Extrapolative Expectations of Housing Price and Long-Term Rental Demand: Evidence from Rental Housing Contract Data
LI Shangchen, ZHANG Yingguang, HU Jiayin, ZHANG Zheng
Center for Financial Innovation and Development, The University of Hong Kong; Guanghua School of Management, Peking University;National School of Development, Peking University; Guanghua School of Management, Peking University
Summary:
The demand for long-term rental housing continues to grow as an increasing number of households choose to rent instead of buying their first homes. In major cities such as Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and Hangzhou, the proportion of renters among the total population reached 40% by 2022. This paper systematically examines the relationship between housing price growth expectations and long-term rental demand using a proprietary dataset comprising over 400,000 rental contracts from a long-term rental platform and approximately 500,000 second-hand housing transactions in Beijing between 2015 and 2019. We address the empirical challenge of measuring long-term rental demand by analyzing leases through the innovative business model of a long-term rental platform. Acting as a “second landlord” in the rental market, the platform signs long-term leasing contracts with property owners, acquires properties with fixed rents, and sublets them to tenants after standardizing renovation and furnishing. To minimize vacancies and maximize profits, the rental platform prioritizes tenant renewals. Therefore, tenant renewals with the platform serve as a reliable proxy for long-term rental demand unaffected by landlords. To investigate the impact of housing price expectations, we exploit the implementation of the differentiated housing purchase restriction (HPR) policy in Beijing in 2017 as an exogenous shock. We find a significant negative (positive) correlation between house price growth in the tenant's neighborhood and the tenant's renewal rate before (after) March 2017. Prior to the HPR policy, during a period of rapid house price growth, a 1% increase in house price growth is, on average, associated with a 2.2% decrease in tenant renewal rate after controlling for tenant, leasing, and rental property characteristics and including neighborhood and year-month fixed effects. In contrast, following the HPR policy, a 1% increase in house price growth is significantly associated with a 1.9% increase in tenant renewal rate. Our pre-trend analysis confirms that the HPR policy is critical to reversing the impact of house price growth on long-term rental demands. Our results suggest that as the HPR policy stabilizes house price expectations, tenants residing in neighborhoods with faster house price growth become more inclined to choose long-term rentals as their housing solution. Tenants who continue renting from the platform are more likely to switch to new leases with higher rent and to entire rentals, indicating a trend of moving up the housing ladder as they decide to rent instead of buying. We further find that in the post-HPR period, house price growth in multiple past periods is positively related to tenant renewal rates, with stronger effects observed as the renewal time approaches. Moreover, both the volatility and dispersion of house price growth are significantly and positively associated with tenant renewal rates. Our empirical findings align with the predictions of extrapolative expectations theory and diagnostic expectations theory in the economics and finance literature (Malmendier and Nagel, 2016; Bordalo et al., 2018; Bordalo et al., 2020). During house price booms, tenants extrapolate recent house price information and conclude that prices will continue to rise in the future. However, the introduction of the HPR policy serves as a diagnostic signal that prompts tenants to adjust their expectation formation mechanism and recognize the potential downsides. Apart from housing price expectations, the HPR policy may impact tenants' demand for long-term rentals by increasing the cost of home purchases. However, the differentiated HPR policy implemented in Beijing aims to deter speculative home purchases while safeguarding reasonable home purchase demand, thus having a relatively minor impact on first-home buyers. Notably, 94% of the tenants in our sample are non-local residents with an average age of 29 years, suggesting that most of them, who are eligible to purchase their first home, are not directly affected by the tightened credit constraints of the HPR. This is supported by a heterogeneity analysis showing that the effects are not related to the age of tenants but are more pronounced among tenants from less developed provinces. These pieces of evidence collectively indicate that direct credit restrictions are not the primary mechanism driving our results. This paper makes several contributions to the literature. First, we address the empirical challenge of measuring tenants' willingness to rent for an extended period by utilizing a unique dataset from a long-term rental platform, which ensures that the renewal information reflects tenants' decision-making rather than supply-side factors. Second, we verify the spillover effects of the housing transaction market on tenants' demand for long-term rentals, thereby enriching the research on the relationship between the housing sales market and the rental market. Third, we provide empirical evidence of the application of extrapolative expectations theory and diagnostic expectations theory in real decision-making processes regarding tenants' rental renewal choices. Our empirical findings demonstrate the crucial role of future house price growth expectations in influencing residents' demand for long-term rentals.
[1]郭进、徐盈之和白俊红,2022,《住房、便利设施与异质性劳动力流动——微观机制与福利效应》,《金融研究》第7期,第135~153页。 [2]李凤、罗建东、路晓蒙、邓博夫和甘犁,2016,《中国家庭资产状况、变动趋势及其影响因素》,《管理世界》第2期,第45~56+187页。 [3]李雪松和黄彦彦,2015,《房价上涨、多套房决策与中国城镇居民储蓄率》,《经济研究》第9期,第100~113页。 [4]吴迪、张楚然和侯成琪,2022,《住房价格、金融稳定与宏观审慎政策》,《金融研究》第7期,第57~75页。 [5]颜色和朱国钟,2013,《“房奴效应”还是“财富效应”?——房价上涨对国民消费影响的一个理论分析》,《管理世界》第3期,第34~47页。 [6]易行健、苏欣、周聪和杨碧云,2022,《房价预期与城镇居民家庭股市参与——理论探讨与微观经验证据》,《金融研究》第4期,第151~169页。 [7]尹志超、仇化和潘学峰,2021,《住房财富对中国城镇家庭消费的影响》,《金融研究》第2期,第114~132页。 [8]张光利和刘小元,2018,《住房价格与居民风险偏好》,《经济研究》第1期,第110~128页。 [9]张翔、李伦一、柴程森和马双,2015,《住房增加幸福:是投资属性还是居住属性?》,《金融研究》第10期,第17~31页。 [10]赵玮和李勇,2022,《需求结构、异质性预期和房价波动——兼论限购限贷政策与货币政策效果》,《南开经济研究》第7期,第81~99页。 [11]赵文哲、刘思嘉和史宇鹏,2019,《干得好不如嫁得好?——房价变动与居民婚姻观念研究》,《金融研究》第9期,第94~111页。 [12]Afrouzi, H., S.Y. Kwon, A. Landier, Y. Ma and D. Thesmar, 2023. “Overreaction in expectations: Evidence and theory”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 138(3), pp.1713~1764. [13]Armona, L., A. Fuster and B. Zafar, 2019, “Home Price Expectations and Behaviour: Evidence from a Randomized Information Experiment”, The Review of Economic Studies, 86(4), pp.1371~1410. [14]Bailey, M., E. Dávila, T. Kuchler and J. Stroebel, 2019, “House Price Beliefs and Mortgage Leverage Choice”, The Review of Economic Studies, 86(6), pp.2403~2452. [15]Bordalo, P., N. Gennaioli and A. Shleifer, 2018, “Diagnostic Expectations and Credit Cycles”, The Journal of Finance, 73(1), pp.199~227. [16]Bordalo, P., N. Gennaioli, Y. Ma and A. Shleifer, 2020, “Overreaction in Macroeconomic Expectations”, American Economic Review, 110(9), pp.2748~2782. [17]Case, K. E. and R. J. Shiller, 1989, “The Efficiency of the Market for Single-Family Homes”, American Economic Review, 79(1), pp.125~37. [18]Case, K. E. and R. J. Shiller, 2003, “Is there a Bubble in the Housing Market?”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2003(2), pp.299~362. [19]Fuster, A., D. Laibson and B. Mendel, 2010. “Natural Expectations and Macroeconomic Fluctuations”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(4), pp.67~84. [20]Fuster, A. R. Perez-Truglia, M. Wiederholt and B. Zafar, 2022, “Expectations with Endogenous Information Acquisition: An Experimental Investigation”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 104(5), pp.1059~1078. [21]Deng, Y., L. Liao, J. Yu and Y. Zhang, 2021, “Capital Spillover, House Prices, and Consumer Spending: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from House Purchase Restrictions”, The Review of Financial Studies, 31(7), pp.2806~2853. [22]Gargano, A., M. Giacoletti, and E. Jarnecic, 2023, “Local Experiences, Search, and Spillovers in the Housing Market”, The Journal of Finance, 78(2), pp.1015~1053. [23]Gete, P. and M. Reher, 2018, “Mortgage Supply and Housing Rents”, The Review of Financial Studies, 31(12), pp.4884~4911. [24]Glaeser, E. L. and C. G. Nathanson, 2017, “An Extrapolative Model of House Price Dynamics”, Journal of Financial Economics, 126(1), pp.147~170. [25]Guren, A. M., 2018, “House Price Momentum and Strategic Complementarity”, Journal of Political Economy, 126(3), pp.1172~1218. [26]Han, L., 2010, “The Effects of Price Risk on Housing Demand: Empirical Evidence from US Markets”, The Review of Financial Studies, 23(11), pp.3889~3928. [27]Kuchler, T., M. Piazzesi and J. Stroebel, 2023, “Chapter 6—Housing market expectations”, Handbook of Economic Expectations. Academic Press. [28]Malmendier, U. and S. Nagel, 2016, “Learning from Inflation Experiences”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(1), pp.53~87. [29]Shiller, R. J. and A. K. Thompson, 2022, “What Have They Been Thinking? Home Buyer Behavior in Hot and Cold Markets: A Ten-Year Retrospect”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2022(1), pp.307~366. [30]Stein, J. C., 1995, “Prices and Trading Volume in the Housing Market: A Model with Down-payment Effects”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), pp.379~406.