Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2022, Vol. 506 Issue (8): 38-54    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
实体杠杆对经济增长的影响研究——基于金融稳定的调节效应
龙海明, 吴迪
湖南大学金融与统计学院,湖南长沙 410006
The Effect of Real Sector Leverage on Economic Growth: Based on the Moderating Effects of Financial Stability
LONG Haiming, WU Di
College of Finance and Statistics, Hunan University
下载:  PDF (931KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文以全球43个国家和地区2001-2020年的动态面板数据为研究样本,实证检验不同实体部门杠杆对经济增长的影响差异及作用机制。通过构造金融稳定指数,进一步论证金融稳定对实体杠杆与经济增长之间关系的调节效应。结果表明:实体杠杆与经济增长之间存在“倒U形”关系,不同部门杠杆对经济增长影响的“拐点”有所不同。机制检验发现,居民杠杆、企业杠杆和政府杠杆分别通过“消费”“投资”和“政府支出”渠道影响经济增长;金融稳定性的提升能够正向调节实体杠杆对经济增长的影响,提高实体杠杆对经济增长影响的“拐点”。上述结论对我国经济增长和杠杆调控具有一定政策启示。在经济运行过程中,应充分考虑各部门杠杆异质性,细化实体杠杆的调控方向,进一步优化杠杆结构,以期实现经济增长与金融稳定双重目标下的动态平衡。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
龙海明
吴迪
关键词:  实体杠杆  金融稳定  经济增长    
Summary:  The effects of real sector leverage on the macro economy are of long-standing academic interest. Excessive real sector leverage exaggerates the true potential of economic growth. External shocks in the real sector amplify the financial system's vulnerability. High real sector leverage combined with the highly contagious and nonlinear effects of financial risks can adversely affect economic growth. In general, although scholars discuss the effects of real sector leverage and financial stability on the macro economy, some drawbacks exist in their assumptions. Excessive real sector leverage inevitably affects the growth of economies at various levels of development; however, the extent of this effect remains open to discussion, and no consensus has been reached yet. Besides debates concerning real sector leverage and economic growth, whether financial stability affects the correlation between real sector leverage and the macro economy is another matter of interest. Theoretically, financial stability is an important prerequisite for economic growth, and the effect of real sector leverage on the macro economy is inevitably affected by financial stability. However, two important questions exist: is the effect positive or negative? And is the effect significant? Clarifying the interactions among real sector leverage, the economy, and financial stability may help deepen our understanding of related issues. In addition, existing studies have considerable limitations with respect to research samples. Most of the foreign literature focuses on the United States, the eurozone, and other developed economies; by contrast, there is insufficient research on leverage in emerging economies, especially China. Domestic studies mainly focus on the effects of macro leverage on economic growth, mostly ignoring the heterogeneity of leverage across various sectors. Meanwhile, research on micro leverage mostly focuses on the leverage in a single sector and its influencing factors, without examining the effects of real sector leverage and financial stability on the macro economy from a global perspective.
This study uses the dynamic panel data of 43 countries and regions from 2001 to 2020 as the research sample and employs the systematic generalized method of moments estimation method to empirically assess the effects of real sectors leverage on economic growth. A financial stability index is constructed to assess the moderating effects of financial stability on the correlation between real sector leverage and economic growth. The results reveal an inverted U-shaped relationship between real sector leverage and economic growth, and the inflection points differ between sectors. Further tests to uncover the underlying mechanisms show that household, enterprise, and government leverages affect economic growth through the channels of consumption, investment, and government expenditure, respectively. Improvements in financial stability can positively adjust the effects of real sector leverage on the macro economy and improve the inflection point. These findings have certain policy implications in terms of a country's economic growth and leverage control. Thus, it is necessary to fully consider the heterogeneity of the leverage of various sectors and refine the regulatory directions of real sector leverage to achieve dynamic balance under the dual goals of economic growth and financial stability.
Compared with the existing literature, the marginal contributions of this study are mainly reflected in the following aspects. First,by incorporating the variables of real sector leverage, the heterogeneity effects of leverage in different sectors on the macro economy and the specific mechanisms are investigated, bridging the previous gaps caused by lack of relevant domestic studies. Second, this study explores the moderating effects of financial stability on the correlation between real sector leverage and the macro economy, providing useful empirical evidence for policy formulation, with the dual goals of economic recovery and financial stability.
Keywords:  Real Sector Leverage    Financial Stability    Economic Growth
JEL分类号:  G21   G32   011  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家社会科学基金项目(17FJY013)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  吴 迪,博士研究生,湖南大学金融与统计学院,E-mail:979302327@qq.com.   
作者简介:  龙海明,经济学博士,教授,湖南大学金融与统计学院,E-mail:lhm8684859@126.com.
引用本文:    
龙海明, 吴迪. 实体杠杆对经济增长的影响研究——基于金融稳定的调节效应[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 506(8): 38-54.
LONG Haiming, WU Di. The Effect of Real Sector Leverage on Economic Growth: Based on the Moderating Effects of Financial Stability. Journal of Financial Research, 2022, 506(8): 38-54.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V506/I8/38
[1] 纪敏、严宝玉和李宏瑾,2017,《杠杆率结构、水平和金融稳定——理论分析框架和中国经验》,《金融研究》第2期,第11~25页。
[2] 刘哲希和李子昂,2018,《结构性去杠杆进程中居民部门可以加杠杆吗》,《中国工业经济》第10期,第42~60页。
[3] 马勇、田拓、阮卓阳和朱军军,2016,《金融杠杆、经济增长与金融稳定》,《金融研究》第6期,第37~51页。
[4] 马勇和陈雨露,2017,《金融杠杆、杠杆波动与经济增长》,《经济研究》第6期,第31~45页。
[5] 饶晓辉和刘方,2014,《政府生产性支出与中国的实际经济波动》,《经济研究》第11期,第17~30页。
[6] 阮健弘、刘西和叶欢,2020,《我国居民杠杆率现状及影响因素研究》,《金融研究》第8期,第18~33页。
[7] 陶玲和朱迎,2016,《系统性金融风险的监测和度量——基于中国金融体系的研究》,《金融研究》第6期,第18~36页。
[8] 谭小芬、李源和王可心,2019,《金融结构与非金融企业“去杠杆”》,《中国工业经济》第2期,第23~41页。
[9] 王桂虎和郭金龙,2019,《宏观杠杆率与系统性金融风险的门槛效应——基于跨国面板数据的经验研究》,《金融评论》第1期,第112~122页。
[10] 王宇伟、盛天翔和周耿,2018,《宏观政策、金融资源配置与企业部门高杠杆率》,《金融研究》第1期,第36~52页。
[11] 薛涧坡和张网,2018,《积极财政政策:理论发展、政策实践与基本经验》,《财贸经济》第10期,第30~41页。
[12] 叶永刚和张培,2009,《中国金融监管指标体系构建研究》,《金融研究》第4期,第159~171页。
[13] 张斌、何晓贝和邓欢,2018,《不一样的杠杆——从国际比较看杠杆上升的现象、原因与影响》,《金融研究》第2期,第15~29页。
[14] Abreu, D., and Brunnermeier, M. K. 2003. “Bubbles and crashes”, Econometrica, 71(1):173~204.
[15] Bernanke, B., Gertler, M., and Gilchrist, S. 1996. “The Financial Accelerator and The Flight to Quality”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(1):1~15.
[16] Checherita-Westphal, C., and Rother, P. 2012. “The Impact of High Government Debt on Economic Growth and ts Channels: An Empirical Investigation For The Euro Area”, European Economic Review, 56(7):1392~1405.
[17] Crouzet, N. 2018. “Aggregate Implications of Corporate Debt Choices”, The Review of Economic Studies, 85(3):1635~1682.
[18] Dewatripont, M., and Maskin, E. 1995. “Credit and Efficiency in Centralized and Decentralized Economies”, The Review of Economic Studies, 62(4):541~555.
[19] Debelle, G. 2004. Macroeconomic Implications of Rising Household Debt.
[20] Fisher, I. 1933. “The Debt-Deflation Theory of Great Depressions”. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 337~357.
[21] Glick, R., and Lansing, K. J. 2009. “US Household Deleveraging and Future Consumption Growth”, FRBSF Economic Letter.
[22] Illing, M., and Liu, Y. 2006. “Measuring Financial Stress in a Developed Country: An Application to Canada”, Journal of Financial Stability, 2(3):243~265.
[23] Kornai, J. 1986. “The Soft Budget Constraint”, Kyklos, 39(1):3~30.
[24] Kornai, J., Maskin, E., and Roland, G. 2003. “Understanding The Soft Budget Constraint”, Journal of Economic Literature, 41(4):1095~1136.
[25] Laeven, L., Levine, R., and Michalopoulos, S. 2015. “Financial Innovation and Endogenous Growth”, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 24(1):1~24.
[26] Lustig, N., and Mariscal, J. 2020. “How COVID-19 Could be Like the Global Financial Crisis (or worse)”, Mitigating the COVID Economic Crisis: Act Fast and do Whatever it Takes, 185~190.
[27] Puente-Ajovín, M., and Sanso-Navarro, M. 2015. “Granger Causality Between Debt and Growth: Evidence from OECD countries”, International Review of Economics & Finance, 35:66~77.
[28] Reinhart, C. M., Rogoff, K., and Savastano, M. A. 2003. “Debt Intolerance”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, (1):1~62.
[29] Reinhart, C. M., and Rogoff, K. S. 2010. “Growth in a Time of Debt”, American Economic Review, 100(2):573~78.
[30] Stiglitz, J. E. 1990. “Symposium on Bubbles”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(2):13~18.
[31] Scott III, R. H., and Pressman, S. 2015. “Inadequate Household Deleveraging: Income, Debt, and Social Provisioning”, Journal of Economic Issues, 49(2):483~492.
[1] 王博, 赵森杨, 罗荣华, 彭龙. 地方政府债务、空间溢出效应与区域经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 506(8): 18-37.
[2] 文书洋, 刘浩, 王慧. 绿色金融、绿色创新与经济高质量发展[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 506(8): 1-17.
[3] 吴迪, 张楚然, 侯成琪. 住房价格、金融稳定与宏观审慎政策[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 505(7): 57-75.
[4] 刘哲希, 郭俊杰, 谭涵予, 陈彦斌. 货币政策能够兼顾“稳增长”与“稳杠杆”双重目标吗?——基于不同杠杆环境的比较[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 505(7): 20-37.
[5] 文竹, 金涛. 关于中国经济增长模式的一个解释框架——基于“土地财政”的演进分析[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 502(4): 1-17.
[6] 陈创练, 高锡蓉, 刘晓彬. “稳增长”与“防风险”双目标的宏观调控政策抉择[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 499(1): 19-37.
[7] 牛欢, 严成樑. 环境税率、双重红利与经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 493(7): 40-57.
[8] 文书洋, 张琳, 刘锡良. 我们为什么需要绿色金融?——从全球经验事实到基于经济增长框架的理论解释[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 498(12): 20-37.
[9] 刘贯春, 司登奎, 刘芳. 人力资本偏向金融部门如何影响实体经济增长?[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 496(10): 78-97.
[10] 吕有吉, 景鹏, 郑伟. 人口老龄化、养老保险基金缺口弥补与经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 487(1): 51-70.
[11] 马勇, 付莉. “双支柱”调控、政策协调搭配与宏观稳定效应[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 482(8): 1-17.
[12] 庄毓敏, 储青青, 马勇. 金融发展、企业创新与经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 478(4): 11-30.
[13] 贾俊雪, 晁云霞, 李紫霄. 财政分权与经济增长可持续性——基于情势转换与聚类视角的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 484(10): 55-73.
[14] 刘淑琳, 王贤彬, 黄亮雄. 经济增长目标驱动投资吗?——基于2001-2016年地级市样本的理论分析与实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 470(8): 1-19.
[15] 姜富伟, 郭鹏, 郭豫媚. 美联储货币政策对我国资产价格的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 467(5): 37-55.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1