Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2022, Vol. 502 Issue (4): 151-169    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
房价预期与城镇居民家庭股市参与——理论探讨与微观经验证据
易行健, 苏欣, 周聪, 杨碧云
广东金融学院金融与投资学院,广东广州 510521;
广东外语外贸大学金融学院,广东广州 510006;
复旦大学经济学院,上海 200433
House Price Expectations and Urban Households' Stock Market Participation: Theoretical Discussion and Micro Empirical Evidence
YI Xingjian, SU Xin, ZHOU Cong, YANG Biyun
School of Finance and Investment, Guangdong University of Finance;
School of Finance, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies;
School of Economics, Fudan University
下载:  PDF (608KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文基于中国家庭金融调查数据,通过构建理论模型和实证检验分析了房价预期与家庭股市参与的关系,考察了行为金融偏差在房价预期影响股市参与过程中的作用,并根据背景风险、社会网络和户主特征进行异质性分析。结果表明:(1)房价上涨预期通过降低居民家庭的股票收益率预期和增加住房资产,进而降低居民家庭的股市参与概率和参与程度;(2)“心理账户”以及“有限关注”的存在显著弱化了房价上涨预期对家庭股市参与的负向作用;(3)房价上涨预期对股市参与概率和参与程度的负向作用在收入风险更高、健康状况更差、社会网络水平较低以及受教育程度偏低的家庭中更大。因此,稳定房价预期能够通过提升家庭股市参与,进而从需求角度促进股票市场的健康发展。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
易行健
苏欣
周聪
杨碧云
关键词:  房价预期  住房资产  股票市场  心理账户  有限关注    
Summary:  In recent years, Chinese households' limited participation in the stock market has become noticeable. However, the proportion of housing assets in the asset allocation of households is very high. Within the general adherence to the position of “houses are for living in and not for speculative investment,” it is of great theoretical and practical significance to discuss Chinese households' limited participation in the stock market from the perspective of house price expectations.
Based on data from the China Household Finance Survey (CHFS), this paper analyzes the relationship between house price expectations and household stock market participation by constructing a theoretical model and conducting empirical tests. In terms of the theoretical model, this paper constructs a two-phase model and finds that house price expectations affect stock investment by changing stock return expectations and adjusting investment in housing assets. In terms of empirical analysis, this paper uses a probit and tobit model to analyze the impact of rising house price expectations on stock market participation and share and uses both direct and indirect methods to empirically test the existence of the two mechanisms. In the direct method, by constructing proxy variables for stock return expectations and housing asset investment, this paper expounds whether households' expectations of house price increases affect these variables. In the indirect method, the paper introduces the exogenous impact of the housing purchase restriction policy, which hinders the adjustment mechanism of housing asset investment, to indirectly identify the impact mechanism. The empirical results further verify that the expectation of higher house prices reduces the probability and degree of households' participation in the stock market through the mechanisms of changes in expected stock returns and adjustments in housing assets. At the same time, this paper empirically analyzes the impact of deviation in household behavior on the relationship between house price expectations and stock market participation. The results show that behavioral deviations such as mental accounts and limited attention hinder the adjustment of household portfolios and weaken the inhibitory effect of house price expectations on household stock investment. This paper further analyzes the heterogeneity of households according to their background risk, social network, and the head of household's education level. The results show that the expectation of higher house prices has a greater inhibitory effect on stock investment by households with higher levels of background risk, lower levels of social network, and lower levels of education.
Compared with previous studies, the innovation of this paper is mainly reflected in the following aspects. First, through the theoretical model and empirical tests, this paper comprehensively analyzes the effect and underlying mechanism of house price expectations on stock investment, providing a new explanation for the mystery of households' limited stock market participation. Second, the paper uses behavioral finance theory, taking mental accounts and limited attention as the starting point, to study the impact of irrational behavioral deviation on the relationship between house price expectations and stock investment, and expands the research perspective in the field of household asset allocation. Third, this paper chooses “whether the city publishes real estate policy regulation documents” as the instrumental variable for house price expectations, which better overcomes the possible endogeneity problem.
It is expected that rising house prices will reduce households' stock investment through the mechanisms of changes in expected stock returns and adjustments in housing assets. Therefore, considering the position that houses are for living in, not for speculative investment, it is necessary to not only stabilize land and house prices but also pay attention to guiding and stabilizing house price expectations to promote the steady and healthy development of the real estate market. In addition, it is necessary to promote households' demand for stocks and provide impetus for the healthy development of the housing market and capital market from the perspective of demand. Moreover, the existence of behavioral financial deviations such as mental accounts and limited attention will prevent households from adjusting their portfolios according to the expected changes in prices. When macroeconomic management and financial supervision departments design policies and when financial institutions design financial products and wealth management services, they need to consider households' behavioral deviations.
Keywords:  House Price Expectations    Housing Assets    Stock Market    Mental Accounts    Limited Attention
JEL分类号:  G11   D13   D84  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家自然科学基金面上项目(72073036)、广东省自然科学基金面上项目(2021A1515012641)与国家社科基金青年项目(20CJL031)的资助。感谢第十一届《金融研究》论坛评论人提出的宝贵建议,感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
作者简介:  易行健,经济学博士,教授,广东金融学院金融与投资学院,广东外语外贸大学金融学院,E-mail:yxjby@163.com.苏 欣,经济学硕士研究生,广东外语外贸大学金融学院,E-mail:280865804@qq.com.周 聪,经济学博士研究生,复旦大学经济学院,E-mail: idzhoucong@126.com.杨碧云,经济学博士,教授,广东外语外贸大学金融学院,广东外语外贸大学华南财富管理中心研究基地,E-mail:biyunyang@163.com.
引用本文:    
易行健, 苏欣, 周聪, 杨碧云. 房价预期与城镇居民家庭股市参与——理论探讨与微观经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 502(4): 151-169.
YI Xingjian, SU Xin, ZHOU Cong, YANG Biyun. House Price Expectations and Urban Households' Stock Market Participation: Theoretical Discussion and Micro Empirical Evidence. Journal of Financial Research, 2022, 502(4): 151-169.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V502/I4/151
[1]蔡栋梁、何翠香和方行明,2015,《住房及房价预期对家庭创业的影响》,《财经科学》第6期,第108~118页。
[2]陈永伟、史宇鹏和权五燮,2015,《住房财富、金融市场参与和家庭资产组合选择——来自中国城市的证据》,《金融研究》第4期,第1~18页。
[3]甘犁、吴雨、何青、何欣和弋代春,2019,《中国家庭金融研究(2016)》,西南财经大学出版社。
[4]高波、王辉龙和李伟军,2014,《预期、投机与中国城市房价泡沫》,《金融研究》第2期,第44~58页。
[5]何兴强、史卫和周开国,2009,《背景风险与居民风险金融资产投资》,《经济研究》第12期,第119~130页。
[6]李爱梅、凌文辁、方俐洛和肖胜,2007,《中国人心理账户的内隐结构》,《心理学报》第4期,第706~714页。
[7]李凤、罗建东、路晓蒙、邓博夫和甘犁,2016,《中国家庭资产状况、变动趋势及其影响因素》,《管理世界》第2期,第45~56页。
[8]李增刚和杜舒康,2021,《房股联动影响固定资产投资吗?——来自中国资产市场的经验证据》,《济南大学学报(社会科学版)》第4期,第100~114页。
[9]罗楚亮,2004,《经济转轨、不确定性与城镇居民消费行为》,《经济研究》 第4期,第100~106页。
[10]王聪、柴时军、田存志和吴甦,2015,《家庭社会网络与股市参与》,《世界经济》 第5期,第105~124页。
[11]王聪和田存志,2012,《股市参与,参与程度及其影响因素》,《经济研究》第10期,第97~107页。
[12]王松涛,2011,《中国住房市场政府干预的原理与效果评价》,《统计研究》第1期,第27~35页。
[13]王晓全、骆帝涛和王奇,2016,《非正式保险制度与农户风险分担建模与政策含义——来自CFPS数据的实证研究》,《经济科学》第6期,第89~101页。
[14]易行健、周聪、来特和周利,2019,《商业医疗保险与家庭风险金融资产投资——来自CHFS数据的证据》,《经济科学》第5期,第104~116页。
[15]尹海员和乔小乐,2015,《基于多中介变量的货币市场利率及预期波动对股票收益率冲击效应分解》,《中央财经大学学报》第6期,第46~54页。
[16]尹志超、宋全云和吴雨,2014,《金融知识、投资经验与家庭资产选择》,《经济研究》第4期,第62~75页。
[17]尹志超、吴雨和甘犁,2015,《金融可得性、金融市场参与和家庭资产选择》,《经济研究》第3期,第87~99页。
[18]张前程和杨光,2016,《产能利用、信贷扩张与投资行为——理论模型与经验分析》,《经济学(季刊)》第4期,第1507~1532页。
[19]赵留彦和隋福民,2016,《股票收益与通货膨胀:近代中国的长期视角》,《中国经济史研究》第1期,第51~64页。
[20]周广肃、樊纲和申广军,2014,《收入差距、社会资本与健康水平——基于中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)的实证分析》,《管理世界》第7期,第12~21页。
[21]Aboody, D., R. Lehavy., and B. Trueman, 2010. “Limited Attention and the Earnings Announcement Returns of Past Stock Market Winners”, Review of Accounting Studies, 15(2):317~344.
[22]Angrist, J. D., and J. S. Pischke, 2008, Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton University Press.
[23]Armona, L., A. Fuster and B. Zafar, 2019, “Home Price Expectations and Behavior: Evidence from a Randomized Information Experiment”, Review of Economic Studies, 86(4):1371~1410.
[24]Barber, B. M., and T. Odean, 2008, “All that Glitters: The Effect of Attention and News on The Buying Behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors”, The Review of Financial Studies, 21(2): 785~818.
[25]Cardak, B. A., and R. Wilkins, 2009, “The Determinants of Household Risky Asset Holdings: Australian Evidence on Background Risk and Other Factors”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 33(5): 850~860.
[26]Chetty, R., L. Sándor., and A. Szeidl, 2017, “The Effect of Housing on Portfolio Choice”, The Journal of Finance, 72(3): 1171~1212.
[27]Combes, P. P., G. Duranton, and L. Gobillon, 2019, “The Costs of Agglomeration: House and Land Prices in French Cities”, The Review of Economic Studies, 86(4): 1556~1589.
[28]Corradin, S., J. L. Fillat, and C. Vergara-alert, 2014, “Optimal Portfolio Choice with Predictability in House Prices and Transaction Costs”, Review of Financial Studies, 27(3): 823~880.
[29]Guiso, L., and P. Sodini, 2012, “Household Finance: An Emerging Field”, Handbook of the Economics of Finance, (2): 1397~1532.
[30]Heaton, J., and D. Lucas, 2000, “Portfolio Choice and Asset Prices: The Importance of Entrepreneurial Risk”, Journal of Finance, 55(3): 1163~1198.
[31]Hirst, D. E., and P. E. Hopkins, 1998, “Comprehensive income Reporting and Analysts' Valuation Judgments”, Journal of Accounting Research, 36:47~75.
[32]Kahneman, D.,1973, Attention and Effort, Published by Prentice-Hall.
[33]Morck, R., B. Yeung, and W. Yu, 2000, “The Information Content of Stock Markets: Why do Emerging Markets Have Synchronous Stock Price Movements?”, Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2): 215~260.
[34]Shefrin, H., and M. Statman, 2000, “Behavioral Portfolio Theory”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35(2): 127~151.
[35]Shiller, R. J., 2007, “Understanding Recent Trends in House Prices and Home Ownership”, NBER Working Paper, NO. 13553.
[36]Thaler, R., 1980, “Towards a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1(1): 39~60.
[37]Thaler, R., 1985, “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice”, Marketing Science, 4(3): 199~214.
[1] 姜富伟, 胡逸驰, 黄楠. 央行货币政策报告文本信息、宏观经济与股票市场[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 492(6): 95-113.
[2] 郑挺国, 葛厚逸. 中国股市羊群效应的区制转移时变性研究[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 489(3): 170-187.
[3] 邹文理, 王曦, 谢小平. 中央银行沟通的金融市场响应──基于股票市场的事件研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 476(2): 34-50.
[4] 刘程程, 苏治, 宋鹏. 全球股票市场间风险传染的测度、监管及预警[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 485(11): 94-112.
[5] 陈运森, 黄健峤. 股票市场开放与企业投资效率——基于“沪港通”的准自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 470(8): 151-170.
[6] 陈国进, 丁杰, 赵向琴. “好”的不确定性、“坏”的不确定性与股票市场定价——基于中国股市高频数据分析[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 469(7): 174-190.
[7] 谢谦, 唐国豪, 罗倩琳. 上市公司综合盈利水平与股票收益[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 465(3): 189-207.
[8] 许荣, 刘成立. 限制交易政策如何影响期现关系?——对股指期货价格发现功能的实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 464(2): 154-168.
[9] 陈坚, 张轶凡. 中国股票市场的已实现偏度与收益率预测[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 459(9): 107-125.
[10] 杨晓兰, 金雪军. 我国股票市场熔断机制的磁力效应:基于自然实验的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 161-177.
[11] 尹力博, 柳依依. 中国商品期货金融化了吗?—来自国际股票市场的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 429(3): 189-206.
[12] 郭永济, 张谊浩. 空气质量会影响股票市场吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 428(2): 71-85.
[1] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[2] 李万福, 杜静, 张怀. 创新补助究竟有没有激励企业创新自主投资——来自中国上市公司的新证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 130 -145 .
[3] 金宇超, 靳庆鲁, 李晓雪. 资本市场注意力总量是稀缺资源吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 162 -177 .
[4] 祝继高, 李天时, 尤可畅. 房地产价格波动与商业银行贷款损失准备——基于中国城市商业银行的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 83 -98 .
[5] 康书隆, 余海跃, 刘越飞. 住房公积金、购房信贷与家庭消费——基于中国家庭追踪调查数据的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 67 -82 .
[6] 纪志宏, 曹媛媛. 信用风险溢价还是市场流动性溢价:基于中国信用债定价的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 1 -10 .
[7] 孙淑伟, 梁上坤, 阮刚铭, 付宇翔. 高管减持、信息压制与股价崩盘风险[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 175 -190 .
[8] 邓路, 刘瑞琪, 江萍. 公司超额银行借款会导致过度投资吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 115 -129 .
[9] 黎文靖, 李茫茫. “实体+金融”:融资约束、政策迎合还是市场竞争?——基于不同产权性质视角的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 100 -116 .
[10] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1