Summary:
The effect of air pollution on people's lives is becoming more and more serious. Haze pollution caused by PM2.5 damages the human respiratory and cardiovascular systems and increases the risk of disease. Therefore, it is important to improve governance efficiency to increase local air pollution control. In China, the “Province Managing County” and “Strong County Expansion” are important government reforms. Exploring whether they can improve the governance structure and promote air pollution control is important both theoretically and practically. The Province Managing County and Strong County Expansion reforms were designed to optimize the structure of the government by simplifying its levels. Theoretically, as an important public service, air pollution control is also affected by these reforms. On the one hand, the improvement in regional financial capacity brought by the reforms can help local governments improve air pollution control. On the other hand, the intensified competition caused by the reforms could lead local governments to pay more attention to higher-level assessments and reduce their investment in air pollution control. That is, the improvement in financial resources might promote regional air pollution control, while the resulting intensified competition might negatively affect regional air pollution control. To verify whether air pollution control is consistent with these theories, this paper examines the changes in the regional air pollution situation before and after the reforms using satellite inversion data to analyze the relationship between governance reform and local air pollution control. The results show that the Strong County Expansion significantly worsened local PM2.5 concentrations, whereas the Province Managing County reform significantly suppressed them. The exploration of the mechanisms of influence shows that the reform of Province Managing County is mainly reflected in the changes in air pollution control caused by the improvement of financial capacity, while the Strong County Expansion reform is mainly reflected in changes in air pollution control caused by changes in local government competition. Further analysis shows that the more local governments attach importance to environmental pollution control, the more the reforms are conducive to the improvement of regional air quality. The main contributions of this paper are as follows: First, this paper uses satellite data instead of ground observation data. Satellite data provide a large sample size and a long coverage period, which solves the problem of the lack of PM2.5 data for most areas in China before 2012. Second, compared with the data used in the literature, this paper effectively avoids the problems of tampering and fabricating common with ground monitoring data. Third, based on the literature, research on environmental protection governance under these reforms is still limited. To enrich research related to the reforms, this paper uses relatively comprehensive data to analyze and discuss this topic, and conducts a preliminary analysis of regional pollution control problems after decentralization. The research conclusions show that for environmental pollution prevention, decentralization is not a once-and-for-all strategy. The improvement of regional financial capacity is more important. Matching power and financial resources is a necessary condition for perfecting the public service supply. Whether the reforms can promote the treatment of regional air pollution also depends on the importance of a region to air pollution. From the perspective of government governance, county-level governments may not have the incentives or ability to adequately address air pollution control, as it is a public service with spatial spillover. The intervention and coordination of the superior government can solve this problem. However, after decentralization, local governments' blind expansion of productive expenditures to compete for economic growth has seriously hindered environmental pollution control. Reducing pure economic growth in assessments and including environmental protection indicators, such as the implementation of green GDP, might alleviate this problem.
王小龙, 陈金皇. 省直管县改革与区域空气污染——来自卫星反演数据的实证证据[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 485(11): 76-93.
WANG Xiaolong, CHEN Jinhuang. Province Managing County Reform and Regional Air Pollution: Empirical Evidence from Satellite Inversion Data. Journal of Financial Research, 2020, 485(11): 76-93.
Andrews, S Q. 2008. “Inconsistencies in Air Quality Metrics: ‘Blue Sky' days and PM10 concentrations in Beijing”, Environmental Research Letters, 3(3): 034009.
[32]
Beck, T,R.Levine, and A.Levkov 2010. “Big Bad Banks？ The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States”, The Journal of Finance, 65(5): 1637～1667.
[33]
Broner, F,P.Bustos, and V. M.Carvalho 2012.“Sources of Comparative Advantage in Polluting Industries”, NBER Working Papers.
[34]
Buchard, V.,A. M. D. Silva,P. R. Colarco 2015. “Using the OMI Aerosol Index and Absorption Aerosol Optical Depth to evaluate the NASA MERRA Aerosol Reanalysis”, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,15(23): 5743～5760.
[35]
Buchard, V., A. M. D.Silva,C. A. Randles 2016. “Evaluation of the Surface PM 2.5 in Version 1 of the NASA MERRA Aerosol Reanalysis over the United States”, Atmospheric Environment, 125: 100～111.
[36]
Cai, H.Y.Chen, and Q.Gong 2016. “Polluting thy neighbor: Unintended Consequences of China's Pollution Reduction Mandates”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 76: 86～104.
[37]
Chay, K. Y. and M.Greenstone 2003. “The Impact of Air Pollution on Infant Mortality: Evidence from Geographic Variation in Pollution Shocks Induced by a Recession”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(118): 1121～1167.
[38]
Chen, S,P. Oliva, and P.Zhang 2018. “Air Pollution and Mental Health: Evidence from China”, NBER Working Papers.
[39]
Chen, Y., A.Ebenstein,M. Greenstone 2013. “Evidence on the Impact of Sustained Exposure to Air Pollution on Life Expectancy from China's Huai River policy”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(32): 12936～12941.
[40]
Eva, Arceo , H. Rema , and O. Paulina .2016. “Does the Effect of Pollution on Infant Mortality Differ Between Developing and Developed Countries？ Evidence from Mexico City”, Economic Journal, 126(591): 257～280.
[41]
Fu, S., V. B.Viard, and P.Zhang 2017. “Air Quality and Manufacturing Firm Productivity: Comprehensive Evidence from China”, MPRA Paper.
[42]
Ghanem, D. and J.Zhang 2014. “‘Effortless Perfection:’ Do Chinese Cities Manipulate Air Pollution Data？”, Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 68(2): 203～225.
[43]
Jia, J.,S. Ding, and Y.Liu 2020. “Decentralization, Incentives, and Local Tax Enforcement”, Journal of Urban Economics, 115: 103225.
[44]
Li, P., Lu Y, and J.Wang 2016. “Does Flattening Government Improve Economic Performance？ Evidence from China”, Journal of Development Economics, 123: 18～37.
[45]
Van Donkelaar, A., R. V. Martin, M. Brauer, N. C. Hsu, R. A. Kahn, R. C. Levy, A. Lyapustin, A. M. Sayer, and D. M. Winker. 2016. “Global Estimates of Fine Particulate Matter using a Combined Geophysical-Statistical Method with Information from Satellites, Models, and Monitors”, Environmental Science & Technology, 50(7): 3762～3772.
