Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2024, Vol. 523 Issue (1): 169-186    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
期权隐含信息和价格发现——基于中国场内期权市场的研究
马腾, 张晓燕, 李志勇
清华大学五道口金融学院,北京 100083;北京外国语大学国际商学院,北京 100089
Option-implied Information and Price Discovery: Evidence from Chinese Options Markets
MA Teng, ZHANG Xiaoyan, LI Zhiyong
PBC School of Finance, Tsinghua University; International Business School, Beijing Foreign Studies University
下载:  PDF (575KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文基于中国场内期权交易数据,研究期权隐含信息的收益率预测能力,检验中国期权市场的价格发现功能。实证结果表明:波动率指数、方差风险溢价和波动率偏度等期权隐含信息,能够有效预测股票市场未来不同期限的超额收益率。信息假说和限制做空假说,是解释期权市场价格发现职能的2个经济学机制:期权隐含信息包含了一定的宏观经济信息和企业盈利信息;在中国期权市场上,由于对冲效应大于投机效应,做空限制会影响期权隐含信息的预测效果。本文对提升资本市场定价效率、建设高质量场内期权市场和加强监管政策协同,均具启示意义。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
马腾
张晓燕
李志勇
关键词:  价格发现  期权隐含信息  信息假说  做空限制    
Summary:  The options market, as an important part of the capital market, promotes price discovery and risk sharing, reduces transaction costs and improves resource allocation efficiency. Since the launch of the first on-exchange option, the SSE 50 ETF option, in 2015, the trading volumes of on-exchange options have continued to grow. Meanwhile, the information transmission efficiency of financial markets is a core issue in financial economics. Well-informed investors predominantly trade in the options market due to this market's high leverage and low short-selling costs, which may lead to delays in the transmission of information between different markets. With the rapid development of China's financial options market, accurately assessing its price discovery role in the overall capital market is crucial to improving market functions and understanding market operating mechanisms.
To examine the price discovery role of China's options market, this paper constructs indicators to extract the implicit information in option transactions and tests the ability of the option-implied information to predict future returns on the stock market. First, we provide evidence that the volatility index, jump factor, and option parity formula deviation can significantly predict negative excess returns on the stock market in the next month, while those excess returns are positively and significantly predicted by the variance risk premium, volatility skewness, and difference in implied volatility changes between call and put options, among other indicators. Second, in an out-of-sample test, all the above indicators retain their predictive ability to a certain extent, and all the option-implied information indicators show significant predictive power in a linear regression model and principal component regression model. Finally, we test two hypotheses regarding the economic mechanism of price discovery in the options market: the information hypothesis and the short-selling restriction hypothesis. According to the information hypothesis, option-implied information can significantly predict the future trends of macroeconomic variables; at the same time, some option-implied indicators can also significantly predict future firm earnings information in the stock market. According to the short-selling restriction hypothesis, when the stock market faces short-selling restrictions or the cost of short-selling increases, investors with private information will be more inclined to trade in the options market, which will increase the speculative effect of this market, in turn affecting the predictive power of the option-implied information.
We contribute to the literature in three respects. First, focusing systematically on option-implied information, we assemble a series of option indicators whose ability to obtain the information contained in option trading is widely discussed in the literature. Based on the development status of China's options market, this study scientifically and rigorously explores the price discovery role of China's options market, thus filling gaps in the research on this market. Second, this paper confirms that information transmission affects price discovery in the Chinese stock market. New information tends to first enter the options market before entering the stock market, causing a time delay in information transmission between the two markets, allowing the options market to effectively predict the future price of the stock market. In terms of information content, this study also confirms that the options market contains macroeconomic and firm earnings information in advance of the stock market acquiring this information. Finally, the study enriches research on the spillover effects of capital market regulatory policies. A series of short-selling restrictions, such as stock index futures trading policies and stock market futures discount rates, can also be expected to affect the predictive power of option-implied information.
Keywords:  Price Discovery    Option-implied Information    Information Hypothesis    Short-sale Constraints
JEL分类号:  G11   G12   G14  
基金资助: *本文感谢国家自然科学基金(72350710220)、北京市自然科学基金(IS2317)、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2022QD027,2023JJ003)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  李志勇,经济学博士,助理研究员, 北京外国语大学国际商学院, E-mail: lizhiyong@bfsu.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  马腾,经济学博士,清华大学五道口金融学院,E-mail: mat.17@pbcsf.tsinghua.edu.cn.
张晓燕,经济学博士,教授,清华大学五道口金融学院,E-mail: zhangxiaoyan@pbcsf.tsinghua.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
马腾, 张晓燕, 李志勇. 期权隐含信息和价格发现——基于中国场内期权市场的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 523(1): 169-186.
MA Teng, ZHANG Xiaoyan, LI Zhiyong. Option-implied Information and Price Discovery: Evidence from Chinese Options Markets. Journal of Financial Research, 2024, 523(1): 169-186.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2024/V523/I1/169
[1]丛明舒,2018,《中国场内期权市场研究——基于中美关于期权隐含方差的差异》,《金融研究》第12期,第189~206页。
[2]李志勇、余湄和汪寿阳,2022,《方差风险溢价和收益率预测:来自上证50ETF期权市场的证据》,《系统工程理论与实践》第2期,第306~319页。
[3]吕雪岭、熊熊、严雨萌和许克维,2020,《“稳定”还是“扰动”——基于上证50ETF期权的实证分析》,《管理科学》第4期,第149~157页。
[4]倪中新、郭婧和王琳玉,2020,《上证50ETF期权隐含波动率微笑形态的风险信息容量研究》,《财经研究》第4期,第155~169页。
[5]陶利斌、潘婉彬和黄筠哲,2014,《沪深300股指期货价格发现能力的变化及其决定因素》,《金融研究》第4期,第128~142页。
[6]许荣和刘成立,2019,《限制交易政策如何影响期现关系?——对股指期货价格发现功能的实证检验》,《金融研究》第2期,第154~168页。
[7]张金清、何菁和展一帆,2021,《期权交易量对现货收益率预测能力的研究》,《投资研究》第2期,第92~108页。
[8]郑振龙、许鋆和陈蓉,2021,《期权“净购买压力”的隐含信息》,《管理科学学报》第6期,第42~56页。
[9]郑振龙、杨荔海和陈蓉,2022,《方差风险、偏度风险与市场收益率的可预测性》,《经济学(季刊)》第3期,第795~818页。
[10]周强龙、朱燕建和贾璐熙,2015,《市场知情交易概率、流动性与波动性——来自中国股指期货市场的经验证据》,《金融研究》第5期,第132~147页。
[11]Ahn, K., Y. Bi and S. Sohn, 2019, “Price Discovery Among SSE 50 Index-based Spot, Futures and Options Markets”, The Journal of Futures Markets, 39(2), pp. 238~259.
[12]An, B., A. Ang, T. G. Bali and N.Cakici, 2014, “The Joint Cross Section of Stocks and Options”, The Journal of Finance, 69(5), pp. 2279~2337.
[13]Ang, A., R. J. Hodrick, Y. Xing and X. Zhang, 2006, “The Cross Section of Volatility and Expected Returns”, The Journal of Finance, 61(1), pp. 259~299.
[14]Atilgan, Y., T. G. Bali and K. O. Demirtas, 2015, “Implied Volatility Spreads and Expected Market Returns”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 33(1), pp. 87~101.
[15]Bali, T. G. and A. Hovakimian, 2009, “Volatility Spreads and Expected Stock Returns”, Management Science, 55(11), pp. 1797~1812.
[16]Black, F., 1975, “Fact and Fantasy in the Use of Options”, Financial Analysts Journal, 31(4), pp. 36~72.
[17]Bollerslev, T., G. Tauchen and H. Zhou, 2009, “Expected Stock Returns and Variance Risk Premia”, The Review of Financial Studies, 22(11), pp. 4463~4492.
[18]Cai, J., J. He, W. Jiang and W.Xiong, 2021, “The Whack-a-Mole Game: Tobin Taxes and Trading Frenzy”, The Review of Financial Studies, 34(12), pp. 5723~5755.
[19]Carr, P. and L. Wu, 2009, “Variance Risk Premiums”, The Review of Financial Studies, 22(3), pp. 1311~1341.
[20]Chen, H., S. Joslin and S. X. Ni, 2019, “Demand for Crash Insurance, Intermediary Constraints and Risk Premia in Financial Markets”, The Review of Financial Studies, 32(1), pp. 228~265.
[21]Clark, T. E. and K. D. West, 2007, “Approximately Normal Tests for Equal Predictive Accuracy in Nested Models”, Journal of Econometrics, 138(1), pp. 291~311.
[22]Cremers, M. and D. Weinbaum, 2010, “Deviations From Put-call Parity and Stock Return Predictability”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45(2), pp. 335~367.
[23]Cremers, M., M. Halling and D. Weinbaum, 2015, “Aggregate Jump and Volatility Risk in the Cross-section of Stock Returns”, The Journal of Finance, 70(2), pp. 577~614.
[24]Easley, D., M. O′Hara and P. S. Srinivas, 1998, “Option Volume and Stock Prices: Evidence on Where Informed Traders Trade”, The Journal of Finance, 53(2), pp. 431~465.
[25]Ge, L., T. Lin and N. D. Pearson, 2016, “Why Does the Option to Stock Volume Ratio Predict Stock Returns?”, Journal of Financial Economics, 120(3), pp. 601~622.
[26]Han, B. and G. Li, 2020, “Information Content of Aggregate Implied Volatility Spread”, Management Science, 67(2), pp. 1249~1269.
[27]Hu, G. X., J. Pan and J. Wang, 2018, “Chinese Capital Market: An Empirical Overview”, NBER Working Paper, No.24346.
[28]Hu, J., 2014, “Does Option Trading Convey Stock Price Information?”, Journal of Financial Economics, 111(3), pp. 625~645.
[29]Jin, L., X. Yuan, J. Long, X. Li and F. Lian, 2022, “Price Discovery in The CSI 300 Lndex Derivatives Markets”, Journal of Futures Markets, 42(7), pp. 1352~1368.
[30]Johnson, T. L. and E. C. So, 2012, “The Option to Stock Volume Ratio and Future Returns”, Journal of Financial Economics, 106(1), pp. 262~286.
[31]Jones, C. M., D. Shi, X. Zhang and X. Zhang, 2023, “Retail Trading and Return Predictability in China”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, forthcoming.
[32]Jones, C. S., H. Mo and T. Wang, 2018, “Do Option Prices Forecast Aggregate Stock Returns?”, SSRN Working Paper, No. 3009490.
[33]Muravyev, D. and N. D. Pearson, 2020, “Options Trading Costs Are Lower Than You Think”, The Review of Financial Studies, 33(11), pp. 4973~5014.
[34]Newey, W. K. and K. D. West, 1987, “A Simple Positive Semi-definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix”, Econometrica, 55(3), pp. 703~708.
[35]Ofek, E., M. Richardson and R. F. Whitelaw, 2004, “Limited Arbitrage and Short Sales Restrictions: Evidence From the Options Markets”, Journal of Financial Economics, 74(2), pp. 305~342.
[36]Page, L. and C. Siemroth, 2021, “How Much Information is Incorporated Into Financial Asset Prices? Experimental Evidence”, The Review of Financial Studies, 34(9), pp. 4412~4449.
[37]Pan, J. and A. M. Poteshman, 2006, “The Information in Option Volume For Future Stock Prices”, The Review of Financial Studies, 19(3), pp. 871~908.
[38]Santa-Clara, P. and S. Yan, 2010, “Crashes, Volatility, and the Equity Premium: Lessons From S&P 500 Options”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(2), pp. 435~451.
[39]Xing, Y., X. Zhang and R. Zhao, 2010, “What Does the Individual option Volatility Smirk Tell us About Future Equity Returns?”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45(3), pp. 641~662.
[1] 陈彬彬, 刘善存, 张强, 曾庆铎. 基于理性预期均衡的金融期货定价研究:信息驱动还是套利驱动?[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 518(8): 170-188.
[2] 许荣, 刘成立. 限制交易政策如何影响期现关系?——对股指期货价格发现功能的实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 464(2): 154-168.
[3] 张劲帆, 汤莹玮, 刚健华, 樊林立. 中国利率市场的价格发现 ——对国债现货、期货以及利率互换市场的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 463(1): 19-34.
[1] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[2] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[3] 金宇超, 靳庆鲁, 李晓雪. 资本市场注意力总量是稀缺资源吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 162 -177 .
[4] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[5] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
[6] 王丽艳, 马光荣. 帆随风动、人随财走?——财政转移支付对人口流动的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 18 -34 .
[7] 张靖佳, 孙浦阳, 古芳. 欧洲量化宽松政策对中国企业出口影响——一个汇率网状溢出效应视角[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 18 -34 .
[8] 刘凤良, 章潇萌, 于泽. 高投资、结构失衡与价格指数二元分化[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 54 -69 .
[9] 李建军, 马思超. 债券违约对涉事信用评级机构的影响:基于中国信用债市场违约事件的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 116 -129 .
[10] 洪正, 张硕楠, 张琳. 经济结构、财政禀赋与地方政府控股城商行模式选择[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 83 -98 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1