Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2022, Vol. 500 Issue (2): 61-79    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
ESG投资能够促进银行创造流动性吗?——兼论经济政策不确定性的调节效应
宋科, 徐蕾, 李振, 王芳
中国人民大学财政金融学院,北京 100872;
复旦大学大数据学院,上海 200433
ESG Investment and Bank Liquidity Creation: The Moderating Effect of Economic Policy Uncertainty
SONG Ke, XU Lei, LI Zhen, WANG Fang
School of Finance, Renmin University of China;
School of Data Science, Fudan University
下载:  PDF (619KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 当前在我国致力于实现“碳达峰、碳中和”目标的大背景下,银行能否通过ESG投资促进流动性创造,进而推动高质量发展具有重大战略意义。本文利用2009年第一季度至2020年第二季度中国36家上市银行的面板数据,实证分析ESG投资对银行流动性创造的影响,并将其置于经济政策不确定性条件下予以讨论。研究发现:第一,ESG投资整体上促进流动性创造,表现为对资产端和负债端流动性创造的促进作用,以及对表外流动性创造的抑制作用。从ESG投资结构看,环境保护投资和社会责任投资均抑制流动性创造,而公司治理投资则促进流动性创造。异质性分析表明,地方性银行和资本短缺银行的ESG投资对流动性创造具有更强的促进作用。第二,中介机制分析发现,ESG投资主要通过“盈利”和“风险”渠道促进流动性创造。第三,在经济政策不确定性上升时期,ESG投资对流动性创造的促进作用更加显著。从ESG投资分项看,经济政策不确定性会增强环境保护投资和社会责任投资对流动性创造的抑制作用,以及公司治理投资对流动性创造的促进作用。本文结论为充分发挥ESG投资作用并以此推动高质量发展提供了政策启示。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
宋科
徐蕾
李振
王芳
关键词:  ESG投资  银行流动性创造  “风险”渠道  “盈利”渠道  经济政策不确定性    
Summary:  In the current efforts to achieve “carbon peak” and “carbon neutral,” ESG investment is an increasingly important standard for measuring the sustainability of commercial banks. Thus, ESG investment can be considered a further extension of corporate social responsibility. Several studies on related topics enrich our understanding of the motives and economic consequences of corporate social responsibility; however, these studies still have several drawbacks. First, most studies are concerned with nonfinancial companies and direct studies of the banking sector are rare. Second, among the small number of bank-related studies, most explore the relationship between bank social responsibility and financial performance. However, as an important means of reputation management, ESG investment requires banks to integrate ESG principles into their daily business, which has multidimensional impacts on bank performance, especially bank liquidity creation.
Liquidity creation is one of the core functions of modern commercial banks. Moderate liquidity creation improves market financing conditions, which promotes high-quality development. First, banks can create liquidity on their balance sheets by converting their liquid liabilities into illiquid assets. Second, banks can create off-balance sheet liquidity by providing customers with credit commitments. Based on the liquidity creation measurement method proposed by Berger and Bouwman (2009), many studies explore the factors influencing liquidity creation, but no studies systematically analyze the relationship between ESG investment and bank liquidity creation. Theoretically, ESG investment may affect liquidity creation in two opposite ways. On the one hand, as a means of reputation management, ESG investment may promote liquidity creation through a reputation spillover effect. On the other hand, a reputation constraint effect associated with ESG investment may suppress liquidity creation.
Based on the panel data from 36 listed banks in China from 2009Q1 to 2020Q2, this paper constructs liquidity creation indicators according to Berger and Bouwman (2009), and uses ESG rating data from Sino-Securities Index to empirically examine the relationship between ESG investment and bank liquidity creation. Economic policy uncertainty is also introduced into our model to explore how it affects the relationship between ESG investment and liquidity creation. The main results of this paper are as follows. First, the reputation spillover effect of ESG investment is greater than the reputation constraint effect; therefore, ESG investment promotes overall liquidity creation, but its impact has certain structural differences. From the perspective of the liquidity creation structure, ESG investment can promote bank liquidity creation from the asset and liability sides while suppressing bank off-balance sheet liquidity creation. From the perspective of the ESG investment structure, corporate governance investment can promote liquidity creation, while environmental protection investment and social responsibility investment can suppress liquidity creation. Based on the heterogeneity analysis, the positive impact of ESG investment on liquidity creation is especially distinct in local banks and capital-deficient banks. Second, according to the intermediary effect analysis, the reputation spillover effect of ESG investment promotes liquidity creation through the “profit” channel, which improves banks' profitability and reduces income diversification, and through the “risk” channel, which increases banks' risk tolerance. Third, economic policy uncertainty can magnify the reputation spillover effect of ESG investment and strengthen its positive impact on bank liquidity creation. From the perspective of the ESG investment structure, economic policy uncertainty will strengthen the positive impact of corporate governance investment on liquidity creation and deepen the negative impact of environmental protection investment and social responsibility investment on bank liquidity creation. This paper provides important policy inspiration to promote the development of ESG Investment and realize high-quality economic development.
This paper makes three marginal contributions to the literature. First, this paper systematically examines the impact of ESG investment on bank liquidity creation, which enriches the relevant literature on the relationship between ESG investment and bank performance. Second, this paper reveals how ESG investment affects bank liquidity creation. Based on the intermediary effect test method proposed by Baron and Kenny (1986), this paper examines whether ESG investment promotes liquidity creation through the “profit” and “risk” channels. Third, against the current background of increasing economic policy uncertainty, this paper further introduces economic policy uncertainty into the model and examines its asymmetric impact on the relationship between ESG investment and bank liquidity creation, providing relevant empirical evidence.
Keywords:  ESG Investment    Bank Liquidity Creation    Risk Channel    Profit Channel    Economic Policy Uncertainty
JEL分类号:  C33   G21   G33  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家自然科学基金应急管理项目(71850009)、广东省哲学社会科学“十四五”规划青年项目(GD21YYJ07)、中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2020M680048)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  李振,经济学博士,复旦大学大数据学院、珠海复旦创新研究院、中国人民大学国际货币研究所,E-mail:lizhenfd@fudan.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  宋科,经济学博士,副教授,中国人民大学财政金融学院、中国财政金融政策研究中心、国际货币研究所,E-mail:songke@ruc.edu.cn.
徐蕾,博士研究生,中国人民大学财政金融学院,E-mail:xulei1997@ruc.edu.cn.
王芳,经济学博士,教授,中国人民大学财政金融学院、中国财政金融政策研究中心、国际货币研究所,E-mail:wangfruc@ruc.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
宋科, 徐蕾, 李振, 王芳. ESG投资能够促进银行创造流动性吗?——兼论经济政策不确定性的调节效应[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 500(2): 61-79.
SONG Ke, XU Lei, LI Zhen, WANG Fang. ESG Investment and Bank Liquidity Creation: The Moderating Effect of Economic Policy Uncertainty. Journal of Financial Research, 2022, 500(2): 61-79.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V500/I2/61
[1]丁宁、任亦侬和左颖,2020,《绿色信贷政策得不偿失还是得偿所愿?——基于资源配置视角的PSM-DID成本效率分析》,《金融研究》第4期,第112~130页。
[2]高勇强、陈亚静和张云均,2012,《“红领巾”还是“绿领巾”:民营企业慈善捐赠动机研究》,《管理世界》第8期,第106~114页。
[3]顾海峰和于家珺,2019,《中国经济政策不确定性与银行风险承担》,《世界经济》第11期,第148~171页。
[4]顾雷雷、郭建鸾和王鸿宇,2020,《企业社会责任、融资约束与企业金融化》,《金融研究》第2期,第109~127页。
[5]李凤羽和杨墨竹,2015,《经济政策不确定性会抑制企业投资吗?——基于中国经济政策不确定指数的实证研究》,《金融研究》第4期,第115~129页。
[6]李海芹和张子刚,2010,《CSR对企业声誉及顾客忠诚影响的实证研究》,《南开管理评论》第1期,第90~98页。
[7]李增福、汤旭东和连玉君,2016,《中国民营企业社会责任背离之谜》,《管理世界》第9期,第136~148页。
[8]权小锋、吴世农和尹洪英,2015,《企业社会责任与股价崩盘风险:“价值利器”或“自利工具”?》,《经济研究》第11期,第49~64页。
[9]宋科、李振和尹李峰,2021,《市场竞争与银行流动性创造——基于分支机构的银行竞争指标构建》,《统计研究》第11期,第87~100页。
[10]王晓芳和权飞过,2019,《如何防范银行系统性风险:去杠杆、稳杠杆,还是优杠杆?——基于表外业务结构性数据的实证研究》,《国际金融研究》第9期,第65~75页。
[11]星焱,2017,《责任投资的理论构架、国际动向与中国对策》,《经济学家》第9期,第44~54页。
[12]颜爱民和李歌,2016,《企业社会责任对员工行为的跨层分析——外部荣誉感和组织支持感的中介作用》,《管理评论》第1期,第121~129页。
[13]Alexander, G. J., and R. A. Buchholz. 1978. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Market Performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 21(3):479~486.
[14]Attig, N., S. El Ghoul, O. Guedhami, and J. Suh. 2013. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Credit Ratings”, Journal of Business Ethics, 117(4): 679~694.
[15]Baker, S. R., N. Bloom, and S. J. Davis. 2016. “Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4):1593~1636.
[16]Barnea, A., and A. Rubin. 2010. “Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict between Shareholders”, Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1):71~86.
[17]Barnett, M. L. 2007. “Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility”, Academy of Management Review, 32(3):794~816.
[18]Baron, R. M., and D. A. Kenny. 1986. “The Moderator-mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6):1173~1182.
[19]Berger, A. N., and C. H. S. Bouwman. 2009. “Bank Liquidity Creation”, The Review of Financial Studies, 22(9):3779~3837.
[20]Bhattacharya, S., and A. V. Thakor. 1993. “Contemporary Banking Theory”, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 3(1):2~50.
[21]Bolton, B. J. 2013. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Bank Performance”, Available at SSRN 2277912.
[22]Boot, A. W., S. I. Greenbaum, and A. V. Thakor. 1993. “Reputation and Discretion in Financial Contracting”, The American Economic Review, 83(5):1165~1183.
[23]Bordo, M. D., J. V. Duca, and C. Koch. 2016. “Economic Policy Uncertainty and the Credit Channel: Aggregate and Bank Level U.S. Evidence over Several Decades”, Journal of Financial Stability, 26(10):90~106.
[24]Cornett, M. M., O. Erhemjamts, and H. Tehranian. 2016. “Greed or Good Deeds: An Examination of the Relation between Corporate Social Responsibility and the Financial Performance of U.S. Commercial Banks around the Financial Crisis”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 70(9):137~159.
[25]Cui, J., H. Jo, and H. Na. 2018. “Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect Information Asymmetry?”, Journal of Business Ethics, 148(3):549~572.
[26]Davis, S. J., D. Liu, and X. S. Sheng. 2019. “Economic Policy Uncertainty in China since 1949: The View from Mainland Newspapers”, Working Paper.
[27]Davydov, D., Z. Fungáčová, and L. Weill. 2018. “Cyclicality of Bank Liquidity Creation”, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 55(3):81~93.
[28]Diamond, D. W., and P. H. Dybvig. 1983. “Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Liquidity”, Journal of Political Economy, 91(3):401~419.
[29]Diamond, D. W., and R. G. Rajan. 2001. “Liquidity Risk, Liquidity Creation, and Financial Fragility: A Theory of Banking”, Journal of Political Economy, 109(2):287~327.
[30]Duan, Y., X. Fan, X. Li, Y. Rong, and B. Shi. 2021. “Do Efficient Banks Create more Liquidity: International Evidence”, Finance Research Letters, 42(10):101919.
[31]Freeman, R. E. 1984. “Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach” ,Cambridge University Press.
[32]Friedman, M. 1970. “A Theoretical Framework for Monetary Analysis”, Journal of Political Economy, 78(2):193~238.
[33]Godfrey, P. C. 2005. “The Relationship between Corporate Philanthropy and Shareholder Wealth: A Risk Management Perspective”, Academy of Management Review, 30(4):777~798.
[34]Gorton, G., and A. Winton. 2017. “Liquidity Provision, Bank Capital, and the Macroeconomy”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 49(1):5~37.
[35]Goss, A., and G. S. Roberts. 2011. “The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Cost of Bank Loans”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(7):1794~1810.
[36]Huang, Y., and P. Luk. 2020. “Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty in China”, China Economic Review, 59(2):101367.
[37]Keeley, M. C., and F. T. Furlong. 1990. “A Reexamination of Mean-variance Analysis of Bank Capital Regulation”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 14(1):69~84.
[38]Luo, S., S. Yu, and G. Zhou. 2021. “Does Green Credit Improve the Core Competence of Commercial Banks? Based on Quasi-natural Experiments in China”, Energy Economics, 100(5):105335.
[39]Porter, M. E., and M. R. Kramer. 2006. “The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility”, Harvard Business Review, 84(12):78~92.
[40]Shen, C., M. Wu, T. Chen, and H. Fang. 2016. “To Engage or Not to Engage in Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from Global Banking Sector”, Economic Modelling, 55(6):207~225.
[41]Valencia, F. 2017. “Aggregate Uncertainty and the Supply of Credit”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 81(8):150~165.
[42]Wu, M., and C. Shen. 2013. “Corporate Social Responsibility in the Banking Industry: Motives and Financial Performance”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(9):3529~3547.
[1] 綦建红, 尹达, 刘慧. 经济政策不确定性如何影响企业出口决策?——基于出口频率的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 479(5): 95-113.
[2] 刘威, 黄晓琪. 经济政策不确定性、地区文化与保险需求[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 471(9): 39-56.
[3] 宋全云, 李晓, 钱龙. 经济政策不确定性与企业贷款成本[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 469(7): 57-75.
[4] 宫汝凯, 徐悦星, 王大中. 经济政策不确定性与企业杠杆率[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 472(10): 59-78.
[5] 陈胜蓝, 刘晓玲. 经济政策不确定性与公司商业信用供给[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 455(5): 172-190.
[6] 郭晔, 程玉伟, 黄振. 货币政策、同业业务与银行流动性创造[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 455(5): 65-81.
[1] 徐丽鹤, 袁燕. 财富分层、社会资本与农户民间借贷的可得性[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 131 -146 .
[2] 彭浩然, 郑倩昀, 呙玉红. 中国社会医疗保险扩张会促进商业健康保险发展吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 443(5): 97 -110 .
[3] 陆瑶, 张叶青, 贾睿, 李健航. “辛迪加”风险投资与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 444(6): 159 -175 .
[4] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[5] 李春涛, 刘贝贝, 周鹏. 卖空与信息披露:融券准自然实验的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 130 -145 .
[6] 周开国, 应千伟, 钟畅. 媒体监督能够起到外部治理的作用吗?——来自中国上市公司违规的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 432(6): 193 -206 .
[7] 李志冰, 杨光艺, 冯永昌, 景亮. Fama-French五因子模型在中国股票市场的实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 444(6): 191 -206 .
[8] 祝继高, 胡诗阳, 陆正飞. 商业银行从事影子银行业务的影响因素与经济后果——基于影子银行体系资金融出方的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 427(1): 66 -82 .
[9] 朱小能, 周磊. 未预期货币政策与股票市场——基于媒体数据的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 451(1): 102 -120 .
[10] 余淼杰, 崔晓敏, 张睿. 司法质量、不完全契约与贸易产品质量[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 438(12): 1 -16 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1