The Construction of a Unified National Market, the Rise in Firms' Cross-Regional Sourcing of Intermediate Goods, and Export Growth
YU Lili, YUAN Jin
Institute of International Business, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics; School of Economics,Fudan University; School of Public Finance & Taxation, Guangdong University of Finance & Economics
Summary:
In recent years, the global supply chain has been undergoing a phase of accelerated restructuring, introducing considerable uncertainty to the participation of Chinese firms in the international division of labor and the realization of export growth. To this end, deepening domestic openness and refining the division of labor within the country to restructure industrial and supply chains, thereby enhancing export competitiveness and achieving steady yet progressive export growth, is not only a fundamental requirement for building a unified national market but also a crucial pillar for advancing the new development paradigm of mutually reinforcing “dual circulation” featureing positive interplay between domestic and international economic flows. Both macro-level data and micro-level studies (e.g., Kee and Tang, 2016) indicate that achieving steady and sustained export growth increasingly depends on the domestic configuration of intermediate goods production. In this context, the paper adopts a novel focus on firms' cross-regional sourcing of intermediate goods to examine the effects and mechanisms of market integration on export growth, providing theoretical foundations and policy guidance for reducing costs and increasing the efficiency of the domestic industrial chain, and promoting sustainable foreign trade development. From a theoretical perspective, this paper revises the framework proposed by Halpern et al. (2015) to construct a unified model linking domestic division of labor with export growth. Within the context of building a unified national market, it examines the impact and transmission mechanisms of increased cross-regional sourcing of intermediate goods by firms on export performance. Theoretical analysis suggests that a higher share of cross-regional sourcing, as facilitated by market integration, promotes export volume through productivity gains, while also influencing export diversification through the combined effects of productivity improvement and reduced incentives for R&D investment. From an empirical perspective, this paper adopts the lens of firms' cross-regional sourcing of intermediate goods to investigate the impact and transmission mechanisms of unified market development on export growth, using matched data from China's Customs Statistics and listed company databases. The results show that a one-percentage-point increase in the share of cross-regional sourcing of intermediate goods leads to a 0.2845% increase in the quantity of firm exports to a specific destination-product pair, and a 0.0737% increase in the number of product varieties exported to a given destination. The former effect is primarily driven by productivity gains, while the latter reflects the combined influence of productivity improvement and reduced incentives for R&D investment. This study carries significant policy implications. First, it highlights the need to strengthen domestic openness by dismantling inter-regional market segmentation and advancing the development of a unified national market. Second, it underscores the importance of improving both the quality and diversity of domestically produced intermediate goods to support the modernization of domestic industrial chains and safeguard the security and resilience of national supply chains. Third, it is essential to enhance cross-regional sourcing of intermediate goods in line with firm-level heterogeneity, in order to boost productivity and promote export growth. The marginal contributions of this paper are as follows. First, it addresses the limitations of existing literature that primarily measure market integration from a macro perspective by identifying the increase in firms' cross-regional sourcing of intermediate goods as a salient indicator of the development of a unified national market. This allows for the establishment of a firm-level analytical lens to examine the relationship between domestic market integration and international export growth. Second, this study extends the theoretical framework of Halpern et al. (2015) by incorporating domestic specialization in intermediate goods and international exports, and further introduces firms' decisions regarding product line expansion. In doing so, it develops an innovative theoretical model linking the construction of a unified domestic market with export growth through the lens of cross-regional intermediate input sourcing, thereby enriching the theoretical foundation for the dual circulation pattern. Third, adopting this micro-level perspective, the paper empirically investigates the impact of unified market development on both the intensive and extensive margins of firm-level exports, alongside its transmission mechanisms and heterogeneous effects. The empirical findings not only lend strong support to the theoretical propositions but also help mitigate potential upward biases in previous studies that rely solely on macro-level measures of market integration when assessing firm-level export performance.
余丽丽, 袁劲. 国内统一大市场建设、企业中间品异地采购份额提升与出口增长[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 538(4): 131-150.
YU Lili, YUAN Jin. The Construction of a Unified National Market, the Rise in Firms' Cross-Regional Sourcing of Intermediate Goods, and Export Growth. Journal of Financial Research, 2025, 538(4): 131-150.
[1] 何欢浪、蔡琦晟和章韬,2021,《进口贸易自由化与中国企业创新——基于企业专利数量和质量的证据》,《经济学(季刊)》第2期,第597～616页。 [2] 刘志彪和孔令池,2021,《从分割走向整合:推进国内统一大市场建设的阻力与对策》,《中国工业经济》第8期,第20～36页。 [3] 盛丹、包群和王永进,2011,《基础设施对中国企业出口行为的影响:“集约边际”还是“扩展边际”》,《世界经济》第1期,第17～36页。 [4] 宋灿和孙浦阳,2023,《市场可达性、中间品替代与企业出口国内附加值率》,《国际贸易问题》第4期,第124～141页。 [5] 田巍和余淼杰,2014,《中间品贸易自由化和企业研发:基于中国数据的经验分析》,《世界经济》第6期,第90～112页。 [6] 吴群锋、刘冲和刘青,2021,《国内市场一体化与企业出口行为——基于市场可达性视角的研究》,《经济学(季刊)》第5期,第1639～1660页。 [7] 袁劲、冯桂媚、李玲玲和刘啟仁,2023,《央地退税分担与企业采购的区位选择》,《经济研究》第10期,第134～151页。 [8] 袁劲、余丽丽和冯桂媚,2024,《统一大市场建设与企业采购的区位选择》,《金融研究》第1期,第187～206页。 [9] 张杰、张培丽和黄泰岩,2010,《市场分割推动了中国企业出口吗？》,《经济研究》第8期,第29～41页。 [10] 张杰、郑文平和陈志远,2015,《进口与企业生产率——中国的经验证据》,《经济学(季刊)》第3期,第1029～1052页。 [11] 张翊、陈雯和骆时雨,2015,《中间品进口对中国制造业全要素生产率的影响》,《世界经济》第9期,第107～129页。 [12] 赵玉奇和柯善咨,2016,《市场分割、出口企业的生产率准入门槛与“中国制造”》,《世界经济》第9期,第74～98页。 [13] 朱希伟、金祥荣和罗德明,2005,《国内市场分割与中国的出口贸易扩张》,《经济研究》第12期,第68～76页。 [14] Amiti, M. and J. Konings, 2007, “Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs and Productivity”, American Economic Review, 97(5), pp.1611～1638. [15] Angrist, J. D. and J. S. Pischke, 2014, Mastering ’Metrics: The Path from Cause to Effect, Princeton: Princeton University Press. [16] Bas, M. and V. Strauss-Kahn, 2015, “Input-trade Liberalization, Export Prices and Quality Upgrading”, Journal of Internaitonal Economics, 95, pp.250～262. [17] Bellemare, M., T. Masaki and B. Pepinsky, 2017, “Lagged Explanatory Variables and the Estimation of Causal Effect”, The Journal of Politics, 79(3), pp.949～963. [18] Defever, F., M. Imbruno and R. Kneller, 2020, “Trade Liberalization, Input Intermediaries, and Firm Productivity: Evidence from China”, Journal of International Economics, 126(1), No.103329. [19] Donaldson, D. and R. Hornbeck, 2016, “Railroads and American Economic Growth: A ‘Markst Access' Approach”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131, pp.799～858. [20] Fan, H., L. C. Lai and H. Qi, 2019, “Trade Liberalization and Firms' Export Performance in China: Theory and Evidence”, Journal of Comparative Economics, 47, pp.640～668. [21] Feng, L., Z. Li and D. L. Swenson, 2016, “The Connection between Imported Intermediate Inputs and Exports: Evidence from Chinese Firms”, Journal of International Economics, 101, pp.86～101. [22] Goldberg, P., A. Khandelwal, N. Pavcnik and P. Topalova, 2009, “Trade Liberalization and New Imported Inputs”, American Economic Review: Papers ＆ Proceedings, 99(2), pp.494～500. [23] Halpern, L., K. Miklós and A. Szeidl, 2015, “Imported Inputs and Productivity”, American Economic Review, 105 (12), pp.3660～3703. [24] Kee, H. L. and H. W. Tang, 2016, “Domestic Value Added in Exports: Theory and Firm Evidence from China”, American Economic Review, 106(6), pp.1402～1436. [25] Liu, Q. and L. D. Qiu, 2016, “Intermediate Input Imports and Innovations: Evidence from Chinese Firms' Patent Filings”, Journal of International Economics, 103, pp.166～183. [26] Manova, K. and Z. Yu, 2016, “How Firms Export: Processing vs. Ordinary Trade with Financial Frictions”, Journal of International Economics, 100, pp.120～137. [27] Martincus, C. V., J. Carballo and A. Cusolito, 2017, “Roads, Exports and Employment: Evidence from a Developing Country”, Journal of Development Economics, 125, pp.21～39. [28] Melitz, M., 2003, “The Impact of Trade on Intra-industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity”, Econometrica, 71(6), pp.1695～1725. [29] Olley, S. and A. Pakes, 1996, “The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry”, Econometrica, 64(6), pp.1263～1297.
