Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2023, Vol. 521 Issue (10): 104-124    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
债务协商、再融资风险与信用债定价 ——来自中国债券市场的证据
叶彦艺, 刘碧波, 施展
北京化工大学经济管理学院, 北京 102202;
清华大学五道口金融学院, 北京 100083
Debt Renegotiation, Rollover Risk, and Credit Spreads: Evidence from the Chinese Bond Market
YE Yanyi, LIU Bibo, SHI Zhan
School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Chemical Technology;
PBC School of Finance, Tsinghua University
下载:  PDF (562KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 在债券风险事件频出的背景下,债务协商已经成为国内债券市场常态。基于信用债交易数据,本文研究债务协商风险(破产清算成本和股东相对于债权人的谈判能力)及其与再融资风险之间的交互作用对信用债定价的影响。通过在“策略性债务支付模型”中引入再融资风险,本文建立结构化模型推导得出:债务协商风险会提升信用利差;再融资风险会放大债务协商风险提升信用利差的效应。实证检验结果与模型预测一致:债务协商风险对信用利差存在显著正向影响;再融资风险能够显著放大债务协商风险对信用利差的影响。再融资风险放大作用在短期债券、财务困境企业子样本中更为显著。本文的研究发现,对完善信用债定价理论、处置违约风险、健全国内债券市场机制、提升金融服务实体经济能力具有参考意义。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
叶彦艺
刘碧波
施展
关键词:  债务协商风险  再融资风险  策略性债务支付  信用利差  谈判博弈    
Summary:  As the world's second-largest onshore credit market, China's corporate bond market has become increasingly important in the global financial system. With an escalating number of bond defaults, debt renegotiation has emerged as a prevailing practice in the bond market. Debt renegotiation refers to shareholders bargaining with creditors to renegotiate debt contracts when a company is in financial distress. Although the literature on debt renegotiation examines its implications for expected stock returns and corporate yield spreads, it has remained silent on how the heterogeneity of firms' debt structures affects their incentives to negotiate strategic debt servicing. In this paper, we aim to fill this gap and examine the role of firms' debt rollover frequency in shaping the pricing implications of debt renegotiation.
When a firm is exposed to rollover maturing debt, its overall rollover costs depend on its fundamentals as well as its debt structure. Structural models that embed rollover risk typically focus on the interaction with bond market illiquidity but overlook the impact on the pricing effect of shareholders' strategic actions. By incorporating rollover risk into a structural model of strategic debt servicing, we propose a novel channel through which a firm's debt structure influences its financing costs. Given the theoretical finding that shareholders' strategic behavior directly affects corporate bond spreads by means of liquidation costs and bargaining power, the new insight offered by our model is that the rollover channel amplifies the effect of debt renegotiation on credit spreads: a higher rollover frequency forces equity holders to absorb a greater rollover loss per unit of time and, in turn, the increased cost of complying with debt obligations motivates firms to strategically service their debt at a higher fundamental threshold. It follows that bondholders increase the credit spread ex ante as compensation for the increased probability of strategic debt service.
Using the theoretical implications derived from our model, we empirically test these hypotheses using a data sample of over-the-counter market transactions of corporate bonds issued by Chinese public firms from May 2014 to December 2020. In the baseline regression analysis, we consider two proxies for liquidation costs—the concentration of an issuer's industry and the degree of tangibility of its assets—and measure shareholders' bargaining power by the fractions of equity owned by the firm's CEO as well as the proportion of public debt to its total debt financing. We find that credit spreads widen as the liquidation costs and bargaining power of shareholders increase, regardless of the empirical proxies used. This finding identifies debt renegotiation as an important determinant of corporate yield spreads in China.
Furthermore, we find evidence that rollover risk is an accelerator in the pricing impact of debt renegotiation. Specifically, the effect of debt renegotiation on credit spreads is more pronounced for bond issuers with a higher (vs. lower) proportion of long-term debt maturing within a year, which we use as a proxy for rollover risk exposure. This accelerator effect is statistically and economically significant after controlling for other well-documented determinants of corporate bond spreads.
In addition, our heterogeneity analysis shows that the impact of rollover risk on the renegotiation effect is stronger for bonds with a short time to maturity, small firms, and firms in financial distress than for other firms. Moreover, our results remain robust to alternative measures of credit spreads, alternative proxies for debt renegotiation risk and rollover exposure, and the exclusion of bonds with option-like features. Finally, we introduce instruments with respect to our strategic proxies and confirm that our main results are unlikely to be driven by potential endogeneity effects associated with these proxies.
This paper makes three contributions to the literature. First, we extend the strategic debt service model by incorporating firms' exposure to rollover risk. As such, our study lays a solid theoretical foundation for subsequent research. Second, this paper enriches the literature on the determinants of credit spreads by testing the effect of liquidation costs and bargaining power in the Chinese corporate bond market. Our empirical results contrast with findings obtained from developed credit markets. Finally, we empirically test the marginal effect of debt renegotiation through a rollover risk channel. Our findings demonstrate the role of rollover risk in shaping credit spreads above and beyond its interaction with debt illiquidity.
Keywords:  Debt Renegotiation    Rollover Risk    Strategic Debt Service    Credit Spreads    Nash Bargaining Game
JEL分类号:  G12   G32   G10  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家自然科学基金青年项目(72103017)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,感谢冯绪教授以及2023年中国金融学术年会与会者专家学者的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  施 展,金融学博士,副教授,清华大学五道口金融学院,E-mail:shizh@pbcsf.tsinghua.edu.cn   
作者简介:  叶彦艺,管理学博士,讲师,北京化工大学经济管理学院,E-mail:yeyy@buct.edu.cn.
刘碧波,经济学博士,副教授,清华大学五道口金融学院,E-mail:liubb@pbcsf.tsinghua.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
叶彦艺, 刘碧波, 施展. 债务协商、再融资风险与信用债定价 ——来自中国债券市场的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 521(10): 104-124.
YE Yanyi, LIU Bibo, SHI Zhan. Debt Renegotiation, Rollover Risk, and Credit Spreads: Evidence from the Chinese Bond Market. Journal of Financial Research, 2023, 521(10): 104-124.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2023/V521/I10/104
[1]高强和邹恒甫, 2015, 《企业债与公司债二级市场定价比较研究》, 《金融研究》第1期, 第84~100页。
[2]纪志宏和曹媛媛, 2017, 《信用风险溢价还是市场流动性溢价:基于中国信用债定价的实证研究》, 《金融研究》第2期, 第1~10页。
[3]康晶和陈守东, 2022, 《企业展期风险与债券信用利差——兼论信用评级的中介效应与流动性的调节作用》, 《西安交通大学学报(社会科学版)》第6期, 第49~63页。
[4]李平、李芳芳、刘洁和黄光东, 2019, 《考虑展期风险的可赎回CoCo债券定价》, 《管理科学学报》第4期, 第16~26页。
[5]史永东、宋明勇、李凤羽和甄红线, 2021, 《控股股东股权质押与企业债权人利益保护——来自中国债券市场的证据》, 《经济研究》第8期, 第109~126页。
[6]谭英贤和杨招军, 2019, 《基于债务协商视角的债转股定量研究》, 《中国管理科学》第4期, 第13~24页。
[7]张一林和蒲明, 2018, 《债务展期与结构性去杠杆》, 《经济研究》第7期, 第32~46页。
[8]张岳松、宋丹丹和陈彪, 2020, 《基于可协商的可转换债券和企业资本结构》, 《中国管理科学》第9期, 第1~11页。
[9]Acharya V. V., R. K. Sundaram and K. John, 2011, “Cross-Country Variations in Capital Structures: The Role of Bankruptcy Codes”, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 20(1), pp.25~54.
[10]Alanis E., S. Chava and P. Kumar, 2018, “Shareholder Bargaining Power, Debt Overhang, and Investment”, Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 7(2), pp.276~318.
[11]Anderson R. W. and S. Sundaresan, 1996, “Design and Valuation of Debt Contracts”, Review of Financial Studies, 9(1), pp.37~68.
[12]Anderson R. and S. Sundaresan, 2000, “A Comparative Study of Structural Models of Corporate Bond Yields: An Exploratory Investigation”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 24(1-2), pp.255~269.
[13]Bao J. and K. Hou, 2017, “De Facto Seniority, Credit Risk, and Corporate Bond Prices”, Review of Financial Studies, 30(11), pp.4038~4080.
[14]Betker B. L., 1995, “Management's Incentives, Equity's Bargaining Power, and Deviations From Absolute Priority in Chapter 11 Bankruptcies”, Journal of Business, pp.161~183.
[15]Davydenko S. A. and I. A. Strebulaev, 2007, “Strategic Actions and Credit Spreads: An Empirical Investigation”, Journal of Finance, 62(6), pp.2633~2671.
[16]Fan H. and S. M. Sundaresan, 2000, “Debt Valuation, Renegotiation, and Optimal Dividend Policy”, Review of Financial Studies, 13(4), pp.1057~1099.
[17]Favara G., E. Schroth and P. Valta, 2012, “Strategic Default and Equity Risk Across Countries”, Journal of Finance, 67(6), pp.2051~2095.
[18]Garlappi L. and H. Yan, 2011, “Financial Distress and the Cross‐Section of Equity Returns”, Journal of Finance, 66(3), pp.789~822.
[19]Garlappi L., T. Shu and H. Yan, 2008, “Default Risk, Shareholder Advantage, and Stock Returns”, Review of Financial Studies, 21(6), pp.2743~2778.
[20]Hackbarth D., R. Haselmann and D. Schoenherr, 2015, “Financial Distress, Stock Returns, and the 1978 Bankruptcy Reform Act”, Review of Financial Studies, 28(6), pp.1810~1847.
[21]He Z. and K. Milbradt, 2014, “Endogenous Liquidity and Defaultable Bonds”, Econometrica, 82(4), pp.1443~1508.
[22]He Z. and W. Xiong, 2012, “Rollover Risk and Credit Risk”, Journal of Finance, 67(2), pp.391~430.
[23]Hu G. X., 2020, “Rollover Risk and Credit Spreads in the Financial Crisis of 2008”, Journal of Finance and Data Science, 6, pp.1~15.
[24]Huang J., B. Liu and Z. Shi, 2023, “Determinants of Short-Term Corporate Yield Spreads: Evidence From the Commercial Paper Market”, Review of Finance, 27(2), pp.539~579.
[25]Leland H. E., 1998, “Agency Costs, Risk Management, and Capital Structure”, Journal of Finance, 53(4), pp.1213~1243.
[26]Leland H. E., 1994, “Corporate Debt Value, Bond Covenants, and Optimal Capital Structure”, Journal of Finance, 49(4), pp.1213~1252.
[27]Leland H. E. and K. B. Toft, 1996, “Optimal Capital Structure, Endogenous Bankruptcy, and the Term Structure of Credit Spreads”, Journal of Finance, 51(3), pp.987~1019.
[28]LoPucki L. M. and W. C. Whitford, 1990, “Bargaining Over Equity's Share in the Bankruptcy Reorganization of Large, Publicly Held Companies”, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 139(1), pp.125~196.
[29]Mella Barral P. and W. Perraudin, 1997, “Strategic Debt Service”, Journal of Finance, 52(2), pp.531~556.
[30]Merton R. C., 1974, “On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates”, Journal of Finance, 29(2), pp.449~470.
[31]Rajan R. G., 1992, “Insiders and Outsiders: The Choice Between Informed and Arm's‐Length Debt”, Journal of Finance, 47(4), pp.1367~1400.
[32]Strebulaev I. A., 2007, “Do Tests of Capital Structure Theory Mean What They Say?”, Journal of Finance, 62(4), pp.1747~1787.
[33]Valenzuela P., 2015, “Rollover Risk and Credit Spreads: Evidence From International Corporate Bonds”, Review of Finance, 20(2), pp.631~661.
[1] 甄红线, 吉继平. 债券市场开放影响债券信用利差吗?——基于“债券通”的准自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 522(12): 38-55.
[2] 王雷, 李晓腾, 张自力, 赵学军. 失信风险传染会影响债券定价吗?——基于担保网络大数据的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 505(7): 171-189.
[3] 徐思, 潘昕彤, 林晚发. “一带一路”倡议与公司债信用利差[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 500(2): 135-152.
[4] 史永东, 郑世杰, 袁绍锋. 中债估值识别了债券信用风险吗?——基于跳跃视角的实证分析[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 493(7): 115-133.
[5] 陈国进, 丁赛杰, 赵向琴, 蒋晓宇. 中国绿色金融政策、融资成本与企业绿色转型——基于央行担保品政策视角[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 498(12): 75-95.
[6] 刘晓蕾, 吕元稹, 余凡. 地方政府隐性债务与城投债定价[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 498(12): 170-188.
[7] 杨国超, 盘宇章. 信任被定价了吗? ——来自债券市场的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 463(1): 35-53.
[8] 林晚发, 钟辉勇, 李青原. 高管任职经历的得与失?——来自债券市场的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 456(6): 171-188.
[9] 纪志宏, 曹媛媛. 信用风险溢价还是市场流动性溢价:基于中国信用债定价的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 1-10.
[10] 王雄元, 高开娟. 客户集中度与公司债二级市场信用利差[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 439(1): 130-144.
[11] 郭晔, 黄振, 王蕴. 未预期货币政策与企业债券信用利差——基于固浮利差分解的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 432(6): 67-80.
[12] 钟辉勇, 钟宁桦, 朱小能. 城投债的担保可信吗?——来自债券评级和发行定价的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 430(4): 66-82.
[1] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[2] 卢洪友, 余锦亮, 张楠. 纵向行政管理结构与地方政府财政支出规模[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 35 -51 .
[3] 金宇超, 靳庆鲁, 李晓雪. 资本市场注意力总量是稀缺资源吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 162 -177 .
[4] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[5] 潘越, 肖金利, 戴亦一. 文化多样性与企业创新:基于方言视角的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 146 -161 .
[6] 江娇, 刘红忠, 曾剑平. 中国股票网络论坛的信息含量分析段[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 178 -192 .
[7] 张晓宇, 徐龙炳. 限售股解禁、资本运作与股价崩盘风险[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 158 -174 .
[8] 潘彬, 王去非, 金雯雯. 时变视角下非正规借贷利率的货币政策反应研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 52 -67 .
[9] 祝继高, 李天时, 尤可畅. 房地产价格波动与商业银行贷款损失准备——基于中国城市商业银行的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 83 -98 .
[10] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1