Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2023, Vol. 518 Issue (8): 1-18    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
资产价格、预期冲击与中国宏观经济波动
庄子罐, 韩恺明, 刘鼎铭, 王熙
中南财经政法大学金融学院,湖北武汉 430073;
厦门大学宏观经济研究中心,福建厦门 361005;
厦门大学王亚南经济研究院,福建厦门 361005;
北京大学经济学院,北京 100080
Asset Prices, Anticipated Shocks, and Macroeconomic Fluctuations of China
ZHUANG Ziguan, HAN Kaiming, LIU Dingming, WANG Xi
School of Finance,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law;
Center for Macroeconomic Research, Xiamen University;
Wang Yanan Institute for Studies in Economics, Xiamen University;
School of Economics, Peking University
下载:  PDF (561KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文构建了包含长期预期冲击的新凯恩斯一般动态均衡模型,并使用包含资产价格的数据集对模型进行估计,用于分析资产价格、预期冲击与中国宏观经济波动之间的关系。模型研究发现:首先,资产价格数据中蕴含的额外信息对于正确识别和评估预期冲击对中国经济的影响不可或缺,且长期预期冲击的设定更有利于模型从现实数据中提取与预期有关的信息;其次,预期冲击对于解释宏观经济波动十分重要,可以解释一半以上的产出、消费和投资波动以及几乎全部的资产价格波动;最后,在预期冲击主导经济波动的情况下,货币政策适当关注资产价格波动可能会在一定程度上降低预期冲击带来的福利损失。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
庄子罐
韩恺明
刘鼎铭
王熙
关键词:  资产价格  预期冲击  宏观经济波动    
Summary:  In the face of multiple challenges both domestically and internationally, stabilizing market confidence and maintaining a positive outlook among the public are of paramount importance for economic development. Understanding how economic agents' expectations are formed, grasping the transmission channels of expectations in the economy, and accurately assessing the significance of various anticipated shocks on economic fluctuations are the foundations for effective expectation management. A substantial body of literature has discussed the relationship between expectation changes and macroeconomic fluctuations by constructing Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) models, considering expectations as a significant factor influencing macroeconomic fluctuations. However, asset prices, which are crucial channels for the transmission of expectations, often receive insufficient attention in discussions of expectations. The connection between asset prices and expectations is close: on one hand, changes in asset prices reflect changes in economic agents' expectations of future economic fundamentals; on the other hand, expectations and the formation of asset prices are closely intertwined. Macroeconomic fluctuations or changes in economic fundamentals can affect economic agents' expectations, subsequently influencing their investment decisions and other choices, ultimately manifesting in asset prices. Therefore, exploring whether asset prices contribute to understanding the role of expectations in the Chinese economy is not only theoretically important for clarifying the relationship between asset prices, anticipated shocks, and macroeconomic fluctuations but also holds practical significance for stabilizing public expectations and promoting stable economic development.
This paper constructs a New Keynesian DSGE model, incorporating settings that reflect the unique characteristics of the Chinese economy and introducing multiple long-run anticipated shocks. Bayesian estimation serves as the foundation for quantitative analysis, with macroeconomic data and asset price data (stock prices and market interest rates) being used to estimate the model. This paper demonstrates that the information contained in asset prices is helpful in accurately assessing the impact of anticipated shocks on the Chinese economy. First, we compare estimation results of unconditional variance decompositions and second-moment results of key model variables between datasets that include asset price data and those that do not. We find that asset price data contain additional information about expectations, aiding in the correct identification and evaluation of the impact of anticipated shocks on economic fluctuations in China. Then, based on the estimated results with asset prices, this paper further decomposes forecast error variances for both macroeconomic and asset price variables. It reveals that anticipated shocks can explain more than 50% of output, consumption, and investment fluctuations, as well as nearly all asset price fluctuations. Different variables exhibit varying degrees of sensitivity to expectations over time, with asset prices being the most sensitive. Subsequently, the paper contrasts the differences between long-run anticipated shock processes and short-run anticipated shock processes, demonstrating long-run anticipated shock processes have advantages in model fitting. Finally, through welfare analysis, the paper finds that incorporating a response to asset prices in monetary policy can effectively mitigate welfare losses resulting from anticipated shocks.
The contributions of this paper to the existing literature are followings: firstly, it bridges the gap between research on anticipated shocks and asset prices, emphasizing the need to consider asset price data that are sensitive to expectations when studying anticipated shocks. Secondly, there is limited consideration of long-run shock processes in both domestic and international research on business cycles. This paper conducts a detailed comparison of the model fitting of long-run and short-run shock processes to the Chinese economy, demonstrating the advantages of using long-run anticipated shocks in fitting Chinese macroeconomic and asset price data. Lastly, the paper employs welfare analysis to suggest that when facing economic fluctuations dominated by expectation factors, policy authorities adopting more flexible and diverse monetary policies, such as incorporating asset price factors into monetary policy rules, may effectively improve overall welfare.
Keywords:  Asset Prices    Anticipated Shocks    Macroeconomic Fluctuations
JEL分类号:  G12   E12   E32  
基金资助: * 本文感谢高等学校学科创新引智基地(B21038)、国家社科基金重大项目(22&ZD116)、教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(22JJD790048)和福建省自然科学基金项目(2022J01045)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  韩恺明,博士研究生,厦门大学宏观经济研究中心,E-mail:mikehan@stu.xmu.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  庄子罐,经济学博士,教授,中南财经政法大学金融学院,E-mail:ziguanzhuang@zuel.edu.cn.
刘鼎铭,经济学博士,副教授,厦门大学王亚南经济研究院,E-mail:dmliu@xmu.edu.cn.
王 熙,经济学博士,助理教授,北京大学经济学院,E-mail:wang.x@pku.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
庄子罐, 韩恺明, 刘鼎铭, 王熙. 资产价格、预期冲击与中国宏观经济波动[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 518(8): 1-18.
ZHUANG Ziguan, HAN Kaiming, LIU Dingming, WANG Xi. Asset Prices, Anticipated Shocks, and Macroeconomic Fluctuations of China. Journal of Financial Research, 2023, 518(8): 1-18.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2023/V518/I8/1
[1]崔百胜和丁宇峰,2016,《股价波动,社会福利与货币政策制定——基于中国DSGE模型的模拟分析》,《财经研究》第1期,第93~102页。
[2]郭豫媚,陈伟泽和陈彦斌,2016,《中国货币政策有效性下降与预期管理研究》,《经济研究》 第 1 期,第28~41页。
[3]何德旭和饶明,2010,《资产价格波动与实体经济稳定研究》,《中国工业经济》第3期,第19~30页。
[4]侯成琪和龚六堂,2014,《货币政策应该对住房价格波动作出反应吗——基于两部门动态随机一般均衡模型的分析》,《金融研究》第10期,第15~33页。
[5]寇明婷、杨海珍和汪寿阳,2018,《股票价格与宏观经济联动关系研究——政策预期视角》,《管理评论》第9期,第3~11页。
[6]马勇,2013,《植入金融因素的DSGE模型与宏观审慎货币政策规则》,《世界经济》第7期,第68~92页。
[7]马勇和谭艺浓,2019,《金融状态变化与货币政策反应》,《世界经济》第3期,第27~46页。
[8]马勇、张靖岚和陈雨露,2017,《金融周期与货币政策》,《金融研究》第3期,第33~53页。
[9]王频和侯成琪,2017,《预期冲击, 房价波动与经济波动》,《经济研究》第4期,第48~63页。
[10]王曦, 汪玲, 彭玉磊和宋晓飞,2017,《中国货币政策规则的比较分析——基于 DSGE 模型的三规则视角》,《经济研究》第9期, 第24~38页。
[11]王义中和宋敏,2014,《宏观经济不确定性, 资金需求与公司投资》,《经济研究》第2期,第4~17页。
[12]吴化斌、许志伟、胡永刚和鄢萍,2011,《消息冲击下的财政政策及其宏观影响》,《管理世界》第9期,第26~39页。
[13]许志伟和王文甫,2019,《经济政策不确定性对宏观经济的影响——基于实证与理论的动态分析》,《经济学(季刊)》第1期,第23~50页。
[14]庄子罐、崔小勇、龚六堂和邹恒甫,2012,《预期与经济波动——预期冲击是驱动中国经济波动的主要力量吗?》,《经济研究》第6期,第46~59页。
[15]Avdjiev, S., 2016, “News Driven Business Cycles and Data on Asset Prices in Estimated DSGE Models”, Review of Economic Dynamics, 20, pp. 181~197.
[16]Beaudry, P. and F. Portier, 2004, “An Exploration into Pigou's Theory of Cycles”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 51(6), pp. 1183~1216.
[17]Carlstrom, C., T. Fuerst and M. Paustian, 2010, “Optimal Monetary Policy in a Model with Agency Costs”, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 42(1), pp. 37~70.
[18]Calvo, G. A., 1983, “Staggered Prices in a Utility-maximizing Framework”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 12(3), pp. 383~398.
[19]Chang, C., K. Chen, D. F. Waggoner and T. Zha, 2016, “Trends and Cycles in China's Macroeconomy”, NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 30, pp. 1~84.
[20]Christiano, L. J., M. Eichenbaum and C. L. Evans, 2005, “Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy”, Journal of Political Economy, 113(1), pp. 1~45.
[21]Christiano, L. J., I. Cosmin and R. Massimo, 2008, “Monetary Policy and Stock Market Boom-bust Cycles”, European Central Bank Working Paper, No.995.
[22]Clark, J. M., 1934, “Strategic Factors in Business Cycles”, NBER Books, 19(1), pp. 76~76.
[23]Cochrane, J. H., 1994, “Shocks”, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 41, pp. 295~364.
[24]Cúrdia,V. and M. Woodford, 2010, “Credit Spreads and Monetary Policy”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 42(S2), pp. 3~35.
[25]Davis, J. M., 2007, “News and the Term Structure in General Equilibrium”, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[26]Fama, E. F., 1990, “Stock Returns, Expected Returns, and Real Activity”, The Journal of Finance, 45(4), pp. 1089 ~1108.
[27]Jaimovich, N. and S. Rebelo, 2009, “Can News About the Future Drive the Business Cycle?” American Economic Review, 99(4), pp. 1097~1118.
[28]Justiniano, A., G.E. Primiceri and A. Tambalotti, 2011, “Investment Shocks and the Relative Price of Investment”, Review of Economic Dynamics, 14(1), pp. 102~121.
[29]Malkhozov, A. and A. Tamoni, 2015, “News Shocks and Asset Prices”, LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 62004, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
[30]Miyamoto, W. and T.L. Nguyen, 2020, “The Expectational Effects of News in Business Cycles: Evidence from Forecast Data”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 116(C), pp. 184~200.
[31]Pigou, A.C., 1927, Industrial Fluctuations, London: MacMillan.
[32]Schmitt-Grohe, S. and M. Uribe, 2008, “What's News in Business Cycles,” NBER Working Paper No. 14215.
[33]Schmitt-Grohe, S. and M. Uribe, 2012, “What's News in Business Cycles,” Econometrica, 80(6), pp. 2733~2764.
[1] 郭杰, 饶含. 土地资产价格波动与经济中的流动性供给——基于以地融资视角的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 505(7): 76-93.
[2] 吴立元, 赵扶扬, 王忏, 龚六堂. 美国货币政策溢出效应、中国资产价格波动与资本账户管理[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 493(7): 77-94.
[3] 梅冬州, 温兴春, 王思卿. 房价调控、地方政府债务与宏观经济波动[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 487(1): 31-50.
[4] 庄子罐, 贾红静, 刘鼎铭. 居民风险偏好与中国货币政策的宏观经济效应——基于DSGE模型的数量分析[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 483(9): 40-58.
[5] 闫先东, 张鹏辉. 土地价格、土地财政与宏观经济波动[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 471(9): 1-18.
[6] 姜富伟, 郭鹏, 郭豫媚. 美联储货币政策对我国资产价格的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 467(5): 37-55.
[7] 刘晓星, 石广平. 杠杆对资产价格泡沫的非对称效应研究[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 453(3): 53-70.
[8] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1-17.
[9] 谢红军, 蒋殿春. 竞争优势、资产价格与中国海外并购[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 439(1): 83-98.
[10] 张翔, 刘璐, 李伦一. 国际大宗商品市场金融化与中国宏观经济波动[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 439(1): 35-51.
[11] 陆前进. 最优货币政策规则参数的估计和中国货币状况指数的测度[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 431(5): 35-50.
[1] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[2] 卢洪友, 余锦亮, 张楠. 纵向行政管理结构与地方政府财政支出规模[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 35 -51 .
[3] 金宇超, 靳庆鲁, 李晓雪. 资本市场注意力总量是稀缺资源吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 162 -177 .
[4] 王攀娜, 罗宏. 放松卖空管制对分析师预测行为的影响——来自中国准自然实验的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 191 -206 .
[5] 潘彬, 王去非, 金雯雯. 时变视角下非正规借贷利率的货币政策反应研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 52 -67 .
[6] 李少昆. 美国货币政策是全球发展中经济体外汇储备影响因素吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 68 -82 .
[7] 邓路, 刘瑞琪, 江萍. 公司超额银行借款会导致过度投资吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 115 -129 .
[8] 史永东, 王龑. 职务犯罪是否加剧了银行风险?——来自中国城商行和农商行的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 99 -114 .
[9] 黎文靖, 李茫茫. “实体+金融”:融资约束、政策迎合还是市场竞争?——基于不同产权性质视角的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 100 -116 .
[10] 步丹璐, 狄灵瑜. 治理环境、股权投资与政府补助[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 193 -206 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1