Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2024, Vol. 524 Issue (2): 1-18    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
菲利普斯曲线“逆位反转”的机理阐释与政策合力下的经济复苏路径重塑
刘达禹, 徐斌, 宋洋
吉林大学数量经济研究中心,吉林长春 130012;
西南财经大学财政税务学院,四川成都 611130
Mechanism Analysis of an Inverted Phillips Curve and Reshaping the Economic Recovery Path under Policy Coordination
LIU Dayu, XU Bin, SONG Yang
Center for Quantitative Economics, Jilin University;
School of Public Finance and Taxation, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
下载:  PDF (2355KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文提出了“产出—通胀”空间再分割和“菲利普斯曲线束”两个新型研究理念,并深入探讨如何防范实体经济风险和规划经济复苏路径。研究发现:第一,近期中国的菲利普斯曲线呈现出“逆位反转”特征,表明供需关系仍处于失衡状态;第二,实体经济运行是否面临风险,不仅取决于产出增速和通货膨胀水平,还会受到菲利普斯曲线斜率的影响,低产出、低通胀结合“逆位反转”的菲利普斯曲线,才是真正的风险预警信号;第三,现阶段中国经济已具备稳中向好的可行发展路径,考虑到前期基数效应,中高速到适度高速的经济增长及温和的弱通货膨胀,可作为短期内经济复苏的目标区间;第四,当下单一经济政策已很难令经济驶入目标区域,采取“社会融资规模扩张+减税”的政策组合,有利于产出、通胀和菲利普斯曲线斜率的协同修复。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
刘达禹
徐斌
宋洋
关键词:  菲利普斯曲线束  经济复苏路径规划  经济风险管理    
Summary:  During the post-epidemic period, China's economic recovery has faced difficulties associated with persistently weakening long-term demand. This unusual divergence of trends suggests that the Phillips curve in China may have inverted, evolving into a left-skewed, upward-sloping curve. An inverted Phillips curve is an alarming economic signal of unsteadiness in the state of constant output growth and price deflation. Specifically, means that the output-inflation combination will eventually shift from the lower right to the upper left along the inverted Phillips curve when the economy realizes a bottom equilibrium of low output and high inflation. This scenario is similar to the eve of “stagflation” in the United States. Hence, China's economic recovery continues to face several potential risks; accordingly, demand management and inflation governance are now the core tasks needed to maintain stable growth and guard against risks.
This paper comprehensively and mechanistically analyzes how weak economic recovery occurs during the post-epidemic period and discusses in depth how a classical economic crisis can be prevented ex ante and the appropriate guidance for economic recovery. The major conclusions are summarized as follows. First, the fundamental causes of the inversion of China's Phillips curve are constant demand contraction and inner rotation verticalization of the supply curve. Second, this paper proposes the principle of output-inflation spatial re-segmentation, in which the traditional two-dimensional space of output-inflation is re-segmented using the slope of the Phillips curve to identify the safe, crisis and early warning zones of economic operation. It shows that the Chinese economy is yet to completely escape the warning zone. Policy instruments are needed to guide the economy rapidly into the safe zone. Third, this paper proposes a new principle of Phillips curve set research. Taking a combination of loci in the y-p two-dimensional rectangular coordinate system as a benchmark, feasible empirical solutions are planned for all curve patterns based on historical combinations of output-inflation; this can serve as a reference for policy authorities when scheduling economic recovery paths. With reference to historical base effects, in the short term, medium-high to moderately high growth and appropriately weak inflation are the optimal targets for economic recovery, and 0.70 is the optimal solution for the Phillips curve slope. Fourth, this paper thoroughly compares the real-time corrective effects of various macroeconomic policy instruments and combinations on the curve slope. The policy combination that involves both expansion of the scale of social financing and tax cuts is found to be the best option to guide economic recovery.
The policy implications of this paper are summarized as follows. First, in terms of economic monitoring, policy authorities should focus on the degree of matching between output growth and inflation, as well as the unilateral risk of output or inflation. Second, in terms of guidance for economic recovery, future macro-governance efforts should focus on the coordination of fiscal and monetary policies. It is necessary to properly apply new forms of fiscal policies, such as structural tax cuts, and strengthen the appropriate support given to fiscal policies on consumption to enable the economy to eliminate deflation risk as soon as possible. It is also necessary to strengthen the supportive role of monetary policy for the real economy. Third, future macroeconomic research must focus on theoretical and empirical analysis of crisis economics, especially the ex-ante warning and prevention of a recurring classical economic crisis.
Keywords:  Phillips Curve Set    Economic Recovery Path Planning    Economic Risk Management
JEL分类号:  E31   E47   E63  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家社会科学基金重大项目(23&ZD064)、教育部人文社会科学研究项目(20YJA790046)和西南财经大学“双一流”建设项目(220110004006000055)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  宋 洋,经济学博士,副教授,西南财经大学财政税务学院,E-mail:songyang26@swufe.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  刘达禹,经济学博士,教授,吉林大学数量经济研究中心,E-mail:liuyuchris@163.com.徐 斌,博士研究生,吉林大学数量经济研究中心,E-mail:xubin23@mails.jlu.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
刘达禹, 徐斌, 宋洋. 菲利普斯曲线“逆位反转”的机理阐释与政策合力下的经济复苏路径重塑[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 524(2): 1-18.
LIU Dayu, XU Bin, SONG Yang. Mechanism Analysis of an Inverted Phillips Curve and Reshaping the Economic Recovery Path under Policy Coordination. Journal of Financial Research, 2024, 524(2): 1-18.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2024/V524/I2/1
[1] 陈创练、郑挺国和姚树洁,2019,《时变乘数效应与改革开放以来中国财政政策效果测定》,《经济研究》第12期,第38~53页。
[2] 范从来,2000,《菲利普斯曲线与我国现阶段的货币政策目标》,《管理世界》第6期,第122~129页。
[3] 何启志和范从来,2014,《学习型预期与中国扩展的新菲利普斯曲线研究》,《金融研究》第9期,第34~52页。
[4] 刘达禹和刘金全,2015,《人民币实际汇率波动与中国产业结构调整——一价定律偏离还是相对价格波动》,《国际贸易问题》第5期,第154~165页。
[5] 刘达禹、徐斌和王俏茹,2022,《中国经济增长长期趋势的实时估算与贡献分解——兼论中高速阶段稳态的形成与识别》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第7期,第26~46页。
[6] 刘金全、刘达禹和徐宁,2015,《中国通货膨胀成本的非对称性与货币政策动态调控模式研究》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第12期,第21~38页。
[7] 刘悦和刘金全,2023,《中国菲利普斯曲线的扁平化特征与利率政策撬动》,《南开经济研究》第3期,第3~19页。
[8] 彭洋、张龙和吴莉昀,2019,《时变概率的区制转换泰勒规则设计及其“稳定器”作用机制研究》,《金融研究》第7期,第19~37页。
[9] 谭小芬、王欣康和杨雅涵,2023,《全球化与通货膨胀》,《中国工业经济》第5期,第24~42页。
[10] 伍戈和刘琨,2014,《中国通胀与产出的动态研究——基于时变性的菲利普斯曲线》,《财贸经济》第10期,第61~72页。
[11] 郑挺国、王霞和苏娜,2012,《通货膨胀实时预测及菲利普斯曲线的适用性》,《经济研究》第3期,第88~101页。
[12] 祝梓翔和高然,2022,《通胀—增长权衡和中国菲利普斯曲线的平坦化》,《金融研究》第11期,第1~20页。
[13] Ball, L. and S. Mazumder, 2019, “A Phillips Curve with Anchored Expectations and Short-term Unemployment”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 51(1), pp.111~137.
[14] Barnichon, R. and G. Mesters, 2021, “The Phillips Multiplier”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 117(1), pp.689~705.
[15] Blanchard, O., 2016, “The US Phillips Curve: Back to the 60's?”, American Economic Review, 106(5), pp.31~34.
[16] Costain, J., A. Nakov and B. Petit, 2022, “Flattening of the Phillips Curve with State-Dependent Prices and Wages”, The Economic Journal, 132(2), pp.546~581.
[17] Del Negro, M., M. P. Giannoni and F. Schorfheide, 2015, “Inflation in The Great Recession and New Keynesian Models”, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 7(1), pp.168~196.
[18] Doser, A., R. Nunes, N. Rao and V. Sheremirov, 2023, “Inflation Expectations and Nonlinearities in the Phillips Curve”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 38(4), pp.453~471.
[19] Hall, R. E., 2011, “The Long Slump”, The American Economic Review, 101(2), pp.431~469.
[20] Krugman, P., 2009, “The Increasing Returns Revolution in Trade and Geography”, The American Economic Review, 99(3), pp.561~71.
[21] Nakajima, J., 2011, “Time-varying Parameter VAR Model with Stochastic Volatility: An Overview of Methodology and Empirical Applications”, Monetary and Economic Studies, 29(11), pp.107~142.
[22] Stock, J. H. and M. W. Watson, 2020, “Slack and Cyclically Sensitive Inflation”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 52(S2), pp.393~428.
[1] 蒋晓宇, 李宏瑾, 林楠. 重大突发公共事件下的通胀测量偏差——来自中国的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 521(11): 21-38.
[2] 杨长江, 李博. 竞争性增长与中国地区间通货膨胀差异形成机制 ——基于空间计量的“宾大—巴拉萨—萨缪尔森效应”分析[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 517(7): 21-39.
[3] 刘珺, 唐建伟, 周边, 鄂永健, 王运良. 数字经济如何影响中国通货膨胀?——基于作用机理和动态特征的实证分析[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 513(3): 1-19.
[4] 祝梓翔, 高然. 通胀—增长权衡和中国菲利普斯曲线的平坦化[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 1-20.
[5] 马勇, 姚驰. 通胀目标调整、政策可信度与宏观调控效应[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 505(7): 1-19.
[6] 洪智武, 牛霖琳. 中国通货膨胀预期及其影响因素分析——基于混频无套利Nelson-Siegel利率期限结构扩展模型[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 486(12): 95-113.
[7] 林东杰, 崔小勇, 龚六堂. 货币政策、消费品和投资品通货膨胀——基于金融加速器视角[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 465(3): 18-36.
[8] 高晶, 林曙. 省际边界、方言边界和一价定律[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 454(4): 138-154.
[9] 孟庆斌, 荣晨. 中国房地产价格泡沫研究——基于马氏域变模型的实证分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 101-116.
[10] 陈梦根, 牛华. 购买力平价变动影响因素研究:国际视角[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 435(9): 82-98.
[11] 饶品贵, 罗勇根. 通货膨胀如何影响股票回报——基于债务融资的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 433(7): 160-175.
[12] 杨子晖, 李广众, 张宁. 通胀国际传递的动态关系研究——兼论中国汇率的“通胀屏蔽功能”[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 432(6): 1-17.
[13] 彭方平, 周先波, 连玉君, 展凯. 垄断与通货膨胀:理论与证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 431(5): 19-34.
[14] 孙力军, 盛文军, 段军山. 中国股价与物价的关系研究——基于FTPL的理论视角和结构突变的实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 428(2): 145-153.
[15] 李青原, 吴素云, 王红建. 通货膨胀预期与企业银行债务融资[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 425(11): 124-141.
[1] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[2] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[3] 孙淑伟, 梁上坤, 阮刚铭, 付宇翔. 高管减持、信息压制与股价崩盘风险[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 175 -190 .
[4] 张晓宇, 徐龙炳. 限售股解禁、资本运作与股价崩盘风险[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 158 -174 .
[5] 潘彬, 王去非, 金雯雯. 时变视角下非正规借贷利率的货币政策反应研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 52 -67 .
[6] 祝继高, 李天时, 尤可畅. 房地产价格波动与商业银行贷款损失准备——基于中国城市商业银行的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 83 -98 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
[9] 王丽艳, 马光荣. 帆随风动、人随财走?——财政转移支付对人口流动的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 18 -34 .
[10] 金宇超, 靳庆鲁, 李晓雪. 资本市场注意力总量是稀缺资源吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 162 -177 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1