Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2026, Vol. 551 Issue (5): 152-169    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
中国企业的人工智能投入:来自招聘大数据的发现
方颖, 王翔宇, 叶梦芊, 赵西亮
AI Investment of Chinese Firms: Findings Based on Large-Scale Job Posting Data
FANG Ying, WANG Xiangyu, YE Mengqian, ZHAO Xiliang
Wang Yanan Institute for Studies in Economics/Interdisciplinary Laboratory of Big Data Finance/Paula and Gregory Chow Institute for Studies in Economics, Xiamen University; Fujian Institute of Scientific and Technical Information
下载:  PDF (887KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文构建了涵盖近10万项技能维度的中国劳动力技能大词典,并将其与大规模企业招聘数据进行匹配,从人力资本视角量化测度我国企业的人工智能投入强度。经三种方法交叉验证,该指标能够有效识别企业间人工智能发展水平的差异。在此基础上,本文系统对比了基于年报等公开文本信息挖掘的人工智能测度指标与基于人力资本投入的测度指标,研究发现,二者分别捕捉了企业人工智能发展的不同维度,基于公开披露文本的测度更多反映企业在人工智能领域的前瞻性布局与技术定位。最后,本文以人工智能技术进步作为外生冲击开展资产定价分析,结果表明,投资者在评估企业人工智能水平时,更容易受到公开披露信息的影响;相比之下,对企业实际投入信息的分析,更多建立在企业已进行相关披露的基础之上。本文研究对更好地测算我国企业人工智能投入提供了参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
方颖
王翔宇
叶梦芊
赵西亮
关键词:  人工智能投入  招聘数据  大数据分析    
Summary:  Measuring firm-level artificial intelligence (AI) investment is central to understanding technology adoption, productivity upgrading, and market valuation, yet direct accounting measures are limited because most AI inputs are intangible and rarely separated in financial statements. Existing proxies based on annual-report wording, IT hardware spending, or patent output capture only part of the process and can blur real investment behavior. Building on the view that AI adoption is human-capital intensive, this study develops a recruitment-based measure that tracks whether firms are actually allocating resources to AI capability development. The core idea is that hiring demand for AI-related skills reflects concrete investment decisions at the implementation stage, thereby providing a scalable, behavior-based indicator that complements disclosure-based metrics.
To operationalize this idea, we construct a Chinese labor-skill dictionary with 99,463 skills by integrating Lightcast, O*NET, and ESCO and then localizing the lexicon with a BERT-based named-entity-recognition pipeline trained on Chinese job texts. Using skill co-occurrence with four anchor concepts (AI, machine learning, image recognition, and natural language processing), we compute an AI relevance score for each skill, aggregate scores to the posting level, and classify a posting as AI-relatedwhen its average relevance exceeds 0.05. We then define AIRatio at the firm-year level as the share of AI-related postings in total postings. This framework follows a transparent skill-to-position-to-firm aggregation logic and can be extended to other technologies by replacing anchor skills.
The empirical sample combines 7.13 million postings from theZhaopin platform (organized by CnOpenData and matched to listed firms) with annual-report disclosures from CNINFO, AI patent information identified under China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) rules, and accounting and market variables from CSMAR, covering the period from 2015-2022. We validate AIRatio through three complementary tests. First, benchmark validation shows strong discrimination: firms on the CEIDI Top 100 AI list have a much higher mean AIRatio than other firms (0.0617 versus 0.0097). Second, patent validation shows a significantly positive association between AIRatio and AI patent applications. Third, a capital-market validation based on the release of ChatGPT on November 30, 2022, shows that high-AIRatio portfolios outperform low-AIRatio portfolios in China's event window (form December 30, 2022 to April 1, 2023), and firm-level cumulative abnormal returns are positively related to AIRatio.
UsingAIRatio, we document a substantial increase in AI investment among Chinese listed firms from 0.0023 in 2015 to 0.0157 in 2020, followed by a mild normalization to 0.0130 in 2022. Industry heterogeneity is substantial, with information services and finance leading, while agriculture, mining, and hospitality lagging behind. We then compare investment-based and disclosure-based AI measures and find only a modest correlation with frequent firm-level mismatch, including many cases of high disclosure but low contemporaneous hiring. Mechanism analysis indicates that mismatch is not purely cosmetic: disclosure contains forward-looking signals that predict next-period hiring, and it also captures technology positioning and business-AI relatedness beyond current input. In asset pricing, a disclosure premium is broad, while an investment premium is strongest when disclosure is already high, indicating a disclosure-first information hierarchy.
The study contributes in three ways.First, it introduces a scalable and behavior-based AI investment metric that is less dependent on voluntary narrative disclosure. Second, it clarifies the different information content of disclosure and investment indicators. Third, it provides evidence on how AI adoption in the real economy is transmitted into equity valuation under a major technology shock. Policy implications are to support AI diffusion in traditional sectors through application-oriented incentives, strengthen AI talent training and mobility, monitor widening inter-firm AI gaps, and improve verifiable AI disclosure standards by linking narrative claims to recruitment, R&D, and patent evidence. Future research can extend the framework to non-listed firms, add new input channels such as cloud and compute spending, and develop stronger causal designs for productivity, labor, and competition effects of AI diffusion.
Keywords:  AI Investment    Job Posting Data    Big Data Analysis
JEL分类号:  J24   O33   G14  
基金资助: *本文感谢国家自然科学基金重大项目《人工智能时代劳动力市场理论与微观结构计量研究》(72595870)、国家自然科学基金重大项目课题二《人工智能时代人力资本供给的测度与建模》(72595875)和国家社会科学基金一般项目“人工智能技术应用对劳动力行业间配置和工资的影响研究”(23BJL042)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  叶梦芊,经济学博士,助理研究员,福建省科学技术信息研究所,E-mail:em_ymq08@163.com.   
作者简介:  方 颖,经济学博士,教授,厦门大学王亚南经济研究院、厦门大学大数据金融交叉实验室,E-mail:yifst1@xmu.edu.cn.
王翔宇,博士研究生,厦门大学邹至庄经济研究院,E-mail:wangxiangyu@stu.xmu.edu.cn.
赵西亮,经济学博士,教授,厦门大学经济学院、王亚南经济研究院,E-mail:zhaoxl2.03@xmu.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
方颖, 王翔宇, 叶梦芊, 赵西亮. 中国企业的人工智能投入:来自招聘大数据的发现[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 551(5): 152-169.
FANG Ying, WANG Xiangyu, YE Mengqian, ZHAO Xiliang. AI Investment of Chinese Firms: Findings Based on Large-Scale Job Posting Data. Journal of Financial Research, 2026, 551(5): 152-169.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2026/V551/I5/152
[1]方明月、林佳妮和聂辉华,2022,《数字化转型是否促进了企业内共同富裕?——来自中国A股上市公司的证据》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第11期,第50~70页。
[2]方颖、王翔宇、叶梦芊和赵西亮,2025,《中国上市企业的“人工智能+”创新:理论分析与实证证据》,工作论文。
[3]何晓斌和石一琦,2019,《人工智能的发展和我国人工智能文科人才的培养》,《清华大学教育研究》第4期,第32~38页。
[4]金星晔、左从江、方明月、李涛和聂辉华,2024,《企业数字化转型的测度难题:基于大语言模型的新方法与新发现》,《经济研究》第3期,第34~53页。
[5]李青原和肖泽华,2020,《异质性环境规制工具与企业绿色创新激励——来自上市企业绿色专利的证据》,《经济研究》第9期,第192~208页。
[6]李哲、李心武、焦焰和张文婷,2024,《“多言寡行”的数字化转型披露与分析师预测行为》,《会计研究》第9期,第61~75页。
[7]刘飞和田高良,2019,《信息技术是否替代了就业——基于中国上市公司的证据》,《财经科学》第7期,第95~107页。
[8]马慧和陈胜蓝,2022,《企业数字化转型、坏消息隐藏与股价崩盘风险》,《会计研究》第10期,第31~44页。
[9]潘越、林淑萍、张鹏东和戴亦一,2021,《语言将来时态标记特征与公司股利政策——基于投资者语言认知效应的跨国研究》,《经济研究》第7期,第127~143页。
[10]祁怀锦、曹修琴和刘艳霞,2020,《数字经济对公司治理的影响——基于信息不对称和管理者非理性行为视角》,《改革》第4期,第50~64页。
[11]邵红霞和方军雄,2006,《我国上市公司无形资产价值相关性研究——基于无形资产明细分类信息的再检验》,《会计研究》第12期,第25~32页。
[12]陶锋、王欣然、徐扬等,2023,《数字化转型、产业链供应链韧性与企业生产率》,《中国工业经济》第5期,第118~136页。
[13]吴非、胡慧芷、林慧妍和任晓怡,2021,《企业数字化转型与资本市场表现——来自股票流动性的经验证据》,《管理世界》第7期,第130~144页。
[14]肖土盛、孙瑞琦、袁淳等,2022,《企业数字化转型、人力资本结构调整与劳动收入份额》,《管理世界》第12期,第220~237页。
[15]许宪春、雷泽坤和胡亚茹,2025,《中国数据资本形成总额与数据资本存量测算》,《经济研究》第3期,第54~68页。
[16]姚加权、张锟澎、郭李鹏和冯绪,2024,《人工智能如何提升企业生产效率?——基于劳动力技能结构调整的视角》,《管理世界》第2期,第101~116、117~122、133页。
[17]张俊芳、郭戎和郭永济,2018,《中国无形资产测度及其对科技进步贡献率影响的研究》,《科学学与科学技术管理》第1期,第46~54页。
[18]赵宸宇、王文春和李雪松,2021,《数字化转型如何影响企业全要素生产率》,《财贸经济》第7期,第114~129页。
[19]Acemoglu, D. and D. Autor, 2011, “Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings”,Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 4, pp.1043~1171. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
[20]Autor, D., C. Chin, A. Salomons and B. Seegmiller, 2024, “New Frontiers: The Origins and Content of New Work, 1940–2018”,The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 139(3), pp.1399~1465.
[21]Babina, T., A. Fedyk, A. He and J. Hodson, 2024, “Artificial Intelligence, Firm Growth, and Product Innovation”, Journal of Financial Economics, 151, 103745.
[22]Brynjolfsson, E., D. Rock and C. Syverson, 2021, “The Productivity J-Curve: How Intangibles Complement General Purpose Technologies”, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 13(1), pp.333~372.
[23]Cadman, B., M. S. Heinle and D. Macciocchi, 2023, “Insider Horizon and Disclosure Policies”,The Accounting Review, 98(4), pp.55~88.
[24]Chu, J., Y. He, K. W. Hui and R. Lehavy, 2025, “New Product Announcements, Innovation Disclosure, and Future Firm Performance”,Review of Accounting Studies, 30(1), pp.352~383.
[25]Darendeli, A., K. K. Law and M. Shen, 2022, “Green New Hiring”,Review of Accounting Studies, 27(3), pp.986~1037.
[26]Duarte, J., E. Hu and L. Young, 2020, “A Comparison of Some Structural Models of Private Information Arrival”,Journal of Financial Economics, 135(3), pp.795~815.
[27]Hirshleifer, D. and J. Sheng, 2022, “Macro News and Micro News: Complements or Substitutes?”,Journal of Financial Economics, 145(3), pp.1006~1024.
[28]Hunt, W., S. Sarkar and C. Warhurst, 2022, “Measuring the Impact of AI on Jobs at the Organization Level: Lessons from a Survey of UK Business Leaders”,Research Policy, 51(2), 104425.
[29]Jiang, W., J. Park, R. J. Xiao and S. Zhang, 2025, “AI and the Extended Workday: Productivity, Contracting Efficiency, and Distribution of Rents”,NBER Working Paper, No. 33536.
[30]LeCun, Y., Y. Bengio and G. Hinton, 2015, “Deep Learning”, Nature, 521(7553), pp.436~444.
[31]Loh, R. K., 2010, “Investor Inattention and the Underreaction to Stock Recommendations”,Financial Management, 39(3), pp.1223~1252.
[32]Müller, O., M. Fay and J. Vom Brocke, 2018, “The Effect of Big Data and Analytics on Firm Performance: An Econometric Analysis Considering Industry Characteristics”,Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(2), pp.488~509.
[33]Pástor,. and P. Veronesi, 2006, “Was There a Nasdaq Bubble in the Late 1990s?”,Journal of Financial Economics, 81(1), pp.61~100.
[34]Rock, D., 2022, “Engineering Value: The Returns to Technological Talent and Investments in Artificial Intelligence”, Brookings Institution Center on Regulation and Markets Working Paper.
[35]Sharma, S. S. and P. K. Narayan, 2022, “Technology Shocks and Stock Returns: A Long-Term Perspective”,Journal of Empirical Finance, 68, pp.67~83.
[1] 方颖附录 Download
[1] 张颖, 孙鲲鹏, 侯微怡, 白彦锋. 税务稽查人才投入的税收治理效应[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 548(2): 95-114.
[2] 孙鲲鹏, 李新阳, 肖星. 就业政策如何影响微观企业用工行为?——来自互联网招聘大数据的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 544(10): 133-150.
[3] 赵葆颖, 江轩宇, 伊志宏, 张澈. 注册制改革对企业劳动生产率的溢出效应研究——基于信息反馈效应的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 525(3): 132-149.
[4] 潘妍, 余泳泽. 社会信用体系建设促进了农户创业吗?——基于失信信息公开视角[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 522(12): 169-187.
[5] 李朝前, 沈悦, 姚树洁, 安磊. 金融地理可及性与劳动收入份额——基于融资成本与人力资本结构视角[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 519(9): 150-167.
[6] 周怀康, 张莉, 刘善仕. 城市房价与企业间高技能人才流动——基于在线简历大数据的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 515(5): 115-133.
[7] 宋弘, 张庆, 陆毅. 消费信贷与家庭人力资本投资[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 511(1): 131-149.
[8] 金智, 彭辽. 地方人才引进政策与公司人力资本[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 508(10): 117-134.
[9] 刘贯春, 司登奎, 刘芳. 人力资本偏向金融部门如何影响实体经济增长?[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 496(10): 78-97.
[10] 周广肃, 李力行, 孟岭生. 智能化对中国劳动力市场的影响——基于就业广度和强度的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 492(6): 39-58.
[11] 赵烁, 施新政, 陆瑶, 刘心悦. 兼并收购可以促进劳动力结构优化升级吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 484(10): 150-169.
[12] 宋弘, 吴茂华. 高房价是否导致了区域高技能人力资本流出?[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 477(3): 77-95.
[13] 鲁元平, 赵颖, 石智雷. 产假政策与子女长期人力资本积累[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 473(11): 57-74.
[14] 封世蓝, 谭娅, 蒋承. 家庭社会网络与就业质量——基于2009-2015年“全国高校毕业生就业状况调查”的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 472(10): 79-97.
[15] 孙榆婷, 杜在超, 赵国昌, 李睿. 出国镀金,回国高薪?[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 437(11): 174-190.
[1] 张成思, 田耕宇, 蒋仁智, 刘泽豪. 中国商业银行超额准备金持有的驱动机制研究[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 547(1): 1 -19 .
[2] 宋科, 李亭, 朱斯迪. 人民币清算行设立能推动跨境贸易人民币结算吗?——兼论CIPS的协同效应[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 546(12): 1 -19 .
[3] 刘冲, 张紫嫣, 李欣明, 程子帅. 商业银行利率风险的计量与管理——基于重定价缺口的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 547(1): 20 -37 .
[4] 王博, 吴振伦, 罗荣华, 张晓玫. 金融监管与企业资本结构动态调整——来自资管新规的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 547(1): 57 -75 .
[5] 倪红福, 王琬婷, 张星铜. 消费税征收环节后移改革的价格和福利效应——基于社会核算矩阵的价格模型分析[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 548(2): 1 -19 .
[6] 孟宪春. 家庭资产负债表约束、宏观经济波动与住房调控政策有效性[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 549(3): 1 -19 .
[7] 王擎, 秦慧颖, 盛夏. 金融科技、货币政策传导与消费——来自大科技平台个人用户的微观证据[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 545(11): 1 -18 .
[8] 林师涵, 杨子晖, 戴志颖, 温雪莲. 系统性金融压力下的信贷“脱绿”与信用风险研究[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 549(3): 20 -38 .
[9] 刘思瑶, 董青马, 尚玉皇, 汤继强. 非标违约后地方债务的可持续路径:资金腾挪还是产业升级?[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 549(3): 39 -56 .
[10] 肖争艳, 武佳慧, 江艳. 公众预期、政策协调与房地产金融宏观审慎政策有效性[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 550(4): 1 -18 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1