Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2024, Vol. 534 Issue (12): 78-96    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
汇率冲击、银行外币敞口与企业投资
王雅琦, 贾思源
中央财经大学金融学院,北京 100081
Exchange Rate Depreciation, Banks' Foreign Currency Exposure and Real Investment
WANG Yaqi, JIA Siyuan
School of Finance, Central University of Finance and Economics
下载:  PDF (642KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文基于2015年“8·11”汇改事件,探究汇率冲击通过银行信贷渠道在中国市场上传导的效应。研究发现,汇率贬值冲击后,外币净负债水平更高的银行更倾向于减少信贷投放。分解外币敞口,发现这种信贷收缩效应由外币资产端与负债端的共同变化驱动。在控制企业贷款需求因素后,外币净负债水平较高的银行仍然表现出更明显的信贷收缩倾向。进一步探究汇率贬值冲击通过银行信贷渠道对实体经济的影响发现,原本更依赖于从外币负债水平较高的银行借款的企业,投资水平出现了更为明显的下降。值得注意的是,即使企业自身未持有外币负债,也会因银行信贷渠道而间接承担汇率风险,这一发现在控制企业替代融资渠道及转换借款行的行为后依旧稳健。研究结论对完善中国汇率政策框架、加强银行外汇风险管理具有重要政策启示,为金融开放进程中的宏观审慎管理提供了理论依据。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王雅琦
贾思源
关键词:  汇率风险  货币错配  银行信贷  企业投资    
Summary:  In recent years, the elasticity and volatility of the RMB exchange rate have been rising. Although it contributes to the improvement of pricing efficiency and openness for the foreign exchange market, it also introduces broader foreign exchange risks. According to statistics from the Bank for International Settlements, at the end of the third quarter of 2024, China's debt position to cross-border banks reached $\$$962.8 billion. The total amount of foreign currency debt was 401.5 billion US dollars, accounting for about 40% of the total foreign debt, and half of these foreign currency debts were from the banking sector. Financing of Chinese enterprises relies primarily on the banking system, and the banking sector not only plays a key financial intermediation role, but also provides funds to the real economy. Exchange rate risks brought by foreign currency exposure of banks warrant the attention of policy makers.According to the “currency mismatch” theory, depreciation of the domestic currency could cause pressure on banks holding foreign currency liabilities to repay them. In the case where foreign currency assets are difficult to fully hedge, the net worth of banks will shrink. Consequently, their lending capacity declines, and credit supply reduces. It is called the “bank lending channel” of exchange rate transmission. The bank lending channel of the exchange rate has been confirmed in several developed countries. China is stepping in a new stage of promoting the two-way opening of its financial market, with foreign currency liabilities accumulating. However, the foreign exchange derivatives market that manages exchange rate risks remains in development, making it easier to observe changes in bank's net worth caused by foreign currency exposure. Besides, compared to developed countries, bank credit is the main source of financing for Chinese enterprises. Thus, the changes in real investment caused by credit contraction further amplify the impact of foreign exchange risks on banks.Using data from Chinese commercial banks, loans, and enterprises from 2010 to 2019, we examine the currency depreciation following China's 2015 exchange rate policy adjustment to verify the bank lending channel of exchange rate. Our findings indicate that the currency depreciation shock causes a decline in the supply of credit by banks with higher foreign currency exposure, due to the effects of both liability side and asset side after decomposing the net exposure. The supply effect remains robust even after controlling firm's credit demand using loan-level data. Moreover, we show that firms that rely heavily on banks with higher foreign currency debt ratio experience a decline in real investment; that is, the exchange rate fluctuations can transmit to the real economy through bank's foreign currency exposure.The contributions of this paper are as follows. First, our research establishes a detailed dataset of Chinese commercial banks' foreign currency assets and liabilities, which provides more evidence on how foreign currency exposure of the banking system works on emerging markets. Second, while existing literature has explored the relationship between currency crises and banking crises, and found they are often “twin crises”, there are few studies on the relationship between exchange rate depreciation and bank credit during non-crisis periods. This research confirms that exchange rate depreciation could make banks reduce credit supply in normal times. Third, the paper explores the relationship between exchange rate and investment from the perspective of bank credit and explores bank behavior in detail, which is a novel perspective to existing studies.The paper has important policy implications on exchange rate risk management. On the one hand, the banking sector should strengthen the matching of foreign currency assets and liabilities, including the currency type, maturity and interest rate of foreign exchange positions, to avoid repayment risks caused by the imbalance of them. On the other hand, enterprises should consider exchange rate risks from broader sources, that is, not only the direct exchange rate risk from their own foreign currency debts, but also indirect risks from highly exposed banks which provide loans to them.
Keywords:  Exchange Rate Risks    Currency Mismatch    Bank Lending    Firm-Level Investment
JEL分类号:  F31   F34   G31  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家社会科学基金重大项目(20&ZD101)、国家自然科学基金面上项目(72273164,72373175)、北京社会科学基金重点项目( 22JJA006) 和国家自然科学基金重点项目(72133002)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  贾思源,博士研究生,中央财经大学金融学院,E-mail:2811139378@qq.com.   
作者简介:  王雅琦,经济学博士,教授,中央财经大学金融学院,E-mail:yakisunny@126.com.
引用本文:    
王雅琦, 贾思源. 汇率冲击、银行外币敞口与企业投资[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 534(12): 78-96.
WANG Yaqi, JIA Siyuan. Exchange Rate Depreciation, Banks' Foreign Currency Exposure and Real Investment. Journal of Financial Research, 2024, 534(12): 78-96.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2024/V534/I12/78
[1]郭飞、肖浩和史永, 2014,《为什么人民币汇率波动的影响不显著?——基于美的电器的案例研究》,《管理世界》第10期, 第163~171页。
[2]郭飞、游绘新和郭慧敏, 2018,《为什么使用外币债务?——中国上市公司的实证证据》,《金融研究》第3期, 第137~154页。
[3]何青和刘尔卓, 2022,《汇率敏感性会影响企业贷款利率吗?——基于中国上市公司的分析》,《金融研究》第8期, 第132~151页。
[4]孟为和姜国华, 2023,《汇率政策不确定性与企业信贷融资:基于外币贷款视角》,《世界经济》第3期, 第31~62页。
[5]罗用文和王潇, 2022,《中国资本项目渐进开放对企业外币债务及经营的影响》,《计量经济学报》第4期, 第841~863页。
[6]Abbassi, P. and F. Bräuning, 2023, “Exchange Rate Risk, Banks' Currency Mismatches, and Credit Supply”, Journal of International Economics, 141, pp.103725.
[7]Adrian, T., P. Colla and H. S. Shin, 2012, “Which Financial Frictions? Parsing the Evidence from the Financial Crisis of 2007-9”, NBER Working Paper, No. w18335.
[8]Agarwal, I., 2018, “Banks' Foreign Currency Exposure and the Real Effects of Exchange Rate Shocks”, Risk Management eJournal.
[9]Akinci, O. and A. Queralto, 2018, “Balance Sheets, Exchange Rates, and International Monetary Spillovers”, FRB of New York Staff Report, No. 849.
[10]Amiti, M., O. Itskhoki and J. Konings, 2014, “Importers, Exporters, and Exchange Rate Disconnect”, American Economic Review, 104(7), pp.1942~1978.
[11]Babecký, J., T. Havránek, J. Matěju, M. Rusnák, K. Šmídková and B. Vašíček, 2014, “Banking, Debt, and Currency Crises in Developed Countries: Stylized Facts and Early Warning Indicators”, Journal of Financial Stability, 15, pp.1~17.
[12]Banerjee, R., B. Hofmann and A. Mehrotra, 2020, “Corporate Investment and the Exchange Rate: The Financial Channel”, International Finance.
[13]Bleakley, H. and K. Cowan, 2008, “Corporate Dollar Debt and Depreciations: Much Ado About Nothing”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(4), pp.612~626.
[14]Brito, S., N. E. Magud and S. Sosa, 2018, “Real Exchange Rates, Economic Complexity, and Investment”, IMF Working Paper, No. WP/18/107.
[15]Brown, M., S. Ongena and P. Yein, 2011, “Foreign Currency Borrowing by Small Firms in the Transition Economies”, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 20(3), pp.285~302.
[16]Caballero, J., 2021, “Corporate Dollar Debt and Depreciations: All's Well That Ends Well”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 130, pp.106185.
[17]Dao, M. C., C. Minoiu and J. D. Ostry, 2021, “Corporate Investment and the Real Exchange Rate”, Journal of International Economics, 131, pp.103437.
[18]Eijffinger, S. C. W. and B. Karata, 2023, “Three Sisters: The Interlinkage between Sovereign Debt, Currency, and Banking Crises”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 131, pp.102798.
[19]Gabaix, X. and M. Maggiori, 2015, “International Liquidity and Exchange Rate Dynamics”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(3), pp.1369~1420.
[20]Gertler, M. and N. Kiyotaki, 2010, “Financial Intermediation and Credit Policy in Business Cycle Analysis”, in Friedman, B. M. and M. Woodford, Handbook of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, pp. 547~599.
[21]Fendoglu, S., E. Gulsen and J.-L. Peydró, 2019, “Global Liquidity and Impairment of Local Monetary Policy”, Economic Working Paper Series, No. 1680.
[22]Hofmann, B., I. Shim and H. S. Shin, 2020, “Bond Risk Premia and the Exchange Rate”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 52(S2), pp.497~520.
[23]Kalemli-Ozcan, S., H. Kamil and C. Villegas-Sanchez, 2016, “What Hinders Investment in the Aftermath of Financial Crises: Insolvent Firms or Illiquid Banks”, Review of Economics Statistics, 98(4), pp.756~769.
[24]Khwaja, A. I. and A. Mian, 2008, “Tracing the Impact of Bank Liquidity Shocks: Evidence from an Emerging Market”, American Economic Review, 98(4), pp.1413~1442.
[25]Itskhoki, O. and D. Mukhin, 2021, “Exchange Rate Disconnect in General Equilibrium”, Journal of Political Economy, 129(8), pp.2183~2232.
[26]Jimenez, G., S. Ongena, J. Peydro-Alcalde and J. Saurina, 2012, “Credit Supply: Identifying Balance-Sheet Channels with Loan Applications and Granted Loans”, American Economic Review, 102(5), pp.2301~2326.
[27]Lilley, A., M. Maggiori, B. Neiman and J. Schreger, 2022, “Exchange Rate Reconnect”, Review of Economics Statistics, 104(4), pp.845~855.
[28]Schnabl, P., 2012, “The International Transmission of Bank Liquidity Shocks: Evidence from an Emerging Market”, The Journal of Finance, 67(3), pp.897~932.
[29]Serena, J. M. and R. Sousa, 2017, “Does Exchange Rate Depreciation Have Contractionary Effects on Firm-Level Investment”, BIS Working Paper, No. 624.
[30]Zettelmeyer, J. and O. D. Jeanne, 2002, “‘Original Sin,’ Balance Sheet Crises, and the Roles of International Lending”, IMF Working Paper, No. wp02234.
[1] 陈学彬, 李鑫. 关联网络视角下的国际外汇市场汇率风险溢出研究[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 530(8): 20-38.
[2] 马思超, 沈吉, 彭俞超. 杠杆率变动、固定资产投资与研发活动——兼论金融赋能高质量发展[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 503(5): 1-19.
[3] 朱孟楠, 徐云娇. 汇率风险对冲如何影响企业并购行为——基于自由现金流的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 510(12): 36-54.
[4] 郭晔, 未钟琴, 方颖. 金融科技布局、银行信贷风险与经营绩效——来自商业银行与科技企业战略合作的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 508(10): 20-38.
[5] 赵娜, 王博, 张珂瑜. 融资租赁、银行信贷与企业投资[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 487(1): 150-168.
[6] 李志生, 金凌. 银行竞争提高了企业投资水平和资源配置效率吗?——基于分支机构空间分布的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 487(1): 111-130.
[7] 赵仁杰, 范子英. 税费替代:增值税减税、非税收入征管与企业投资[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 487(1): 71-90.
[8] 唐遥, 陈贞竹, 刘柯含. 需求和供给冲击对企业投资以及价值链的影响——基于突发事件的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 480(6): 40-59.
[9] 叶永卫, 李增福. 续贷限制与企业技术创新[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 485(11): 151-169.
[10] 徐明东, 陈学彬. 中国上市企业投资的资本成本敏感性估计[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 470(8): 113-132.
[11] 才国伟, 吴华强, 徐信忠. 政策不确定性对公司投融资行为的影响研究[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 453(3): 89-104.
[12] 龙海明, 王志鹏. 征信系统、法律权利保护与银行信贷[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 117-130.
[13] 褚剑, 方军雄, 于传荣. 卖空约束放松与银行信贷决策[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 450(12): 111-126.
[14] 俞剑, 郑文平, 程冬. 油价不确定性与企业投资[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 438(12): 32-47.
[15] 倪婷婷, 王跃堂. 增值税转型、集团控制与企业投资[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 427(1): 160-175.
[1] 纪志宏, 曹媛媛. 信用风险溢价还是市场流动性溢价:基于中国信用债定价的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 1 -10 .
[2] 纪敏, 严宝玉, 李宏瑾. 杠杆率结构、水平和金融稳定——理论分析框架和中国经验[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 11 -25 .
[3] 姚前, 汤莹玮. 关于央行法定数字货币的若干思考[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 445(7): 78 -85 .
[4] 黄宪, 黄彤彤. 论中国的“金融超发展”[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 26 -41 .
[5] 王弟海, 崔小勇, 邹恒甫. OLG模型中的多重均衡和经济效率——兼论政府在经济中的作用[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 443(5): 1 -17 .
[6] 刘行. 政府干预的新度量——基于最终控制人投资组合的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 435(9): 145 -160 .
[7] 赵颖, 石智雷. 城镇集聚、户籍制度与教育机会[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 86 -100 .
[8] 蒋冠宏. 我国企业跨国并购真的失败了吗?——基于企业效率的再讨论[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 442(4): 46 -60 .
[9] 姚耀军, 施丹燕. 互联网金融区域差异化发展的逻辑与检验——路径依赖与政府干预视角[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 443(5): 127 -142 .
[10] 马勇, 张靖岚, 陈雨露. 金融周期与货币政策[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 33 -53 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1