Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2017, Vol. 448 Issue (10): 52-67    DOI: 10.12094/1002-7246(2017)10-0052-16
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
时变视角下非正规借贷利率的货币政策反应研究
潘彬, 王去非, 金雯雯
宁波大学商学院,浙江宁波 315211;
中国人民银行杭州中心支行,浙江杭州 310001;
温州大学金融研究院,浙江温州 325035
The Response of Informal Lending Interest Rate to Monetary Policy from Time-varying Perspective
PAN Bin, WANG Qufei, JIN Wenwen
Business School, Ningbo University;
Hangzhou Central Sub-branch,the People's Bank of China;
Financial Research Institute, Wenzhou University
下载:  PDF (2126KB)  Mobile PDF (2125KB)
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文从时变视角研究了非正规借贷利率的货币政策反应,试图为二元金融结构下的货币政策选择提供参考。基于修正的IS-IM模型的研究表明,非正规借贷利率的货币政策反应受正规与非正规金融市场间的替代性等因素的影响。实证结果显示,非正规借贷利率的货币政策反应具有明显的时变特征,表现在价格型货币政策工具在短期能够有效引导非正规借贷利率走势,但长期来看政策效果有所弱化;数量型货币政策工具在2008年国际金融危机前期出现暂时“失灵”,但在后金融危机时期政策效果有明显改善。正规与非正规金融市场间替代性的动态演化能够为以上结论提供合理解释。本文研究还发现,正规与非正规金融市场利率间存在时变的同向变动关系,前者对后者的影响随滞后期数增加而衰减。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
潘彬
王去非
金雯雯
关键词:  非正规借贷利率  货币政策  时变参数    
Abstract:  Studying on the response of informal lending interest rate to monetary policy from time-varying perspective, this paper tried to provide some suggestions for monetary policy choice under the dual financial structure. Based on the modified IS - IM model, we concluded that the response of informal lending interest rate to monetary policy would be influenced by factors such as the substitutability between the formal and informal financial market. The empirical results showed that, the response of informal lending rate to monetary policy had obvious time-varying characteristics. While price-based monetary policy instrument could influence the movements of informal lending interest rate effectively in the short term, the policy effects had weakened in the long term. While quantity-based monetary policy instrument were temporarily “broken” in the early stage before the international financial crisis in 2008, the policy effect was significantly improved in the post-financial crisis period. The dynamic evolution of the substitutability between the formal and informal financial market could provide a reasonable explanation for these conclusions. We also concluded that, the movements of informal lending interest rate and interest rates of formal financial market were in the same direction, although the relationship was time-varying. Besides, the effect of interest rates of formal financial market on informal lending interest rates was decreasing with the increase of lag period.
Key words:  Informal Lending Interest Rate    Monetary Policy    Time-varying Parameters
JEL分类号:  C32   E43   E52  
基金资助: 国家社科基金重大项目《创新与完善我国民间金融监管协调机制研究》(14ZDA045),宁波大学人文社会科学培育项目研究成果。南湖互联网金融学院提供了数据调研协助。
作者简介:  潘彬,博士,教授,宁波大学商学院,Email:panbin109@163.com.
王去非,高级经济师,中国人民银行杭州中心支行,Email:happy171504@163.com.
金雯雯(通讯作者),博士,讲师,温州大学金融研究院,Email:jinwenwen_nju@163.com.
引用本文:    
潘彬, 王去非, 金雯雯. 时变视角下非正规借贷利率的货币政策反应研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 52-67.
PAN Bin, WANG Qufei, JIN Wenwen. The Response of Informal Lending Interest Rate to Monetary Policy from Time-varying Perspective. Journal of Financial Research, 2017, 448(10): 52-67.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/10.12094/1002-7246(2017)10-0052-16  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2017/V448/I10/52
[1] 陈守东、易晓溦和刘洋,2014,《货币供给、通货膨胀与产出波动的动态效应研究:1992-2013》,《南方经济》第2期,第24~41页。
陈守东、易晓溦和刘洋,2014,《货币供给、通货膨胀与产出波动的动态效应研究:1992-2013》,《南方经济》第2期,第24~41页。
[2] 方意和方明,2012,《中国货币市场基准利率的确立及其动态关系研究》,《金融研究》第7期,第84~97页。
方意和方明,2012,《中国货币市场基准利率的确立及其动态关系研究》,《金融研究》第7期,第84~97页。
[3] 顾宁和康海俐,2016,《货币政策对我国农村非正规金融市场的影响渠道及效应研究》, 《农业技术经济》第5期,第32~40页。
顾宁和康海俐,2016,《货币政策对我国农村非正规金融市场的影响渠道及效应研究》, 《农业技术经济》第5期,第32~40页。
[4] 胡育蓉和范从来,2015,《货币政策工具的选择:利率双轨制和利率市场化》,《经济评论》第4期,第3~16页。
胡育蓉和范从来,2015,《货币政策工具的选择:利率双轨制和利率市场化》,《经济评论》第4期,第3~16页。
[5] 刘澜飚、齐炎龙和张靖佳,2016,《互联网金融对货币政策有效性的影响——基于微观银行学框架的经济学分析》,《财贸经济》第1期,第61~73页。
刘澜飚、齐炎龙和张靖佳,2016,《互联网金融对货币政策有效性的影响——基于微观银行学框架的经济学分析》,《财贸经济》第1期,第61~73页。
[6] 马骏和王红林,2014,《政策利率传导机制的理论模型》,《金融研究》第12期,第1~22页。
马骏和王红林,2014,《政策利率传导机制的理论模型》,《金融研究》第12期,第1~22页。
[7] 马鑫媛和赵天奕,2016,《非正规金融与正规金融双重结构下货币政策工具比较研究》,《金融研究》第2期,第137~144页。
马鑫媛和赵天奕,2016,《非正规金融与正规金融双重结构下货币政策工具比较研究》,《金融研究》第2期,第137~144页。
[8] 钱雪松、杜立和马文涛,2015,《中国货币政策利率传导有效性研究:中介效应和体制内外差异》,《管理世界》第11期,第11~29页。
[9] 孙焱林、陈普和熊义明,2011,《贝叶斯视角下时变参数VAR建模——兼论“斜率之谜”》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第10期,第123~133页。
[8] 钱雪松、杜立和马文涛,2015,《中国货币政策利率传导有效性研究:中介效应和体制内外差异》,《管理世界》第11期,第11~29页。
[10] 杨坤、曹晖和孙宁华,2015,《非正规金融、利率双轨制与信贷政策效果——基于新凯恩斯动态随机一般均衡模型的分析》,《管理世界》第5期,第41~51页。
[9] 孙焱林、陈普和熊义明,2011,《贝叶斯视角下时变参数VAR建模——兼论“斜率之谜”》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第10期,第123~133页。
[10] 杨坤、曹晖和孙宁华,2015,《非正规金融、利率双轨制与信贷政策效果——基于新凯恩斯动态随机一般均衡模型的分析》,《管理世界》第5期,第41~51页。
[11] 中国人民银行温州市中心支行课题组,2011,《温州民间借贷利率变动影响因素及其监测体系重构研究》,《浙江金融》第1期,第15~20页。
中国人民银行温州市中心支行课题组,2011,《温州民间借贷利率变动影响因素及其监测体系重构研究》,《浙江金融》第1期,第15~20页。
[12] Acharya, S., and S.Madhur .1983. “Informal Credit Markets and Black Money: Do They Frustrate Monetary Policy?”,Economic and Political Weekly, 28:1751~1756.
Acharya, S., and S.Madhur .1983. “Informal Credit Markets and Black Money: Do They Frustrate Monetary Policy?”,Economic and Political Weekly, 28:1751~1756.
[13] Carpenter. 1999. “Informal Credit Markets and the Transmission of Monetary Policy: Evidence from South Korea” ,Review of Development Economics, 3: 323~335.
Carpenter. 1999. “Informal Credit Markets and the Transmission of Monetary Policy: Evidence from South Korea” ,Review of Development Economics, 3: 323~335.
[14] Duo, Qin, Zhong Xu, Xuechun Zhang. 2014. “How Much Informal Credit Lending Responded to Monetary Policy in China? The Case of Wenzhou”, Journal of Asian Economics, 3: 22~31.
Duo, Qin, Zhong Xu, Xuechun Zhang. 2014. “How Much Informal Credit Lending Responded to Monetary Policy in China? The Case of Wenzhou”, Journal of Asian Economics, 3: 22~31.
[15] Gupta, M. R. and Chaudhuri S.. 1997. “Formal Credit, Corruption and the Informal Credit Market in Agriculture: A Theoretical Analysis” ,Economica, 64: 331~343.
Gupta, M. R. and Chaudhuri S.. 1997. “Formal Credit, Corruption and the Informal Credit Market in Agriculture: A Theoretical Analysis” ,Economica, 64: 331~343.
[16] Harold, P.E. Ngalawa and Nicola Viegi. 2013. “Interaction of Formal and Informal Financial Markets in Quasi-Emerging Market Economies” ,ESRA Working paper, No.326.
[17] Madestam ,A.. 2014. “Informal Finance: A Theory of Moneylenders”, Journal of Development Economics, 107: 157~174.
[16] Harold, P.E. Ngalawa and Nicola Viegi. 2013. “Interaction of Formal and Informal Financial Markets in Quasi-Emerging Market Economies” ,ESRA Working paper, No.326.
[17] Madestam ,A.. 2014. “Informal Finance: A Theory of Moneylenders”, Journal of Development Economics, 107: 157~174.
[18] Montiel, J. Peter. 1991. “The Transmission Mechanism for Monetary Policy in Developing Countries”, IMF Staff Papers, 38:83~108.
Montiel, J. Peter. 1991. “The Transmission Mechanism for Monetary Policy in Developing Countries”, IMF Staff Papers, 38:83~108.
[19] Ngalawa, H., and Viegi V.. 2013. “Interactions between Formal and Informal Financial Markets in Quasi-emerging Market Economies” ,Economic Modeling, 31: 614~624.
Ngalawa, H., and Viegi V.. 2013. “Interactions between Formal and Informal Financial Markets in Quasi-emerging Market Economies” ,Economic Modeling, 31: 614~624.
[20] Primiceri, G. E.. 2005. “Time Varying Structural Vector Auto Regressions and Monetary Policy”, Review of Economic Studies, 72:821~852.
Primiceri, G. E.. 2005. “Time Varying Structural Vector Auto Regressions and Monetary Policy”, Review of Economic Studies, 72:821~852.
[21] Rahman, A. 1992. “The Informal Financial Sector in Bangladesh: An Appraisal of Its Role in Development” ,Development and Change, 23: 147~168.
Rahman, A. 1992. “The Informal Financial Sector in Bangladesh: An Appraisal of Its Role in Development” ,Development and Change, 23: 147~168.
[22] Rudrani, Bhattacharya, IlaPatnaik and Ajay Shah. 2011. “Monetary Policy Transmission in an Emerging Market Setting”, IMF Working paper, No. 07617.
Rudrani, Bhattacharya, IlaPatnaik and Ajay Shah. 2011. “Monetary Policy Transmission in an Emerging Market Setting”, IMF Working paper, No. 07617.
[23] Sundaram, K. and Pandit V. 1984. “Informal Credit Markets, Black Money and Monetary Policy: Some Analytical and Empirical Issues”, Economic and Political Weekly,19: 675~682.
Sundaram, K. and Pandit V. 1984. “Informal Credit Markets, Black Money and Monetary Policy: Some Analytical and Empirical Issues”, Economic and Political Weekly,19: 675~682.
[24] Sweder van Wijnbergen. 1984. “Stagflationary Effects of Monetary Stabilization Policies: A Quantitative Analysis of South Korea”, Journal of Development Economics, 10: 133~169.
Sweder van Wijnbergen. 1984. “Stagflationary Effects of Monetary Stabilization Policies: A Quantitative Analysis of South Korea”, Journal of Development Economics, 10: 133~169.
[1] 谭小芬, 李源, 苟琴. 美国货币政策推升了新兴市场国家非金融企业杠杆率吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 470(8): 38-57.
[2] 贾盾, 孙溪, 郭瑞. 货币政策公告、政策不确定性及股票市场的预公告溢价效应——来自中国市场的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 469(7): 76-95.
[3] 姜富伟, 郭鹏, 郭豫媚. 美联储货币政策对我国资产价格的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 467(5): 37-55.
[4] 林东杰, 崔小勇, 龚六堂. 货币政策、消费品和投资品通货膨胀——基于金融加速器视角[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 465(3): 18-36.
[5] 陈雨露. 四十年来中央银行的研究进展及中国的实践[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 464(2): 1-19.
[6] 王永钦, 徐鸿恂. 杠杆率如何影响资产价格?——来自中国债券市场自然实验的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 464(2): 20-39.
[7] 郭晔, 徐菲, 舒中桥. 银行竞争背景下定向降准政策的“普惠”效应——基于A股和新三板三农、小微企业数据的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 463(1): 1-18.
[8] 郑挺国, 赵丽娟, 宋涛. 房地产价格失调与时变货币政策立场识别[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 459(9): 1-18.
[9] 崔嵬. 审慎推进我国银行间债券市场两类回购改革[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 456(6): 47-55.
[10] 汪勇, 马新彬, 周俊仰. 货币政策与异质性企业杠杆率——基于纵向产业结构的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 455(5): 47-64.
[11] 战明华, 李欢. 金融市场化进程是否改变了中国货币政策不同传导渠道的相对效应?[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 455(5): 20-36.
[12] 郭晔, 程玉伟, 黄振. 货币政策、同业业务与银行流动性创造[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 455(5): 65-81.
[13] 郭豫媚, 戴赜, 彭俞超. 中国货币政策利率传导效率研究:2008-2017[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 462(12): 37-54.
[14] 温信祥, 苏乃芳. 大资管、影子银行与货币政策传导[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 460(10): 38-54.
[15] 朱小能, 周磊. 未预期货币政策与股票市场——基于媒体数据的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 451(1): 102-120.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1