicators, and Federal Reserve Economic Data, the paper constructs a panel dataset covering 50 economies from 1990 to 2020, empirically testing the valuation effects' impact on external imbalances and delay capacity of balance of payments. The heterogeneity analysis reveals that, in terms of the sources of valuation effects, the impact of exchange rate and filed factors on delay capacity exhibits more significant. In terms of asset category, equity net assets are crucial for strengthening the valuation effects and thus the delay capacity. In terms of country types, the countries with low economic growth, high political risk and high dependency ratio, the negative valuation effects have a more significant impact on reducing the delay capacity of balance of payments.
The empirical findings further confirm the spillover effects of the U.S. policy adjustments on peripheral economies under the international monetary system, as well as how these countries can enhance their own delay capacity of the balance of payments. By absorbing capital gains from emerging markets and the low and middle-income countries,the U.S. monetary policy adjustments can temporarily impact the valuation effects of these countries, enhance its own balance of payments resilience while weaken the others' delay capacity to adjustment, thus maintaining the U.S. “BoP deficit without tear”. This highlights the asymmetry in global economic rebalancing. Other countries can enhance its delay capacity by valuation effects by strengthening monetary policy independence, improving official asset structure (e.g. increasing gold reserves) and enhancing the exchange rate flexibility, enlarge the improvement of valuation effect in delay capacity.
This paper ’s marginal contributions to current literature are reflected in three key aspects. Firstly, it enriches the theory of global economic rebalancing and validate the core of U.S. delay capacity of balance of payments and the economic logic behind a“deficit without tear”. Secondly, it identifies the long-term mechanism underlying the “deficit without tears” in the U.S. balance of payments and proposes that asset price volatility is the core determinant of the delay capacity. Thirdly, it highlights the asymmetry and unfairness of global imbalances, offers crucial insights into the redistribution effects of global balance of payments rebalancing, and provides a reference for peripheral economies in the international monetary system (including China) in maintaining the internal and external economic balance.
The policy implications of this paper are as follows. Firstly, the valuation effects can temporarily adjust the external imbalances, but in the long run, the result of valuation effects is equilibrium and the improvement of real economic structure is the key to rebalancing; Secondly, a country can optimize its asset and liability structure to reduce the influence from negative valuation effects caused by core countries' monetary policy adjustments, alleviate their own external adjustment pressure, better smooth financial market fluctuations, and ensure sustainable economic development; Thirdly, the responsibility for rebalancing global imbalances is unevenly distributed, with the delayed capacity of core countries such as the United States moves burden on other countries. Given China's significant role in global trade and investment networks, in the long term, China should not only share the responsibility of adjustment and also insist on relying on multilateral platforms to play a role in global macroeconomic policy coordination; Fourthly, for China and other emerging market economies, improving currency status and monetary functions may be conducive to external economic rebalancing. In this context,strengthening the Renminbi's functions as international currency are the key efforts to promote high-level financial openness, build a strong financial country, and achieve Chinese-style modernization.
Keywords:  External Imbalance    Current Account Deficit    Evaluation Effect    Delay Capacity
JEL分类号:  F21   F32   F41  
基金资助: *本文感谢国家自然科学基金青年项目(72403174),北京市国际金融学会重点项目(BIFS241005)和首都经济贸易大学学术创新团队项目(XSCXTD202501)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  李 婧,经济学博士,教授,首都经济贸易大学经济学院,E-mail: lijingchinablue@163.com.   
作者简介:  李 贺,经济学博士,讲师,河北经贸大学金融学院,E-mail: lihe0311183@163.com.
姜雪晴,经济学博士,助理研究员,中国人民银行金融研究所,E-mail: jiangxueqing930@163.com.
引用本文:    
李贺, 李婧, 姜雪晴. 估值效应对国际收支延迟调整能力的影响研究[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 539(5): 1-20.
LI He LI Jing JIANG Xueqing. A Study on the Impact of Valuation Effect on the Ability to Delay Capacity of the Balance of Payments. Journal of Financial Research, 2025, 539(5): 1-20.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2025/V539/I5/1
[1] [美]本杰明·科恩,2017,《货币强权》,张琦译,中信出版社。
[2] 宋科、杨雅鑫和苏治,2021,《全球失衡条件下的货币政策传导机制:基于估值效应视角》,《世界经济》第4期,第54~83页。
[3] 谭小芬、虞梦薇和王欣康,2023,《跨境资本流动的新特征、新风险及其政策建议》,《国际金融研究》第4期,第17~28页。
[4] 肖立晟、夏广涛、袁梦怡和范小云,2022,《不平等国际货币体系下中国的“过度损失”》,《经济学(季刊)》第1期,第323~342页。
[5] 肖立晟和陈思翀,2013,《中国国际投资头寸表失衡与金融调整渠道》,《经济研究》第7期,第20~34页。
[6] 余永定,2024,《见证失衡II:双顺差的结束、人民币国际化和美元武器化》,电子工业出版社。
[7] 张礼卿和钟茜,2020,《全球金融周期、美国货币政策与“三元悖论”》,《金融研究》第2期,第15~33页。
[8] Allen, C., D. Gautam and L. Juvenal, 2023, “Currencies of External Balance Sheets”, IMF Working Papers, No. 237.
[9] Amol, A. and E. G. J. Luttmer, 2024, “Unique Implementation of Permanent Primary Deficits?”, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Working Papers, No. 807.
[10] Arslanalp, S., B. Eichengreen and C. Simpson-Bell, 2023, “Gold as International Reserves: A Barbarous Relic No More?”, Journal of International Economics, 145, 103822.
[11] Bergant, K., 2021, “The Role of Stock-flow Adjustment during the Global Financial Crisis”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 110, 102261.
[12] Brunnermeier, M. K., S. Merkel and Y. Sannikov, 2024, “Safe Assets”, Journal of Political Economy, 132(11), pp.3603~3657.
[13] Curcuru, S. E., C. P. Thomas and F. E. Warnock, 2008, “Current Account Sustainability and Relative Reliability”, NBER Working Papers, No. 14295.
[14] Evans, M. D. D., 2014, “Risk, External Adjustment and Capital Flows”, Journal of International Economics, 92(4), pp.S68~S93.
[15] Evans, M. D. D., 2017. “External Balances, Trade and Financial Conditions”, Journal of International Economics, 107(7), pp.165~184.
[16] Gourinchas, P. O. and H. Rey, 2005, “From World Banker to World Venture Capitalist: US External Adjustment and the Exorbitant Privilege”, NBER Working Papers, No. 11563.
[17] Gourinchas, P. O. and H. Rey, 2007, “International Financial Adjustment”, Journal of Political Economy, 115(4), pp.665~703.
[18] Gourinchas, P. O. and H. Rey, 2013, “External Adjustment, Global Imbalances and Valuation Effects”, NBER Working Papers, No. 19240.
[19] Gourinchas, P. O., H. Rey and M. Sauzet, 2019, “The International Monetary and Financial System”, Annual Review of Economics, 11, pp.859~893.
[20] Herkenhoff, P. and P. Sauré,2021, “How Expected Inflation Distorts the Current Account and the Valuation Effect”, European Economic Review, 135, 103721.
[21] Hu, W., G. Xia and Y. Li, 2024, “A New Tri-channel Decomposition of External Adjustment: Model and Application”, China & World Economy, 32(4), pp.68~84.
[22] Jiang, Z., R. J. Richmond and T. Zhang, 2024a, “A Portfolio Approach to Global Imbalances”, The Journal of Finance, 79(3), pp.2025~2076.
[23] Jiang, Z., H. Lustig and S. Van Nieuwerburgh et al., 2024b, “The U.S. Public Debt Valuation Puzzle”, Econometrica, 92(4). pp.1309~1347.
[24] Lane, P. R. and G. M. Milesi-Ferretti, 2001, “The External Wealth of Nations: Measures of Foreign Assets and Liabilities for Industrial and Developing Countries”, Journal of International Economics, 55(2), pp.263~294.
[25] Miao, J. and D. Su, 2024, “Fiscal and Monetary Policy Interactions in a Model with Low Interest Rates”, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 16(4), pp.35~76.
[26] Pavlova, A. and R. Rigobon, 2010, “An Asset-pricing View of External Adjustment”, Journal of International Economics, 80(1), pp.144~156.
[27] Rueff,J.,1961,“Le Gdd Exchange Standard”,Le Monde,June28.
[28] Rueff,J.,1971,“Le Péché” Monnétaire de I'occident” Plon,Palis.
[29] Schuster, F., M. Alnasaa and L. Bounader I. Jung, J. Menkulasi and J. Mota, 2024, “Debt Surges—Drivers, Consequences, and Policy Implications”, IMF Working Papers, No. 050.”
[1] 谭小芬, 李子若, 赵茜, 卢冰. 货币政策分化与跨境银行资本流动的部门间配置——兼论官方部门的“缓冲器”作用[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 534(12): 1-19.
[2] 王孝松, 袁佳圻, 冯晟. 国际关系与跨国并购——来自中国企业的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 531(9): 20-38.
[3] 杨娇辉, 王伟, 冯云. 经济政策不确定性、国家宏观风险与国际证券投资[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 530(8): 58-76.
[4] 颜色, 辛星. 中国历史上的国际收支估算:1550—1948[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 513(3): 188-206.
[5] 毛其淋, 杨晓冬. 破解中国制造业产能过剩的新路径:外资开放政策的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 505(7): 38-56.
[6] 肖立晟, 徐子桐, 范小云. 估算中国的IFDI和OFDI——来自“避税天堂”与返程投资的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 500(2): 40-60.
[7] 杨连星. 反倾销如何影响了跨国并购[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 494(8): 61-79.
[8] 景光正, 盛斌. 金融结构如何影响了外资进入方式选择?[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 491(5): 59-77.
[9] 罗长远, 曾帅. “走出去”对企业融资约束的影响——基于“一带一路”倡议准自然实验的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 484(10): 92-112.
[10] 陈琳, 袁志刚, 朱一帆. 人民币汇率波动如何影响中国企业的对外直接投资?[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 477(3): 21-38.
[11] 吕朝凤, 毛霞. 地方金融发展能够影响FDI的区位选择吗?——一个基于城市商业银行设立的准自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 477(3): 58-76.
[12] 沈春苗, 郑江淮. 中国企业“走出去” 获得发达国家“核心技术”了吗? ——基于技能偏向性技术进步视角的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 463(1): 111-127.
[13] 罗长远, 毛成学, 柴晴圆. 美国对外直接投资:中国是一个特别的目的地吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 462(12): 72-90.
[14] 吕朝凤, 黄梅波. 金融发展能够影响FDI的区位选择吗[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 458(8): 137-154.
[15] 严宝玉. 我国跨境资金流动的顺周期性、预警指标和逆周期管理[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 456(6): 22-39.
[1] 贾君怡, 潘慧峰, 宋敏杰. 资管产品估值规范如何影响债券市场效率?——来自资管新规的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 538(4): 39 -56 .
[2] 张龙耀, 李渊, 郜栋玺. 提低扩中:普惠金融能否实现益贫式增长?[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 539(5): 21 -38 .
[3] 张少辉, 余泳泽, 陶云清. 新型“政银担”模式与小微企业投资——基于风险共担的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 539(5): 57 -75 .
[4] 王雄元, 王慧娴, 王子平. 竞争对手主持或参与标准制定与企业创新质量[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 539(5): 95 -113 .
[5] 孙传旺, 何一若. 低碳转型中差异化绿色金融政策的驱动机制与协同影响——基于引入多元绿色金融工具的DSGE模型[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 539(5): 114 -132 .
[6] 邓国营, 李欣媛, 颜镜洲, 邓启运. 媒体ESG报道情绪与公司债券风险溢价——基于信息传导视角的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 539(5): 133 -151 .
[7] 郭豫媚, 王航, 郭田勇, 郭俊杰. 中央银行通货膨胀预期管理有效性评估——基于文本通货膨胀预期指数的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 538(4): 1 -20 .
[8] 兰天琪, 陈运森, 赵瑞瑞, 贾宁. 股东诉讼溢出与策略性信息披露[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 539(5): 188 -206 .
[9] 王筱澍, 胡涛, 宋芳秀. 信用衍生品发行对民营企业融资成本的影响——基于信用风险缓释凭证微观数据的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 539(5): 76 -94 .
[10] 栗宇丹, 郭雅婷, 罗炜. 产业政策与债券发行定价效率[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 539(5): 152 -170 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1