Summary:
Enhancing total factor productivity (TFP) is not only a key lever for fostering new quality productive forces but also an important foundation for promoting high-quality economic development. Against the backdrop of the deepening global division of labor within industrial and supply chains, competition among firms has gradually evolved from individual game theory to comprehensive competition within supply chain networks. How to effectively integrate innovative resources within supply chains to enhance firms' TFP has thus become a key issue in promoting high-quality economic development. Existing studies predominantly focus on the effects of firms' own innovation on TFP, while overlooking innovation spillovers embedded in supply chain networks, particularly the role of upstream supplier innovation. To address this gap, this paper adopts the perspective of supplier innovation and systematically examines the mechanisms and channels through which innovation within supply chain networks affects firms' TFP. Based on multi-source matched data from the CSMAR database, firm-level patent data, and the Chinese Research Data Services Platform (CNRDS), this study constructs firm-upstream supplier paired samples and conducts an empirical analysis of Chinese listed manufacturing firms from 2004 to 2022 using fixed effects models, instrumental variable approaches, and propensity score matching (PSM) methods. The main findings are as follows. First, supplier innovation significantly enhances firms' TFP, and this result remains robust after addressing potential endogeneity concerns and conducting a series of robustness checks. Second, after separating firms' own innovation from supplier innovation, we find that when both suppliers and firms innovate simultaneously, the promotion of firms' TFP is the strongest; even in cases where firms' own innovation is insufficient, reliance on supplier innovation can still significantly improve firms' TFP. Third, mechanism analyses indicate that supplier innovation improves firms' TFP primarily through three channels: stimulating firms' own innovation activities, alleviating financing constraints, and restructuring supply chain procurement networks. Fourth, heterogeneity analyses show that the TFP-enhancing effect of supplier innovation is more pronounced for firms operating in competitive industries, and innovation spillovers are stronger when suppliers and firms are located in the same region. Moreover, as firms' absorptive capacity increases, the positive impact of supplier innovation on TFP is further amplified. Supplier innovation also contributes to improvements in firms' product competitiveness and operating performance. The marginal contributions of this paper are primarily manifested in the following three aspects. First, this study examines productivity effects from the perspective of the supply chain networks and empirically identifies the role of supplier innovation in enhancing firms' TFP. It effectively disentangles firm-level innovation from supply chain innovation spillovers, thereby enriching the literature on supply chain innovation and productivity. Second, with respect to theoretical mechanisms, this paper develops a systematic analytical framework through which supplier innovation affects firms' TFP. Along two fundamental pathways of technological progress and resource allocation efficiency, it highlights three specific channels: promoting firm innovation, easing financing constraints, and restructuring procurement networks. Third, this study not only examines the moderating role of firms' absorptive capacity in the relationship between supplier innovation and TFP, revealing how firms can amplify innovation spillovers by strengthening absorptive capacity, but also analyzes the effects of supplier innovation on firms' product competitiveness and operating performance. This not only provides feasible pathways for strengthening the effectiveness of supplier innovation, but also extends the scope of research on the spillover effects of supplier innovation. Overall, this study extends the network perspective in the literature on innovation and productivity, and provides important theoretical and empirical evidence for firms seeking to integrate innovative resources through supply chains, as well as for governments aiming to implement more targeted innovation support policies.
朱光, 张鹏杨. 供应链网络中创新与企业全要素生产率提升:供应商创新视角[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 550(4): 112-129.
ZHU Guang, ZHANG Pengyang. Innovation in Supply Chain Networks and the Enhancement of Firms' Total Factor Productivity: The Perspective of Supplier Innovation. Journal of Financial Research, 2026, 550(4): 112-129.
[1] 成程、田轩和徐照宜,2023,《供应链金融与企业效率升级——来自上市公司公告与地方政策文件的双重证据》,《金融研究》第6期,第132~149页。 [2] 谷克鉴、李晓静和崔旭,2020,《生产性投入进口与企业全要素生产率:水平影响与垂直溢出》,《国际贸易问题》第10期,第1~16页。 [3] 黄勃、李海彤、刘俊岐和雷敬华,2023,《数字技术创新与中国企业高质量发展——来自企业数字专利的证据》,《经济研究》第3期,第97~115页。 [4] 江艇,2022,《因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应》,《中国工业经济》第5期,第100~120页。 [5] 黎峰,2024,《中间品进口如何影响国内企业自主创新》,《国际贸易问题》第6期,第39~55页。 [6] 李斌、杨冉、卢娟和贾真,2024,《企业数字化转型、供应链溢出与劳动力技能偏向》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第8期,第133~153页。 [7] 钱雪松、康瑾、唐英伦和曹夏平,2018,《产业政策、资本配置效率与企业全要素生产率——基于中国2009年十大产业振兴规划自然实验的经验研究》,《中国工业经济》第8期,第42~59页。 [8] 任曙明和吕镯,2014,《融资约束、政府补贴与全要素生产率——来自中国装备制造企业的实证研究》,《管理世界》第11期,第10~23+187页。 [9] 屠西伟和张平淡,2024,《企业数字化转型、碳排放与供应链溢出》,《中国工业经济》第4期,第133~151页。 [10] 王冠宇和马野青,2025,《供应链技术规制与企业全要素生产率——基于中间品进口视角》,《国际贸易问题》第6期,第1~19页。 [11] 韦庆芳和魏下海,2024,《为有源头活水来:供应商创新的溢出效应研究》,《当代财经》第4期,第85~98页。 [12] 魏浩、李翀和赵春明,2017,《中间品进口的来源地结构与中国企业生产率》,《世界经济》第6期,第48~71页。 [13] 巫俊和魏浩,2022,《中间品进口产品质量与中国企业创新绩效——基于企业专利数据的实证分析》,《中国软科学》第5期,第35~44页。 [14] 杨汝岱,2015,《中国制造业企业全要素生产率研究》,《经济研究》第2期,第61~74页。 [15] 易行健和周利,2018,《数字普惠金融发展是否显著影响了居民消费——来自中国家庭的微观证据》,《金融研究》第11期,第47~67页。 [16] 袁淳、肖土盛、耿春晓和盛誉,2021,《数字化转型与企业分工:专业化还是纵向一体化》,《中国工业经济》第9期,第137~155页。 [17] 张杰、郑文平和陈志远,2015,《进口与企业生产率——中国的经验证据》,《经济学(季刊)》第3期,第1029~1052页。 [18] 张杰、张帆和陈志远,2016,《出口与企业生产率关系的新检验:中国经验》,《世界经济》第6期,第54~76页。 [19] 张鹏杨、肖音、刘会政和岳云嵩,2024,《数字化转型对供应链上下游产出波动的非对称影响研究》,《世界经济》第7期,第123~152页。 [20] 张鹏杨、冯阔和唐宜红,2025,《全球价值链下贸易政策的跨国协同研究——兼论中国扩大开放的全球开放引领作用》,《经济研究》第2期,第158~175页。 [21] 张鹏杨和朱光,2024,《供应商创新与下游企业出口绩效》,《国际贸易问题》第8期,第89~105页。 [22] 周新苗和唐绍祥,2011,《自主研发、技术引进与企业绩效:基于平均处理效应估计的微观考察》,《财贸经济》第4期,第104~110页。 [23] Amiti, M. and J. Konings, 2007, “Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs, and Productivity: Evidence from Indonesia”,American Economic Review, 97(5), pp.1611~1638. [24] Chen, M. and A. Guariglia, 2013, “Internal Financial Constraints and Firm Productivity in China: Do Liquidity and Export Behavior Make a Difference?”,Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(4), pp.1123~1140. [25] Domnich, Y., 2022, “The Impact of Product and Process Innovations on Productivity: A Review of Empirical Studies”,Foresight and STI Governance, 16(3), pp.68~82. [26] Henke Jr, J. W. and C. Zhang, 2010, “Increasing Supplier-Driven Innovation”,MIT Sloan Management Review,51(2), 16, pp.41~46. [27] Homfeldt, F., A. Rese and F. Simon, 2019, “Suppliers Versus Start-Ups: Where Do Better Innovation Ideas Come From?”,Research Policy, 48(7), pp.1738~1757. [28] Huang, K. F., K. H. Lin, L. Y. Wu and P. H. Yu, 2015, “Absorptive Capacity and Autonomous R&D Climate Roles in Firm Innovation”,Journal of Business Research, 68(1), pp.87~94. [29] Isaksson, O. H., M. Simeth and R. W. Seifert, 2016, “Knowledge Spillovers in the Supply Chain: Evidence from the High Tech Sectors”,Research Policy, 45(3), pp.699~706. [30] Kostopoulos, K., A. Papalexandris, M. Papachroni and G. Ioannou, 2011, “Absorptive Capacity, Innovation, and Financial Performance”,Journal of Business Research, 64(12), pp.1335~1343. [31] Kugler, M. and E. Verhoogen, 2012, “Prices, Plant Size, and Product Quality”,The Review of Economic Studies, 79(1), pp.307-339. [32] Li, Q., J. Wang, G. Cao and J. Zhang, 2021, “Financial Constraints, Government Subsidies, and Corporate Innovation”,Plos One, 16(11), pp.e0259642. [33] Li, Z. and J. Chen, 2024, “Supplier Innovativeness, Supplier Relationships, and Enterprises' Finance Constraints”,Managerial and Decision Economics, 45(2), pp.652~663. [34] Mohnen, P. and B. H. Hall, 2013, “Innovation and Productivity: An Update”,Eurasian Business Review, 3(1), pp.47~65. [35] Schiele, H., 2012, “Accessing Supplier Innovation by Being Their Preferred Customer”,Research-Technology Management, 55(1), pp.44~50. [36] Serpa, J. C. and H. Krishnan, 2018, “The Impact of Supply Chains on Firm-Level Productivity”,Management Science, 64(2), pp.511~532. [37] Tan, Y., X. Tian, X. Zhang and H. Zhao, 2020, “The Real Effect of Partial Privatization on Corporate Innovation: Evidence from China's Split Share Structure Reform”,Journal of Corporate Finance, 64, pp.101661. [38] Ullah, B., 2020, “Signaling Value of Quality Certification: Financing under Asymmetric Information”,Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 55, pp.100629. [39] Xiao, Z., H. Peng and Z. Pan, 2022, “Innovation, External Technological Environment and the Total Factor Productivity of Enterprises”,Accounting & Finance, 62(1), pp.3~29.
