Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2023, Vol. 515 Issue (5): 189-206    
  金融史专栏 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
银点套利与银跨境流动:中国银本位1902—1932
赵岩, 董小琦, 赵留彦
北京大学软件与微电子学院,北京 102600;
纽约州立大学石溪分校,美国 纽约 NY11794;
北京大学经济学院,北京 100871
Silver-point Arbitrage and International Flows of Silver: The Chinese Silver Standard, 1902-1933
ZHAO Yan, DONG Xiaoqi, ZHAO Liuyan
School of Software & Microelectronics, Peking University;
Applied Math & Statistics, The State University of New York at Stony Brook;
School of Economics, Peking University
下载:  PDF (1511KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文研究了近代中国银本位制度下外汇市场的运行效率以及国内外金融市场的整合程度。我们从近代上海和伦敦的报纸中手工收集了20世纪前期(1902—1932)外汇市场高频(日度)数据,并基于“银点套利”模型估计了上海和伦敦之间的银套利成本。结果显示,关于银点的估计值与当时两地之间的银贸易成本接近,且当出现银点背反情况时,银跨境流动的方向也与银点套利理论的预测一致。这些结果表明上海与国际市场之间存在有效的银套利机制,为国内外金融市场的高度整合提供了经验支持。不过,第一次世界大战期间以及战后初期,上海与伦敦之间银点的估计值大幅提高,表明中外金融联系受到了战争的严重干扰。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
赵岩
董小琦
赵留彦
关键词:  银本位  银点套利  市场整合    
Summary:  In research on the international monetary system, prominence has been given to the international adjustment of gold standard countries between the 19th and 20th centuries. One of the main issues underlying this research theme is the relative efficiency of the gold standard and its role in moderating nominal exchange rates. Tests of its efficiency revolve around consideration of the gold-point arbitrage. Although the market exchange rate fluctuated due to supply and demand shocks in the currency market, its deviation from parity was generally constrained by the so-called gold points, which refer to the cost of cross-border shipments of gold.
However, there is a relative paucity of research into the conditions of the silver standard. In the early 20th century, China was the only large country in the world adhering to the silver standard, and the operation of China's foreign exchange market is largely neglected in the literature. Silver was just another commodity in the international monetary system dominated by gold. As the price of silver in the world market was notoriously fickle, it is generally considered that the international adjustment mechanism between China and gold countries was equivalent to the floating exchange rate regime of fiat currencies. However, the Chinese silver standard shared some important characteristics with a fixed exchange rate system. Specifically, the exchange rate was determined by the world price of silver and would not adjust spontaneously according to China's international balance of payments. Thus, in adhering to the silver standard, China lost the buffer function provided by a free-floating exchange rate, which would otherwise insulate it from international shocks.
Exchange rate fluctuations and corresponding cross-border silver arbitrage played an important role in determining China's base money supply and balance of payments. They also provided a valuable perspective for measuring the relative efficiency of China's silver standard and the degree of integration in its financial market. Despite political turmoil, China gradually opened up to the outside world and underwent its first wave of industrialization and modernization. By the early 20th century, although China as a whole remained economically underdeveloped, its eastern coastal areas were significantly more developed than its inland regions. The degree of market development in modern China is a topic of debate, with some researchers arguing that the country's spatial markets were seriously segmented, whereas others consider that China's market integration had reached a substantially high level during the late Qing Dynasty. Research on this topic generally focuses on evidence from commodity markets, particularly grain markets. In recent years, the integration of monetary and financial markets has received increasing attention, and the literature on China's domestic financial integration is growing rapidly. However, there remains a lack of research on the integration of Chinese and external financial markets.
In this paper, we collect high-frequency datasets on the foreign exchange market from 1902 to 1932 and apply the silver point arbitrage mechanism and threshold autoregression models to estimate silver points between Shanghai and London, the world's major international financial center during this period. Our inferred measures of silver points are small, with estimated silver points at around 1.7% during peacetime, which match the measured costs of the silver trade derived from contemporary accounts. We observe that silver point violations and exploitable arbitrage opportunities periodically emerged, but did not persist for long. We also find a general correspondence between silver-point violations and international flows of silver, indicating that there were no significant trade barriers in cross-border silver trade. This leads us to conclude that the Chinese foreign exchange market was remarkably efficient, and that the degree of Chinese financial market integration was substantial. However, during and immediately after World War I, our estimates of the silver points increase significantly, indicating the collapse of China's links to world financial markets. As the United Kingdom was at the center of the war, the destructive effect of the war on trade and on the financial links between Shanghai and London is expected.
At the turn of the 20th century, while most countries around the world were aspiring to join the gold club, China retained its traditional silver currency, remaining the only major silver outlier. This alternative monetary system is often viewed as a reflection of China's economic and political problems. Despite political disintegration and the chaos of the regional monetary system in China, the efficiency of Shanghai's foreign exchange market was comparable with that of the gold standard system at the time. This indicates that Shanghai and the international financial markets were highly integrated, and that the eastern China market, centered around Shanghai, was deeply connected to the global economy in the early 20th century. This finding is consistent with evidence of economic growth in Shanghai's surrounding areas during this period.
In recent years, the literature on market integration in modern China has expanded rapidly, but it largely focuses on the commodity market. Financial assets are more homogeneous and have lower transaction costs than commodities such as grain and other goods. Thus, our results regarding financial integration provide an important benchmark for comparing market development in modern China and the West. It is important to note, however, that our evidence from the financial market may not necessarily apply to commodity markets because commodities such as grain, which have lower value-to-weight ratios, are less profitable to arbitrage than silver.
Keywords:  Silver Standard    Silver Point    Market Integration
JEL分类号:  E42   F15   N25  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家社科基金一般项目“汇率不确定性、短期资本流动与金融危机(20BJL120) ”的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  赵留彦,经济学博士,教授,北京大学经济学院,E-mail:zhly@pku.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  赵 岩,经济学博士,副教授,北京大学软件与微电子学院金融信息与工程管理系,E-mail:zhaoyan@ss.pku.edu.cn.
董小琦,博士研究生,纽约州立大学石溪分校(The State University of New York at Stony Brook)应用数学与统计系,E-mail:xiaoqi.dong@stonybrook.edu.
引用本文:    
赵岩, 董小琦, 赵留彦. 银点套利与银跨境流动:中国银本位1902—1932[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 515(5): 189-206.
ZHAO Yan, DONG Xiaoqi, ZHAO Liuyan. Silver-point Arbitrage and International Flows of Silver: The Chinese Silver Standard, 1902-1933. Journal of Financial Research, 2023, 515(5): 189-206.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2023/V515/I5/189
[1]陈岱孙,1935,《放弃银本位之后》,《独立评论》第177期,第1~6页。
[2]戴建兵,2012,《中国近代的白银核心型货币体系(1890—1935)》,《中国社会科学》第9期,第190~206页。
[3]戴建兵,2017,《中国近代货币史研究——白银核心型的货币体系》,北京:中国社会科学出版社。
[4]谷春帆,1934,《现银外流之原因及其防阻办法》,《东方杂志》第18期,第23~28页。
[5]管汉晖,2007,《20世纪30年代大萧条中的中国宏观经济》,《经济研究》第2期,第16~26页。
[6]刘巍,2004,《对近代中国的银价、汇率与进出口关系之实证分析》,《中国社会经济史研究》第12期,第22~26页。
[7]刘应骐,1930,《金贵银贱声中禁止生银进口之讨论》,《交大月刊》第1期,第31~35页。
[8]马寅初,1935,《我国银本位应放弃乎抑应维持》,《银行周报》第22期,第22~32页。
[9]王信、张翼和魏磊,2021,《庚子赔款的债务化偿付及其影响》,《金融研究》第2期,第133~152页。
[10]王业键,1981,《中国近代货币与银行的演进1664—1937》,台北:“中央研究院”经济研究所。
[11]魏友棐,1934,《制止银输出问题之理论与实际》,《钱业月报》第10期,第8~12页。
[12]吴大业,1932,《百年来金银比价变动之原因及其影响》,《经济统计季刊》第1期,第1~79页。
[13]吴大业,1933,《金银本位国间金银货流动的原则及中国金银货进出口的解释》,《经济统计季刊》第2期,第351~381页。
[14]颜色、辛星和滕飞,2020,《银行危机与政府干预——基于中国金融史的研究》,《金融研究》第10期,第113~130页。
[15]燕红忠、李裕威和曾雄佩,2020,《近代中国区域汇兑市场的运行机制研究——以大连为中心的钱市、汇市与贸易(1906-1931)》,《中国经济史研究》第5期,第38~57页。
[16]裕孙,1923,《英汇平价之研究及其最近之变态》,《银行周报》第50期,第18~19页。
[17]赵兰坪,1935,《我国银本位不应放弃乎》,《交易所周刊》第25期,第6~8页。
[18]赵留彦和隋福民,2015,《从汇率与国际银价关系看清末民国外汇市场整合》,《中国经济史研究》第1期,第26~37页。
[19]中国人民银行上海市分行,1960,《上海钱庄史料》,上海:上海人民出版社。
[20]周作仁,1936,《中国放弃银本位之前后》,《国立北京大学社会科学季刊》第1期,第105~127页。
[21]Brandt, L., D. Ma, and T. Rawski. 2014. “From Divergence to Convergence: Reevaluating the History Behind China's Economic Boom”, Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1): 45~123.
[22]Canjels, E., G. Canjels and A. Taylor. 2004. “Measuring Market Integration: Foreign Exchange Arbitrage and the Gold Standard, 1879-1913”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(4), 868~882.
[23]Chen, Y., and F. Ward. 2019. “When Do Fixed Exchange Rates Work? Evidence from the Gold Standard”, Journal of International Economics, 116: 158~172.
[24]Chernyshoff, N., D. Jacks, and A. M. Taylor. 2009. “Stuck on Gold: Real Exchange Rate Volatility and the Rise and Fall of the Gold Standard, 1875-1939”, Journal of International Economics, 77(2), 195~205.
[25]Dean, A. 2020, China and the End of Global Silver, 1873-1937, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
[26]Fetter, F. W., and H. M. Bratter. 1936. “China and the Flow of Silver”, Geographical Review, 26(1): 32~47.
[27]Friedman, M. 1992. “Franklin D. Roosevelt, Silver, and China,” Journal of Political Economy, 100(1): 62~83.
[28]Friedman, M., and A. Schwartz. 1963. A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[29]Hansen, B. 1997. “Inference in TAR Models”, Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 2(1): 1~14.
[30]Ho, T. 2016. “Money Doctors and Their Reform Proposals for China Reconsidered, 1903-29”, Oxford Economic Papers, 68(4): 1016~1038.
[31]Ho, T., and C. Lai. 2013. “Silver fetters? The Rise and Fall of the Chinese Price Level 1928-34”, Explorations in Economic History, 50(3): 446~462.
[32]Jacks, D., S. Yan, and L. Zhao. 2017. “Silver points, Silver Flows, And the Measure of Chinese Financial Integration”, Journal of International Economics, 108: 377~386.
[33]Kann, E. 1927, The Currencies of China: An Investigation of Silver & Gold Transactions Affecting China, with a Section on Copper. Shanghai: Kelly & Walsh.
[34]Kann, E. 1934, “The Silver Crisis”, The China Critic, 7(9): 205.
[35]Keller, W., C. Shiue, and X. Wang. 2021. “Capital Markets in China and England in the 18th and 19th Centuries: Evidence from Grain Price”, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 13(3): 31~64.
[36]Lewis, A. B. 1935, “Economic Conditions in Rural China”, in The China Mission Year Book, Shanghai: Christian Literature Society for China, 93~107.
[37]Li, C. 1937. “The Theory of International Trade Under Silver Exchange”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 53(4): 491~521.
[38]Li, L. 2000. “Integration and Disintegration in North China's Grain Markets, 1738-1911”, Journal of Economic History, 60(3): 665~699.
[39]Lieu, D. K. 1930. “The Silver Question”, The China Critic, 3(29), 678~682.
[40]Ma, D. 2006. “Economic Growth in the Lower Yangzi Region of China In 1911-1937: A Quantitative and Historical Analysis”, Journal of Economic History, 68(2): 355~392.
[41]Ma, D., and L. Zhao. 2020. “A Silver Transformation: Chinese Monetary Integration in Times of Political Disintegration, 1898-1933”, Economic History Review, 73(2): 513~539.
[42]Meissner, C. M., “A New World Order: Explaining the International Diffusion of the Gold Standard, 1870-1913”, Journal of International Economics, 66(2): 385~406.
[43]Obstfeld, M., and A. Taylor. 1997, “Nonlinear Aspects of Goods-Market Arbitrage and Adjustment: Heckscher's Commodity Points Revisited”, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 11(4): 441~479.
[44]Officer, L. H. 1989. “The Remarkable Efficiency of the Dollar-Sterling Gold Standard, 1890-1906”, Journal of Economic History, 49(1): 1~41.
[45]Officer, L. H. 1996. Between the Dollar-Sterling Gold Points: Exchange Rates, Parity and Market Behavior, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
[46]Officer, L. H. 2020. “International Monetary Regimes: The Gold Standard”, In: Battilossi S., Cassis Y., Yago K. (eds) Handbook of the History of Money and Currency. Singapore: Springer: 599~631.
[47]Palma, N., and L. Zhao. 2021. “The Efficiency of the Chinese Silver Standard, 1920-1933”, Journal of Economic History, 81(3): 872~908.
[48]Rawski, E. S. 2013. Agricultural Change and the Peasant Economy of South China, Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press.
[49]Shiue, C. 2002. “Transport Costs and the Geography of Arbitrage in Eighteenth-Century China”, American Economic Review, 92(5): 1406~1419.
[50]Shiue, C., and W. Keller. 2007. “Markets in China and Europe on the Eve of the Industrial Revolution”, American Economic Review, 97(4): 1189~1216.
[51]Tong, H. 1983. Threshold Models in Non-Linear Time Series Analysis (Lecture Notes in Statistics, 21), New York: Springer-Verlag.
[1] 刘京军, 张健. 信息传导与市场整合——基于商品期货上市的准自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 154-170.
[1] 张海洋. 融资约束下金融互助模式的演进——从民间金融到网络借贷[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 101 -115 .
[2] 张学勇, 柳依依, 罗丹, 陈锐. 创新能力对上市公司并购业绩的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 159 -175 .
[3] 牛霖琳, 林木材. 中国超长期国债的相对流动性溢价与收益率曲线的结构性建模[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 442(4): 17 -31 .
[4] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[5] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[8] 邓路, 刘瑞琪, 江萍. 公司超额银行借款会导致过度投资吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 115 -129 .
[9] 胡婷, 惠凯, 彭红枫. 异常波动停牌对股价波动性和流动性的影响研究——来自我国取消异常波动停牌的自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 146 -160 .
[10] 张晓宇, 徐龙炳. 限售股解禁、资本运作与股价崩盘风险[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 158 -174 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1