Summary:
Finance is an important part of poverty alleviation and development strategies; however, the problem of imbalanced and inadequate development persists and is mainly reflected in the allocation of financial resources. Financial development in rural areas is relatively slow, and the financing needs of disadvantaged groups, such as poor households, have not been effectively met. Digital finance is an important aspect of the development of inclusive finance; it can effectively expand the coverage and ensure the penetration of inclusive finance, and it has a major impact on the relative poverty and vulnerability of households. However, the development of digital finance is controlled by various factors, such as the “divide.” Because of the uneven distribution of digital technology and obstacles, vulnerable groups may encounter new financial exclusions owing to a lack of resources such as Internet tools and financial literacy. Using a combination dataset from the China Household Financial Survey and The Peking University Digital Financial Inclusion Index of China, this study focuses on the impact of digital finance on the relative income and vulnerability of households and examines the impact of the “divide” on this effect. This paper provides a new perspective on how the development of digital finance can reduce household poverty and offers a reference for overcoming the imbalance and inadequacy of financial development and for the formulation of policies to reduce the income gap of residents by ensuring digital financial inclusion. Our empirical results show that digital finance inclusion, especially extending access to digital finance, can increase the relative income and reduce the vulnerability of households. We explore these channels and find that digital finance inclusion can effectively increase the availability of financial services to households and improve the ability of potential investment, non-farm employment, and self-employment to help households reduce poverty. Further study shows that the development of digital finance is inclusive but has not broken space constraints. Digital finance has a stronger poverty reduction effect in advantaged areas such as urban regions and households as well as among individuals with digital literacy and financial education; however, it has little effect on the relative income of disadvantaged households or poor or digitally illiterate individuals. In brief, this phenomenon reflects the urgency of breaking the “divide” between disadvantaged and advantaged regions, households, and individuals. This study makes the following contributions to the literature. First, it is important to verify the impact of the development of digital finance on the relative income and vulnerability of households and to analyze its micromechanisms because it is the key to promoting common prosperity. This paper systematically analyzes the above problems, not only enriching the literature on digital finance and poverty reduction but also clarifying the role of digital finance on households' relative income and vulnerability. Second, we examine whether the effect of digital finance on the relative income and vulnerability of households is affected by the “divide” because this is a difficult problem that must be overcome in the development of digital finance and will reduce the poverty reduction effect of digital finance. Analyzing the impact of the “divide” will accelerate the formulation of relevant policies and promote the differentiated development of digital finance. Apart from the abovementioned empirical findings, first, we must develop digital finance and maximize its inclusive effects. We should use the advantages of digital technology to promote digital financial innovations in the future, such that households can use finance to achieve factor accumulation and increase their income. Second, we should increase investments in communication infrastructure in poor villages and help poor households and families without digital devices to buy mobile phones or computers. For example, we can implement an “Internet equipment to the countryside” plan to overcome the “tool exclusion” of poor households to ensure that poor households in remote areas also enjoy high-quality financial services. For poor households that lack financial literacy, the government should increase poverty alleviation efforts by offering education and improving their financial literacy through lectures and websites to prevent financial exclusion because of the “divide” in digital finance.
赵亚雄, 王修华. 数字金融、家庭相对收入及脆弱性——兼论多维“鸿沟”的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 508(10): 77-97.
ZHAO Yaxiong, WANG Xiuhua. Digital Finance, the Relative Income and Vulnerability of Households: The Impact of the Multidimensional “Divide”. Journal of Financial Research, 2022, 508(10): 77-97.
Bauer, J. M., 2018, “The Internet and Income Inequality: Socio-economic Challenges in A Hyperconnected Society”, Telecommunications Policy, 42(4): 333～343.
[29]
Beck, T., D. K. Asli, and R. Levien, 2007, “Finance, Inequality and the Poor”, Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1): 27～49.
[30]
Bruhn, M., and I. Love., 2014, “The Real Impact of Improved Access to Finance: Evidence from Mexico”, Journal of Finance, 69(3):1347～1376.
[31]
Burgess, R., and R. Pande., 2005, “Do Rural Banks Matter？ Evidence from the Indian Social Banking Experiment”, The American Economic Review, 95(3):780～795.
[32]
Chaudhuri, S., J. Jalan, and A. Suryahadi., 2002, “Assessing Household Vulnerability to Poverty from Cross-sectional Data: A Methodology and Estimates from Indonesia”, Columbia University Discussion Paper.
[33]
Dollar, D., and A. Kraay, 2002, “Growth is Good for the Poor” Journal of Economic Growth, 7(3):195～225.
[34]
Dupas, P., and J. Robinson, 2013, “Savings Constraints and Microenterprise Development: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Kenya”, Applied Economics, (10):163～192.
[35]
Forman, C., A. Goldfarb, and S. Greenstein, 2012, “The Internet and Local Wages:A Puzzle”, American Economic Review, 102(1): 556～575.
[36]
Hau, H., Y. Huang, H. Shan, and Z. Sheng, 2019, “How Fin-Tech Enters China's Credit Market”, AEA Papers and Proceedings, 109(5):60～64.
[37]
Jalilian, H., and C. Kirkpatrick, 2005, “Does Financial Development Contribute to Poverty Reduction？”, Journal of Development Studies, 41(4):636～656.
[38]
Jamel., and Boukhatem., 2016, “Assessing the Direct Effect of Financial Development on Poverty Reduction in A Panel of Low-and Middle-income Countries”, Research in International Business & Finance, 37:214～230.
[39]
Jeanneney, S. G., and K. Kpodar, 2011, “Financial Development and Poverty Reduction: Can there be a Benefit without a Cost”, The Journal of Development Studies, 47(1):143～163.
[40]
Kim., and Jong-Hee., 2016, “A Study on the Effect of Financial Inclusion on the Relationship Between Income Inequality and Economic Growth”, Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 52(2):498～512.
[41]
Park,C. Y., 2015, “Financial Inclusion, Poverty, and Income Inequality in Developing Asia”, Social Science Electronic Publishing, 20(5):419～435.
[42]
Pitt, M. M., and S. R. Khandker., 1998, “The impact of Group‐Based Credit Programs on Poor Households in Bangladesh: Does the Gender of Participants Matter？”, Journal of Political Economy, 106(5):958～996.
