Summary:
Green development is a must for human progress, and the role of finance in green development is receiving more attention. “Green finance” generally refers to financial products, markets and policies related to environmental protection and sustainable development. In academia, the concept of green finance is closely related to environmental and climate finance and overlaps sustainable finance and socially responsible investing (SRI). In the past two decades, the development of global green finance has significantly advanced, and green finance issues have received increasing attention. However, theoretical research in this field lags behind. Although the number and proportion of studies have grown rapidly,and the economic theory of green finance is weak. Scholars struggle to rigorously answer the fundamental question of why we need green finance. According to the general principles of economics, the externality of pollution indicates that the main force of environmental protection should be the public sector rather than the financial system. However, more and more countries are choosing green finance. What is the economic intuition behind this phenomenon? An in-depth discussion of these issues forms the basis for effective policymaking and the development of green finance theory. This study uses data on listed companies worldwide to estimate the debt ratio of green enterprises in various countries as a proxy indicator of green finance. Then, combining that with fiscal expenditure data from the United Nations, we examine the changes in global green finance and government expenditures on environmental protection. The results show that in the past 20 years, total global government expenditures on environmental protection have slightly increased, but the ratio of this expenditure to GDP has a downward trend. Meanwhile, the scale and ratio of green finance to GDP have continued to increase, and the development level of green finance has been in line with the economy. Further cross-country panel data analysis shows that green finance effectively promotes long-term economic growth, showing obvious heterogeneity with green fiscal investment. On the basis of these findings, we ask whether green finance differs from traditional public finance in terms of economic principles? This study builds a multisector general equilibrium growth model that includes residents, enterprises, financial sector and government. It depicts the dynamic relationship between green fiscal investment, green finance and economic growth and reproduces the abovementioned facts. The theoretical analysis shows that, firstly, green finance has advantages for long-term growth. It can mitigate the deficiency of public services subject to congestion and achieve high-quality economic development. Secondly, there is a scale threshold above which firms voluntarily choose to protect the environment by using green finance without government intervention. Subsidies for green credit can promote firms' green investment and enable the economy to reach a higher steady state. Thirdly, a combination of green financial and fiscal policies to guide fiscal investment in the initial stage of economic development and gradually strengthen the promotion of green finance in later stages can speed economic growth, achieve a higher steady-state capital stock level, and meet the goal of high-quality economic development. This study answers the question of why we need green finance from the economic theory perspective. It addresses the basic theoretical shortcomings in the field of green finance, providing basic theoretical support for the development of green finance and a useful analytical framework for further theoretical research on green finance. This article also has implications for future research. For instance, the next important academic question to address is how green finance affects financial institutions. Although this article discusses the macroeconomic benefits of green finance, it does not explore whether financial institutions have inherent incentives to engage in green finance. There is some empirical evidence in the literature, but the theoretical basis of this problem is still unclear. Whether the implementation of green finance policies can be incentive compatible is an important direction for future research.
文书洋, 张琳, 刘锡良. 我们为什么需要绿色金融?——从全球经验事实到基于经济增长框架的理论解释[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 498(12): 20-37.
WEN Shuyang, ZHANG Lin, LIU Xiliang. Why Do We Need Green Finance? Global Empirical Facts and Theoretical Explanations in an Economic Growth Framework. Journal of Financial Research, 2021, 498(12): 20-37.
[1]丁宁、任亦侬和左颖,2020,《绿色信贷政策得不偿失还是得偿所愿?——基于资源配置视角的PSM-DID成本效率分析》,《金融研究》第4期,第112~130页。 [2]郭晔和房芳,2021,《新型货币政策担保品框架的绿色效应》,《金融研究》第1期,第91~110页。 [3]韩立岩、蔡立新和尹力博, 2017,《中国证券市场的绿色激励:一个四因素模型》,《金融研究》第1期,第145~161页。 [4]刘锡良和文书洋,2019,《中国的金融机构应当承担环境责任吗?——基本事实、理论模型与实证检验》,《经济研究》第3期,第38~54页。 [5]彭水军和包群,2006,《资源约束条件下长期经济增长的动力机制——基于内生增长理论模型的研究》,《财经研究》第6期,第110~119页。 [6]苏冬蔚和连莉莉,2018,《绿色信贷是否影响重污染企业的投融资行为?》,《金融研究》第12期,第123~137页。 [7]王遥、潘冬阳、彭俞超和梁希,2019,《基于DSGE模型的绿色信贷激励政策研究》,《金融研究》第11期,第1~18页。 [8]王遥、潘冬阳和张笑,2016,《绿色金融对中国经济发展的贡献研究》,《经济社会体制比较》第6期,33~42页。 [9]文书洋、林则夫和刘锡良,2021,《绿色金融与经济增长质量:带有资源环境约束的一般均衡模型构建与实证检验》,《中国管理科学》网络首发,第1~11页。 [10]Allen, F., Carletti, E., Goldstein, I., and Leonello, A., 2018, “Government Guarantees and Financial Stability”, Journal of Economic Theory, 177, 518~557. [11]Bovenberg, A L, Smulders S.1995.“Environmental Quality and Pollution-augmenting Technological Change in a Two-sector Endogenous Growth Model”, Journal of Public Economics, 57(3), 369~391. [12]Bovenberg A L, Mooij R A D.1994, “Environmental Tax Reform and Endogenous Growth”.Journal of Public Economics, 63(2):207~237. [13]Dong Q, Wen S, Liu X.2019,“Credit Allocation, Pollution, and Sustainable Growth: Theory and Evidence from China”.Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 12(56): 2793~2811. [14]Feenstra, R., Robert I., Marcel, T., 2015.“The Next Generation of the Penn World Table”, American Economic Review, 105(10), 3150~3182. [15]Jeucken M, Bouma J J.1999, “The Changing Environment of Banks”.Greener Management International, 1999(27):24~38(15). [16]Liu, R.,Wang, D.,Zhang, L., 2019.“Can Green Financial Development Promote Regional Ecological Efficiency? A Case Study of China”, Natural Hazards, 1~19. [17]Menuet, M., Minea, A., Villieu, P,.Xepapadeas, A.2021, “Growth, Endogenous Environmental Cycles, and Indeterminacy”, Economic Research Department of the University of Orléans (LEO), France, Working Paper Series, DR LEO 2021~10. [18]Nordhaus, W D., 1994.“Managing the Global Commons: the Economics of Climate change”, Cambridge, MA: MIT press. [19]Nordhaus W D, Yang Z.1996, “A Regional Dynamic General-equilibrium Model of Alternative Climate-Change Strategies”, The American Economic Review, 4(86): 741~765. [20]Ren, X., Shao, Q., Zhong, R., 2020.“Nexus between Green Finance, Non-fossil Energy use, and Carbon Intensity: Empirical Evidence from China Based on a Vector Error Correction Model”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 277. [21]Weber O, Scholz R W, 2010, “Michalik G.Incorporating Sustainability Criteria into Credit Risk management”.Business strategy and the environment, 19(1): 39~50. [22]Wen, S., 2016.“Financial Misallocation, Pollution, and Sustainable Growth: Theory and Evidence from China”, SSRN Working Paper. [23]Zhou, X., Tang, X., Zhang, R., 2020.“Impact of Green Finance on Economic Development and Environmental Quality: A Study Based on Provincial Panel Data from China”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(16), 19915~19932.