Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2025, Vol. 538 Issue (4): 189-206    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基金再申购行为中的近因效应研究
伍燕然, 祁莉莉, 李忠太
北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院,北京 100875;
青海师范大学经济管理学院,青海西宁 810008;
恒丰银行股份有限公司博士后工作站,山东济南 250013
A Study on the Recency Effect in Mutual Fund Repurchase Behavior
WU Yanran, QI Lili, LI Zhongtai
Business School, Beijing Normal University;
School of Economics and Management,Qinghai Normal University;
Postdoctoral Research Station, Hengfeng Bank Co., Ltd.
下载:  PDF (748KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本研究基于独特的账户级交易数据,系统分析了中国共同基金市场中个人投资者的再申购行为及近因效应的影响。研究结果表明,相较于其他基金,个人投资者更倾向于再次申购此前盈利的基金。此外,近因效应对基金个人投资者的再申购决策有重要影响。具体表现为,投资者近期在其他基金上的交易,无论是申购还是赎回,均会显著降低其再申购倾向。同时,近期交易频率越高,基金个人投资者的再申购倾向越低。本文从买入决策视角揭示了投资者的行为偏差,丰富了对基金个人投资者的决策过程和行为模式的研究,有助于引导投资者形成更准确的自我认知和理性投资决策,促进基金市场的健康发展。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
伍燕然
祁莉莉
李忠太
关键词:  行为金融  基金个人投资者  再申购行为  近因效应    
Summary:  Existing research has primarily focused on the behavioral patterns of stock investors, while studies on mutual fund investors have largely centered on fund managers. Within the limited literature on individual mutual fund investors, most attention has been directed toward the redemption behavior, with relatively little emphasis on buying behavior. A key challenge in this area is the difficulty of defining the set of funds available for potential purchase. This issue can be mitigated by focusing on repurchase behavior, as previously redeemed funds form a naturally observable and well-defined choice set. Although prior studies have explored stock investors' repurchase behavior, notable differences between stock and fund investors—in trading frequency, investment strategies, performance, and disposition effect—necessitate further investigation into whether mutual fund investors exhibit similar behavioral biases.
We utilize micro-level data from a major anonymous online mutual fund distribution platform. Our analysis is based on complete transaction and portfolio records from 200,000 individual investors between 2018 and 2019. Using a Logit model, we empirically examine investors' repurchase decisions and assess the influence of the recency effect. Grounded in behavioral finance theory, this paper systematically explores the cognitive mechanisms underlying mutual fund repurchase behavior. Our findings reveal that investors prefer to repurchase funds previously redeemed at a gain compared to other previously redeemed funds. Importantly, the recency effect substantially influences individual investors' repurchase decisions. Specifically, recent transactions involving other funds—whether subscriptions or redemptions—significantly reduce investors' propensity to repurchase previously redeemed funds. Additionally, a higher frequency of recent transactions further decreases the likelihood of repurchasing previously redeemed funds. Finally, the repurchase decisions of experienced investors are less affected by the recency bias.
This paper makes several contributions to existing literature. First, our study shifts the focus from the widely studied selling behavior of individual investors to an in-depth analysis of their buying behavior in the mutual fund context, extending the understanding of investor trading activities beyond single-security decisions. Second, we introduce the recency effect—a relatively underexplored cognitive bias—into the study of mutual fund trading behavior. Based on the research of Nofsinger and Varma (2013), this paper further refines the measurement of recency effect from two dimensions of transaction type (subscription and redemption) and transaction frequency, and comprehensively examines its influence on repurchase behavior. Third, unlike prior studies that focus on single-security decisions, we adopt a portfolio-level perspective to examine how transactions in other funds influence repurchase decisions, offering new insights into cross-security behavioral patterns.
Based on our findings, we offer three policy recommendations. First, investor education and emotional management programs should be strengthened to reduce irrational behaviors driven by cognitive biases such as the recency effect. Second, fund distribution platforms should enhance their customization and intelligent decision support functions. Fund sales institutions should make use of algorithm recommendation and intelligent reminder functions, based on investors' historical transaction data and investment preferences, to prompt them to pay attention to long-term performance and risk, avoid excessive attention to recent transactions and short-term performance, reduce the negative impact of recency bias, and promote the reasonable allocation of investment portfolio. Third, regulatory authorities should improve investor transaction data infrastructure and promote controlled data sharing. This initiative would support behavioral finance research and evidence-based policymaking, ultimately contributing to the sustainable development of the mutual fund market.
Future research can extend this study in several meaningful directions. First, comparing the repurchase behavior of online and offline mutual fund investors could help evaluate the generalizability of the findings. Second, investigating differences in repurchase behavior between passive and active fund investors may clarify how fund type shapes investor decision-making patterns. Third, examining the relationship between repurchase behavior and investment performance can offer insights into the long-term impact of cognitive biases on investor outcomes. These extensions would enhance the theoretical understanding of mutual fund subscription behavior and provide empirical evidence to inform fintech development and policy optimization.
Keywords:  Behavioral Finance    Individual Investor    Recency Effect
JEL分类号:  G02   G20   G11   G14  
基金资助: * 本文感谢北京市习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想研究中心重点项目(23LLLJB072)的资助。本研究所使用数据由数字经济开放研究平台(www.deor.org.cn)支持。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  李忠太,经济学博士,恒丰银行股份有限公司博士后工作站,E-mail:liztmail123@163.com.   
作者简介:  伍燕然,管理学博士,教授,北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院,E-mail:Wuyrbnu@163.com.
祁莉莉,博士研究生,北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院;讲师,青海师范大学经济管理学院,E-mail:qilili@mail.bnu.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
伍燕然, 祁莉莉, 李忠太. 基金再申购行为中的近因效应研究[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 538(4): 189-206.
WU Yanran, QI Lili, LI Zhongtai. A Study on the Recency Effect in Mutual Fund Repurchase Behavior. Journal of Financial Research, 2025, 538(4): 189-206.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2025/V538/I4/189
[1] 胡聪慧、亓婧宇和徐鑫,2024,《信用交易会放大个人投资者的卖出行为偏差吗》,《财贸经济》第3期,第93~109页。
[2] 江静琳、王正位、向虹宇和廖理,2019,《金融知识与基金投资收益:委托投资能否替代金融知识》,《世界经济》第8期,第170~192页。
[3] 李凤、吴卫星、李东平和路晓蒙,2023,《投资者教育发挥作用了吗?——来自公募基金个人投资者调查数据的证据》,《金融研究》第1期,第150~168页。
[4] 王美今,2005,《我国基金投资者的处置效应——基于交易账户数据的持续期模型研究》,《中山大学学报(社会科学版)》第6期,第122~128页。
[5] 伍燕然、黄文婷、苏凇和江婕,2016,《基金投资者处置效应的个体差异》,《国际金融研究》第3期,第84~96页。
[6] 闫竹、王正位和佀佳欣,2024,《投资者短视影响基金投资收益吗——基于公募基金个人投资者调查数据》,《金融经济学研究》第9期,第113~132页。
[7] 张春霞、刘淳和廖理,2013,《是什么使我们陷入非理性陷阱》,《统计研究》第8期,第92~101页。
[8] 周铭山、周开国、张金华和刘玉珍,2011,《我国基金投资者存在处置效应吗?——基于国内某大型开放式基金交易的研究》,《投资研究》第10期,第87~97页。
[9] 左大勇和陆蓉,2013,《理性程度与投资行为——基于机构和个人基金投资者行为差异研究》,《财贸经济》第10期,第59~69页。
[10] Arikan, O., A.E.Gozluklu, G.H. Kim and H. Sakaguchi, 2019, “Primacy in Stock Market Participation: The Effect of Initial Returns on Market Re-entry Decisions”, The European Journal of Finance, 25(10), pp. 883~909.
[11] Ashton, R. H. and K. Jane, 2002, “Eliminating Recency with Self-Review: The Case of Auditors ‘Going Concern' Judgments”, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(3), pp. 221~231.
[12] Bailey, W., A. Kumar and D. Ng, 2011, “Behavioral Biases of Mutual Fund Investors”, Journal of Financial Economics, 102(1), pp. 1~27.
[13] Barber, B. M. and T. Odean, 2000, “Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors”, Journal of Finance, 55, pp. 773~806.
[14] Barber, B. M. and T. Odean, 2001, “Boys Will Be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, pp. 261~292.
[15] Barber, B. M., and T. Odean, 2008, “All That Glitters: The Effect of Attention on the Buying Behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors”, Review of Financial Studies, 21, pp. 785~818.
[16] Ben-David, I., Li, J., Rossi, A., and Y. Song, 2022, “What Do Mutual Fund Investors Really Care About?”, The Review of Financial Studies, 35(4), pp. 1723~1774.
[17] Capon, N., G. Fitzsimons and R. Prince, 1996, “An Individual Level Analysis of the Mutual Fund Investment Decision”, Journal of Financial Services Research, 10(1), pp. 59~82.
[18] Cen, X., 2024, “Smartphone Trading Technology, Investor Behavior, and Mutual Fund Performance”, Management Science, 70(10), pp. 6483~7343.
[19] Chang, T. M., D. H. Solomon and M. M. Westerfield, 2016, “Looking for Someone to Blame: Delegation, Cognitive Dissonance, and the Disposition Effect”, Journal of Finance, 71(1), pp. 267~302.
[20] Dahlquist, M., Martinez, J. V., and P. Soderlind, 2017, “Individual Investor Activity and Performance”, The Review of Financial Studies, 30(3), pp. 866~899.
[21] Dalt, C. D., D. Feldman, G. Garvey,and P.J.Westerholm, 2019, “Contrarians or Momentum Chasers? Individual Investors' Behavior When Trading Exchange-Traded Funds”, Journal of Futures Markets, 39, pp. 553~578.
[22] Daniel, K., D. Hirshleifer and A. Subrahmanyam, 1998, “Investor Psychology and Security Market Under-and Overreactions”, The Journal of Finance, 53(6), pp. 1839~1885.
[23] Dhar, R., and N. Zhu, 2006, “Up Close and Personal: An Individual Level Analysis of the Disposition Effect”, Management Science, 52(5), pp. 726~740.
[24] Ebbinghaus, H., 1913, Memory: “A Contribution to Experimental Psychology”, Columbia University Press.
[25] Highhouse, S. and A. Gallo, 1997, “Order Effects in Personnel Decision Making”, Human Performance, 10(1), pp. 31~46.
[26] Hogarth, R. M., and H. J. Einhorn, 1992, “Order Effects in Belief Updating: The Belief-Adjustment Model”, Cognitive Psychology, 24(1), pp. 1~55.
[27] Jiang, J., D. G. Shrider, T. Huang and Y. Wu, 2021, “Are Mutual Fund Investors Loss Averse? Evidence from China”, Financial Review, 56(2), pp. 231~250.
[28] Kaniel, R., G. Saar and S. Titman, 2008, “Individual Investor Trading and Stock Returns”, Journal of Finance, 63(1), pp. 273~310.
[29] Kaustia, M., and S. Knupfer, 2008, “Do Investors Overweight Personal Experience? Evidence from IPO Subscriptions”, Journal of Finance, 63, pp. 2679~2702.
[30] Korniotis, G. M., and A. Kumar, 2011, “Do Older Investors Make Better Investment Decisions”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(1), pp. 244~265.
[31] Leal, C. C., M. J. Armada and G. Loureiro, 2018, “Individual Investors' Repurchasing Behavior: Evidence from the Portuguese Stock Market”, The European Journal of Finance, 24(11), pp. 976~999.
[32] Lee, B., J. O’Brien, and K. Sivaramakrishnan, 2008, “An Analysis of Financial Analysts' Optimism in Long-Term Growth Forecasts”, Journal of Behavioral Finance, 9(3), pp. 171~184.
[33] Li, J., M. Massa, H. Zhang and J. Zhang, 2021, “Air Pollution, Behavioral Bias, and the Disposition Effect in China”, Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), pp. 641~673.
[34] Magron, C., and M. Merli, 2015, “Repurchase Behavior of Individual Investors, Sophistication and Regret”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 61, pp. 15~26.
[35] Malmendier, U., 2021, “Experience Effects in Finance: Foundations, Applications, and Future Directions”, Review of Finance, 25(5), pp. 1339~1363.
[36] Malmendier, U., and S. Nagel, 2011,”Depression Babies: Do Macroeconomic Experiences Affect Risk Taking”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(1), pp. 373~416.
[37] Ng, L., and F. Wu, 2007, “The Trading Behavior of Institutions and Individuals in Chinese Equity Markets”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 31, pp. 2695~2710.
[38] Nofsinger, J. R., and A. Varma, 2013, “Availability, Recency, and Sophistication in the Repurchasing Behavior of Retail Investors”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 37, pp. 2572~2585.
[39] Shefrin, H., and M. Statman, 1985, “The Disposition to Sell Winners Too Early and Ride Losers Too Long: Theory and Evidence”, Journal of Finance, 40(3), pp. 777~790.
[40] Strahilevitz, M., T. Odean and B. M. Barber, 2011, “Once Burned, Twice Shy: How Naive Learning, Counterfactuals, and Regret Affect the Repurchase of Stocks Previously Sold”, Journal of Marketing Research, 48, pp.102~120.
[41] Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman, 1973, “Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability”, Cognitive Psychology,5(2), pp. 207~232.
[42] Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman, 1974, “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases”, Science, 185(4157), pp. 1124~1131.
[43] Wu, Y., and Z. Li, 2024, “Who Are the Momentum Chasers? New Evidence from Mutual Funds in China”, Applied Economics Letters, 31(5), pp. 470~476.
[1] 贾璐熙, 朱叶, 陈达飞. 公司名称、投资者认知与公司价值——基于公司名称评价指标体系的行为金融学研究[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 431(5): 173-190.
[1] 郭豫媚, 王航, 郭田勇, 郭俊杰. 中央银行通货膨胀预期管理有效性评估——基于文本通货膨胀预期指数的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 538(4): 1 -20 .
[2] 戴亦一, 梁师赫, 王剑韬, 梁伟娟. 地铁开通的降本效应——来自企业用工的微观证据[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 538(4): 151 -169 .
[3] 张甜, 刘一鸣. 绿色企业的贷款利率会更低吗?——基于商业银行贷款定价行为的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 537(3): 76 -93 .
[4] 钟茜. 商业银行采纳人工智能有助于优化企业绿色转型中的信贷支持吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 538(4): 57 -74 .
[5] 周泽将, 汪顺, 董丰. 气候政策不确定性应对与实体企业金融资产配置[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 538(4): 95 -113 .
[6] 黄叙涵, 马光荣, 熊芮. 中小企业与经济增长——理论梳理和实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 536(2): 20 -38 .
[7] 何富美, 刘兵, 欧阳志刚. 通胀预期不确定性的内需效应: 理论机制与经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 537(3): 1 -20 .
[8] 宗计川, 吴庆帮. 流动性冲击与系统重要性银行的稳定作用[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 538(4): 21 -38 .
[9] 潘红波, 周颖, 石宇欣. 上市公司壳资源、挤出效应与中小企业银行贷款成本——基于“不允许在创业板借壳上市”的准自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 538(4): 114 -130 .
[10] 余丽丽, 袁劲. 国内统一大市场建设、企业中间品异地采购份额提升与出口增长[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 538(4): 131 -150 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1