Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2017, Vol. 443 Issue (5): 143-159    DOI: 10.12094/1002-7246(2017)05-0143-17
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
地方关系承销与市场定价有效性研究——基于承销商独立性视角
余峰燕, 梁琪
天津大学管理与经济学部,天津 300072;
南开大学经济学院,天津 300071
Local Relationship Underwriting and Market Pricing Efficiency
YU Fengyan, LIANG Qi
School of Economics & Management, Tianjin University;
School of Economics, Nankai University
下载:  PDF (1655KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 承销业务在我国证券市场上具有明显的“属地性”特征,本文采用选择偏差修正模型探讨了这种“属地性”的地方关系承销现象。研究发现:第一,国有企业、承销商声誉较低的小券商更可能参与地方关系承销业务,而在市场化发展程度较低的地区,地方关系承销的发生概率较高。第二,地方关系承销能显著降低股票IPO折价率,且地方关系承销的股票具有显著的财务业绩优势,说明地方关系资产具有价值且能被市场有效识别。第三,本文基于地方政府对承销双方区域管辖权、股权角度刻画地方关系密度,发现地方关系密度与承销股票IPO折价率呈倒U型关系,当且仅当地方政府是发行人实际控制人时,地方关系承销存在正业绩效应。研究结论为学术界剖析中国式关系承销“异象”、监管部门改善券商执业质量提供了理论基础和经验证据。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
余峰燕
梁琪
关键词:  地方关系承销  关系密度  承销商独立性    
Abstract:  Underwriting in Chinese stock market has the characteristic of ‘local oligopolies’. Utilizing selection bias adjustment model, this paper investigates the local relationship underwriting in China. We find that, firstly SOEs and investment banks with poor reputation are more likely to engage in the local relationship underwriting, and local relationship underwriting takes place more frequently in the less market-oriented regions. Secondly, local relationship underwriting can significantly reduce IPO underpricing and improve the issuers’ financial performance, which means that local relationship has played a certification role and investors have the ability to identify such relationship capital. Thirdly, using territorial jurisdiction and ownership as the relationship intensity measurement, we find an inverted U-shaped relation between the local relationship intensity and IPO underpricing, and only when the local governments serve as the issuers’ final controller can the positive performance effects be observed. Our findings have important policy implications for improving the quality of underwriting services in Chinese stock market.
Key words:  Local Relationship Underwriting    Relationship Intensity    Underwriter Independence
JEL分类号:  G14   G24   G32  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金项目(71272183;71403183;71302097;71672123)国家社会科学基金重大项目(09&ZD037)。
作者简介:  余峰燕,经济学博士,天津大学管理与经济学部金融学系讲师,Email: yufengyan@tju.edu.cn.梁琪(通讯作者),经济学博士,南开大学经济学院财金研究所教授,中国特色社会主义经济建设协同创新中心研究员,Email: liangqi@nankai.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
余峰燕, 梁琪. 地方关系承销与市场定价有效性研究——基于承销商独立性视角[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 443(5): 143-159.
YU Fengyan, LIANG Qi. Local Relationship Underwriting and Market Pricing Efficiency. Journal of Financial Research, 2017, 443(5): 143-159.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/10.12094/1002-7246(2017)05-0143-17  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2017/V443/I5/143
[4] 樊纲、王小鲁和朱恒鹏,2015,《中国市场化指数:各地区市场化相对进程2015年报告》,经济科学出版社。
[1] 陈工孟和高宁, 2000,《中国股票一级市场发行抑价的程度与原因》,《金融研究》第8期,第1~12页。
[5] 梁琪和余峰燕,2014,《商业银行混业经营, 承销商独立性与IPO质量》,《世界经济》第1期,第81~105页。
[2] 刘煜辉和熊鹏,2005,《股权分置、政府管制和中国IPO抑价》,《经济研究》第5期,第85~95页。
[3] 陈晓和李静,2001,《地方政府财政行为在提升上市公司业绩中的作用探析》,《会计研究》第12期,第87~98页。
[6] 刘江会,2010,《中国上市公司股权再融资发行时为何频繁更换主承销商?》,《中国金融评论国际研讨会论文集》。
[4] 樊纲、王小鲁和朱恒鹏,2015,《中国市场化指数:各地区市场化相对进程2015年报告》,经济科学出版社。
[7] 田利辉, 2010,《金融管制、投资风险和新股发行的超额抑价》,《金融研究》第4期,第85~100页。
[5] 梁琪和余峰燕,2014,《商业银行混业经营, 承销商独立性与IPO质量》,《世界经济》第1期,第81~105页。
[8] 徐浩萍和罗炜,2007,《投资银行声誉机制有效性一一执业质量与市场份额双重视角的研究》,《经济研究》第2期,第74~84页。
[6] 刘江会,2010,《中国上市公司股权再融资发行时为何频繁更换主承销商?》,《中国金融评论国际研讨会论文集》。
[7] 田利辉, 2010,《金融管制、投资风险和新股发行的超额抑价》,《金融研究》第4期,第85~100页。
[8] 徐浩萍和罗炜,2007,《投资银行声誉机制有效性一一执业质量与市场份额双重视角的研究》,《经济研究》第2期,第74~84页。
[9] Duarte-Silva, T.2010.“The Market for Certification by External Parties: Evidence from Underwriting and Banking Relationships.” Journal of Financial Economics, 98, pp.568~582.
Duarte-Silva, T.2010.“The Market for Certification by External Parties: Evidence from Underwriting and Banking Relationships.” Journal of Financial Economics, 98, pp.568~582.
[10] Fang Lily H.2005.“Investment Bank Reputation and the Price and Quality of Underwriting Services.” Journal of Finance, 60, pp.2729~2761.
Fang Lily H.2005.“Investment Bank Reputation and the Price and Quality of Underwriting Services.” Journal of Finance, 60, pp.2729~2761.
[11] Gompers, P. and Lerner J.1999.“An Analysis of Compensation in the U.S. Venture Capital Partnership”, Journal of Financial Economics,51, pp.3~44.
Gompers, P. and Lerner J.1999.“An Analysis of Compensation in the U.S. Venture Capital Partnership”, Journal of Financial Economics,51, pp.3~44.
[12] Heckman, J.1997.“The Sample Selection Bias as A Specification Error”. Econometrica, 47,pp.153~162.
Heckman, J.1997.“The Sample Selection Bias as A Specification Error”. Econometrica, 47,pp.153~162.
[13] Jia, N., and Zhang, H.2010.“Impact of Government Ownership on Investment Banks’ Underwriting Performance-Evidence from China”, Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 39,pp.198~228.
Jia, N., and Zhang, H.2010.“Impact of Government Ownership on Investment Banks’ Underwriting Performance-Evidence from China”, Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 39,pp.198~228.
[14] Kang, J. and Liu, W.2007.“Is Universal Banking Justified? Evidence from Bank Underwriting of Corporate Bonds in Japan.” Journal of Financial Economics, 84, pp.142~186.
Kang, J. and Liu, W.2007.“Is Universal Banking Justified? Evidence from Bank Underwriting of Corporate Bonds in Japan.” Journal of Financial Economics, 84, pp.142~186.
[15] Kroszner, R. and Rajan, R.1997.“Organization Structure and Credibility: Evidence from Commercial Bank Securities Activities before the Glass-Steagall Act.” Journal of Monetary Economics,39, pp.475~516.
Kroszner, R. and Rajan, R.1997.“Organization Structure and Credibility: Evidence from Commercial Bank Securities Activities before the Glass-Steagall Act.” Journal of Monetary Economics,39, pp.475~516.
[16] Kutsuna, K.,Smith, J.K. and Smith, R. 2007.“Banking Relationships and Access to Equity Capital Markets: Evidencefrom Japan's Main Bank System.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 31, pp.335~360.
Kutsuna, K.,Smith, J.K. and Smith, R. 2007.“Banking Relationships and Access to Equity Capital Markets: Evidencefrom Japan's Main Bank System.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 31, pp.335~360.
[17] Li, H., and Zhou L.2005.“Political Turnover and Economic Performance: The Disciplinary Role of Personnel Control in China”.Journal of Public Economics ,89, pp. 1743~1762.
Li, H., and Zhou L.2005.“Political Turnover and Economic Performance: The Disciplinary Role of Personnel Control in China”.Journal of Public Economics ,89, pp. 1743~1762.
[18] Liu, X.,Ritter, J., Ritter.2011.“Local Underwriter Oligopolies and IPO Underpricing”, Journal of Financial Economics, 102(3), pp.579~601.
Liu, X.,Ritter, J., Ritter.2011.“Local Underwriter Oligopolies and IPO Underpricing”, Journal of Financial Economics, 102(3), pp.579~601.
[19] Hamao Y., F. Packer and J. R. Ritter.2000.“Institutional Affiliation and the Role of Venture Capital: Evidence from initial public offerings in Japan”. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal,8,pp.529~558.
Hamao Y., F. Packer and J. R. Ritter.2000.“Institutional Affiliation and the Role of Venture Capital: Evidence from initial public offerings in Japan”. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal,8,pp.529~558.
[20] Puri M.1999.“Commercial Banks as Underwriters: Implications for the Going Public Process”. Journal ofFinancial Economics ,54, pp.133~163.
Puri M.1999.“Commercial Banks as Underwriters: Implications for the Going Public Process”. Journal ofFinancial Economics ,54, pp.133~163.
[21] Puri, M.1996.“Commercial Banks in Investment Banking: Conflict of Interest or Certification Role? ”Journal of Financial Economics, 40, pp.373~401.
Puri, M.1996.“Commercial Banks in Investment Banking: Conflict of Interest or Certification Role? ”Journal of Financial Economics, 40, pp.373~401.
[22] Schenone, C.2004.“The Effect of Banking Relationships on the Firm’s IPO Underpricing.” Journal of Finance, 59, pp.2903~2958.
Schenone, C.2004.“The Effect of Banking Relationships on the Firm’s IPO Underpricing.” Journal of Finance, 59, pp.2903~2958.
[23] Suzuki, Katsushi. 2010.“Do the Equity Holding and Soundness of Bank Underwriters Affect Issue Costs of SEOs?”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 34(5), pp.984~995.
Suzuki, Katsushi. 2010.“Do the Equity Holding and Soundness of Bank Underwriters Affect Issue Costs of SEOs?”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 34(5), pp.984~995.
[24] Tian, L.2011.“Regulatory Underpricing: Determinants of Chinese Extreme IPO returns.” Journal of Empirical Finance, 18(1): pp. 78~90.
Tian, L.2011.“Regulatory Underpricing: Determinants of Chinese Extreme IPO returns.” Journal of Empirical Finance, 18(1): pp. 78~90.
[25] Wang Q, Wong T J, Xia L.2008.“ State Ownership, the Institutional Environment, and Auditor Choice: Evidence from China”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46(1), pp.112~134.
Wang Q, Wong T J, Xia L.2008.“ State Ownership, the Institutional Environment, and Auditor Choice: Evidence from China”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46(1), pp.112~134.
[26] Yasuda, A.2001.“Institutions, Relationships and Bank Competition in Bond Underwriting Markets: An International Comparative Study.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers.
Yasuda, A.2001.“Institutions, Relationships and Bank Competition in Bond Underwriting Markets: An International Comparative Study.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers.
[1] 何顶, 罗炜. 风险投资声誉和股价“传染”效应——来自中国上市公司立案公告的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 471(9): 169-187.
[2] 肖欣荣, 马梦璇. 信息共享还是利益冲突?——基于买方单独调研与买卖双方联合调研的实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 470(8): 171-188.
[3] 汝毅, 薛健, 张乾. 媒体新闻报道的声誉溢出效应[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 470(8): 189-206.
[4] 贾盾, 孙溪, 郭瑞. 货币政策公告、政策不确定性及股票市场的预公告溢价效应——来自中国市场的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 469(7): 76-95.
[5] 张宗新, 张秀秀. 引入国债期货合约能否发挥现货市场稳定效应?——基于中国金融周期的研究视角[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 468(6): 58-75.
[6] 刘丽华, 徐艳萍, 饶品贵, 陈玥. 一损俱损:违规事件在企业集团内的传染效应研究[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 468(6): 113-131.
[7] 鄢伟波, 王小华, 温军. 分层制度提升新三板流动性了吗?——来自多维断点回归的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 467(5): 170-189.
[8] 杨威, 赵仲匡, 宋敏. 多元化并购溢价与企业转型[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 467(5): 115-131.
[9] 谭松涛, 黄俊凯, 杜安然. 个人大股东持股与股价暴跌风险[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 467(5): 152-169.
[10] 梁上坤, 张宇, 王彦超. 内部薪酬差距与公司价值——基于生命周期理论的新探索[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 466(4): 188-206.
[11] 杨青, 吉赟, 王亚男. 高铁能提升分析师盈余预测的准确度吗?——来自上市公司的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 465(3): 168-188.
[12] 谢谦, 唐国豪, 罗倩琳. 上市公司综合盈利水平与股票收益[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 465(3): 189-207.
[13] 王雄元, 曾敬. 年报风险信息披露与银行贷款利率[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 463(1): 54-71.
[14] 朱恩伟, 吴璟, 刘洪玉. 基于新闻文本共现性的银企关系分析——以房地产上市公司为例[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 464(2): 117-135.
[15] 张劲帆, 汤莹玮, 刚健华, 樊林立. 中国利率市场的价格发现 ——对国债现货、期货以及利率互换市场的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 463(1): 19-34.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1