Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2026, Vol. 550 Issue (4): 74-92    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
媒体负面报道与银行信贷——基于信息中介和外部监督的双重视角
孙莎, 巩倩, 潘奇, 范静
Negative Media Coverage and Bank Lending: A Dual Perspective of Information Intermediary and External Monitoring
SUN Sha, GONG Qian, PAN Qi, FAN Jing
International Business School, Beijing Foreign Studies University; School of Finance, Central University of Finance and Economics
下载:  PDF (623KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 信贷供给和投向是银行服务实体经济的重要手段。本文以A股上市银行为研究对象,实证检验媒体关于银行的负面报道对银行贷款增速和投向的影响。研究发现,负面报道虽然抑制了银行总贷款增速,但同时引导银行投向非实体经济行业的贷款增速下降。机制检验表明,负面报道一方面通过披露不利信息提升银行融资难度,另一方面通过发挥外部监督功能提升银行审慎程度,最终导致银行贷款增速放缓。同时,负面报道通过强化银行合规压力促使银行降低投向非实体经济行业的贷款增速。此外,负面报道的治理效果因媒体导向、报道原创程度及银行类型不同而存在显著差异。进一步地,本文探讨了媒体与银行其他内外部治理的交互作用,发现银行内部治理能发挥显著调节作用,媒体与外部审计之间存在协同效应,而与金融监管存在替代效应。本文证实了媒体在银行外部治理中扮演关键角色,尤其是在推动银行服务实体经济方面的积极作用。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
孙莎
巩倩
潘奇
范静
关键词:  媒体报道  银行信贷  信息中介  外部监督    
Summary:  The steady growth of the real economy relies on the support of the financial system. As the core business of the banking industry, bank lending plays a pivotal role in boosting the development of the real economy. Therefore, exploring the factors that influence bank lending is of great practical significance. Media coverage, as a vital information intermediary, plays a key role in market discipline. Existing studies mainly focus on the role of media in the external governance of non-financial enterprises, or examine how media coverage affects bank risks and stock prices, while the impact of media coverage on bank lending remains underexplored. Meanwhile, research on the factors influencing bank lending has largely centered on macroeconomic policies, local government intervention, and bank-specific characteristics, failing to systematically investigate the role of media. In this context, this paper focuses on exploring the impact of negative media coverage on banks' loan growth and credit allocation.
Drawing on the perspectives of information intermediary and external monitoring, this paper constructs an analytical framework to examine how negative media coverage influences bank lending. First, as an information intermediary, negative media coverage discloses unfavorable information about banks. This triggers a crisis of confidence among depositors and participants in interbank and capital markets, increasing financing difficulty and thereby suppressing lending. Second, its external monitoring role amplifies reputational loss and increases the likelihood of regulatory penalties. On the one hand, it forces banks to adopt more prudent operations, thereby reducing banks' loan growth. On the other hand, it intensifies compliance pressures, prompting banks to better align with policies and, consequently, reducing lending to non-real economy sectors.
Empirically, this study uses a sample of A-share listed commercial banks in China from Q1 2010 to Q4 2023. Data on negative media coverage are obtained from the Datago news database, and bank-level financial data from BankFocus and CSMAR. Results indicate that negative coverage reduces banks' total loan growth and restrains lending to non-real economy sectors. Mechanism tests reveal that negative media coverage increases banks' financing difficulties by disclosing adverse information and strengthens prudential operation through external monitoring, thereby constraining overall loan growth. Additionally, its external monitoring role curbs non-real economy lending by intensifying compliance pressures. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that total loan growth is mainly affected by market-oriented media, whereas non-real economy lending is more strongly influenced by policy-oriented media. Original news reports exert a more pronounced impact. With respect to total loan growth, state-owned and rural commercial banks are more responsive to negative coverage, while city commercial banks show the largest decline in non-real economy lending. Further analysis shows that banks' internal governance moderates the impact of negative media coverage. The effect is stronger for banks with higher ownership concentration, larger state-owned shareholding, non-dual leadership structure, a higher proportion of female directors, and lower executive compensation. As an external governance mechanism, media complements external auditors but acts as a substitute for financial regulation.
This study confirms the critical role media plays in banks' external governance systems, particularly in promoting prudent operations and encouraging banks to better serve the real economy. Accordingly, we propose the following policy implications. First, banks should incorporate negative media coverage into risk governance frameworks, strengthening monitoring and ensuring timely response to negative coverage. Second, financial regulators should value and make full use of media information to understand banks' operating conditions more comprehensively. In the event of negative coverage, regulators should respond promptly and guide public opinion rationally. Third, policymakers should improve norms for banking media coverage and encourage independent, original, in-depth reporting to strengthen the media's external governance effectiveness.
The main contributions are threefold. First, by exploring the potential constraining effect of negative media coverage on bank lending, this study expands the literature on both banks' external governance and the determinants of bank lending. Second, it empirically examines the interactive relationships between the media and other internal and external governance mechanisms, providing valuable empirical evidence for constructing more effective and comprehensive bank governance systems. Third, it offers a new perspective on the role of the media as an external governance mechanism, demonstrating that the media can play a positive role in optimizing the allocation of financial resources and improving the quality and efficiency of financial services for the real economy.
Keywords:  Media Coverage    Bank Lending    Information Intermediary    External Monitoring
JEL分类号:  G14   G21   G34  
基金资助: *本文感谢感谢国家自然科学基金一般项目(72473012)、教育部人文社科研究青年项目(23YJC790118)、北京外国语大学“双一流”重大标志性项目(2022SYLZD001; 2025SYLZD002)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  巩 倩,博士研究生,北京外国语大学国际商学院,E-mail:gongqian@bfsu.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  孙 莎,金融学博士,副教授,北京外国语大学国际商学院,E-mail:sunsha@bfsu.edu.cn.
潘 奇,硕士研究生,中央财经大学金融学院,E-mail:sariel.20180901@ gmail.com.
范 静,管理学博士,教授,北京外国语大学国际商学院,E-mail:fanjing@bfsu.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
孙莎, 巩倩, 潘奇, 范静. 媒体负面报道与银行信贷——基于信息中介和外部监督的双重视角[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 550(4): 74-92.
SUN Sha, GONG Qian, PAN Qi, FAN Jing. Negative Media Coverage and Bank Lending: A Dual Perspective of Information Intermediary and External Monitoring. Journal of Financial Research, 2026, 550(4): 74-92.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2026/V550/I4/74
[1] 丁鑫和周晔,2024,《数字化转型与银行信贷配置——基于银行贷款投向实体经济的视角》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第3期,第193~216页。
[2] 黄群慧,2017,《论新时期中国实体经济的发展》,《中国工业经济》第9期,第5~24页。
[3] 蒋海、王炳霖和吴文洋,2023,《媒体报道、监管压力与银行风险承担》,《南方金融》第6期,第18~32页。
[4] 江曙霞和刘忠璐,2016,《资本质量会影响银行贷款行为吗?》,《金融研究》第12期,第63~77页。
[5] 江艇,2022,《因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应》,《中国工业经济》第5期,第100~120页。
[6] 李广众和李光华,2025,《金融监管协调与银行违约风险》,《系统工程理论与实践》第2期,第1~21页。
[7] 李培功和沈艺峰,2010,《媒体的公司治理作用:中国的经验证据》,《经济研究》第4期,第14~27页。
[8] 梁虎,2020,《权益融资、债务融资与银行资产配置“脱虚向实”》,《金融经济学研究》第5期,第50~64页。
[9] 刘冲、杜通、刘莉亚和李明辉,2019,《资本计量方法改革、商业银行风险偏好与信贷配置》,《金融研究》第7期,第38~56页。
[10] 明雷、黄远标和吴一凡,2025,《监管处罚与银行高质量发展:基于银行效率的视角》,《世界经济》第3期,第146~179页。
[11] 钱先航、曹廷求和李维安,2011,《晋升压力、官员任期与城市商业银行的贷款行为》,《经济研究》第12期,第72~85页。
[12] 王辉和朱家雲,2022,《金融监管视角下银行稳健性与流动性资产配置》,《经济研究》第12期,第104~123页。
[13] 王艳艳、王成龙、于李胜和郑天宇,2020,《银行高管薪酬延付政策能抑制影子银行扩张吗?》,《管理世界》第12期,第175~185+211+186~189页。
[14] 徐亚飞和孟庆玺,2024,《并购业绩承诺完成质量何以提升?——来自媒体监督的证据》,《金融研究》第6期,第188~206页。
[15] 余明桂和潘红波,2008,《政治关系、制度环境与民营企业银行贷款》,《管理世界》第8期,第9~21+39+187页。
[16] 张宗益、吴恒宇和吴俊,2012,《商业银行价格竞争与风险行为关系——基于贷款利率市场化的经验研究》,《金融研究》第7期,第1~3+5~14页。
[17] 钟畅、周开国和应千伟,2016,《媒体监督能够起到外部治理的作用吗?——来自中国上市公司违规的证据》,《金融研究》第6期,第193~206页。
[18] 周开国、邢子煜和杨海生,2022,《银行负债结构与企业信贷获取》,《经济研究》第8期,第191~208页。
[19] 周颖刚、潘骏和刘岩,2025,《商业银行股权结构特征与银行系统脆弱性水平》,《金融研究》第2期,第39~57页。
[20] 祝继高、饶品贵和鲍明明,2012,《股权结构、信贷行为与银行绩效——基于我国城市商业银行数据的实证研究》,《金融研究》第7期,第48~62页。
[21] 祝继高、岳衡和饶品贵,2020,《地方政府财政压力与银行信贷资源配置效率——基于我国城市商业银行的研究证据》,《金融研究》第1期,第88~109页。
[22] Ananou, F., D. K. Chronopoulos, A. Tarazi and J. O. S. Wilson, 2021, “Liquidity Regulation and Bank Lending”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 69, 101997.
[23] Bushman, R. M., C. D. Williams and R. Wittenberg-Moerman, 2017, “The Informational Role of the Media in Private Lending”, Journal of Accounting Research, 55, pp.115~152.
[24] Carretta, A., D. Cucinelli, L. Fattobene and P. Schwizer, 2025, “Bank Misconduct: The Deterrent Effect of Country Governance and Customer Reaction”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 174, 107434.
[25] Carlini, F., D. Cucinelli, D. Previtali and M. G. Soana, 2020, “Don’t Talk Too Bad! Stock Market Reactions to Bank Corporate Governance News”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 121, 105962.
[26] Cheng, I., H. Hong, and J. A. Scheinkman, 2015, “Yesterday’s Heroes: Compensation and Risk at Financial Firms”, The Journal of Finance, 70(2), pp. 839~879.
[27] Cookson, J. A., C. Fox, J. Gil-Bazo, J. F. Imbet and C. Schiller, 2023, “Social Media as a Bank Run Catalyst”, SSRN Working Paper, No. 4422754.
[28] Cookson, J. A., R. Lu, W. Mullins and M. Niessner, 2024, “The Social Signal”, Journal of Financial Economics, 158, 103870.
[29] Dyck, A., N. Volchkova and L. Zingales, 2008, “The Corporate Governance Role of the Media: Evidence from Russia”, The Journal of Finance, 63, pp.1093~1135.
[30] Fang, X., D. Jutrsa, S. M. Peria, A. F. Presbitero and L. Ratnovski, 2022, “Bank Capital Requirements and Lending in Emerging Markets: The Role of Bank Characteristics and Economic Conditions”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 135, 105806.
[31] Flannery, M. J., 1998, “Using Market Information in Prudential Bank Supervision: A Review of the U.S. Empirical Evidence”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 30(3), pp.273~305.
[32] Houston, J. F., C. Lin and Y. Ma, 2011, “Media Ownership, Concentration and Corruption in Bank Lending”, Journal of Financial Economics, 100, pp.326~350.
[33] Ivanovic', M., 2016, “Determinants of Credit Growth: The Case of Montenegro”, Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 5(2), pp.101~118.
[34] Joe, J. R., 2003, “Why Press Coverage of a Client Influences the Audit Opinion”, Journal of Accounting Research, 41(1), pp. 109~133.
[35] Jin, J. Y., K. Kanagaretnam, Y. Liu and N. Liu. 2019. “Banks’ Loan Growth, Loan Quality, and Social Capital”, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 21, pp.83~102.
[36] Kashyap, A. K. and J. C. Stein. 2000. “What Do a Million Observations on Banks Say about the Transmission of Monetary Policy?”, American Economic Review, 90(3), pp.407~428.
[37] Li, Y., H. Shi and Y. Zhou, 2021, “The Influence of the Media on Government Decisions: Evidence from IPOs in China”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 70, 102056.
[38] Palvia, A., E. Vähämaa, and S. Vähämaa, 2015, “Are Female CEOs and Chairwomen More Conservative and Risk Averse? Evidence from the Banking Industry During the Financial Crisis”, Journal of Business Ethics, 131(3), pp. 577~594.
[39] Rodnyansky, A. and O. M. Darmouni, 2017, “The Effects of Quantitative Easing on Bank Lending Behavior”, Review of Financial Studies, 30, pp.3858~3887.
[40] Ru, Y., J. Xue and Q. Zhang, 2024, “Managing Conflicts of Interest in the Financial Media: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in China”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 48, 107261.
[41] Tetlock, P. C., 2007, “Giving Content to Investor Sentiment: The Role of Media in the Stock Market”, The Journal of Finance, 62, pp.1139~1168.
[1] 孙莎附录 Download
[1] 游家兴, 邵平平, 刘淳. 市场边缘化公司盈余公告后价格漂移现象研究[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 548(2): 152-169.
[2] 江伟, 李钰, 雷婧祯. 生产网络中心性与银行信贷决策[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 536(2): 95-113.
[3] 贺佳, 屈波, 郭俊汝. 基金经理媒体报道与个体投资者行为——来自基金申赎微观大数据的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 546(12): 188-206.
[4] 王雅琦, 贾思源. 汇率冲击、银行外币敞口与企业投资[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 534(12): 78-96.
[5] 陈少凌, 周开国, 杨海生, 钟嘉颖. 分析师利空关注与公司投资效率:“萝卜”加“大棒”[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 523(1): 150-168.
[6] 郭晔, 未钟琴, 方颖. 金融科技布局、银行信贷风险与经营绩效——来自商业银行与科技企业战略合作的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 508(10): 20-38.
[7] 赵娜, 王博, 张珂瑜. 融资租赁、银行信贷与企业投资[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 487(1): 150-168.
[8] 李从刚, 许荣. 保险治理与公司违规——董事高管责任保险的治理效应研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 480(6): 188-206.
[9] 叶永卫, 李增福. 续贷限制与企业技术创新[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 485(11): 151-169.
[10] 戴亦一, 张鹏东, 潘越. 老赖越多,贷款越难?——来自地区诚信水平与上市公司银行借款的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 470(8): 77-95.
[11] 罗进辉. 媒体报道与高管薪酬契约有效性[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 453(3): 190-206.
[12] 罗炜, 何顶, 洪莉莎, 常国珍. 媒体报道可以预测创业企业的发展前景吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 177-191.
[13] 龙海明, 王志鹏. 征信系统、法律权利保护与银行信贷[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 117-130.
[14] 褚剑, 方军雄, 于传荣. 卖空约束放松与银行信贷决策[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 450(12): 111-126.
[1] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[2] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[3] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
[4] 罗进辉, 向元高, 金思静. 中国资本市场低价股的溢价之谜[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 439(1): 191 -206 .
[5] 张靖佳, 孙浦阳, 古芳. 欧洲量化宽松政策对中国企业出口影响——一个汇率网状溢出效应视角[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 18 -34 .
[6] 高昊宇, 杨晓光, 叶彦艺. 机构投资者对暴涨暴跌的抑制作用:基于中国市场的实证[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 163 -178 .
[7] 梁巨方, 韩乾. 商品期货可以提供潜在组合多样化收益吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 129 -144 .
[8] 黄小琳, 朱松, 陈关亭. 劳动投资效率、企业性质与资产收益率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 130 -144 .
[9] 冯根福, 刘虹, 冯照桢, 温军. 股票流动性会促进我国企业技术创新吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 192 -206 .
[10] 张程, 范立夫. 大宗商品价格影响与货币政策权衡——基于石油的金融属性视角[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 72 -85 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1