Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2023, Vol. 515 Issue (5): 20-37    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
金融业应当让利吗?——基本事实、理论分析与全球实证证据
文书洋, 刘锡良, 董青马
西南财经大学中国金融研究院,四川 成都 610000
Should the Financial Sector “Subsidize” the Real Sector? —Facts, Theory, and Global Evidence
WEN Shuyang, LIU Xiliang, DONG Qingma
Institute of Chinses Financial Studies, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
下载:  PDF (1699KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 支持实体经济高质量发展是现代金融业的使命,也是中国金融学的核心理论问题。作为支持实体经济的重要手段,金融让利政策受到了社会各界的广泛支持,但相关理论研究还有待深入。在大量文献和经济学事实的基础上,本文将马克思生息资本理论与西方经济增长理论有机结合,将马克思“利息来源于利润”的著名观点融入现代经济增长框架,解释了金融业利润过高对经济增长的影响机制。基于全球面板数据的实证证据,支持了模型的核心推论。研究表明,促进金融业让利的根本在于构建合理的“产业—金融”利润分配机制,通过反垄断、提供公共信息、倡导金融机构社会责任等方式控制金融部门的议价优势,是增强金融服务实体经济能力的有效手段。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
文书洋
刘锡良
董青马
关键词:  金融业利润  马克思生息资本理论  经济增长  金融发展    
Summary:  Development is the eternal theme of human beings. Supporting the high-quality development of the economy is the mission of the modern financial industry, and a frontier topic in financial research. In recent years, the “transfer of financial profit to the real economy” has become an important means of promoting financial support for the development of the real economy. From the perspective of national policies and public opinion, the profit transfer policy is widely supported. However, in the field of theoretical research, there is little rigorous analysis or empirical evidence. From the perspective of the needs of the state and society, the purpose of “financial profit transfer” is to serve economic development; therefore, this paper proposes that the questions of “whether financial profit should be transferred” and “how to transfer profit” should be answered by examining the relationship between financial profits and economic development.
Compared with Western financial theories, the theories of Marx pay more attention to the analysis of profit sources. Although there are many types of modern financial products and services, the ultimate source of profits remains the real industry. However, with the development of the financial industry, financial institutions have changed from service providers of enterprises to strong market players, which can restrict the development of the real sector. The problem of profit sharing is the natural link between finance and industry. High financial profits mean high financing costs for enterprises, which may result in damage to economic growth. Marxist political economy realizes the importance of the source of profits in the financial sector and puts forward the view that high profits in the financial industry may damage economic development, but provides little detailed theoretical analysis based on economic growth. Conversely, in Western economic research, there are many discussions of the “too much finance” hypothesis, but few analyses of financial profits.
Starting from the literature and economic phenomena, this paper organically combines Marxist economic growth theory with the Western neoclassical framework, seeks common ground between them while reserving differences in mathematical form, and integrates Marx's famous view that “interest comes from profit” into modern economic growth theory to build an economic growth model that considers the distribution of profits between the real sector and the financial sector. The model explains the impact mechanism of excessive profits in the financial industry on economic growth: the ultimate driving force for economic growth comes from the real industry, and the essence of financial profits is to share the value created by the real sector. Although finance can help real industries improve their efficiency, excessive financial profits will affect capital accumulation in the real sector, and this will damage economic growth. Based on the theoretical model, this paper uses cross-country panel data on 187 countries for the period from 1996 to 2017 to test the relationship between financial industry profits and economic growth. It verifies the negative impact of excessive financial profits on economic development, and supports the inferences of the theory. Thus, this paper scientifically answers the question of whether the financial industry should transfer profits to the real sector, provides a rigorous economic explanation for China's actual problems, and points out directions for establishing a reasonable mechanism for distributing profits.
The contributions of this paper to the literature are as follows. (1) First, it connects Marx's classic discourse on financial profits with modern Western economic research, and proposes an innovative approach to study financial profits. Using this framework, we provide theoretical support for the practical problem of “whether the financial sector should transfer profit to the real sector.” (2) In terms of its theoretical model, this paper compares the modeling methods of Marxist and modern Western economic growth theories. Incorporating Marx's famous point that “interest comes from profit” into the theoretical model of economic growth, this paper innovatively endogenizes the financial sector's bargaining power and supervision costs and considers the profit distribution between the financial sector and the real sector in the framework of economic growth. The model developed is based on the empirical literature and economic phenomena, and describes well the dynamics of financial development and “over-financialization.” (3) This paper provides empirical evidence of a nonlinear relationship between financial profits and economic growth. Empirical evidence of over-financialization attributes a nonlinear relationship to financial development and economic growth, but there is much debate about the internal mechanism of this relationship. Our empirical work, together with the model, provide a new interpretation of the over-financialization phenomenon.
Keywords:  Financial Industry Profit    Marx's Interest-Bearing Capital Theory    Economic Growth    Financial Development
JEL分类号:  G20   O41   B51  
基金资助: * 本文得到国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(72203175)、教育部人文社会科学研究西部和边疆地区青年基金项目(21XJC790012)、国家社科基金项目(20BJY255)、国家社科基金重大招标项目(20&ZD081),以及西南财经大学中特现代金融理论研究平台、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金的支持,感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  董青马,经济学博士,教授,西南财经大学中国金融研究院,E-mail: dongqingma@163.com.   
作者简介:  文书洋,经济学博士,副教授,西南财经大学中国金融研究院,E-mail: wensy@swufe.edu.cn.
刘锡良,经济学博士,教授,西南财经大学中国金融研究院,E-mail: liuxl@swufe.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
文书洋, 刘锡良, 董青马. 金融业应当让利吗?——基本事实、理论分析与全球实证证据[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 515(5): 20-37.
WEN Shuyang, LIU Xiliang, DONG Qingma. Should the Financial Sector “Subsidize” the Real Sector? —Facts, Theory, and Global Evidence. Journal of Financial Research, 2023, 515(5): 20-37.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2023/V515/I5/20
[1]丁肖逵,1956,《从马克思扩大再生产公式来研究生产资料优先增长的原理》,《经济研究》第4期,第23~40页。
[2]黄宪和黄彤彤,2017,《论中国的“金融超发展”》,《金融研究》第2期,第26~41页。
[3]黄宪、刘岩和童韵洁,2019,《金融发展对经济增长的促进作用及其持续性研究——基于英美、德国、法国法系的比较视角》,《金融研究》第12期,第147~168页。
[4]黄智淋和董志勇,2013,《我国金融发展与经济增长的非线性关系研究——来自动态面板数据门限模型的经验证据》,《金融研究》第7期,第74~86页。
[5]李海明,2014,《一个古典—马克思经济增长模型的中国经验》,《经济研究》第11期,第159~169页。
[6]林键、范从来和蔡欣磊,2021,《金融同实体经济共生的收益率阈值研究——基于银行业面板门限模型的实证检验》,《经济学家》第6期,第22~31页。
[7]刘锡良和文书洋,2018,《中国存在过度金融化吗》,《社会科学研究》第3期,第28~36页。
[8]刘晓欣和田恒,2021,《虚拟经济与实体经济的关联性——主要资本主义国家比较研究》,《中国社会科学》第10期,第61~82+205页。
[9]裴宏和李瑞钦,2020,《马克思资本循环视角下的经济增长模型——兼论资本循环模型的两种建模方法》,《政治经济学季刊》第1期,第57~91页。
[10]彭俞超和黄志刚,2018,《经济“脱实向虚”的成因与治理:理解十九大金融体制改革》,《世界经济》第9期,第3~25页。
[11]孙国茂和陈国文,2014,《金融业利润增长对制造业的影响》,《中国工业经济》第4期,第45~57页。
[12]王国刚,2012,《“中国银行业垄断暴利”的说法并不成立》,《经济学动态》第5期,第29~32页。
[13]王俏茹、刘金全和刘达禹,2020,《经济增长“俱乐部收敛”中的金融门限效应——基于动态面板门限模型的分析》,《南开经济研究》第1期,第154~175页。
[14]王艺明和刘一鸣,2018,《马克思主义两大部类经济增长模型的理论与实证研究》,《经济研究》第9期,第37~51页。
[15]魏琪和曾胜,2017,《银行特许权对贷款价格的影响研究:兼论我国商业银行的议价能力》,《管理工程学报》第4期,第101~108页。
[16]文书洋、牟爽和刘锡良,2020,《中国金融业利润过高了吗——基于马克思生息资本理论的分析与实证证据》,《经济学家》第6期,第95~106页。
[17]吴易风,2007,《马克思的经济增长理论模型》,《经济研究》第9期,第11~17+48页。
[18]谢富胜和匡晓璐,2019,《金融部门的利润来源探究》,《马克思主义研究》第6期,第58~70页。
[19]张成思和张步昙,2016,《中国实业投资率下降之谜:经济金融化视角》,《经济研究》第12期,第32~46页。
[20]Aghion,P., Dewatripont,M., Rey,P., 1999. “Competition, financial discipline and growth”, The Review of Economic Studies, 66(4): 825~852.
[21]Arcand, J. L, Berkes, E., Panizza, U., 2015. “Too much finance?”, Journal of Economic Growth, 20(2): 105~148.
[22]Beck, T., H. Degryse, and C. Kneer. 2014. “Is More Finance Better? Disentangling Intermediation and Size Effects of Financial Systems”, Journal of Financial Stability 10: 50~64.
[23]Benczúr, P., Karagiannis, S. and Kvedaras, V., 2018. “Finance and economic growth: financing structure and non-linear impact”, Journal of Macroeconomics, 62:103048.
[24]Bijlsma, Michiel., Kool, Clemens., Non, Marielle., 2018. “The effect of financial development on economic growth: a meta-analysis”, Applied Economics, 50: 6128~6148.
[25]Bucci, Alberto., Marsiglio, Simone., 2019. “Financial development and economic growth: long-run equilibrium and transitional dynamics”, Scottish Journal of Political Economy. 66(3): 331~359
[26]Cecchetti, G., Kharroubi,E., 2015. “Why does financial sector growth crowd out real economic growth?”, BIS Working Paper. No. 490.
[27]Ciola E., Namatame A., Lux, T., 2020. “Financial sector bargaining power, aggregate growth and systemic risk”, Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 15(1):89~109.
[28]Crotty, James R., 1993. “Rethinking Marxian investment theory: Keynes-Minsky instability,competitive regime shifts and coerced investment”, Review of Radical Political Economics, (1): 1~26.
[29]Duménil, Gérard., Lévy, Dominique. 2003. “Technology and distribution: historical trajectories à la Marx”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 52(2): 201-233.
[30]Domar, E.D.1952, “ The Theoretical Analysis of Economic Growth”, American Economic Review, 42: 479~495
[31]Foley, K. Duncan., Lance, Taylor., 2004. “A Heterodox Growth and Distribution Model”, Conference Paper: Growth and Distribution Conference at the University of Pisa, June 16~19.
[32]Gehrke, Christian., 2018. “Marx's Reproduction Schemes and Multi-sector Growth Models”, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 25(5): 859~892.
[33]Holmstrom, B., Tirole, J., 1997. “Financial intermediation, loanable funds, and the real sector”, the Quarterly Journal of economics, 112(3): 663-691.
[34]Khatiwada, S., 2010. “Did the financial sector profit at the expense of the rest of the economy? Evidence from the United States”, International Institution for Labor Studies Discussion Paper.
[35]Lapavitsas, C., 2013. “Profiting without producing: How finance exploits us all”, London. Verso Books.
[36]Levina, Irene G., 2012. “The Sources of Financial Profit: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation of the Transformation of Banking in the US”, Open Access Dissertations. No.616.
[37]Levine, R., Lin, C., and Xie, W., 2016, “Spare tire? Stock markets, banking crises, and economic recoveries”, Journal of Financial Economics, 1(120): 81~101.
[38]Lianos, Theodore P.a., 1979. “Domar's growth model and Marx's reproduction scheme”, Journal of Macroeconomics. 1(4): 405~412.
[39]Orhangazi, 2008. “Financialisation and Capital Accumulation in the Non-financial Corporate Sector: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation on the US Economy: 1973-2003”, Cambridge Journal of Economics,32(6),863~886
[40]Aghion,P Howittp.Levine R., 2018. “Financial development and innovation-led growth”, Handbook of Finance and Development, 1:3~30.
[41]Philippon,T., 2015.“Has the US finance industry become less efficient? On the theory and measurement of financial intermediation”, American Economic Review, 4(105): 1408~38.
[42]Popov, A., 2018. “Evidence on finance and economic growth”, Handbook of Finance and Development, 7: 63~106.
[43]Rocheteau,G., Wright,R., Zhang, C., 2018. “Corporate finance and monetary policy”, American Economic Review, 4(108): 1147~86.
[44]Rousseau,L.,Wachtel,P., 2011. “What is happening to the impact of financial deepening on economic growth?”, Economic Inquiry,1 (49) : 276~288.
[45]Sahay, R., Cˇihák, M., N’Diaye, P., Barajas, A., Bi, R., Ayala, D., Gao, Y., Kyobe, A., Nguyen, L., Saborowski, C., Svirydzenka, K., and Yousefi, S.R., 2015. “Rethinking financial deepening: stability and growth in emerging markets”, IMF Staff Discussion Note, SDN/15/08, IMF, Washington, DC.
[46]Sasaki, Hiroaki., 2009. “Cyclical Growth in a Goodwin-Kalecki-Marx Model”, TERG Discussion Papers 246, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Tohoku University.
[47]Xu, G., Gui. B., 2021. “The nonlinearity between finance and economic growth: a literature review and evidence from China”, Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, (1): 1~14.
[1] 龙海明, 吴迪. 实体杠杆对经济增长的影响研究——基于金融稳定的调节效应[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 506(8): 38-54.
[2] 王博, 赵森杨, 罗荣华, 彭龙. 地方政府债务、空间溢出效应与区域经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 506(8): 18-37.
[3] 文书洋, 刘浩, 王慧. 绿色金融、绿色创新与经济高质量发展[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 506(8): 1-17.
[4] 刘哲希, 郭俊杰, 谭涵予, 陈彦斌. 货币政策能够兼顾“稳增长”与“稳杠杆”双重目标吗?——基于不同杠杆环境的比较[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 505(7): 20-37.
[5] 文竹, 金涛. 关于中国经济增长模式的一个解释框架——基于“土地财政”的演进分析[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 502(4): 1-17.
[6] 陈创练, 高锡蓉, 刘晓彬. “稳增长”与“防风险”双目标的宏观调控政策抉择[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 499(1): 19-37.
[7] 牛欢, 严成樑. 环境税率、双重红利与经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 493(7): 40-57.
[8] 文书洋, 张琳, 刘锡良. 我们为什么需要绿色金融?——从全球经验事实到基于经济增长框架的理论解释[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 498(12): 20-37.
[9] 刘贯春, 司登奎, 刘芳. 人力资本偏向金融部门如何影响实体经济增长?[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 496(10): 78-97.
[10] 吕有吉, 景鹏, 郑伟. 人口老龄化、养老保险基金缺口弥补与经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 487(1): 51-70.
[11] 庄毓敏, 储青青, 马勇. 金融发展、企业创新与经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 478(4): 11-30.
[12] 吕朝凤, 毛霞. 地方金融发展能够影响FDI的区位选择吗?——一个基于城市商业银行设立的准自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 477(3): 58-76.
[13] 毛盛志, 张一林. 金融发展、产业升级与跨越中等收入陷阱——基于新结构经济学的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 486(12): 1-19.
[14] 贾俊雪, 晁云霞, 李紫霄. 财政分权与经济增长可持续性——基于情势转换与聚类视角的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 484(10): 55-73.
[15] 刘淑琳, 王贤彬, 黄亮雄. 经济增长目标驱动投资吗?——基于2001-2016年地级市样本的理论分析与实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 470(8): 1-19.
[1] 孙淑伟, 梁上坤, 阮刚铭, 付宇翔. 高管减持、信息压制与股价崩盘风险[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 175 -190 .
[2] 邓路, 刘瑞琪, 江萍. 公司超额银行借款会导致过度投资吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 115 -129 .
[3] 江娇, 刘红忠, 曾剑平. 中国股票网络论坛的信息含量分析段[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 178 -192 .
[4] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[5] 卢洪友, 余锦亮, 张楠. 纵向行政管理结构与地方政府财政支出规模[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 35 -51 .
[6] 李万福, 杜静, 张怀. 创新补助究竟有没有激励企业创新自主投资——来自中国上市公司的新证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 130 -145 .
[7] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[8] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[9] 严成樑. 延迟退休、财政支出结构调整与养老金替代率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 51 -66 .
[10] 李丹, 庞晓波, 方红生. 财政空间与中国政府债务可持续性[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 1 -17 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1