Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2023, Vol. 522 Issue (12): 113-131    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
老农保参保经历会提升养老金预期准确性吗?——来自CHARLS的证据
吕有吉, 郑伟, 谢志伟
南开大学金融学院,天津 300350;
北京大学经济学院,北京 100871
Can Experience with the old Rural Residents' Pension Improve the Accuracy of Pension Expectations? Evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study
LV Youji, ZHENG Wei, XIE Zhiwei
School of Finance,Nankai University;
School of Economics, Peking University
下载:  PDF (650KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文使用处理效应模型检验老农保参保经历对农村居民养老金预期准确性的影响。研究发现,老农保参保经历使农村居民养老金预期偏差程度降低0.24(样本均值为0.70),降幅相当于均值的34.29%,且在使用倾向得分匹配方法、将样本限定在无迁徙经历的居民、考虑样本损耗问题以及对养老金相关变量缩尾处理后,上述结果依旧稳健。同时,上述效应在受教育年限更高、使用网络以及无认知能力障碍的群体中更强。此外,上述效应主要通过提高个体谨慎程度发挥作用。最后,在村庄层面开展的队列双重差分分析也进一步佐证了本文的主要结论。本文结果表明,政府可重点关注认知水平较低的群体,通过提供更精准的制度教育和信息披露,提升其养老金认知水平和预期准确性。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
吕有吉
郑伟
谢志伟
关键词:  养老金预期  老农保  参保经历    
Summary:  Pension expectations are the critical path connecting the public pension system to individual decision-making, and they directly affect individual welfare through economic variables such as savings and labor supply. Incorrect expectations of future pensions can lead to individual decision-making that deviates from the optimal path, fails to maximize lifetime welfare, and weakens the welfare effects of public pension system reform. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the main factors affecting the accuracy of pension expectations to provide a decision-making reference for further improving the public pension system. Using data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study from 2011 to 2018, we examine the impact of experience with the former Rural Residents' Pension (ORBP) on the accuracy of pension expectations among rural residents via the treatment effect model. We find that such experience significantly reduces the degree of pension expectation bias by 0.24, or 34.29% of the sample mean (0.70). This finding holds across several robustness tests, including using the propensity score matching method, restricting the sample to those without migration history, taking into account the sample attrition problem, and shrinking the tails of pension-related variables. We also find the effect to be strengthened among well-educated individuals, those with Internet access, and those without cognitive impairment. In addition, the above effect mainly works by increasing the level of individual caution. The village-level analysis, which uses the cohort difference-in-differences approach, also supports our main findings.
Two policy implications can be drawn from the above conclusions. First, we should objectively evaluate the achievements of the historical exploration of the ORBP, and we should not reject it completely because of the exploration's failure. The historical exploration of the ORBP that began in the 1990s regrettably failed, but it was valuable nonetheless. It not only helped guide the subsequent construction of the New Rural Residents' Pension but also significantly improved the accuracy of residents' pension expectations through several channels, such as increasing the degree of prudence and consolidating the cognitive foundation of pensions. From this point of view, the government should actively explore the construction of various types of public systems. After all, practice is the only standard for testing the truth. However, we must also understand that the realization of the educational function of the ORBP will come at a cost, which can be avoided through a more sophisticated system design. Second, the government should focus on groups with lower levels of cognition. We find that lower levels of cognition can significantly hinder the ORBP from exerting the pension expectation accuracy enhancement effect. Thus, differentiated arrangements are needed to provide more accurate institutional education and information disclosure for groups with lower cognition levels, such as those with lower education, a lack of access to information, and cognitive barriers, to help them better understand the public pension system reform and make reasonable pension arrangements accordingly.
We make two main contributions. First, in terms of research ideas, we integrate experience with the ORBP into impact factors of pension expectation accuracy. This offers a new perspective from which to interpret pension expectation bias and expands the application scenario of the experience learning effect. Second, we verify that the ORBP significantly improves the pension expectation accuracy of the Residents' Basic Pension participants, demonstrating its positive role in improving the level of residents' pension cognition. This result provides new evidence to support objectively evaluating the impact of the ORBP.
In this paper, we explore the impact of experience with the ORBP on the accuracy of pension expectations among rural residents. Limitations pertaining to the calculation method and the impact mechanisms point toward two ways in which future research can be expanded. First, by obtaining longer-term micro-survey data, future research can use residents' expected and real pensions to calculate their pension expectation bias. Second, by obtaining policy trust variables and pension cognition level variables, future research can further characterize how experience with the ORBP affects the accuracy of rural residents' pension expectations.
Keywords:  Pension Expectation    Old Rural Residents' Pension    Participation Experience
JEL分类号:  D84   H55   J18  
基金资助: * 本文感谢中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(63222064)、国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(72204126)和教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(14JZD027)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  郑 伟,经济学博士,劳合社讲席教授,北京大学经济学院,E-mail:wzheng@pku.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  吕有吉,经济学博士,讲师,南开大学金融学院,E-mail:lyjecon@nankai.edu.cn.
谢志伟,博士研究生,北京大学经济学院,E-mail:zw_francis@pku.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
吕有吉, 郑伟, 谢志伟. 老农保参保经历会提升养老金预期准确性吗?——来自CHARLS的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 522(12): 113-131.
LV Youji, ZHENG Wei, XIE Zhiwei. Can Experience with the old Rural Residents' Pension Improve the Accuracy of Pension Expectations? Evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Journal of Financial Research, 2023, 522(12): 113-131.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2023/V522/I12/113
[1] 蔡庆丰、郭春松和黄凯松,2016,《社会关系与社会经历对资本市场影响研究进展》,《经济学动态》第2期,第126~140页。
[2] 代昀昊和孔东民,2017,《高管海外经历是否能提升企业投资效率》,《世界经济》第1期,第168~192页。
[3] 戴维奇、刘洋和廖明情,2016,《烙印效应:民营企业谁在“不务正业”?》,《管理世界》第5期,第99-115+187-188页。
[4] 邓大松和李玉娇,2014,《制度信任、政策认知与新农保个人账户缴费档次选择困境——基于Ordered Probit模型的估计》,《农村经济》第8期,第77~83页。
[5] 高明、贾若和艾美彤,2021,《信任的破坏与重建:来自农村社会养老保险的证据》,《经济研究》第8期,第1~32页。
[6] 何瑛、于文蕾、戴逸驰和王砚羽,2019,《高管职业经历与企业创新》,《管理世界》第11期,第174~192页。
[7] 姜付秀、石贝贝和马云飙,2016,《信息发布者的财务经历与企业融资约束》,《经济研究》第6期,第83~97页。
[8] 赖黎、巩亚林和马永强,2016,《管理者从军经历、融资偏好与经营业绩》,《管理世界》第8期,第126~136页。
[9] 李轩红,2011,《中国农村养老保险制度变迁的原因分析》,《山东社会科学》第3期,第118~123页。
[10] 田文文、岳阳和朱恒鹏,2023,《政策信任对政策参与及家庭经济决策的影响——以新农保政策为例》,《经济学动态》第2期,第33~51页。
[11] 曾毅,2005,《中国人口老化、退休金缺口与农村养老保障》,《经济学(季刊)》第3期,第1043~1066页。
[12] 张晔、程令国和刘志彪,2016,《“新农保”对农村居民养老质量的影响研究》,《经济学(季刊)》第2期,第817~844页。
[13] 张川川、李雅娴和胡志安,2017,《社会养老保险、养老预期和出生人口性别比》,《经济学(季刊)》第2期,第749~770页。
[14] 张川川和朱涵宇,2021,《新型农村社会养老保险参与决策中的同群效应》,《金融研究》第9期,第111~130页。
[15] 郑伟,2007,《中国农村社会养老保险困境反思》,《保险研究》第11期,第39~42页。
[16] 周楷唐、麻志明和吴联生,2017,《高管学术经历与公司债务融资成本》,《经济研究》第7期,第169~183页。
[17] Abadie, A., D. Drukker, J.L. Herr, and G.W. Imbens. 2004. “Implementing Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects in Stata”, Stata Journal, 4(3), pp.290~311.
[18] Alessie, R., M. Van Rooij, and A. Lusardi. 2011. “Financial Literacy and Retirement Preparation in the Netherlands”, Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 10(4), pp.527~545.
[19] Bai, C.-E., W. Chi, T.X. Liu, C. Tang, and J. Xu. 2021. “Boosting Pension Enrollment and Household Consumption by Example: A Field Experiment on Information Provision”, Journal of Development Economics, 150, pp.102622.
[20] Baldini, M., C. Mazzaferro, and P. Onofri. 2019. “Pension Expectations, Reforms and Macroeconomic Downturn in Italy. What Can Microdata Tell Us?”, Applied Economics, 51(13), pp.1396~1410.
[21] Barrett, A., I. Mosca, and B. Whelan. 2015. “How Well-Informed Are Pension Scheme Members on Their Future Pension Benefits? Evidence from Ireland”, Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 27(4), pp.295~313.
[22] Bissonnette, L. and A. Van Soest. 2015. “Heterogeneity in Consumers' Income and Pension Expectations”, Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 14(4), pp.439~465.
[23] Bottazzi, R., T. Jappelli, and M. Padula. 2006. “Retirement Expectations, Pension Reforms, and Their Impact on Private Wealth Accumulation”, Journal of Public Economics, 90(12), pp.2187~2212.
[24] Cai, F., J. Giles, P. O’Keefe, and D. Wang. 2012. “The Elderly and Old Age Support in Rural China”. The World Bank.
[25] Chan, S. and A.H. Stevens. 2004. “Do Changes in Pension Incentives Affect Retirement? A Longitudinal Study of Subjective Retirement Expectations”, Journal of Public Economics, 88(7~8), pp.1307~1333.
[26] Chen, Y., Z. Fan, X. Gu, and L.-A. Zhou. 2020. “Arrival of Young Talent: The Send-Down Movement and Rural Education in China”, American Economic Review, 110(11), pp.3393~3430.
[27] Chen, Y., Q. Fan, X. Yang, and L. Zolotoy. 2021. “CEO Early-Life Disaster Experience and Stock Price Crash Risk”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 68,p.101928.
[28] Chen, Y. and L.-A. Zhou. 2007. “The Long-Term Health and Economic Consequences of the 1959-1961 Famine in China”, Journal of Health Economics, 26(4), pp.659~681.
[29] Cheng, L., H. Liu, Y. Zhang, and Z. Zhao. 2018. “The Health Implications of Social Pensions: Evidence from China's New Rural Pension Scheme”, Journal of Comparative Economics, 46(1), pp.53~77.
[30] Chetty, R., J.N. Friedman, S. Leth-Petersen, T.H. Nielsen, and T. Olsen. 2014. “Active vs. Passive Decisions and Crowd-Out in Retirement Savings Accounts: Evidence from Denmark”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(3), pp.1141~1219.
[31] Chiang, Y.-M., D. Hirshleifer, Y. Qian, and A.E. Sherman. 2011. “Do Investors Learn from Experience? Evidence from Frequent IPO Investors”, Review of Financial Studies, 24(5), pp.1560~1589.
[32] Choi, J.J., D. Laibson, B.C. Madrian, and A. Metrick. 2009. “Reinforcement Learning and Savings Behavior”, Journal of Finance, 64(6), pp.2515~2534.
[33] Delavande, A. and S. Rohwedder. 2011. “Individuals' Uncertainty About Future Social Security Benefits and Portfolio Choice”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 26(3), pp.498~519.
[34] Dolls, M., P. Doerrenberg, A. Peichl, and H. Stichnoth. 2018. “Do Retirement Savings Increase in Response to Information About Retirement and Expected Pensions?”, Journal of Public Economics, 158, pp.168~179.
[35] Ehling, P., A. Graniero, and C. Heyerdahl-Larsen. 2018. “Asset Prices and Portfolio Choice with Learning from Experience”, Review of Economic Studies, 85(3), pp.1752~1780.
[36] Gao, M., Y.-J. Liu, and Y. Shi. 2020. “Do People Feel Less at Risk? Evidence from Disaster Experience”, Journal of Financial Economics, 138(3), pp.866~888.
[37] Giné, X. and D. Yang. 2009. “Insurance, Credit, and Technology Adoption: Field Experimental Evidencefrom Malawi”, Journal of Development Economics, 89(1), pp.1~11.
[38] Guiso, L., T. Jappelli, and M. Padula. 2013. “Pension Wealth Uncertainty”, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 80(4), pp.1057~1085.
[39] Gustman, A.L. and T.L. Steinmeier. 2005. “Imperfect Knowledge of Social Security and Pensions”, Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 44(2), pp.373~397.
[40] Knüpfer, S., E. Rantapuska, and M. Sarvimäki. 2017. “Formative Experiences and Portfolio Choice: Evidence from the Finnish Great Depression”, Journal of Finance, 72(1), pp.133~166.
[41] Kuchler, T. and B. Zafar. 2019. “Personal Experiences and Expectations about Aggregate Outcomes”, Journal of Finance, 74(5), pp.2491~2542.
[42] Landerretche, O.M. and C. Martínez. 2013. “Voluntary Savings, Financial Behavior, and Pension Finance Literacy: Evidence from Chile”, Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 12(3), pp.251~297.
[43] Lei, X., C. Zhang, and Y. Zhao. 2013. “Incentive Problems in China's New Rural Pension Program”//, Research in Labor EconomicsEmerald Publishing Ltd: 181~201.
[44] Liu, T. and L. Sun. 2016. “Pension Reform in China”, Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 28(1), pp.15~28.
[45] Liu, H., Q. Sun, and Z. Zhao. 2014. “Social Learning and Health Insurance Enrollment: Evidence from China's New Cooperative Medical Scheme”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 97, pp.84~102.
[46] Maddala, G.S. 1983. “Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics”. Cambridge University Press.
[47] Malmendier, U. and S. Nagel. 2016. “Learning from Inflation Experiences”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(1), pp.53~87.
[48] Malmendier, U., D. Pouzo, and V. Vanasco. 2020. “Investor Experiences and Financial Market Dynamics”, Journal of Financial Economics, 136(3), pp.597~622.
[49] Mastrobuoni, G. 2011. “The Role of Information for Retirement Behavior: Evidence Based on the Stepwise Introduction of the Social Security Statement”, Journal of Public Economics, 95(7), pp.913~925.
[50] Okumura, T. and E. Usui. 2014. “The Effect of Pension Reform on Pension-Benefit Expectations and Savings Decisions in Japan”, Applied Economics, 46(14), pp.1677~1691.
[51] Seru, A., T. Shumway, and N. Stoffman. 2010. “Learning by Trading”, Review of Financial Studies, 23(2), pp.705~739.
[52] Van Duijn, M., M. Mastrogiacomo, M. Lindeboom, and P. Lundborg. 2013. “Expected and Actual Replacement Rates in the Pension System of the Netherlands: How and Why Do They Differ?”, Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 12(2), pp.168~189.
[1] 易行健, 苏欣, 周聪, 杨碧云. 房价预期与城镇居民家庭股市参与——理论探讨与微观经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 502(4): 151-169.
[2] 徐捷, 袁铭, 郭红. 企业预期形成与预期偏误——基于企业层面调查数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 427(1): 116-129.
[1] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[2] 张成思, 党超. 基于双预期的前瞻性货币政策反应机制[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 1 -17 .
[3] 张海洋. 融资约束下金融互助模式的演进——从民间金融到网络借贷[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 101 -115 .
[4] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[5] 孙淑伟, 梁上坤, 阮刚铭, 付宇翔. 高管减持、信息压制与股价崩盘风险[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 175 -190 .
[6] 闫先东, 高文博. 中央银行信息披露与通货膨胀预期管理——我国央行信息披露指数的构建与实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 35 -49 .
[7] 牛霖琳, 林木材. 中国超长期国债的相对流动性溢价与收益率曲线的结构性建模[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 442(4): 17 -31 .
[8] 梁上坤, 陈冬华. 银行贷款决策中的私人效用攫取——基于业务招待费的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 442(4): 112 -127 .
[9] 王弟海, 崔小勇, 邹恒甫. OLG模型中的多重均衡和经济效率——兼论政府在经济中的作用[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 443(5): 1 -17 .
[10] 陈奎明, 陈通. 关于发放高质量小额贷款的关键因子相关研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 197 -215 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1