Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2024, Vol. 528 Issue (6): 188-206    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
并购业绩承诺完成质量何以提升?——来自媒体监督的证据
徐亚飞, 孟庆玺
首都经济贸易大学会计学院, 北京 100070;
厦门大学会计发展研究中心/管理学院, 福建厦门 361005
How Could the Quality of Completion of M&A Performance Commitment Be Improved ——Evidence from Media Monitoring
XU Yafei, MENG Qingxi
School of Accounting, Capital University of Economics and Business;
Center for Accounting Studies / School of Management, Xiamen University
下载:  PDF (645KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 并购双方签订的业绩补偿承诺协议,是保护投资者利益的关键手段。然而,实践中大量业绩承诺完成质量不高,甚至可能存在被操纵的现象(比如精准达标),降低了并购市场效率。在此背景下,本文首先检验业绩承诺完成过程中的操纵行为,并在此基础上探究业绩承诺完成质量的提升方式。研究发现,业绩承诺操纵现象普遍存在,但媒体监督可以显著抑制业绩承诺操纵行为。当公司管理层进行业绩承诺操纵的动机较强、机会较大以及媒体报道内容的原创性较弱时,媒体监督对抑制业绩承诺操纵的作用效果变弱,反之更强。机制分析发现,媒体监督主要是通过提高投资者关注程度、审计监督投入和监管压力三个渠道发挥作用。研究结论表明,需要关注业绩承诺操纵现象,并积极借助媒体等市场中介在并购重组活动中发挥的治理作用,提升业绩承诺完成质量,保护中小投资者利益。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
徐亚飞
孟庆玺
关键词:  业绩承诺操纵  媒体监督  投资者关注  审计监督投入  监管压力    
Summary:  M&A plays an important role in the process of promoting high-quality development. However, due to the imperfection of internal and external governance, the M&A market is full of chaos. This phenomenon hinders the potential path of optimizing resource allocation efficiency through M&A to achieve high-quality development. In the A-share market, performance compensation commitment is originally an important way to protect investors' interests. However, a large number of performance commitments are not completed with high quality, and there may be manipulation (such as precise compliance), which reduces the efficiency of the market.
This article identifies the performance commitment manipulation with empirical research methods and explores the way to improve the performance commitment fulfillment quality.By manually collecting the completion of performance commitment agreements signed by A-share listed companies in China from 2008 to 2021, the study finds that performance commitment manipulation is widespread, and media monitoring could significantly suppress performance commitment manipulation. In terms of the motivation of performance commitment manipulation is stronger, the opportunity is larger, and the originality of media coverage is lower, the governance effect of media monitoring is weaker, and vice versa. According to the mechanism analysis, media monitoring mainly plays the role through three channels: increasing investors' attention, audit supervision input, and regulatory pressure.
The conclusions indicate that the market needs to notice the performance commitment manipulation and utilize the governance role of the media to improve the quality of performance completion and protect the interests of small and medium-sized investors. Therefore, this study proposes the following policy recommendations: First, the conclusions confirm the important role of the media in improving the performance of M&A. The media should be fully utilized as an external governance force to maintain the order of the capital market. Second, media has the characteristics of wide coverage and low cost. External information users could obtain valuable information to save information collection costs and reduce information asymmetry, which helps curb management opportunism. Third, the influence of the media on decision-making is limited by certain conditions.This suggests that in the process of media commercialization reform, the media should consider conducting in-depth reporting through private information collection and analysis to provide high-quality incremental information for the market and improve information transparency. At the same time, listed companies should improve information disclosure to enhance investors' access to information and reduce their excessive dependence on information intermediaries.
This paper makes several contributions to the literature: First, “precise compliance” in the performance commitment has been mentioned in some literature, but there is no clear definition and concrete evidence for the performance commitment manipulation. This article proposes the conception and provides direct empirical evidence based on whether the completion ratio jumps at the breakpoint, confirming that there is significant performance commitment manipulation in the agreement. Second, few studies have discussed how to suppress performance commitment manipulation, especially when both parties have information advantages and the possibility of collusion. External governance forces are particularly important. This article examines the governance effect of media monitoring on performance commitment manipulation. Unlike previous studies that focus on the impact of the media on investment decisions in the M&A (such as during the negotiation process or before the completion), this article discusses the performance commitment period in a certain period after the completion to test the long-term economic consequences of media supervision on performance commitment manipulation and provides an important supplement to existing literature. Third, this article has certain practical implications for regulating and improving the quality of the M&A. Financial media plays a positive role in curbing performance commitment manipulation and improving the quality of the M&A. In the future, securities regulatory authorities should pay attention to the monitoring and governance function of this important information intermediary, which will help save information collection costs and improve the efficiency of the regulation.
Keywords:  Performance Commitment Manipulation    Media Supervision    Investor Attention    Audit Supervision Input    Regulatory Pressure
JEL分类号:  G34   M41   G10  
基金资助: * 感谢国家自然科学基金项目(72202194)、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(20720221051)和首都经济贸易大学新入职青年教师科研启动基金项目(XRZ2023041)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  孟庆玺,管理学博士,助理教授,厦门大学会计发展研究中心/管理学院,E-mail:qxmeng@xmu.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  徐亚飞,管理学博士,讲师,首都经济贸易大学会计学院,E-mail:xuyafei@cueb.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
徐亚飞, 孟庆玺. 并购业绩承诺完成质量何以提升?——来自媒体监督的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 528(6): 188-206.
XU Yafei, MENG Qingxi. How Could the Quality of Completion of M&A Performance Commitment Be Improved ——Evidence from Media Monitoring. Journal of Financial Research, 2024, 528(6): 188-206.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2024/V528/I6/188
[1] 才国伟、邵志浩和徐信忠,2015,《企业和媒体存在合谋行为吗?——来自中国上市公司媒体报道的间接证据》,《管理世界》第7期,第158~169页。
[2] 池国华、杨金和谷峰,2018,《媒体关注是否提升了政府审计功能?——基于中国省级面板数据的实证研究》,《会计研究》第1期,第53~59页。
[3] 窦超和翟进步,2020,《业绩承诺背后的财富转移效应研究》,《金融研究》第12期,第189~206页。
[4] 李晶晶、郭颖文和魏明海,2020,《事与愿违:并购业绩承诺为何加剧股价暴跌风险?》,《会计研究》第4期,第37~44页。
[5] 李培功和沈艺峰,2010,《媒体的公司治理作用:中国的经验证据》,《经济研究》第4期,第14~27页。
[6] 李善民、杨继彬和钟君煜,2019,《风险投资具有咨询功能吗?——异地风投在异地并购中的功能研究》,《管理世界》第12期,第164~180页。
[7] 李善民、杨若明和杨楠,2022,《重大资产重组核准制效果研究》,《金融研究》第7期,第190~206页。
[8] 李善民和朱滔,2006,《多元化并购能给股东创造价值吗?——兼论影响多元化并购长期绩效的因素》,《管理世界》第3期,第129~137页。
[9] 柳建华、徐婷婷和陆军,2021,《并购业绩补偿承诺会诱导盈余管理吗?》,《管理科学学报》第10期,第82~105页。
[10] 刘启亮、陆开森、李祎和田莉,2022,《媒体负面报道与高管腐败治理》,《会计研究》第3期,第123~135页。
[11] 刘向强和李沁洋,2019,《会计师事务所声誉与并购业绩补偿承诺》,《审计研究》第6期,第79~86页。
[12] 刘笑霞、李明辉和孙蕾,2017,《媒体负面报道、审计定价与审计延迟》,《会计研究》第4期,第88~94页。
[13] 罗进辉,2012,《媒体报道的公司治理作用——双重代理成本视角》,《金融研究》第10期,第153~166页。
[14] 权小锋和吴世农,2010,《投资者关注、盈余公告效应与管理层公告择机》,《金融研究》第11期,第90~107页。
[15] 汝毅、呙昊婧和薛健,2022,《媒体记者与公司管理层沟通提高了新闻报道质量吗?——基于公司调研活动的实证研究》,《金融研究》第2期,第189~206页。
[16] 汝毅、薛健和张乾,2019,《媒体新闻报道的声誉溢出效应》,《金融研究》第8期,第189~206页。
[17] 谭松涛、甘顺利和阚铄,2015,《媒体报道能够降低分析师预测偏差吗?》,《金融研究》第5期,第192~206页。
[18] 王竞达和范庆泉,2017,《上市公司并购重组中的业绩承诺及政策影响研究》,《会计研究》第10期,第71~77页。
[19] 徐莉萍、关月琴和辛宇,2021,《控股股东股权质押与并购业绩承诺——基于市值管理视角的经验证据》,《中国工业经济》第1期,第136~154页。
[20] 杨道广、陈汉文和刘启亮,2017,《媒体压力与企业创新》,《经济研究》第8期,第125~139页。
[21] 易志高、潘子成、茅宁和李心丹,2017,《策略性媒体披露与财富转移——来自公司高管减持期间的证据》,《经济研究》第4期,第166~180页。
[22] 于忠泊、田高良、齐保垒和张皓,2011,《媒体关注的公司治理机制——基于盈余管理视角的考察》,《管理世界》第9期,第127~140页。
[23] 郑志刚、丁冬和汪昌云,2011,《媒体的负面报道、经理人声誉与企业业绩改善——来自我国上市公司的证据》,《金融研究》第12期,第163~176页。
[24] 支晓强、王瑶和侯德帅,2023,《并购重组业绩承诺与内部人减持》,《南开管理评论》第4期,第1~34页。
[25] 周开国、应千伟和陈晓娴,2014,《媒体关注度、分析师关注度与盈余预测准确度》,《金融研究》第2期,第139~152页。
[26] 朱冰和杨晓彤,2022,《股票支付与并购业绩承诺:协同还是合谋?》,《经济管理》第10期,第151~170页。
[27] Ahern, K. R. and D. Sosyura, 2014, “Who Writes the News? Corporate Press Releases during Merger Negotiations”, Journal of Finance, 69(1), pp.241~291.
[28] Bens, D. A., T. H. Goodman and M. Neamtiu, 2012, “Does Investment-related Pressure Lead to Misreporting? An Analysis of Reporting Following M&A Transactions”, The Accounting Review, 87(3), pp.839~865.
[29] Bushee, B. J., J. E. Core, W. Guay and S. J. W. Hamm, 2010, “The Role of the Business Press as an Information Intermediary”, Journal of Accounting Research, 48(1), pp.1~19.
[30] Core, J. E., W. Guay and D. F. Larcker, 2008, “The Power of the Pen and Executive Compensation”, Journal of Financial Economics, 88(1), pp.1~25.
[31] Dyck, A., N. Volchkova and L. Zingales, 2008, “The Corporate Governance Role of the Media: Evidence from Russia”, The Journal of Finance, 63(3), pp.1093~1135.
[32] Hope, O. K., Y. Li, Q. Liu and H. Wu, 2021, “Newspaper Censorship in China: Evidence from Tunneling Scandals”, Management Science, 67(11), pp.7142~7166.
[33] Joe, J. R., 2003, “Why Press Coverage of a Client Influences the Audit Opinion”, Journal of Accounting Research, 41(1), pp.109~133.
[34] Liu, B. and J. J. McConnell, 2013, “The Role of the Media in Corporate Governance: Do the Media Influence Managers' Capital Allocation Decisions?”, Journal of Financial Economics, 110(1), pp.1~17.
[35] McCrary, J., 2008, “Manipulation of the Running Variable in the Regression Discontinuity Design: A Density Test”, Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), pp.698~714.
[36] Wu, D. and Q. Ye, 2020, “Public Attention and Auditor Behavior: The Case of Hurun Rich List in China”, Journal of Accounting Research, 58(3), pp.777~825.
[1] 杨涛, 郭萌萌. 投资者关注度与股票市场——以PM2.5概念股为例[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 467(5): 190-206.
[2] 刘杰, 陈佳, 刘力. 投资者关注与市场反应——来自中国证券交易所交易公开信息的自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 473(11): 189-206.
[3] 周开国, 应千伟, 钟畅. 媒体监督能够起到外部治理的作用吗?——来自中国上市公司违规的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 432(6): 193-206.
[4] 杨晓兰, 沈翰彬, 祝宇. 本地偏好、投资者情绪与股票收益率:来自网络论坛的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 438(12): 143-158.
[5] 邵新建, 何明燕, 江萍, 薛熠, 廖静池. 媒体公关、投资者情绪与证券发行定价[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 423(9): 190-207.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1