Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2022, Vol. 499 Issue (1): 167-184    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
中国式卖空机制与高管减持——基于融资融券分步扩容的准自然实验
董卉宁, 刘琦, 阮宏勋
北京大学光华管理学院,北京 100871
Short-selling Constraints and Managerial Selling: Margin Trading in a Natural Experiment
DONG Huining, LIU Qi, RUAN Hongxun
Guanghua School of Management, Peking University
下载:  PDF (923KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文以我国的融资融券制度为背景,结合双重差分模型,研究卖空机制对上市公司高管减持行为的影响。研究发现,相对于非融券标的,可融券标的公司高管的月减持比例在允许卖空后下降22%,这种抑制作用在小规模、高盈余平滑度以及非国有公司中体现得更为明显。其次,成为可融券标的后,股价定价效率提高,高管减持收益显著下降。进一步地,本文将高管的减持行为分为定期性与投机性两类,发现卖空机制显著抑制了高管基于信息优势和股价偏差的投机性减持行为。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
董卉宁
刘琦
阮宏勋
关键词:  卖空机制  定价效率  高管减持  定期性与投机性减持    
Summary:  As insiders, senior executives have information advantages and are able to manage their firms' external information environment; therefore, investors, regulators, and markets pay close attention to their trading activities. Understanding the causes and consequences of executives' trading activities, especially their selling behavior, is of vital importance in developing healthy financial markets.
This question is approached in the literature through a focus on the role of internal governance, such as increasing equity concentration, increasing institutional holdings, restricting earnings management, and improving information disclosure. Few scholars explore the perspective of external governance. Short-selling behavior is an important external governance mechanism; therefore, we study how the short-selling mechanism influences executives' trading behavior.
The margin trading policy implemented in the Chinese A-share market since 2010 allows investors to short sell their stocks. The introduction of the short-selling mechanism facilitates the timely incorporation of negative information into stock prices, reduces information asymmetry, and improves market efficiency. Based on monthly data from A-share firms between January 2007 and December 2015, we use a difference-in-differences method to leverage the staggered expansion of the list of stocks allowed to be shorted by the policy as exogenous shocks to the efficiency of the underlying stocks. We also study whether managerial selling behavior is changed by this short-selling mechanism. Our results show that the introduction of the short-selling mechanism reduces managerial selling behavior. In particular, the percentage of shares sold by managers compared with firms' outstanding shares is reduced by 0.004% in the treatment group relative to the control group, which comprises about 22.22% of the average shares sold by managers. We also find that the short-selling mechanism mainly deters managers' speculative selling behavior to profit from trading on information advantages, but has no effect on their regular selling. In a cross-sectional analysis, we show that for smaller firms, firms with higher earnings smoothness, and non-state-owned firms, the short-selling mechanism has a larger effect. Furthermore, we examine the channels through which the short-selling mechanism affects managerial selling behavior and find that margin trading policies improve price efficiency and reduce profits from managerial selling. The literature shows that managers conceal negative information before they sell their shares. However, we do not find any evidence that this behavior is reduced by margin trading policies.
We contribute to the literature in the following ways. First, while most scholars analyze the role of internal governance on managerial trading activities, we complement the literature by focusing on the external governance role of the market. We find that the short-selling mechanism can reduce managerial selling and improve corporate governance. We not only provide a broader perspective for analyzing the influential factors on managerial trading activities, but also present supportive evidence that show executives profit from trading on their information advantages. Second, we classify managerial selling into two types of trading purpose: regular and speculative selling. While regular selling is based on the executives' routine adjustment of asset portfolios or liquidity needs, speculative selling occurs when executives trade on their information advantages. We show that the short-selling mechanism reduces only speculative selling. Finally, we present evidence for channels through which the short-selling mechanism affects managerial selling. Our results provide insights for supervising managerial trading activities.
Keywords:  Short-selling    Pricing Efficiency    Managerial Selling    Regular and Speculative Selling
JEL分类号:  G14   G18   M41  
基金资助: * 本文感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  阮宏勋,金融学博士,助理教授,北京大学光华管理学院,E-mail:hongxunruan@gsm.pku.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  董卉宁,金融学博士研究生,北京大学光华管理学院,E-mail:donghn@pku.edu.cn.刘 琦,金融学博士,副教授,北京大学光华管理学院,E-mail:qiliu@gsm.pku.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
董卉宁, 刘琦, 阮宏勋. 中国式卖空机制与高管减持——基于融资融券分步扩容的准自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 499(1): 167-184.
DONG Huining, LIU Qi, RUAN Hongxun. Short-selling Constraints and Managerial Selling: Margin Trading in a Natural Experiment. Journal of Financial Research, 2022, 499(1): 167-184.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V499/I1/167
[1]蔡宁和魏明海,2009,《“大小非”减持中的盈余管理》,《审计研究》第2期,第40~49页。
[2]陈晖丽和刘峰,2014,《融资融券的治理效应研究——基于公司盈余管理的视角》,《会计研究》第9期,第45~52页。
[3]陈康和刘琦,2018,《股价信息含量与投资-股价敏感性——基于融资融券的准自然实验》,《金融研究》第9期,第126~142页。
[4]陈胜蓝和马慧,2017,《卖空压力与公司并购——来自卖空管制放松的准自然实验证据》,《管理世界》第7期,第142~156页。
[5]方军雄,2014,《信息公开、治理环境与媒体异化——基于IPO有偿沉默的初步发现》,《管理世界》第11期,第95~104页。
[6]郭彪、刘普阳和姜圆,2020,《卖空限制与收益可预测性——A股融资融券制度的证据》,《金融研究》第8期,第169~187页。
[7]李维安、李慧聪和郝臣,2013,《高管减持与公司治理创业板公司成长的影响机制研究》,《管理科学》第4期,第1~12页。
[8]李志生、陈晨和林秉旋,2015,《卖空机制提高了中国股票市场的定价效率吗?——基于自然实验的证据》,《经济研究》第4期,第165~177页。
[9]孟庆斌、邹洋和侯德帅,2019,《卖空机制能抑制上市公司违规吗?》,《经济研究》第6期,第89~105页。
[10]倪骁然,2020,《卖空压力和风险防范与产品市场表现,企业利益相关者的视角》,《经济研究》第5期,第183~198页。
[11]苏冬蔚和彭松林,2019,《卖空者与内幕交易——来自中国证券市场的证据》,《金融研究》第9期,第188~206页。
[12]孙淑伟、梁上坤、阮刚铭和付宇翔,2017,《高管减持和信息压制与股价崩盘风险》,《金融研究》第11期,第175~190页。
[13]王玉涛、陈晓和薛健,2013,《限售股减持,利润平滑还是投资收益最大?》,《金融研究》第1期,第164~176页。
[14]吴育辉和吴世农,2010,《企业高管自利行为及其影响因素研究——基于我国上市公司股权激励草案的证据》,《管理世界》第5期,第141~149页。
[15]易志高、李心丹、潘子成和茅宁,2019,《公司高管减持同伴效应与股价崩盘风险研究》,《经济研究》第11期,第54~70页。
[16]易志高、潘子成、茅宁和李心丹,2017,《策略性媒体披露与财富转移——来自公司高管减持期间的证据》,《经济研究》第4期,第166~180页。
[17]曾庆生,2008,《公司内部人具有交易时机的选择能力吗?——来自中国上市公司内部人卖出股票的证据》,《金融研究》第10期,第117~135页。
[18]朱茶芬、姚铮和李志文,2011,《高管交易能预测未来股票收益吗?》,《管理世界》第9期,第141~152 页。
[19]Bhattacharya, U., Daouk, H., and Welker, M., 2003.“The World Price of Earnings Opacity.”The Accounting Review,78(3) : 641~678.
[20]Boehmer, E., and Wu, J.,2013.“Short-Selling and the Price Discovery Process.” Review of Financial Studies,26(2):287~322.
[21]Cheng, Q., and Lo, K.,2006.“Insider Trading and Voluntary Disclosures.”Journal of Accounting Research,44(5):815~848.
[22]Cohen, L., Malloy, C., and Pomorski, L.,2012.“Decoding Inside Information.” The Journal of Finance,67(3):1009~1043.
[23]Damodaran, A., and Liu, C. H., 1993.“Insider Trading as a Signal of Private Information.” Review of Financial Studies,6(1):79~119.
[24]Fang, V. W., Huang, A. H., and Karpoff, J. M., 2016.“Short-Selling and Earnings Management: A Controlled Experiment.”The Journal of Finance,71(3):1251~1294.
[25]Friederich, S., Gregory, A., Matatko, J., and Tonks, I., 2002.“Short-run Returns Around the Trades of Corporate Insiders on the London Stock Exchange.”European Financial Management, 8(1):7~30.
[26]Grullon, G., Michenaud, S., and Weston, J. P. ,2015.“The Real Effects of Short-Selling Constraints.” Review of Financial Studies,28(6):1737~1767.
[27]Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H.,1976.“Theory of the Firm:Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics,3(4):305~360.
[28]Jones, C. M., and Lamont, O. A.,2002.“Short-Sale Constraints and Stock Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics,66(2~3):207~239.
[29]Karpoff, J. M., and Lou, X., 2010.“Short Sellers and Financial Misconduct.” The Journal of Finance,65(5):1879~1913.
[30]Li, Y., and Zhang, L.,2015.“Short Selling Pressure, Stock Price Behavior, and Management Forecast Precision: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” Journal of Accounting Research,53:79~117.
[31]Massa, M., Qian, W., Xu, W., and Zhang, H.,2015.“Competition of the Informed: Does the Presence of Short Sellers Affect Insider Selling?” Journal of Financial Economics, 118(2):268~288.
[32]Miller, E. M. ,1977.“Risk,Uncertainty and Divergence of Opinion.”The Journal of Finance, 32(4):1151~1168.
[33]Saffi, P. A., and Sigurdsson, K.,2011.“Price Efficiency and Short Selling.” Review of Financial Studies,24(3):821~852.
[1] 徐细雄, 占恒, 李万利. 卖空机制、双重治理与公司违规 ——基于市场化治理视角的实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 496(10): 190-206.
[2] 孙广宇, 李志辉, 杜阳, 王近. 市场操纵降低了中国股票市场的信息效率吗——来自沪市A股高频交易数据的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 495(9): 151-169.
[3] 张路, 李金彩, 袁振超, 岳衡. 管理者能力与资本市场稳定[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 495(9): 188-206.
[4] 韩珣, 李建军. 政策连续性、非金融企业影子银行化与社会责任承担[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 495(9): 131-150.
[5] 李少育, 张滕, 尚玉皇, 周宇. 市场摩擦对特质风险溢价的影响效应——基于A股主板市场的实证分析[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 494(8): 190-206.
[6] 史永东, 郑世杰, 袁绍锋. 中债估值识别了债券信用风险吗?——基于跳跃视角的实证分析[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 493(7): 115-133.
[7] 寇宗来, 千茜倩. 私有信息、评级偏差和中国评级机构的市场声誉[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 492(6): 114-132.
[8] 宫汝凯. 信息不对称、过度自信与股价变动[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 492(6): 152-169.
[9] 陆蓉, 兰袁. 大股东股权质押与上市公司资本运作[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 490(4): 169-186.
[10] 郑挺国, 葛厚逸. 中国股市羊群效应的区制转移时变性研究[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 489(3): 170-187.
[11] 阮睿, 孙宇辰, 唐悦, 聂辉华. 资本市场开放能否提高企业信息披露质量?——基于“沪港通”和年报文本挖掘的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 488(2): 188-206.
[12] 庞家任, 张鹤, 张梦洁. 资本市场开放与股权资本成本——基于沪港通、深港通的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 486(12): 169-188.
[13] 曾爱民, 魏志华, 张纯, 左婉平. 企业社会责任:“真心”抑或“幌子”?——基于高管内幕交易视角的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 483(9): 154-171.
[14] 胡聪慧, 朱菲菲, 邱卉敏. 股权质押、风险管理与大股东增持[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 483(9): 190-206.
[15] 王晓珂, 于李胜, 王艳艳. 衍生工具应用能改善资本市场信息环境吗?——基于分析师预测行为的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 481(7): 190-206.
[1] 王贤彬, 黄亮雄, 董一军. 反腐败的投资效应——基于地区与企业双重维度的实证分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 67 -82 .
[2] 牛霖琳, 林木材. 中国超长期国债的相对流动性溢价与收益率曲线的结构性建模[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 442(4): 17 -31 .
[3] 张倩倩, 周铭山, 董志勇. 研发支出资本化向市场传递了公司价值吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 444(6): 176 -190 .
[4] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[5] 郭晔, 赵静. 存款竞争、影子银行与银行系统风险——基于中国上市银行微观数据的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 444(6): 81 -94 .
[6] 陆瑶, 张叶青, 贾睿, 李健航. “辛迪加”风险投资与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 444(6): 159 -175 .
[7] 林建浩, 吴冰燕, 李仲达. 家庭融资中的有效社会网络:朋友圈还是宗族?[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 427(1): 130 -144 .
[8] 雷文妮, 龚六堂. 房价波动与社会福利——基于内生化企业进入的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 434(8): 51 -67 .
[9] 李政, 梁琪, 涂晓枫. 我国上市金融机构关联性研究——基于网络分析法[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 434(8): 95 -110 .
[10] 李志冰, 杨光艺, 冯永昌, 景亮. Fama-French五因子模型在中国股票市场的实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 444(6): 191 -206 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1