Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2024, Vol. 532 Issue (10): 39-57    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
数字金融发展的劳动力迁移效应——来自中国家庭追踪调查的微观证据
谭莹, 王盼, 张勋
西南财经大学统计学院,四川成都 611100;
北京师范大学统计学院,北京 100875;
北京大学数字金融研究中心,北京 100871
Digital Finance Development and Labor Migration: Micro Evidence from China Family Panel Studies
TAN Ying, WANG Pan, ZHANG Xun
Big Data Laboratory on Financial Security and Behavior, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics Laboratory of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Ministry of Education;
School of Statistics, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics;
School of Statistics, Beijing Normal University; Institute of Digital Finance, Peking University
下载:  PDF (721KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 引导劳动力合理、有序、畅通地迁移,优化劳动力资源配置,是经济持续平稳发展的长久动力。本文聚焦数字金融发展能否通过发挥普惠性特征来吸引劳动力的迁入,进而实现劳动力资源优化配置。本文将中国数字普惠金融指数与中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)数据相结合,通过一系列稳健性检验,证实数字金融发展能显著吸引劳动力迁入。机制分析表明:一方面,数字金融发展通过发挥普惠性特征,可以缓解个体的流动性约束,通过促进个体创业来吸引劳动力流入,并进一步带动就业机会的增加;另一方面,数字金融发展通过发挥普惠性特征,能助力完善社会保障体系,提升居民安全感和幸福感。数字金融在这两方面的作用最终有助于促进劳动力迁移。进一步的分析表明,数字金融推动的劳动力迁移,促进了就业结构转型和产业结构升级,优化了西部、城市化水平较低和市场化水平较低地区的劳动力资源配置,推动了这些地区的经济发展。根据本文的研究,着力推动数字金融发展,是各地提升人才吸引力,引导劳动力资源合理、有序配置,推动经济结构转型与产业结构升级,进而促进区域协调发展的重要举措。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
谭莹
王盼
张勋
关键词:  数字金融  普惠性  劳动力迁移  流动性约束  社会保障体系    
Summary:  Guiding the reasonable, orderly and smooth labour migration and promoting the optimal allocation of labour resources between regions are important driving forces for high-quality economic development. The inclusive nature of low-cost, low-threshold digital finance enables individuals and small and micro-enterprises, that were previously excluded from traditional financial services and traditional credit, to conveniently carry out financial services through digital finance platforms such as online banking and mobile payment, thus promoting investment, business, innovation, and entrepreneurial activities. This aspect of digital finance helps to attract labour migration, which can play a role in optimizing the allocation of labour resources between regions. Therefore, in the context of high-quality economic development, it is particularly important to explore in depth the influencing factors of labour migration, especially the financial factors in the decision-making process of labour migration, so as to obtain the policy paths to promote labour migration, which is particularly important for the rational and orderly guidance of the optimal allocation of labour resources. However, existing studies mainly discuss the impact of digital technology or digital economy on labour migration, and lack attention to the financial attributes in digital finance development. This paper is devoted to researching whether digital finance development can have an impact on labour migration decision-making by exerting inclusive characteristics. This is crucial for regions to enhance the attractiveness of talents, promote economic structural transformation and industry structural upgrade, and promote coordinated regional development.
This paper analyses the labour migration effect of digital finance from both theoretical and empirical perspectives, and further explores the potential mechanisms and economic impacts of its effect. First, from a theoretical perspective, this paper analyses the impact of digital finance on labour migration and focuses on its financial attributes to put forward a research hypothesis on how digital finance affects labour settlement decisions. Second, from an empirical perspective, this paper combines the China Digital Financial Inclusion Index with China Family Tracking Survey (CFPS) data to analyze the impact of digital finance on labour migration decisions. In order to enhance the robustness of the findings, this paper conducts a series of robustness tests and employs the instrumental variable method for endogeneity analysis. In addition, focusing on the financial attributes in the development of digital finance, this paper adopts a split-sample regression method and an interaction model to explore how digital finance can drive labour migration by alleviating individual liquidity constraints and improving the convenience of social security system. Finally, this paper further studies the direction of labour migration driven by the development of digital finance from the perspectives of employment structure transformation, industrial structure upgrading and regional coordinated development.
This paper finds that digital finance development can significantly attract labour migration. Further mechanism analysis shows that: On the one hand, digital finance development, by exerting inclusive features, can alleviate individual mobility constraints, attract labour inflow by promoting individual entrepreneurship, and further lead to an increase in employment opportunities; on the other hand, digital finance development, by exerting inclusive features, can help improve the social security system, and enhance residents' sense of security and well-being. The role of digital finance in these two aspects ultimately helps to promote labour migration. Further analysis shows that labour migration driven by digital finance promotes the transformation of the employment structure and the upgrade of the industry structure, enhances the optimal allocation of labour resources in the western regions, regions with a lower level of urbanization and a lower level of marketization, and promotes the economic development of these regions.
This paper has important policy implications: Firstly, digital finance development can promote labour migration by exerting inclusive characteristics, which provides a feasible solution to guide the rational and orderly allocation of labour resources, and therefore digital finance development should be vigorously promoted; Secondly, the important role of digital finance in alleviating individual mobility constraints should be strengthened, which is an digital finance promotion of entrepreneurship and employment, and an important mechanism for promoting labour migration; Finally, the important role of digital finance in improving the social security system should be strengthened, which is an important mechanism for digital finance to enhance residents' sense of security and well-being and promote labour migration.
The innovations of this paper are as follows: First, in terms of theoretical contribution, this paper exhaustively analyzes the mechanism behind the labour migration effect generated by digital finance, which exhibits through promoting financial inclusion from the perspectives of liquidity constraint alleviation and social security system improvement. This complements the theoretical discussions in related fields; Second, in terms of empirical innovation, this paper uses the CFPS data to measure labour migration for the first time from the perspectives of the change in permanent residence, and explores whether and how digital finance development can influence the labour migration decision by comparing different labour migration decisions. This helps to assess the role of digital finance in sustainably promoting economic structure transformation and industry structure upgrade; Third, in terms of policy innovation, the research in this paper can better serve the formulation of relevant policies, providing new ideas and perspectives for regions to enhance the attractiveness of talents, guide the rational and orderly allocation of labour resources, promote the transformation of economic structure and upgrade of industrial structure, and thus promote the coordinated development among regions.
Keywords:  Digital Finance    Financial Inclusion    Labor Migration    Liquidity Constraints    Social Security System
JEL分类号:  G10   J61   R23  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家社会科学基金重点项目(23AZD028)、国家自然科学基金面上项目(71973014)和国家自然科学基金青年项目(72303180)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  张勋,经济学博士,教授,北京师范大学统计学院,北京大学数字金融研究中心,E-mail:zhangxun@bnu.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  谭莹,经济学博士,副教授,西南财经大学统计学院,E-mail:tanying@swufe.edu.cn.
王盼,硕士研究生,北京师范大学统计学院,西南财经大学统计学院,E-mail:wangpanppw@163.com.
引用本文:    
谭莹, 王盼, 张勋. 数字金融发展的劳动力迁移效应——来自中国家庭追踪调查的微观证据[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 532(10): 39-57.
TAN Ying, WANG Pan, ZHANG Xun. Digital Finance Development and Labor Migration: Micro Evidence from China Family Panel Studies. Journal of Financial Research, 2024, 532(10): 39-57.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2024/V532/I10/39
[1]蔡卫星、韦庆芳和林航宇,2023,《数字金融发展的劳动力需求效应——来自2000万在线招聘岗位的经验证据》,《金融研究》第10期,第28~46页。
[2]方福前、田鸽和张勋,2023,《数字基础设施与代际收入向上流动性——基于“宽带中国”战略的准自然实验》,《经济研究》第5期,第79~97页。
[3]桂琦寒、陈敏和陆铭等,2006,《中国国内商品市场趋于分割还是整合:基于相对价格法的分析》,《世界经济》第2期,第20~30页。
[4]郭峰、孔涛和王靖一,2017,《互联网金融空间集聚效应分析——来自互联网金融发展指数的证据》,《国际金融研究》第8期,第75~85页。
[5]郭峰、王靖一和王芳等,2020,《测度中国数字普惠金融发展:指数编制与空间特征》,《经济学(季刊)》第4期,第1401~1418页。
[6]何婧和李庆海,2019,《数字金融使用与农户创业行为》,《中国农村经济》第1期,第112~126页。
[7]李彦龙和沈艳,2022,《数字普惠金融与区域经济不平衡》,《经济学(季刊)》第5期,第1805~1828页。
[8]马述忠和胡增玺,2022,《数字金融是否影响劳动力流动?——基于中国流动人口的微观视角》,《经济学(季刊)》第1期,第303~322页。
[9]彭澎和周力,2022,《中国农村数字金融发展对农户的收入流动性影响研究》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第6期,第23~41页。
[10]钱海章、陶云清和曹松威等,2020,《中国数字金融发展与经济增长的理论与实证》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第6期,第26~46页。
[11]孙文凯、白重恩和谢沛初,2011,《户籍制度改革对中国农村劳动力流动的影响》,《经济研究》第1期,第28~41页。
[12]孙焱林、李格和汪小愉,2022,《数字金融对劳动力错配的影响及其异质性分析——基于中国地级市面板数据》,《科学学研究》第1期,第47~56页。
[13]田鸽和张勋,2022,《数字经济、非农就业与社会分工》,《管理世界》第5期,第72~84页。
[14]汪亚楠、谭卓鸿和郑乐凯,2020,《数字普惠金融对社会保障的影响研究》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第7期,第92~112页。
[15]王德文、蔡昉和张国庆,2008,《农村迁移劳动力就业与工资决定:教育与培训的重要性》,《经济学(季刊)》第4期,第1131~1148页。
[16]王格玮,2004,《地区间收入差距对农村劳动力迁移的影响——基于第五次全国人口普查数据的研究》,《经济学(季刊)》第S1期,第77~98页。
[17]王辉、罗元清和胡晟明,2023,《数字经济对劳动力迁移的影响——基于职业流动方向的视角》,《中国人口科学》第2期,第84~99页。
[18]王丽莉和乔雪,2020,《我国人口迁移成本、城市规模与生产率》,《经济学(季刊)》第1期,第165~188页。
[19]王正位、邓颖惠和廖理,2016,《知识改变命运:金融知识与微观收入流动性》,《金融研究》第12期,第111~127页。
[20]乌云图、陶克涛和彭俊超,2023,《产业协同集聚、数字技术支持与资源错配》,《科研管理》第1期,第125~135页。
[21]夏怡然和陆铭,2015,《城市间的“孟母三迁”——公共服务影响劳动力流向的经验研究》,《管理世界》第10期,第78~90页。
[22]谢绚丽、沈艳、张皓星等,2018,《数字金融能促进创业吗?——来自中国的证据》,《经济学(季刊)》第4期,第1557~1580页。
[23]邢春冰,2014,《教育扩展、迁移与城乡教育差距——以大学扩招为例》,《经济学(季刊)》第1期,第207~232页。
[24]易行健和周利,2018,《数字普惠金融发展是否显著影响了居民消费——来自中国家庭的微观证据》,《金融研究》第11期,第47~67页。
[25]张骥、杨开忠、陆军和王彦博,2018,《基于相对效用函数的新经济地理模型》,《经济学(季刊)》第3期,第1149~1170页。
[26]张勋、万广华、张佳佳等,2019,《数字经济、普惠金融与包容性增长》,《经济研究》第8期,第71~86页。
[27]张勋、杨紫和谭莹,2023,《数字经济、家庭分工与性别平等》,《经济学(季刊)》第1期,第125~141页。
[28]赵晓鸽、钟世虎和郭晓欣,2021,《数字普惠金融发展、金融错配缓解与企业创新》,《科研管理》第4期,第158~169页。
[29]赵亚雄和王修华,2022,《数字金融、家庭相对收入及脆弱性——兼论多维“鸿沟”的影响》,《金融研究》第10期,第77~97页。
[30]周世军和陈博文,2023,《数字经济是否影响劳动力空间配置?——基于中国流动人口的微观证据》,《云南财经大学学报》第2期,第96~110页。
[31]周天芸,2022,《数字普惠金融、要素价格与劳动力流动》,《当代经济管理》第4期,第77~87页。
[32]Bogue, D. J., 1959, “Internal Migration”, in Hauser, D. (ed.), The Study of Population: An Inventory Appraisal, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[33]Bryan, G. and M. Morten, 2017, “The Aggregate Productivity Effects of Internal Migration: Evidence from Indonesia”, Journal of Political Economy, pp.2229~2268.
[34]Chen, L., 2016, “From Fintech to Finlife: The Case of Fintech Development in China”, China Economic Journal, 9(3), pp.225~239.
[35]Ma, L. and Y. Tang, 2020, “Geography, Trade, and Internal Migration in China”, Journal of Urban Economics, 115, p.103181.
[36]Ngai, L., C. Pissarides and J. Wang, 2018, “China's Mobility Barriers and Employment Allocations”, Journal of the European Economic Association, 17(5), pp.1617~1653.
[37]Tombe, T. and X. Zhu, 2019, “Trade, Migration, and Productivity: A Quantitative Analysis of China”, American Economic Review, 109(5), pp.1843~1872.
[1] 沈艳, 江弘毅, 胡诗云, 赵家琪, 黄卓. 数字金融支持高质量发展:理论、机制和证据[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 529(7): 20-39.
[2] 许泳昊, 刘玉珍, 厉行. 休闲消费与居民资产配置——基于情绪理论的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 519(9): 168-187.
[3] 田鸽, 黄海, 张勋. 数字金融与创业高质量发展:来自中国的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 513(3): 74-92.
[4] 蔡卫星, 韦庆芳, 林航宇. 数字金融发展的劳动力需求效应 ——来自2000万在线招聘岗位的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 520(10): 28-46.
[5] 张海洋, 胡英琦, 陆利平, 蔡卫星. 数字时代的银行业变迁——网点布局与行业结构[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 507(9): 75-92.
[6] 尹志超, 吴子硕, 蒋佳伶. 移动支付对中国家庭储蓄率的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 507(9): 57-74.
[7] 赵亚雄, 王修华. 数字金融、家庭相对收入及脆弱性——兼论多维“鸿沟”的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 508(10): 77-97.
[8] 聂秀华, 江萍, 郑晓佳, 吴青. 数字金融与区域技术创新水平研究[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 489(3): 132-150.
[9] 王修华, 赵亚雄. 数字金融发展是否存在马太效应?——贫困户与非贫困户的经验比较[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 481(7): 114-133.
[10] 廖红君, 樊纲治, 弋代春. 关系型借贷视角下购房融资方式与家庭创业行为——基于2017年中国家庭金融调查的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 481(7): 153-171.
[11] 徐飞, 花冯涛, 李强谊. 投资者理性预期、流动性约束与股价崩盘传染研究[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 468(6): 169-187.
[12] 蒋涛, 董兵兵, 张远. 中国城镇家庭的资产配置与消费行为:理论与证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 473(11): 133-152.
[13] 易行健, 周利. 数字普惠金融发展是否显著影响了居民消费——来自中国家庭的微观证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 461(11): 47-67.
[14] 康书隆, 余海跃, 刘越飞. 住房公积金、购房信贷与家庭消费——基于中国家庭追踪调查数据的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 67-82.
[15] 张琳琬, 吴卫星. 风险态度与居民财富——来自中国微观调查的新探究[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 430(4): 115-127.
[1] 宋献中, 胡珺, 李四海. 社会责任信息披露与股价崩盘风险——基于信息效应与声誉保险效应的路径分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 442(4): 161 -175 .
[2] 盛丹, 陆毅. 国有企业改制降低了劳动者的工资议价能力吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 439(1): 69 -82 .
[3] 罗进辉, 向元高, 金思静. 中国资本市场低价股的溢价之谜[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 439(1): 191 -206 .
[4] 曹春方, 陈露兰, 张婷婷. “法律的名义”:司法独立性提升与公司违规[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 443(5): 191 -206 .
[5] 程宇丹, 龚六堂. 财政分权框架下的最优税收结构[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 431(5): 1 -18 .
[6] 尚玉皇, 郑挺国. 短期利率波动测度与预测:基于混频宏观-短期利率模型[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 437(11): 47 -62 .
[7] 全怡, 梁上坤, 付宇翔. 货币政策、融资约束与现金股利[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 437(11): 63 -79 .
[8] 杨青, 王亚男, 唐跃军. “限薪令”的政策效果:基于竞争与垄断性央企市场反应的评估[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 451(1): 156 -173 .
[9] 钟辉勇, 陆铭. 财政转移支付如何影响了地方政府债务?[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 423(9): 1 -16 .
[10] 马理, 娄田田, 牛慕鸿. 定向降准与商业银行行为选择[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 423(9): 82 -95 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1