Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2020, Vol. 482 Issue (8): 54-73    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于房地产市场的我国系统性金融风险测度与预警研究
白鹤祥, 刘社芳, 罗小伟, 刘蕾蕾, 郝威亚
中国人民银行广州分行,广东广州 510120;
中国人民银行西安分行,陕西西安 710075;
中国人民银行西安分行营业管理部,陕西西安 710004
Research on the Measurement and Early Warning of Real Estate Market Based Systemic Financial Risk in China
BAI Hexiang, LIU Shefang, LUO Xiaowei, LIU Leilei, HAO Weiya
Guangzhou Branch, the People's Bank of China;
Xi'an Branch, the People's Bank of China;
Business Management Department of Xi'an Branch, the People's Bank of China
下载:  PDF (2183KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文阐释了基于房地产市场的系统性金融风险形成机制,据此建立了分阶段、跨部门的房地产市场的系统性金融风险网络模型,并运用2006-2017年16家上市银行数据,分析和测度了我国房价大幅下跌所引发的系统性金融风险水平和结构,构建了基于房地产市场的系统性金融风险预警指标并进行测算。研究发现:在房价下跌30%的压力情景下,我国金融体系的潜在总损失总体呈级数式上升,年均增长22.70%;基于房地产市场的系统性金融风险值(SR)呈现先上升后波动下降的总体趋势;系统性金融风险(SR)的脆弱性指标(FLI)整体呈现波浪式振荡变化,且与房地产贷款/权益整体呈反向变动,系统性金融风险(SR)的传染性指标(CTI)在2012-2017年呈持续下降趋势,且与金融市场压力指数、金融机构间资产占总资产比重呈现出高度的一致性变化趋势。最后,基于房地产市场的系统性金融风险预警指标(SRWI)值呈收敛式振荡走势,表明基于房地产市场的系统性金融风险总体可控且呈收敛式下降。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
白鹤祥
刘社芳
罗小伟
刘蕾蕾
郝威亚
关键词:  房地产市场  系统性金融风险  风险预警  网络模型    
Summary:  The historical experience of global economic operations demonstrates that housing price and real estate credit are key factors affecting financial stability. With China's real estate market developing rapidly and housing prices increasing continuously in recent years, real estate credit in China has expanded too quickly. This has caused significant risk to the financial system.
This paper describes the mechanism though which systemic financial risk based on the real estate market forms and establishes a phased and cross-sector network model to characterize it. The risk formation process is divided into three stages. The first stage is the risk accumulation stage. The second stage is the risk spillover stage. Financial risk spills over from real estate companies, the residential sector and non-real estate companies and the government sector to the financial sector, respectively. The third stage is the risk contagion stage.
This paper constructs a systemic financial risk network model. In this model, if housing prices decrease significantly, the total loss, which causes systemic risk, consists of the default loss of financial institutions and the contagion loss of the financial system. The default loss is caused by the bankruptcy of real estate companies, foreclosures in the residential sector, the default of other real estate mortgage companies and the local government's default on its debt due to the reduction of income from land. The contagion loss includes the total asset loss of the financial system caused by the bankruptcy of financial institutions, the liquidity run loss among financial institutions and the asset sell-off loss for active deleverage.
Based on the above model, this paper constructs a systemic financial measurement indicator (SR) and two structural indicators (a fragility indicator and a contagion indicator). Using data from 16 listed commercial banks between 2006 and 2017, it also studies the level and structure of systemic financial risk triggered by steep reductions in housing prices. Furthermore, it constructs early-warning indicators for real estate market based systemic financial risk. The relevant data come from the annual reports of the 16 listed banks and the Wind database. The results indicate that the financial system's potential total loss increases exponentially when housing prices decrease by 30%. The average annual growth rate of the potential total loss is 22.70%. In 2017, it reached 6,500.682 billion yuan, accounting for 8% of the GDP. The real estate market based systemic risk increased, peaking at 60.52 in 2008 and then decreasing to 33.28 in 2017. The fragility indicator (FLI) exhibits wave oscillations and changes inversely with real estate loans/equities. The contagion indicator (CTI) decreases continuously from 2012 to 2017. It changes consistently with the financial market pressure index and the proportion of financial institutions' mutually held assets to total assets. Thus, the more relevant financial institutions are or the worse the financial market environment is, the greater the contagion loss suffered by the entire financial system is. The early warning indicator of real estate market based systemic financial risk (SRWI) oscillates and converges on its trend. This shows that systemic financial risk is generally controllable and decreases in a convergent way.
This paper makes the following contributions. First, it explains the formation of real estate market based systemic financial risk. Second, it constructs a phased and cross-sector network model for systemic financial risk in the real estate market. This model provides theoretical support for measuring systemic financial risk, which may be caused by a dramatic decrease in housing prices. Third, this paper measures the total loss in the financial system due to significant decreases in housing prices and describes the change in systemic financial risk based on the real estate market. Fourth, it constructs early warning indicators of real estate market based systemic financial risk and sets several warning intervals to carry out the “early identification, early warning, early detection, early disposal” guidelines.
This paper also makes several suggestions. The fundamental institution of and a long-term development mechanism for the real estate market should be promoted. The monitoring and early warning of real estate market based systemic financial risk should be strengthened. The real estate finance macro-prudential policy system should be improved. The loan-to-value ratio requirement should be adjusted according to cities' actual situation. Finally, regulatory arbitrage should be strictly prohibited.
Keywords:  Real Estate Market    Systemic Financial Risk    Risk Warning    Network Model
JEL分类号:  E44   G32  
作者简介:  白鹤祥,经济学硕士,高级经济师,中国人民银行广州分行。
刘社芳,经济学硕士,高级经济师,中国人民银行西安分行,E-mail:lsf_xa@126.com.
罗小伟(通讯作者),经济学博士,中级经济师,中国人民银行西安分行营业管理部,E-mail:502152138@qq.com.
刘蕾蕾,经济学硕士,中级经济师,中国人民银行西安分行营业管理部,E-mail:liu_leilei_good@126.com.
郝威亚,经济学博士,中级经济师,中国人民银行西安分行,E-mail:haoweiya6@126.com.
引用本文:    
白鹤祥, 刘社芳, 罗小伟, 刘蕾蕾, 郝威亚. 基于房地产市场的我国系统性金融风险测度与预警研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 482(8): 54-73.
BAI Hexiang, LIU Shefang, LUO Xiaowei, LIU Leilei, HAO Weiya. Research on the Measurement and Early Warning of Real Estate Market Based Systemic Financial Risk in China. Journal of Financial Research, 2020, 482(8): 54-73.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2020/V482/I8/54
[1]淳伟德和肖杨,2018,《供给侧结构性改革期间系统性金融风险的SVM预警研究》,《预测》第5期,第36~42页。
[2]方意,2016,《系统性风险的传染渠道与度量研究——兼论宏观审慎政策实施》,《管理世界》第8期,第32~57页。
[3]吕江林和赖娟,2011, 《我国金融系统性风险预警指标体系的构建与应用》,《江西财经大学学报》,第5~11页。
[4]谭政勋和王聪,2011,《中国信贷扩张、房价波动的金融稳定效应研究——动态随机一般均衡模型视角》,《金融研究》第8期,第57~71页。
[5]陶玲和朱迎,2016,系统性金融风险的监测和度量——基于中国金融体系的研究》,《金融研究》第6期,第18~36页。
[6]王春丽和胡玲,2014,《基于马尔科夫区制转移模型的中国金融风险预警研究》,《金融研究》第9期,第99~114页。
[7]武康平、皮舜和鲁桂华,2004,《中国房地产市场与金融市场共生性的一般均衡分析》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第10期,第24~32页。
[8]肖斌卿、杨旸、李心丹和颜建晔,2015,《基于GA-ANN的中国金融安全预警系统设计及实证分析》,《系统工程理论与实践》第8期,第1928~1937页。
[9]许涤龙和陈双莲,2015,《基于金融压力指数的系统性金融风险测度研究》,《经济学动态》第4期,第69~78页。
[10]Adrian T. and Brunnermeier M. K. 2011. “CoVaR”, NBER Working Paper, No. 17454.
[11]Capozza D. R. and Order R. V.2011. “The Great Surge in Mortgage Defaults 2006–2009: The Comparative Roles of Economic Conditions, Underwriting and Moral Hazard”, Journal of Housing Economics, 20(2):141~151.
[12]Chan-Lau, J. A. 2010. “Balance Sheet Network Analysis of Too-Connected-to-Fail Risk in Global and Domestic Banking Systems”, IMF Working Paper No. 10/107.
[13]Duarte F. and T. Eisenbach. 2015. “Fire-sale Spillovers and Systemic Risk”,Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report, No.645.
[14]Degryse H. and G. Nguyen. 2007. “Interbank Exposures:An Empirical Examination of Systemic Risk in the Belgian Banking System”, International Journal of Central Banking, 2,pp. 123~171.
[15]Elsinger H., Lehar A. and Summer M. 2006. “Risk Assessment for Banking Systems”, Management Science, 52(9):1301~1314.
[16]End J. and Tabbae M. 2005. “Measuring Financial Stability: Applying the Risk Model to the Netherlands”, DNB Working Papers.
[17]Fioramanti M. 2008. “Predicting Sovereign Debt Crises Using Artificial Neural Networks: A Comparative Approach”, Journal of Financial Stability, 4(2):164.
[18]Frankel J. A. and Rose A. K. 1996. “Currency Crashes in Emerging Markets: An Empirical Treatment”, Journal of International Economics, 41:351~366.
[19]Greenwood R., A. Landier, and D. Thesmar. 2015. “Vulnerable Banks”, Journal of Financial Economics, 115(3):471~485.
[20]Hahm J. H., H. S. Shin and K. Shin. 2013. “Noncore Bank Liabilities and Financial Vulnerability”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 45(s1):3~36.
[21]Hu D., Zhao J. L. and Hua Z. 2012. “Network-Based Modeling and Analysis of Systemic Risk in Banking System”, MIS Quarterly, 4:1269~1291.
[22]Illing M. and Liu Y. 2003. “An Index of Financial Stress for Canada”, Staff Working Paper,29:3~14.
[23]International Monetary Fund. 2011.“People's Republic of China:Financial System Stability Assessment”, IMF Country Report No.11/321.
[24]Kaminsky G., Lizondo S. and Reinhart C. M. 1998. “Leading Indicators of Currency Crises”, Staff Papers, 45(1):1~48.
[25]Koetter M. and Poghosyan T. 2010. “Real Estate Prices and Bank Stability”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(6):1129~1138.
[26]Kumar M., Moorthy U. and Perraudin W. 2003. “Predicting Emerging Market Currency Crashes”, Journal of Empirical Finance, 10(4):427-454.
[27]Tressel T. 2010. “Financial Contagion through Bank Deleveraging: Stylized Facts and Simulations Applied to the Financial Crisis”, IMF Working Paper No. 10/236.
[1] 陈湘鹏, 周皓, 金涛, 王正位. 微观层面系统性金融风险指标的比较与适用性分析——基于中国金融系统的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 467(5): 17-36.
[2] 李伦一, 张翔. 中国房地产市场价格泡沫与空间传染效应[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 169-186.
[3] 刘哲希, 随晓芹, 陈彦斌. 储蓄率与杠杆率:一个U型关系[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 473(11): 19-37.
[4] 杨子晖, 陈雨恬, 谢锐楷. 我国金融机构系统性金融风险度量与跨部门风险溢出效应研究[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 460(10): 19-37.
[5] 陶玲, 朱迎. 系统性金融风险的监测和度量——基于中国金融体系的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 432(6): 18-36.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[4] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[5] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
[6] 江娇, 刘红忠, 曾剑平. 中国股票网络论坛的信息含量分析段[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 178 -192 .
[7] 步丹璐, 狄灵瑜. 治理环境、股权投资与政府补助[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 193 -206 .
[8] 张成思, 党超. 基于双预期的前瞻性货币政策反应机制[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 1 -17 .
[9] 严成樑. 延迟退休、财政支出结构调整与养老金替代率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 51 -66 .
[10] 李春涛, 刘贝贝, 周鹏. 卖空与信息披露:融券准自然实验的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 130 -145 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1