Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2020, Vol. 477 Issue (3): 189-206    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
事前披露能够降低董监高减持的获利能力吗?——基于中国“减持新规”的实证检验
张程, 曾庆生, 贺惠宇
上海财经大学会计学院,上海 200433;
上海财经大学会计与财务研究院,上海 200433;
新加坡管理大学会计学院,新加坡 188065
Can Pre-announcement Reduce the Profitability of Insider Selling? Evidence from the “New Regulation of Insider Selling” in China
ZHANG Cheng, ZENG Qingsheng, HE Huiyu
School of Accountancy, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics;
Institute of Accounting and Finance, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics;
School of Accountancy, Singapore Management University
下载:  PDF (644KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 “事前披露”能否降低董监高交易的信息优势?中国证监会于2017年5月修订并实施的“减持新规”首次为上述命题的检验提供了独特的研究场景。通过“事件研究法”,本文对“减持新规”颁布前后的董监高减持行为进行研究,考察事前披露减持计划是否会削弱董监高减持时的信息优势。实证结果表明,“减持新规”实施后董监高减持的短期超常回报显著低于“减持新规”实施前,这说明事前披露会抑制董监高交易的择时能力。进一步研究发现,当公司信息质量较差、所处地区的市场化程度较低、成长性较高、减持规模较大时,事前披露对董监高减持获利能力的削弱作用更强;“减持新规”实施对董监高减持超常回报的削弱主要体现在交易日与减持计划披露日间隔短的减持样本中。本文不仅在实证层面上验证了“事前披露” 可以降低董监高交易的信息优势,丰富了内部人交易研究文献,也为我国“减持新规”的实施效果提供了证据和建议。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张程
曾庆生
贺惠宇
关键词:  减持新规  事前披露  内部人交易  事件研究法    
Summary:  Can pre-announcement reduce the information advantage of insider trading? This question has been discussed deeply in analytical research. In 2000, Fried proposed that pre-announcement can effectively reduce the profitability of insider trading, and as a regulatory method, it has the benefit of lower implementation costs. Subsequently, several papers used theoretical models to show that pre-announcement reduces the probability of insider trading by reducing insiders' information advantages (Huddart et al., 2000; Lenkey, 2014). However, there is no direct empirical evidence to answer this question, as few countries have issued regulations requiring pre-announcement of insider trading.
   The “New Regulation of Insider Selling”, implemented by the China Securities Regulatory Commission in May 2017, provides a unique study setting for the empirical test of this question. The new regulation requires an insider to disclose the selling plan 15 days before the first sale of shares. The pre-announcement should include but is not limited to the number, source, time interval, type, price interval, and reasons for the selling of the shares. The new regulation also requires that the selling period of each pre-announcement should not exceed six months, the progress of the insider selling should be disclosed when more than half of the shares are sold or the selling time is more than half over, and the specific selling condition should be disclosed within two trading days after the implementation of the selling plan or the expiration of the disclosed selling period.
   We focus on the selling behavior of directors, supervisors, and senior managers who sell their company's stock in the secondary market as disclosed by the Shenzhen and Shanghai Stock Exchanges from June 1, 2016, to April 25, 2018. Our sample includes 3,792 observations before the new regulation (June 1, 2016-May 26, 2017) and 2,522 observations after the new regulation (May 27, 2017-April 25, 2018). By using the event study method, we study insider selling before and after the implementation of the “New Regulation”, and examine whether pre-announcement of the selling plan weakens insiders' information advantage.
   The empirical results show that the short-term abnormal return of insider selling after the implementation of the new regulation is significantly lower than before, which indicates that pre-announcement inhibits the timing advantage of insider trading. Further research shows that pre-announcement reduces insider selling's profitability more strongly when the information quality is poor, the degree of marketization is low, the growth opportunity is high, the scale of insider selling is large, or the interval between the pre-announcement date and insider selling date is short.
   The contributions of this paper are as follows. First, by taking advantage of the unique research background of China's “New Regulation of Insider Selling”, it provides empirical evidence on the regulatory effect of pre-announcement on insider trading, which strongly supports and expands the existing theory. Second, unlike previous studies, which focused directly on the profitability of insider trading, this paper examines the weakening effect of pre-announcement on the profitability of insider trading and provides indirect evidence that insiders gain stock returns by using their information advantage. This result provides a useful supplement to the literature. Finally, by examining the effect of the “New Regulation of Insider Selling” on the trading of insiders with different characteristics, the conclusions of this study will help market regulators evaluate the effectiveness of their policies and further improve the efficiency of the capital market.
Keywords:  New Regulation of Insider Selling    Pre-announcement    Insider Trading    Event Study
JEL分类号:  G14   G38   M41  
基金资助: * 本文得到国家自然科学基金项目(71632006、71372039)、教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目(18JJD790010)、上海财经大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助。
通讯作者:  曾庆生,管理学博士,教授,上海财经大学会计与财务研究院,E-mail:qszeng@mail.shufe.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  张程,博士生,上海财经大学会计学院,E-mail:zhangcheng@163.sufe.edu.cn.贺惠宇,博士生,新加坡管理大学会计学院,E-mail:hehejoy@foxmail.com.
引用本文:    
张程, 曾庆生, 贺惠宇. 事前披露能够降低董监高减持的获利能力吗?——基于中国“减持新规”的实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 477(3): 189-206.
ZHANG Cheng, ZENG Qingsheng, HE Huiyu. Can Pre-announcement Reduce the Profitability of Insider Selling? Evidence from the “New Regulation of Insider Selling” in China. Journal of Financial Research, 2020, 477(3): 189-206.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2020/V477/I3/189
[1] 曹新伟、洪剑峭和贾琬娇,2015,《分析师实地调研与资本市场信息效率——基于股价同步性的研究》,《经济管理》第8期,第141~150页。
[2] 李欢和李丹,2015,《上市公司信息环境与内部人交易》,《中国会计评论》第2期,第157~180页。
[3] 刘志远、郑凯和何亚南,2011,《询价制度第一阶段改革有效吗》,《金融研究》第4期,第158~173页。
[4] 彭继增和吴玮,2014,《资本监管与银行贷款结构——基于我国商业银行的经验研究》,《金融研究》第3期,第123~137页。
[5] 谭劲松和林雨晨,2016,《机构投资者对信息披露的治理效应——基于机构调研行为的证据》,《南开管理评论》第5期,第115~126页。
[6] 唐齐鸣、赵传玺和赵袁军,2018,《减持新规对大宗交易市场筛选股票能力的影响——基于双重差分模型的实证检验》,《证券市场导报》第12期,第41~47页。
[7] 王红建、杨筝、阮刚铭和曹瑜强,2018,《放松利率管制、过度负债与债务期限结构》,《金融研究》第2期,第100~117页。
[8] 王小鲁、樊纲和余静文,2016,《中国分省份市场化指数报告》,社会科学文献出版社。
[9] 肖斌卿、彭毅、方立兵和胡辰,2017,《上市公司调研对投资决策有用吗——基于分析师调研报告的实证研究》,《南开管理评论》第1期,第119~131页。
[10] 曾庆生,2008,《公司内部人具有交易时机的选择能力吗?——来自中国上市公司内部人卖出股票的证据》,《金融研究》第10期,第117~135页。
[11] 章晟、景辛辛和苏姣,2019,《规范大股东减持能有效抑制股价波动吗?——基于〈减持新规〉[9号文]的自然实验》,《证券市场导报》第3期,第13~23页。
[12] 朱茶芬、姚铮和李志文,2011,《高管交易能预测未来股票收益吗?》,《管理世界》第9期,第141~152页。
[13] Aboody, D. and B. Lev, 2000, “Information Asymmetry, R&D, and Insider Gains”, Journal of Finance, 55(6), pp.2747~2766.
[14] Ali, A., K. D. Wei and Y. Zhou, 2011, “Insider Trading and Option Grant Timing in Response to Fire Sales (and purchases) of Stocks by Mutual Funds”, Journal of Accounting Research, 49(3), pp.595~632.
[15] Alldredge D.M. and D.C. Cicero, 2015, “Attentive Insider Trading”, Journal of Financial Economics, 115(1), pp.84~101.
[16] Ausubel,L.M., 1990, “Insider Trading in a Rational Expectations Economy”,American Economic Review, 80(5), pp.1022~1041.
[17] Ball, R., A. Robin and J. S. Wu, 2000, “Incentives Versus Standards: Properties of Accounting Income in Four East Asian Countries”,Journal of Accounting & Economics, 36(1), pp. 235~270.
[18] Billings, M. B. and M. C. Cedergren, 2015, “Strategic Silence, Insider Selling and Litigation Risk”, Journal of Accounting & Economics, 59(2-3), pp.119~142.
[19] Dyck, A. and L. Zingales, 2004, “Private Benefits of Control: an International Comparison”, Journal of Finance, 59(2), pp.537~600.
[20] Finnerty, J. E., 1976, “Insiders and Market Efficiency”, Journal of Finance, 31(4), pp.1141~1148.
[21] Fried, J.M., 2000, “Reducing the Profitability of Corporate Insider Trading with Pretrading Disclosure”, Ssrn Electronic Journal, 71(2), pp.303~392.
[22] Fried, J.M. 2006, “Advance Disclosure of Managers' Stock Trades: a Proposal to Improve Executive Compensation”, Economists Voice, 3(8), pp.7~7.
[23] Friederich, S., A. Gregory, J. Matatko and I. Tonks, 2002, “Short-run Returns Around the Trades of Corporate Insiders on the London Stock Exchange”, European Financial Management, 8(1), pp.7~30.
[24] Gregory, A., J. Matatko, I. Tonks and R. Purkis, 1994, “Uk Directors' Trading: the Impact of Dealings in Smaller Firms”, Economic Journal, 104(422), pp.37.
[25] Gu, F. and J.Q. Li, 2012, “Insider Trading and Corporate Information Transparency”, Financial Review, 47(4), pp.645~664.
[26] Huddart, S. J., J. S. Hughes and M. Williams, 2000, “Pre-announcement of Insiders' Trades”, Social Science Electronic Publishing.
[27] Ke, B., S. Huddart and K. Petroni, 2003, “What Insiders Know about Future Earnings and How They Use it: Evidence from Insider Trades”, Journal of Accounting & Economics, 35(3), pp.315~346.
[28] Lakonishok, J., A. Shleifer and R.W. Vishny, 1994, “Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and Risk”, Journal of Finance, 49(5), pp.1541~1578.
[29] Lenkey, S.L., 2014, “Advance Disclosure of Insider Trading”, Review of Financial Studies, 27(8), pp.2504~2537.
[30] Manne, H.G., 1966, “Insider Trading and the Stock Market”, Plos One,7(4).
[31] Rozeff, M.S. and M.A. Zaman, 1998, “Overreaction and Insider Trading: Evidence from Growth and Value Portfolios”, Journal of Finance, 53(2), pp.701~716.
[32] Ryan, S.G., J.W. Tucker and Y. Zhou, 2015, “Securitization and Insider Trading”, Social Science Electronic Publishing, 91(2), pp.649~675.
[33] Seyhun, H.N., 1992, “Why does Aggregate Insider Trading Predict Future Stock Returns?”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(4), pp.1303~1331.
[34] Skaife, H.A., D. Veenman and D. Wangerin, 2013, “Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Managerial Rent Extraction: Evidence from the Profitability of Insider Trading”, Journal of Accounting & Economics, 55(1), pp.91~110.
[1] 邹文理, 王曦, 谢小平. 中央银行沟通的金融市场响应──基于股票市场的事件研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 476(2): 34-50.
[2] 王永钦, 陈映辉, 熊雅文. 存款保险制度如何影响公众对不同银行的信心?——来自中国的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 456(6): 109-122.
[3] 杨青, 王亚男, 唐跃军. “限薪令”的政策效果:基于竞争与垄断性央企市场反应的评估[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 451(1): 156-173.
[4] 张学勇, 柳依依, 罗丹, 陈锐. 创新能力对上市公司并购业绩的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 159-175.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[3] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[4] 王攀娜, 罗宏. 放松卖空管制对分析师预测行为的影响——来自中国准自然实验的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 191 -206 .
[5] 王丽艳, 马光荣. 帆随风动、人随财走?——财政转移支付对人口流动的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 18 -34 .
[6] 潘彬, 王去非, 金雯雯. 时变视角下非正规借贷利率的货币政策反应研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 52 -67 .
[7] 李万福, 杜静, 张怀. 创新补助究竟有没有激励企业创新自主投资——来自中国上市公司的新证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 130 -145 .
[8] 金宇超, 靳庆鲁, 李晓雪. 资本市场注意力总量是稀缺资源吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 162 -177 .
[9] 江娇, 刘红忠, 曾剑平. 中国股票网络论坛的信息含量分析段[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 178 -192 .
[10] 严成樑. 延迟退休、财政支出结构调整与养老金替代率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 51 -66 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1