Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2022, Vol. 503 Issue (5): 189-206    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
正规金融与非正规金融:机制、效率与实证挑战
高明, 胡聪慧
北京大学经济学院,北京 100871;
北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院,北京 100875
Formal and Informal Finance: Institutions, Efficiency, and Empirical Challenges
GAO Ming, HU Conghui
School of Economics, Peking University;
Business School, Beijing Normal University
下载:  PDF (568KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 正规金融与非正规金融的定位和关系,不仅是重要的学术问题,也是影响间接金融体系改革方向的关键。本文从机制视角建立学理框架,从信息和履约两个基础维度,讨论正规金融与非正规金融的相对效率及决定因素,并通过系统梳理相关文献,指出现有实证研究的成果与挑战;进而结合中国特征,讨论如何提高正规金融与非正规金融的效率,最后提出未来研究方向。本文认为,正规金融与非正规金融因信息和履约机制不同而各有其独立存在价值,其相对效率取决于不同经济发展阶段的社会网络基础和征信、法律体系,现有实证文献对两者作用的分歧主要源于分类、样本局限和内生性处理。本文从机制视角进行分析,体现了正规金融和非正规金融的金融属性,为探索相关领域学术研究和政策制定提供启示。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
高明
胡聪慧
关键词:  正规金融  非正规金融  机制  效率  实证挑战    
Summary:  The relationship between formal and informal finance is not only an important academic issue but is also crucial for China's financial system reform. Formal finance has been extensively examined because of its primary role in financing, stabilizing markets, and promoting economic growth. The policies of many emerging economies are aimed at replacing informal with formal finance. However, although informal finance carries a potential risk, it is widespread and important to small and medium-sized enterprises, households, and developing countries, particularly when the financial market is incomplete or has stringent financing restrictions. Thus, clarifying the value of informal finance is important when formulating regulatory policies.
In this study, we discuss the relative efficiency of formal and informal finance and their determinants by establishing a theoretical framework from the perspective of institutions of information and enforcement. We also clarify their roles in the various stages of economic development, and note the contributions and challenges in the empirical literature. We then discuss how to improve the efficiency of formal and informal finance by considering China's unique features, and conclude with suggestions for future research. The institutional perspective reflects the financial attributes of formal and informal finance and provides a basic framework for studying related academic and policy issues.
We suggest that formal finance involves a relatively complete credit system and relies on the legal system as its enforcement institution. Informal finance generally does not have standardized procedural information and enforcement institutions, and it depends on reputation, relationships, and social networks. Formal and informal finance both have unique advantages because of these differences in information and enforcement institutions. Formal finance is easy to regulate and expand, but it is relatively slow to adjust. Informal finance can easily be adapted to economic changes but is difficult to regulate and limited to regional and interpersonal networks. The relative efficiency of formal and informal finance depends on the corresponding social network and the credit and legal systems at the various stages of economic development. The inconsistencies in the literature are mainly due to differences in classification methods, sample limitations, and identification.
Developed economies have high degrees of predictability, relatively effective credit systems, and highly efficient legal systems. Thus, formal finance plays a major role in supporting economic activity and development and thus substitutes for informal finance. Rapidly developing economies often have unpredictable shocks, and so informal finance can be more easily adapted to the changing market environment without persuading the legislature to amend laws. Historical social networks and business relationships are also important foundations of informal finance. Thus, informal finance is an important financing channel in rapidly developing economies and complements formal finance. In underdeveloped areas, formal financial systems and capital markets are typically undeveloped. Both formal and informal finance are therefore important for economic development and should be encouraged.
Finance and growth are subjects of debate in both academic research and policy discussions. The efficiencies of formal and informal finance are typically compared in terms of their contributions to enterprises and economic growth; few institutional analyses of formal and informal finance in the different stages of economic development have been conducted. Establishing institutional measurements for formal and informal finance can thus be of benefit to investigate the mechanisms that affect their relative efficiency in different stages of economic development.
Keywords:  Formal Finance    Informal Finance    Institutions    Efficiency    Empirical Challenges
JEL分类号:  G20   O17   O43  
基金资助: * 本研究曾在首届中国金融发展学术论坛报告并获优秀论文奖。作者感谢国家自然科学基金(72073004;71703004;71972037)资助,感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  胡聪慧,经济学博士,副教授,北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院,E-mail:huconghui@bnu.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  高明,经济学博士,副教授,北京大学经济学院,E-mail:gao@pku.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
高明, 胡聪慧. 正规金融与非正规金融:机制、效率与实证挑战[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 503(5): 189-206.
GAO Ming, HU Conghui. Formal and Informal Finance: Institutions, Efficiency, and Empirical Challenges. Journal of Financial Research, 2022, 503(5): 189-206.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V503/I5/189
[1] 陈鹏和刘锡良,2011,《中国农户融资选择意愿研究——来自10省2万家农户借贷调查的证据》,《金融研究》第7期,第128~141页。
[2] 洪正,2011,《新型农村金融机构改革可行吗?基于监督效率视角的分析》,《经济研究》第2期,第44~58页。
[3] 胡必亮,2004,《村庄信任与标会》,《经济研究》第10期,第115~125页。
[4] 胡枫和陈玉宇,2012,《社会网络与农户借贷行为——来自中国家庭动态跟踪调查(CFPS)的证据》,《金融研究》第12期,第178~192页。
[5] 胡士华和李伟毅,2011,《信息结构、贷款技术与农户融资结构——基于农户调查数据的实证研究》,《管理世界》第7期,第61~68页。
[6] 黄祖辉、刘西川和程恩江,2009,《贫困地区农户正规信贷市场低参与程度的经验解释》,《经济研究》第4期,第118~130页。
[7] 金烨和李宏彬,2009,《非正规金融与农户借贷行为》,《金融研究》第4期,第63~79页。
[8] 李建军,2010,《中国未观测信贷规模的变化:1978—2008年》,《金融研究》第4期,第40~49页。
[9] 林毅夫和孙希芳,2005,《信息、非正规金融与中小企业融资》,《经济研究》第7期,第35~44页。
[10] 刘瑞明,2011,《金融压抑、所有制歧视与增长拖累——国有企业效率损失再考察》,《经济学(季刊)》第2期,第603~618页。
[11] 卢峰和姚洋,2004,《金融压抑下的法治、金融发展和经济增长》,《中国社会科学》第1期,第42~55页。
[12] 马光荣和杨恩艳,2011,《社会网络、非正规金融与创业》,《经济研究》第3期,第83~94页。
[13] 彭凯翔、陈志武和袁为鹏,2008,《近代中国农村借贷市场的机制——基于民间文书的研究》,《经济研究》第5期,第147~159页。
[14] 谭之博和赵岳,2012,《企业规模与融资来源的实证研究——基于小企业银行融资抑制的视角》,《金融研究》第3期,第166~179页。
[15] 王小鲁、樊纲和马光荣,2017,《中国分省企业经营环境指数2017年报告》,社会科学文献出版社。
[16] 王彦超和林斌,2008,《金融中介、非正规金融与现金价值》,《金融研究》第3期,第177~199页。
[17] 王一鸣和李敏波,2005,《非正规金融市场借贷利率决定行为:一个新分析框架》,《金融研究》第7期,第12~23页。
[18] 谢平和陆磊,2003a,《金融腐败:非规范融资行为的交易特征和体制动因》,《经济研究》第6期,第3~13页。
[19] 谢平和陆磊,2003b,《资源配置和产出效应:金融腐败的宏观经济成本》,《经济研究》第11期,第3~13页。
[20] 杨汝岱、陈斌开和朱诗娥,2011,《基于社会网络视角的农户民间借贷需求行为研究》,《经济研究》第11期,第117~130页。
[21] 殷俊华,2006,《金融缺口、非正规金融与农村金融制度改革——沈阳农村民间借贷研究》,《金融研究》第8期,第103~110页。
[22] 虞群娥和李爱喜,2007,《民间金融与中小企业共生性的实证分析——杭州案例》,《金融研究》第12期,第215~222页。
[23] 张雪春、徐忠和秦朵,2013,《民间借贷利率与民间资本的出路:温州案例》,《金融研究》第3期,第1~14页。
[24] Allen, Franklin, Elena Carletti, Robert Cull, Jun “QJ” Qian, Lemma Senbet, and Patricio Valenzuela. 2016. “Resolving the African Financial Development Gap: Cross-Country Comparisons and a Within-Country Study of Kenya.” In: Sebastian Edwards, Simon Johnson, and David N. Weil (Editors), African Successes. University of Chicago Press.
[25] Allen Franklin, Elena. Carletti, Jun “QJ” Qian, and Patricio Valenzuela. 2013. “Financial Intermediation, Markets, and Alternative Financial Sectors,” In: George M. Constantinides, Milton Harris, and Rene M. Stulz (Editors), Handbook of Economics of Finance. North-Holland.
[26] Allen, Franklin, Rajesh Chakrabarti, Sankar De, Jun “QJ” Qian, and Meijun Qian. 2012. “Financing Firms in India”, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 21(3): 409~445.
[27] Allen, Franklin, Jun Qian, and Meijun Qian. 2005. “Law, Finance, and Economic Growth in China”,Journal of Financial Economics, 77(1): 57~116.
[28] Allen, Franklin, Meijun Qian, and Jing Xie. 2019. “Understanding Informal Financing”,Journal of Financial Intermediation 39: 19~33.
[29] Allen, Franklin, Jun “QJ” Qian, and Chenying Zhang. 2011. “An Alternative View on Law, Institutions, Finance and Growth”,Unpublished Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School.
[30] Ayyagari, Meghana, Asli Demirgüç-Kunt, and Vojislav Maksimovic. 2010. “Formal versus Informal Finance: Evidence from China”,Review of Financial Studies, 23(8): 3048~3097.
[31] Ayyagari, Meghana, Asli Demirgüç-Kunt, and Vojislav Maksimovic. 2011. “Firm Innovation in Emerging Markets: The Role of Finance, Governance, and Competition”,Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(6): 1545~1580.
[32] Barth, James R., Chen Lin, Ping Lin, and Frank M. Song. 2009. “Corruption in Bank Lending to Firms: Cross-country Micro Evidence on the Beneficial Role of Competition and Information Sharing”,Journal of Financial Economics, 91(3): 361~388.
[33] Beck, Thorsten, Asli Demirgüç-Kunt, and Vojislav Maksimovic. 2008. “Financing Patterns around the World: Are Small Firms Different?” Journal of Financial Economics, 89(3): 467~487.
[34] Berger, Allen N., and Gregory F. Udell. 1998. “The Economics of Small Business Finance: The Roles of Private Equity and Debt Markets in the Financial Growth Cycle”,Journal of Banking and Finance, 22(6-8): 613~673.
[35] Berkowitz, Daniel, Katharina Pistor, and Jean-Francois Richard. 2003. “Economic Development, Legality, and the Transplant Effect”,European Economic Review, 47(1): 165~195.
[36] Borensztein, Eduardo, Kevin Cowan, Barry Eichengreen, and Ugo Panizza. 2008. “Building Bond Markets in Latin America”,In: Eduardo Borensztein, Kevin Cowan, Barry Eichengreen, and Ugo Panizza (Editors), Bond markets in Latin America: On the Verge of a Big Bang? The MIT Press.
[37] Buchak, Greg, Gregor Matvos, Tomasz Piskorski, and Amit Seru. 2018. “Fintech, Regulatory Arbitrage, and the Rise of Shadow Banks”,Journal of Financial Economics, 130(3): 453~483.
[38] Burgess, Robin, and Rohini Pande. 2005. “Do Rural Banks Matter? Evidence from the Indian Social Banking Experiment”,American Economic Review, 95(3): 780~795.
[39] Casolaro, Luca, Leonardo Gambacorta, and Luigi Guiso. 2005. “Regulation, Formal and Informal Enforcement and the Development of the Household Loan Market: Lessons from Italy”,In: Giuseppe Bertola, Richard Disney, and Charles Grant (Editors), The Economics of Consumer Credit. The MIT Press.
[40] Cull, Robert, Lixin Colin Xu, and Tian Zhu. 2009. “Formal Finance and Trade Credit during China's Transition”,Journal of Financial Intermediation, 18(2): 173~192.
[41] Armendáriz, Beatriz, and Jonathan Morduch. 2010. “The Economics of Microfinance”,The MIT Press.
[42] Degryse, Hans, Liping Lu, and Steven Ongena. 2016. “Informal or Formal Financing? Evidence on the Co-funding of Chinese Firms”,Journal of Financial Intermediation 27: 31~50.
[43] De la Torre, Augusto, Juan Carlos Gozzi, and Sergio L. Schmukler. 2008. “Capital Market Development: Whither Latin America”,In: Sebastian Edwards, and Márcio G. P. Garcia (Editors), Financial Markets Volatility and Performance in Emerging Markets. University of Chicago Press.
[44] Di Maggio, Marco, and Vincent Yao. 2021. “Fintech Borrowers: Lax Screening or Cream-Skimming?” Review of Financial Studies, 34(10): 4565~4618.
[45] Easterly, William, and Ross Levine. 1997. “Africa's Growth Tragedy: Policies and Ethnic Divisions”,Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4): 1203~1250.
[46] Fisman, Raymond, and Inessa Love. 2003. “Trade Credit, Financial Intermediary Development, and Industry Growth”,Journal of Finance, 58(1): 353~374.
[47] Franks, Julian, Colin Mayer, and Stefano Rossi. 2009. “Ownership: Evolution and Regulation”,Review of Financial Studies, 22(10): 4009~4056.
[48] Garmaise, Mark J., and Tobias J. Moskowitz. 2003. “Informal Financial Networks: Theory and Evidence”,Review of Financial Studies, 16(4): 1007~1040.
[49] Giannetti, Mariassunta, Mike Burkart, and Tore Ellingsen. 2011. “What You Sell is What You Lend? Explaining Trade Credit Contracts”,Review of Financial Studies, 24(4): 1261~1298.
[50] Hellmann, Thomas, Laura Lindsey, and Manju Puri. 2008. “Building Relationships Early: Banks in Venture Capital”,Review of Financial Studies, 21(2): 513~541.
[51] Honohan, Patrick. 2004. “Financial Sector Policy and the Poor: Selected Findings and Issues”,World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series 43.
[52] Honohan, Patrick. 2008. “Cross-Country Variation in Household Access to Financial Services”,Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(11): 2493~2500.
[53] La Porta, Rafael, Florencio López-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W. Vishny. 1998. “Law and Finance”,Journal of Political Economy, 106(6): 1113~1155.
[54] La Porta, Rafael, Florencio López-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W. Vishny. 2000. “Investor Protection and Corporate Governance”,Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2): 3~27.
[55] Mckinnon, Ronald I. 1973. Money and Capital in Economic Development. The Brookings Institution.
[56] Melzer, Brian T. 2011. “The Real Costs of Credit Access: Evidence from the Payday Lending Market”,Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(1): 517~555.
[57] Murfin, Justin, and Ken Njoroge. 2014. “The Implicit Costs of Trade Credit Borrowing by Large Firms”,Review of Financial Studies, 28(1): 112~145.
[58] Rajan, Raghuram G., and Luigi Zingales. 2003. “The Great Reversals: The Politics of Financial Development in the Twentieth Century”,Journal of Financial Economics, 69(1): 5~50.
[59] Shaw, Edward S. 1973. Financial Deepening in Economic Development. Oxford University Press.
[60] Tang, Huan. 2019. “Peer-to-Peer Lenders versus Banks: Substitutes or Complements?” Review of Financial Studies, 32(5): 1900~1938.
[61] Thakor, Anjan V. 2020. “Fintech and Banking: What do We Know?” Journal of Financial Intermediation, 43: 100833.
[62] Tsai, Kellee S. 2004. “Imperfect Substitutes: The Local Political Economy of Informal Finance and Microfinance in Rural China and India”,World Development, 32(9): 1487~1507.
[1] 张璇, 孙雪丽, 薛原, 李春涛. 卖空机制与食品安全——基于溢出效应的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 501(3): 152-170.
[2] 倪红福. 扭曲因子、进口中间品价格与全要素生产率——基于非竞争型投入产出网络结构一般均衡模型事后核算方法[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 500(2): 21-39.
[3] 董卉宁, 刘琦, 阮宏勋. 中国式卖空机制与高管减持——基于融资融券分步扩容的准自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 499(1): 167-184.
[4] 孙广宇, 李志辉, 杜阳, 王近. 市场操纵降低了中国股票市场的信息效率吗——来自沪市A股高频交易数据的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 495(9): 151-169.
[5] 许红梅, 倪骁然, 刘亚楠. 上市企业员工满意度与创新——来自“中国年度最佳雇主100强”的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 495(9): 170-187.
[6] 张路, 李金彩, 袁振超, 岳衡. 管理者能力与资本市场稳定[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 495(9): 188-206.
[7] 朱宁, 刘伟其, 于之倩, 王兵. 中国银行业结构性全要素生产率增长研究[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 493(7): 1-18.
[8] 冀云阳, 毛捷, 文雪婷. 地方公共债务与资本回报率——来自新口径债务数据和三重机制检验的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 492(6): 1-20.
[9] 钟腾, 罗吉罡, 汪昌云. 地方政府人才引进政策促进了区域创新吗?——来自准自然实验的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 491(5): 135-152.
[10] 李明, 郑礼明. 回不去的家乡?——教育公共品供给与人口回流的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 490(4): 111-130.
[11] 马云飙, 武艳萍, 石贝贝. 卖空机制能够约束内部人减持吗?——基于融资融券制度的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 488(2): 171-187.
[12] 王艳艳, 王成龙, 于李胜, 蓝一阳. 高管薪酬延付与银行利润效率 ——基于银行微观视角的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 496(10): 117-133.
[13] 徐细雄, 占恒, 李万利. 卖空机制、双重治理与公司违规 ——基于市场化治理视角的实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 496(10): 190-206.
[14] 毛其淋, 盛斌. 劳动力成本对中国加工贸易规模及转型升级的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 496(10): 59-77.
[15] 李丽芳, 谭政勋, 叶礼贤. 改进的效率测算模型、影子银行与中国商业银行效率[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 496(10): 98-116.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1