Mutual Fund Investors and Corporate Governance: New Insights from Investors' Social and Sustainability Preferences
LAI Mianshan, ZHOU You, Philip Arestis
China Center for Special Economic Zone Research, Shenzhen University;Accounting and Finance Department, Leeds University Business School;Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge
Summary:
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investment is increasingly favored in China's public mutual fund industry. Prior to 2008, this field was still in a nascent or even blank state, but by the end of 2023, China's green loan balance had reached as high as 30.08 trillion RMB, marking significant progress in China's financial market in the area of sustainable investment. This growth aligns with national priorities like the carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals and sustainable development, yet it faces challenges such as inconsistent information disclosure, non-uniform standards, and greenwashing risks. Currently, academic and practical interest have surged, with studies highlighting ESG's role in enhancing fund performance, attracting inflows, and mitigating risks during market uncertainties (e.g., Lins et al., 2017; Hartzmark and Sussman, 2019). However, while overall ESG impacts are well-documented, the independent role of the governance (G) dimension remains underexplored, particularly in how it influences investor behavior. Good governance is foundational to corporate sustainability, which can boost firm value, performance, and improve long-term stability (Gompers et al., 2003; John et al., 2008). Investors, driven by social preferences and non-financial motives, may favor funds emphasizing governance to align with ethical norms, even at potential financial return trade-offs (Riedl and Smeets, 2017; Pastor et al., 2021). Drawing on a comprehensive dataset of MSCI ESG and China's mutual funds from 2007 to 2023, this paper addresses this gap by constructing a novel fund-level governance score, which is based on MSCI governance pillar scores weighted by fund holdings, and investigates its link to fund flows amid rising ESG adoption and investor sophistication. We have the following main results. First, this paper reveals a significant “corporate governance premium” flow phenomenon in the China's fund market, and this phenomenon is more reasonably explained by investors' social preference theory. Specifically, investors are more inclined to allocate capital to funds within their portfolios that actively practice good governance principles. This indicates that, driven by social preferences and sustainable development concepts, Chinese fund investors incorporate the governance level of portfolio companies into their decision-making framework when selecting funds, thereby forming capital flow characteristics based on governance quality. Second, investors' positive responses to corporate governance exhibit significant asymmetric characteristics, primarily manifested in buying rather than selling. Further analysis shows governance-driven fund flows differ by fund size and star ratings. Smaller funds and highly rated funds experience more significant effects. Third, this paper further strengthens the reliability of these conclusions through various robustness tests, including instrumental variable (IV) analysis and propensity score matching (PSM). This study contributes threefold to the literature. First, this paper extends the study of the information sets utilized by equity fund investors in their selection processes (Berk and Van Binsbergen, 2016; Barber et al., 2016). Second, it advances understanding of mutual fund dynamics by highlighting buy-sell asymmetries in governance sensitivity, which contributes to behavioral finance in decision contexts. Third, it illuminates non-financial motives of fund investors in China's market, where investors trade off returns for sustainability, which aligns with global evidence (Hartzmark and Sussman, 2019; Pastor et al., 2021). In practice, our findings suggest fund managers may focus on governance transparency to get more societal preference-driven inflows, especially for smaller or higher-rated products. Regulators may tackle greenwashing by encouraging standardized ratings and ESG disclosure. The result will assist with the ESG market grow towards “dual carbon” goals. In conclusion, this paper offers insights into fund investor behavior that are centered on governance. It illustrates how, in China's evolving ESG landscape, social and sustainability preferences impact the mutual fund market. It provides useful recommendations for enhancing fund designs and regulatory procedures by illustrating how governance drives asymmetric, heterogeneous flows, which support China's sustainable financial development.
赖勉珊, 周游, Philip Arestis. 公募基金投资者与公司治理——基于社会和可持续发展偏好[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 548(2): 170-187.
LAI Mianshan, ZHOU You, Philip Arestis. Mutual Fund Investors and Corporate Governance: New Insights from Investors' Social and Sustainability Preferences. Journal of Financial Research, 2026, 548(2): 170-187.
[1]蔡贵龙和张亚楠,2023,《基金ESG投资承诺效应——来自公募基金签署PRI的准自然实验》,《经济研究》第 12 期,第 22～40 页。 [2]财新智库,2020/2024,《2020/2024中国ESG发展白皮书》,北京:财新智库。 [3]冯旭南和李心愉,2013,《参与成本、基金业绩与投资者选择》,《管理世界》第 4 期,第 48～58 页。 [4]姜广省、卢建词和李维安,2021,《绿色投资者发挥作用吗？——来自企业参与绿色治理的经验研究》,《金融研究》第 5 期,第 117～134 页。 [5]李常青和辛立柱,2024,《漂绿还是漂棕:非效率投资下的ESG漂洗倾向》,《经济管理》第 5 期,第 168～189 页。 [6]李维安、张耀伟、郑敏娜、李晓琳、崔光耀和李惠,2019,《中国上市公司绿色治理及其评价研究》,《管理世界》第 5 期,第 126～133+160 页。 [7]李祥文和吴文锋,2018,《基金业绩排名与期末业绩拉升》,《管理世界》第 9 期,第 33～45+191 页。 [8]李向前、赵锐和王菊,2024,《ESG投资提高了基金业绩吗？——兼论ESG投资对“业绩-资金流量关系”的影响》,《南开经济研究》第 6 期,第 185～203 页。 [9]刘洋溢、廖妮和罗荣华,2022,《基金赚钱、基民不赚钱:业绩持续性感知与基金投资者行为》,《中国工业经济》第 2 期,第 156～174 页。 [10]陆培丽、董战峰、申雯竹和蔺霄,2024,《我国ESG投资基金发展趋势分析与展望》,《中国环境管理》第 1 期,第 42～48 页。 [11]陆蓉、陈百助、徐龙炳和谢新厚,2007,《基金业绩与投资者的选择——中国开放式基金赎回异常现象的研究》,《经济研究》第 6 期,第 39～50 页。 [12]苏睿芯、杜建国和金帅,2023,《绿色转型还是投机漂绿:金融支持视角下高碳企业的策略选择》,《企业经济》第 12 期,第 139～149 页。 [13]孙俊秀、谭伟杰和郭峰,2024,《中国主流ESG评级的再评估》,《财经研究》第 5 期,第 4～18+78 页。 [14]田正磊、刘洋溢和罗荣华,2023,《行业集中与风格均衡:双向助力基金价值创造》,《管理世界》第 11 期,第 94～125 页。 [15]王辉、宁炜和陈旭,2024,《数字化平台营销与投资者利益——基于基金管理人视角》,《管理世界》第 3 期,第 205～225 页。 [16]王金平、张洁、潘慧婷等,2024,《国内ESG基金的行为解析:ESG绩效、投资方向与风险警示》,《企业经济》第 10 期,第 127～137 页。 [17]王凯和李婷婷,2022,《ESG基金发展现状、问题与展望》,《财会月刊》第 6 期,第 147～154 页。 [18]王擎、吴玮和蔡栋梁,2010,《基金评级与资金流动:基于中国开放式基金的经验研究》,《金融研究》第9 期,第106～12页。 [19]夏琼、刘逸潇和魏方庆,2023,《如何提升ESG基金的绩效水平？——基于DEA-Malmquist生产率指数与fsQCA方法(英文)》,《中国科学技术大学学报》第 8 期,第 25～33+71 页。 [20]张琳琳、沈红波和范剑青,2022,《证券投资基金规模适度性研究——基于中国市场的证据》,《金融研究》第 3 期,第 189～206 页。 [21]张伟伟、张景静、陈攀和张德涛,2024,《估值修复还是信息混淆？——基于多方ESG评级与股票错误定价的研究》,《金融研究》第 11 期,第 170～188 页。 [22]Ali, A., Chen, X., Yao, T. and Yu, T., 2008, “Do Mutual Funds Profit from the Accruals Anomaly？”, Journal of Accounting Research, 46(1), pp.1～26. [23]Alok, S., Kumar, N. and Wermers, R., 2020, “Do Fund Managers Misestimate Climatic Disaster Risk”, Review of Financial Studies, 33(3), pp.1146～1183. [24]Bailey, W., Kumar, A. and Ng, D., 2011, “Behavioral Biases of Mutual Fund Investors”, Journal of Financial Economics, 102(1), pp.1～27. [25]Barber, B. M., Huang, X. and Odean, T., 2016, “Which Factors Matter to Investors？ Evidence from Mutual Fund Flows”, Review of Financial Studies, 29(10), pp.2600～2642. [26]Berk, J. B. and Van Binsbergen, J. H., 2016, “Assessing Asset Pricing Models Using Revealed Preference”, Journal of Financial Economics, 119(1), pp.1～23. [27]Bhagat, S. and Bolton, B., 2019, “Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: The Sequel”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, pp.142～168. [28]Bolton, P. and Kacperczyk, M., 2021, “Do Investors Care about Carbon Risk？”, Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), pp.517～549. [29]Borgers, A., Derwall, J., Koedijk, K. and Ter Horst, J., 2015, “Do Social Factors Influence Investment Behavior and Performance？ Evidence from Mutual Fund Holdings”, Journal of Banking ＆ Finance, 60, pp.112～126. [30]Cao, J., Titman, S., Zhan, X. and Zhang, W., 2023, “ESG Preference, Institutional Trading, and Stock Return Patterns”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 58(5), pp.1843～1877. [31]Chen, T., Dong, H. and Lin, C., 2020, “Institutional Shareholders and Corporate Social Responsibility”, Journal of Financial Economics, 135(2), pp.483～504. [32]Chen, Y., Miguel, A. F. and Liu, X., 2021, “Does Mutual Fund Family Size Matter？ International Evidence”, Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 62, p.100708. [33]Couvert, M., 2020, “What Is the Impact of Mutual Funds' ESG Preferences on Portfolio Firms？”, Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper No. 21-42. [34]Cremers, K. J. M., Riley, T. B. and Zambrana, R., 2023, “The Complex Materiality of ESG Ratings: Evidence from Actively Managed ESG Funds”, SSRN Working Paper. [35]Del Guercio, D. and Tkac, P. A., 2008, “Star Power: The Effect of Morningstar Ratings on Mutual Fund Flow”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43(4), pp.907～936. [36]Edelen, R. M. and Warner, J. B., 2001, “Aggregate Price Effects of Institutional Trading: A Study of Mutual Fund Flow and Market Returns”, Journal of Financial Economics, 59(2), pp.195～220. [37]Ferrell, A., Liang, H. and Renneboog, L., 2016, “Socially Responsible Firms”, Journal of Financial Economics, 122(3), pp.585～606. [38]Gao, G. P., Gao, P. and Song, Z., 2018, “Do Hedge Funds Exploit Rare Disaster Concerns？”, Review of Financial Studies, 31(7), pp.2650～2692. [39]Gompers, P., Ishii, J. and Metrick, A., 2003, “Corporate Governance and Equity Prices”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), pp.107～156. [40]Griffin, D., Li, K. and Xu, T., 2021, “Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Innovation: International Evidence”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 56(1), pp.123～154. [41]Gruber, M. J., 1996, “Another Puzzle: The Growth in Actively Managed Mutual Funds”, Journal of Finance, 51(3), pp.783～810. [42]Hartzmark, S. M. and Sussman, A. B., 2019, “Do Investors Value Sustainability？ A Natural Experiment Examining Ranking and Fund Flows”, Journal of Finance, 74(6), pp.2789～2837. [43]Heeb, F., Kölbel, J. F., Paetzold, F. and Zeisberger, S., 2023, “Do Investors Care about Impact？”, Review of Financial Studies, 36(5), pp.1737～1787. [44]Hong, H. and Kacperczyk, M., 2009, “The Price of Sin: The Effects of Social Norms on Markets”, Journal of Financial Economics, 93(2), pp.15～36. [45]Huang, J., Wei, K. D. and Yan, H., 2007, “Participation Costs and the Sensitivity of Fund Flows to Past Performance”, Journal of Finance, 62(3), pp.1273～1311. [46]Jiang, G. J. and Yuksel, H. Z., 2017, “What Drives the ‘Smart-Money' Effect？ Evidence from Investors' Money Flow to Mutual Fund Classes”, Journal of Empirical Finance, 40, pp.39～58. [47]John, K., Litov, L. and Yeung, B., 2008, “Corporate Governance and Risk‐Taking”, Journal of Finance, 63(4), pp.1679～1728. [48]Keswani, A. and Stolin, D., 2008, “Which Money Is Smart？ Mutual Fund Buys and Sells of Individual and Institutional Investors”, Journal of Finance, 63(1), pp.85～118. [49]Lins, K. V., Servaes, H. and Tamayo, A., 2017, “Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis”, Journal of Finance, 72(4), pp.1785～1824. [50]Maxfield, S. and Wang, L., 2021, “Does Sustainable Investing Reduce Portfolio Risk？ A Multilevel Analysis”, European Financial Management, 27(5), pp.959～980. [51]McCahery, J. A., Sautner, Z. and Starks, L. T., 2016, “Behind the Scenes: The Corporate Governance Preferences of Institutional Investors”, Journal of Finance, 71(6), pp.2905～2932. [52]Muñoz, F., 2019, “The ‘Smart Money' Effect in Mutual Funds with Socially Responsible Investment: The Role of Investor Sentiment”, International Review of Economics ＆ Finance, 62, pp.1～20. [53]Nanda, V., Wang, Z. J. and Zheng, L., 2004, “Family Values and the Star Phenomenon: Strategies of Mutual Fund Families”, Review of Financial Studies, 17(3), pp.667～698. [54]Pastor, L., Stambaugh, R. F. and Taylor, L. A., 2021, “Sustainable Investing in Equilibrium”, Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), pp.550～571. [55]Pastor, L., Stambaugh, R. F. and Taylor, L. A., 2023, “Green Tilts (No. w31320)”, NBER Working Paper. [56]Raghunandan, A. and Rajgopal, S., 2022, “Do ESG Funds Make Stakeholder-Friendly Investments？”, Review of Accounting Studies, 27(3), pp.822～876. [57]Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J. and Zhang, C., 2008, “Socially Responsible Investments: Institutional Aspects, Performance, and Investor Behavior”, Journal of Banking ＆ Finance, 32(9), pp.1723～1742. [58]Rezaee, Z., 2008, Corporate Governance and Ethics, John Wiley ＆ Sons. [59]Riedl, A. and Smeets, P., 2017, “Why Do Investors Hold Socially Responsible Mutual Funds？”, Journal of Finance, 72(6), pp.2505～2550. [60]Sapp, T. and Tiwari, A., 2004, “Does Stock Return Momentum Explain the ‘Smart Money' Effect？”, Journal of Finance, 59(6), pp.2605～2622. [61]Zheng, L., 1999, “Is Money Smart？ A Study of Mutual Fund Investors' Fund Selection Ability”, Journal of Finance, 54(3), pp.901～933.
