Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2023, Vol. 514 Issue (4): 92-110    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
数字普惠金融对新型农业经营主体创立的影响与机理——来自中国1845个县域的经验证据
黄祖辉, 宋文豪, 叶春辉
浙江大学中国农村发展研究院,浙江杭州 310058
The Impact and Mechanism of Digital Inclusive Finance During the Establishment of New Agricultural Operators: Evidence from 1,845 Chinese Counties
HUANG Zuhui, SONG Wenhao, YE Chunhui
China Academy for Rural Development, Zhejiang University
下载:  PDF (838KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 在普惠金融与数字技术融合发展的背景下,探索数字普惠金融与新型农业经营主体(以下简称“新型主体”)创立之间的关系,对加快农业农村现代化、实现全民共同富裕具有重要意义。本文利用2014—2020年中国27个省份1845个县的面板数据,使用工具变量法实证研究了数字普惠金融发展对新型主体创立的影响及其作用机理。研究发现:(1)数字普惠金融对家庭农场、农民专业合作社和农业企业的创立均具有显著的促进作用,并且该结论在控制地区—时间交互固定效应、以“FIGI中国项目”试点构建DID模型等稳健性检验下仍然成立。(2)数字普惠金融不仅能通过提高农民正规信贷可得性直接促进新型主体创立,还可以通过提升农民收入水平和农业机械化水平间接促进新型主体创立。(3)异质性分析表明,数字金融覆盖广度、使用深度和普惠金融数字化程度对新型主体创立均具有促进作用;相较于大中型新型主体,小微型新型主体更加受益于数字普惠金融的发展;数字普惠金融对新型主体创立的影响存在县域异质性,地形起伏度小的县强于地形起伏度大的县。本文为理解数字普惠金融对新型主体创立的促进效应,进一步稳妥推动数字普惠金融发展,提供了经验证据和决策参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
黄祖辉
宋文豪
叶春辉
关键词:  数字普惠金融  新型农业经营主体  农业农村现代化  共同富裕  乡村振兴    
Summary:  The emergence of new agricultural operators in China includes agricultural business entities with relatively large operating scales and good management capabilities and material equipment conditions. In addition, they have relatively high labor productivity and land output and resource use rates, with commercialized production as their primary goal. These business entities include family farms, farmers' cooperatives, and agricultural enterprises, which not only promote agricultural modernization and increase the added value and supply of agricultural products, but also improve farmers' income and living standards. In recent years, the Chinese government has attached great importance to the development of new agricultural operators and has introduced a series of supporting policies and measures. However, the development of new agricultural operators also relies heavily on financial support. In reality, due to limited personal wealth, lack of collateral, and insufficient credit records, financial institutions, especially commercial banks, do not favor the creators of these entities, who are mainly farmers. These farmers find it difficult to raise sufficient funds; therefore, they cannot operate their projects normally.
Fortunately, digital inclusive finance in China has developed rapidly in the past decade. According to the World Bank's 2021 Global Findex Database, China has become an important leader in the development of digital finance worldwide. Digital inclusive finance has not only overcome the pain points of traditional rural finance, such as information asymmetry and high transaction costs, but has also greatly improved the accessibility, convenience, and effectiveness of financial services for the agricultural sector. This paper explores whether the development of digital inclusive finance can alleviate farmers' financial constraints and promote the establishment of new agricultural operators? Studying this issue not only expands the literature on digital inclusive finance services for the real economy, but also provides references and insights for the development of digital inclusive finance and the modernization of agriculture in other developing countries.
This paper uses panel data from 1,845 counties in 27 Chinese provinces between 2014 and 2020 in an instrumental variable approach to empirically examine the impact of the development of digital inclusive finance on the creation of new agricultural operators, in addition to its underlying mechanisms. We report three main findings. First, the development of digital inclusive finance has a significant positive effect on the creation of family farms, farmers' specialized cooperatives, and agricultural enterprises. This conclusion is robust under various sensitivity tests, including controlling for region-time fixed effects and constructing a difference-in-differences model using the “FIGI China Project” pilot. Second, the mechanism analysis shows that digital inclusive finance not only directly promotes the creation of new agricultural operators by improving farmers' access to formal credit, but also indirectly promotes new agricultural operators by increasing farmers' income and agricultural mechanization levels. Third, a heterogeneity analysis indicates that the breadth, depth, and digitization of digital finance all have a positive impact on the creation of new agricultural operators. Digital inclusive finance has a stronger effect on the creation of small and micro agricultural operators, compared with medium and large new agricultural operators, which highlights the inclusiveness of China's digital inclusive finance development. Furthermore, the impact of digital inclusive finance on the creation of new agricultural operators varies across counties, with a stronger effect in areas with less topographical variation.
This paper makes three main contributions to the literature. It is the first empirical study to examine the impact of digital inclusive finance on the creation of new agricultural operators, which enriches the literature on the role of digital inclusive finance in promoting rural revitalization. Earlier digital inclusive finance studies have mainly focused on its impact on farmers' entrepreneurship, agricultural production, and rural poverty, while its effect on the creation of new agricultural operators has not been explored fully. Second, this paper elucidates the mechanisms through which the development of digital inclusive finance affects the creation of new agricultural operators, including both direct and indirect effects. The findings reveal the deeper reasons for the promotion of the creation of new agricultural operators using digital inclusive finance. Third, we examine the heterogeneity of the impact of digital inclusive finance on the creation of new agricultural operators from three perspectives, namely digital finance heterogeneity, the scale of new agricultural operators, and the topographical variation across counties. These results provide new insights into how digital inclusive finance promotes the creation of new agricultural operators.
Keywords:  Digital Inclusive Finance    New Agricultural Operators    Agricultural and Rural Modernization    Common Prosperity    Rural Revitalization
JEL分类号:  D14   G21   Q14  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家社会科学基金重大项目(21ZDA071)和国家自然科学基金国际(地区)合作与交流项目(71861147002)的资助。本文为第十六届中国农村金融发展论坛优秀论文,作者感谢参会者的评论。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见, 文责自负。
通讯作者:  宋文豪,博士研究生,浙江大学中国农村发展研究院,E-mail: songwenhao@zju.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  黄祖辉,教授,浙江大学中国农村发展研究院,E-mail:zhhuang@zju.edu.cn.
叶春辉,管理学博士,副教授,浙江大学中国农村发展研究院,E-mail:chhye@zju.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
黄祖辉, 宋文豪, 叶春辉. 数字普惠金融对新型农业经营主体创立的影响与机理——来自中国1845个县域的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 514(4): 92-110.
HUANG Zuhui, SONG Wenhao, YE Chunhui. The Impact and Mechanism of Digital Inclusive Finance During the Establishment of New Agricultural Operators: Evidence from 1,845 Chinese Counties. Journal of Financial Research, 2023, 514(4): 92-110.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2023/V514/I4/92
[1] 范子英和赵仁杰,2019,《法治强化能够促进污染治理吗?——来自环保法庭设立的证据》,《经济研究》第3期,第21~37页。
[2] 郭峰、王靖一、王芳、孔涛、张勋和程志云,2020,《测度中国数字普惠金融发展:指数编制与空间特征》,《经济学(季刊)》第4期,第1401~1418页。
[3] 何广文和刘甜,2019,《乡村振兴背景下农户创业的金融支持研究》,《改革》第9期,第73~82页。
[4] 黄祖辉和俞宁,2010,《新型农业经营主体:现状、约束与发展思路——以浙江省为例的分析》,《中国农村经济》第10期,第16~26+56页。
[5] 江艇,2022,《因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应》,《中国工业经济》第5期,第100~120页。
[6] 江维国和李立清,2014,《新型农业经营主体构建与财政金融支农创新研究》,《南方金融》第9期,第54~57页。
[7] 阚立娜、李录堂和薛凯文,2016,《农地流转背景下新型农业经营主体信贷需求及约束研究——基于陕西杨凌农业示范区的调查分析》,《华中农业大学学报(社会科学版)》第3期,第104~111+135~136页。
[8] 李继尊,2015,《关于互联网金融的思考》,《管理世界》第7期,第1~7+16页。
[9] 李宁、周琦宇和汪险生,2020,《新型农业经营主体的角色转变研究:以农机服务对农地经营规模的影响为切入点》,《中国农村经济》第7期,第40~58页。
[10] 林乐芬和法宁,2015,《新型农业经营主体融资难的深层原因及化解路径》,《南京社会科学》第7期,第150~156页。
[11] 欧阳日辉和龚伟,2022,《数字信贷、算法歧视与动态竞合政策》,《南开学报(哲学社会科学版)》第1期,第78~92页。
[12] 阮荣平、曹冰雪、周佩和郑风田,2017,《新型农业经营主体辐射带动能力及影响因素分析——基于全国2615家新型农业经营主体的调查数据》,《中国农村经济》第11期,第17~32页。
[13] 孙学涛、于婷和于法稳,2022,《数字普惠金融对农业机械化的影响——来自中国1869个县域的证据》,《中国农村经济》第2期,第76~93页。
[14] 汪发元和罗昆,2014,《平原和山区新型农业经营主体成长的困难及愿望比较分析——以湖北省10个农业创业培训基地培训班学员为例》,《学术论坛》第7期,第41~45页。
[15] 汪艳涛、高强和苟露峰,2014,《农村金融支持是否促进新型农业经营主体培育——理论模型与实证检验》,《金融经济学研究》第5期,第89~99页。
[16] 王吉鹏、肖琴和李建平,2018,《新型农业经营主体融资:困境、成因及对策——基于131个农业综合开发产业化发展贷款贴息项目的调查》,《农业经济问题》第2期,第71~77页。
[17] 王蔷和郭晓鸣,2017,《新型农业经营主体融资需求研究——基于四川省的问卷分析》,《财经科学》第8期,第118~132页。
[18] 王文龙,2019,《地区差异、代际更替与中国农业经营主体发展战略选择》,《经济学家》第2期,第82~89页。
[19] 吴雨、李晓、李洁和周利,2021,《数字金融发展与家庭金融资产组合有效性》,《管理世界》第7期,第92~104+7页。
[20] 谢绚丽、沈艳、张皓星和郭峰,2018,《数字金融能促进创业吗?——来自中国的证据》,《经济学(季刊)》第4期,第1557~1580页。
[21] 闫桂权、何玉成和张晓恒,2022,《数字普惠金融发展能否促进农业机械化——基于农机作业服务市场发展的视角》,《农业技术经济》第1期,第51~64页。
[22] 杨林和赵洪波,2022,《数字普惠金融助力农民增收的理论逻辑与现实检验》,《山东社会科学》第4期,第149~155页。
[23] 尹龙,2005,《金融创新理论的发展与金融监管体制演进》,《金融研究》第3期,第7~15页。
[24] 游珍、封志明和杨艳昭,2018,《中国1km地形起伏度数据集》,《全球变化数据学报(中英文)》第2期,第151~155+274~278页。
[25] 张龙耀和邢朝辉,2021,《中国农村数字普惠金融发展的分布动态、地区差异与收敛性研究》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第3期,第23~42页。
[26] 张勋、万广华、张佳佳和何宗樾,2019,《数字经济、普惠金融与包容性增长》,《经济研究》第8期,第71~86页。
[27] 张勋、杨桐、汪晨和万广华,2020,《数字金融发展与居民消费增长:理论与中国实践》,《管理世界》第11期,第48~63页。
[28] 张扬,2014,《试论我国新型农业经营主体形成的条件与路径——基于农业要素集聚的视角分析》,《当代经济科学》第3期,第112~117+128页。
[29] 张照新和赵海,2013,《新型农业经营主体的困境摆脱及其体制机制创新》,《改革》第2期,第78~87页。
[30] 钟真、刘世琦和沈晓晖,2018,《借贷利率、购置补贴与农业机械化率的关系研究——基于8省54县调查数据的实证分析》,《中国软科学》第2期,第32~41页。
[31] 周晶、陈玉萍和阮冬燕,2013,《地形条件对农业机械化发展区域不平衡的影响——基于湖北省县级面板数据的实证分析》,《中国农村经济》第9期,第63~77页。
[32] 周利、冯大威和易行健,2020,《数字普惠金融与城乡收入差距:“数字红利”还是“数字鸿沟”》,《经济学家》第5期,第99~108页。
[33] 周振和孔祥智,2019,《农业机械化对我国粮食产出的效果评价与政策方向》,《中国软科学》第4期,第20~32页。
[34] 朱萌、齐振宏、邬兰娅、李欣蕊和唐素云,2015,《新型农业经营主体农业技术需求影响因素的实证分析——以江苏省南部395户种稻大户为例》,《中国农村观察》第1期,第30~38+93~94页。
[35] Adukia, A., S. Asher, and P. Novosad. 2020. “Educational Investment Responses to Economic Opportunity: Evidence from Indian Road Construction”, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 12(1):348~376.
[36] Bachas, P., P. Gertler, S. Higgins, and E. Seira. 2018. “Digital Financial Services Go a Long Way: Transaction Costs and Financial Inclusion”, AEA Papers and Proceedings, 108:444~448.
[37] Karaivanov, A. 2012. “Financial Constraints and Occupational Choice in Thai Villages”, Journal of Development Economics, 97(2):201~220.
[38] Liu, Y., C. Liu, and M. Zhou. 2021. “Does Digital Inclusive Finance Promote Agricultural Production for Rural Households in China? Research Based on the Chinese Family Database (CFD)”, China Agricultural Economic Review, 13(2):475~494.
[39] Xie, W., T. Wang, and X. Zhao. 2020. “Does Digital Inclusive Finance Promote Coastal Rural Entrepreneurship?”, Journal of Coastal Research, 103(SI):240~245.
[40] Zhou, L., and H. Wang. 2021. “An Approach to Study the Poverty Reduction Effect of Digital Inclusive Finance from a Multidimensional Perspective Based on Clustering Algorithms”, Scientific Programming, 2021:1~11.
[1] 魏浩, 杨明明, 李实. 共同富裕、贸易开放与中国的代际收入流动性[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 506(8): 74-93.
[2] 雷晓燕, 沈艳, 杨玲. 数字时代中国老年人被诈骗研究——互联网与数字普惠金融的作用[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 506(8): 113-131.
[3] 李政, 李鑫. 数字普惠金融与未预期风险应对:理论与实证[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 504(6): 94-114.
[4] 易行健, 周利. 数字普惠金融发展是否显著影响了居民消费——来自中国家庭的微观证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 461(11): 47-67.
[5] 傅秋子, 黄益平. 数字金融对农村金融需求的异质性影响——来自中国家庭金融调查与北京大学数字普惠金融指数的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 461(11): 68-84.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
[10] 张晓宇, 徐龙炳. 限售股解禁、资本运作与股价崩盘风险[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 158 -174 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1