Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2026, Vol. 547 Issue (1): 151-169    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
债权人保护与可转债策略性发行——基于破产法庭设立的证据
解维敏, 郭佳璐, 张恒鑫
Creditor Right Protection and Convertible Bonds Strategic Issuance: Evidence from the Establishment of China's Specialized Bankruptcy Courts
XIE Weimin, GUO Jialu, ZHANG Hengxin
School of Accounting, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics;
School of Public Finance & Taxation/School of Accountancy, Shandong University of Finance and Economics
下载:  PDF (615KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文基于中国各地级市设立破产法庭的准自然实验,研究债权人保护对企业可转债策略性发行的影响。研究发现,破产法庭设立后,企业发行可转债的概率显著提高,且更多发行偏股型可转债。机制分析表明,这一效应主要通过企业“后门权益”动机和“风险转移”动机实现。进一步分析发现,在内部治理与外部监督机制较弱、债权人保护不足的企业以及金融监管强度偏低的地区,破产法庭设立对企业发行偏股型可转债的促进作用更强。经济后果检验显示,在设立破产法庭的地区,企业发行偏股型可转债会降低投资效率、提高投机性金融资产投资,同时减少研发投入,表明企业发行偏股型可转债存在策略性动机。本文研究结论丰富了债权人保护与金融工具契约设计的理论框架,也为优化破产法治建设、推动金融市场高质量发展提供了参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
解维敏
郭佳璐
张恒鑫
关键词:  可转债  契约条款  债权人保护  破产法庭    
Summary:  In recent years, convertible bonds have become a significant refinancing channel for Chinese listed firms, with their market prominence increasingly highlighted. Compared to traditional bonds and equities, convertible bonds offer greater flexibility in contractual terms, and their complex clauses shape the dynamic balance between their debt and equity features. Specifically, the debt-like nature of convertible bonds is manifested in the bondholders' claim to the face value and fixed interest payments before conversion, while their equity-like nature is reflected in holders' rights to share in the residual value after conversion. However, firms may issue convertible bonds not merely for financing purposes but also to exploit speculative opportunities that promise short-term gains. As an emerging market, China exhibits relatively weaker protection for creditors. The development of bankruptcy legal frameworks, a direct reflection of creditor protection, focuses on building a robust legal system and an efficient judiciary to effectively safeguard creditors' legitimate rights and interests during firm liquidation. Nevertheless, the impact of bankruptcy legal framework development on convertible bond issuance and its underlying motivations remains unexplored. Therefore, in the context of China's increasingly refined bankruptcy legal system, this study aims to investigate the impact of enhanced creditor protection mechanisms on firm convertible bond issuance behavior and its underlying mechanisms.
Based on a quasi-natural experiment of the bankruptcy court establishment in Chinese prefecture-level cities, this study empirically examines the impact of creditor protection on convertible bond issuance from the perspective of bankruptcy legal system development. The findings reveal that after the establishment of bankruptcy courts, local firms are more likely to use convertible bonds for financing, and the equity-like nature of these bonds significantly increases. Furthermore, the mechanism tests show that the “backdoor equity” and “risk shifting” motivations are the primary channels through which bankruptcy courts affect the attributes of convertible bonds. The heterogeneity analysis shows that the establishment of bankruptcy courts has a more pronounced impact on promoting the issuance of equity-like convertible bonds in firms with weak internal governance, inadequate external monitoring, lower creditor protection levels, and in regions with relatively weaker financial regulation. Finally, further tests demonstrate that after the establishment of bankruptcy courts, issuing equity-like convertible bonds reduces investment efficiency, encourages firms to increase investments in speculative financial assets, and decreases funding for R&D projects, providing evidence for the strategic motivations behind convertible bond issuance.
The marginal contributions of this study are threefold. First, in the context of the Chinese market, this study enriches the literature on the economic consequences of creditor protection. By analyzing the impact of bankruptcy courts on the strategic issuance of convertible bonds, it reveals how firms may circumvent legal constraints through the design of financial instruments following the strengthening of creditor protection. This finding not only supplements the discussion on the potential negative effects of creditor protection but also provides practical insights into the dynamic interplay between policy and firm strategies in emerging markets. Second, this study extends the literature on the microeconomic effects of bankruptcy court establishment. By leveraging the exogenous shock of bankruptcy court establishment, it reveals how the development of bankruptcy legal frameworks influences firm strategic choices in convertible bond issuance through the enhancement of creditor protection mechanisms. The findings provide a novel theoretical perspective on the role of bankruptcy courts in financial markets and offer valuable insights for improving bankruptcy legal systems. Third, this study deepens the understanding of the relationship between the legal environment and the contractual design of convertible bonds. It provides a theoretical foundation and policy recommendations for policymakers to refine the design of bankruptcy judicial systems, optimize financial instrument innovation, and promote high-quality development of the financial sector.
Keywords:  Convertible Bonds    Covenant Terms    Creditor Protection    Bankruptcy Court
JEL分类号:  G14   G33   G38  
基金资助: *本文感谢辽宁省社会科学规划基金重大委托项目“数据要素赋能新质生产力:作用机理、提升效应与对策研究” (L24ZD003) 的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  郭佳璐,管理学博士,副教授,山东财经大学财政税务学院,E-mail:guojialu95@126.com.   
作者简介:  解维敏,管理学博士,教授,东北财经大学会计学院、数字经济研究院,E-mail:xieweimin1981@126.com.
张恒鑫,管理学博士,副教授,山东财经大学会计学院,E-mail:zhanghx0051@163.com.
引用本文:    
解维敏, 郭佳璐, 张恒鑫. 债权人保护与可转债策略性发行——基于破产法庭设立的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 547(1): 151-169.
XIE Weimin, GUO Jialu, ZHANG Hengxin. Creditor Right Protection and Convertible Bonds Strategic Issuance: Evidence from the Establishment of China's Specialized Bankruptcy Courts. Journal of Financial Research, 2026, 547(1): 151-169.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2026/V547/I1/151
[1] 陈文哲、石宁和梁琪,2021,《可转债能促进企业创新吗?——基于资本市场再融资方式的对比分析》,《管理科学学报》第7期,第94~109页。
[2] 姜军、申丹琳、江轩宇和伊志宏,2017,《债权人保护与企业创新》,《金融研究》第11期,第128~142页。
[3] 解维敏和方红星,2011,《金融发展、融资约束与企业研发投入》,《金融研究》第5期,第171~183页。
[4] 解维敏、郭佳璐和张恒鑫,2023,《可转债与企业全要素生产率》,《系统工程理论与实践》第10期,第2787~2806页。
[5] 李晓溪和饶品贵,2022,《破产制度、去杠杆与资本结构动态调整——基于破产法庭设立的研究证据》,《经济科学》第3期,第95~111页。
[6] 刘劲松、谢德仁和张新一,2025,《中国可转债高转股之谜——来自促转动机的解释》,《管理世界》第8期,第165~204页。
[7] 潘越、纪翔阁、宁博和陈怡萍,2023,《破产审判改革、财政减负与企业降税》,《世界经济》第1期,第192~215页。
[8] 彭俞超、韩珣和李建军,2018,《经济政策不确定性与企业金融化》,《中国工业经济》第1期,第137~155页。
[9] 唐松、伍旭川和祝佳,2020,《数字金融与企业技术创新——结构特征、机制识别与金融监管下的效应差异》,《管理世界》第5期,第52~66页。
[10] 王永钦和薛笑阳,2022,《法治建设与金融高质量发展——来自中国债券市场的证据》,《经济研究》第10期,第173~190页。
[11] 肖万、张宇彤和许林,2020,《期权属性、公司治理与可转债发行》,《南开管理评论》第2期,第142~154页。
[12] 许年行、王崇骏和章纪超,2023,《破产审判改革、债权人司法保护与企业创新——基于清算与破产审判庭设立的准自然实验》,《金融研究》第6期,第150~168页。
[13] 周磊、胡可煜和张正平,2024,《破产审判改革、债权人保护与稳就业》,《财经研究》第12期,第62~75页。
[14] Acharya, V. V. and K. V. Subramanian, 2009, “Bankruptcy Codes and Innovation”, The Review of Financial Studies, 22(12), pp.4949~4988.
[15] Bajo, E. and M. Barbi, 2012, “The Role of Time Value in Convertible Bond Call Policy”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(2), pp.550~563.
[16] Bharath, S. T. and T. Shumway, 2008, “Forecasting Default with the Merton Distance to Default Model”, The Review of Financial Studies, 21(3), pp.1339~1369.
[17] Biddle, G. C., G. Hilary and R. S. Verdi, 2009, “How Does Financial Reporting Quality Relate to Investment Efficiency?”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48(2-3), pp.112~131.
[18] Chen, W. E. I., P. Hribar and S. Melessa, 2018, “Incorrect Inferences when Using Residuals as Dependent Variables”, Journal of Accounting Research, 56(3), pp.751~796.
[19] De Vito, A. and M. Jacob, 2023, “The Role of Creditor Protection in Lending and Tax Avoidance”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 58(5), pp.2096~2130.
[20] Djankov, S., O. Hart, C. McLiesh and A. Shleifer, 2008, “Debt Enforcement Around the World”, Journal of Political Economy, 116(6), pp.1105~1149.
[21] Dutordoir, M. and L. Van de Gucht., 2009, “Why Do Western European Firms Issue Convertibles Instead of Straight Debt or Equity?”, European Financial Management, 15(3), pp.563~583.
[22] Fan, J. P. H., J. Huang and N. Zhu, 2013, “Institutions, Ownership Structures, and Distress Resolution in China”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 23, pp.71~87.
[23] Gennaioli, N. and S. Rossi, 2010, “Judicial Discretion in Corporate Bankruptcy”, The Review of Financial Studies, 23(11), pp.4078~4114.
[24] Ingersoll Jr, J. E., 1977, “A Contingent-claims Valuation of Convertible Securities”, Journal of Financial Economics, 4(3), pp.289~321.
[25] Iverson, B., J. Madsen, W. Wang and Q. Xu, 2023, “Financial Costs of Judicial in Experience: Evidence from Corporate Bankruptcies”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 58(3), pp.1111~1143.
[26] Krishnaswami, S. and D. Yaman, 2008, “The Role of Convertible Bonds in Alleviating Contracting Costs”, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 48(4), pp.792~816.
[27] La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer and R. W. Vishny, 1998, “Law and Finance”, Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), pp.1113~1155.
[28] Lee, C. F., K. W. Lee and G. H. H. Yeo, 2009, “Investor Protection and Convertible Debt Design”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(6), pp.985~995.
[29] Li, B. and J. Ponticelli, 2022, “Going Bankrupt in China”, Review of Finance, 26(3), pp.449~486.
[30] Mayers, D., 1998, “Why Firms Issue Convertible Bonds: The Matching of Financial and Real Investment Options”, Journal of Financial Economics, 47(1), pp.83~102.
[31] Müller, K., 2022, “Busy Bankruptcy Courts and the Cost of Credit”, Journal of Financial Economics, 143(2), pp.824~845.
[32] Myers, S. C., 1977, “Determinants of Corporate Borrowing”, Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), pp.147~175.
[33] Ponticelli, J. and L. S. Alencar, 2016, “Court Enforcement, Bank Loans, and Firm Investment: Evidence from a Bankruptcy Reform in Brazil”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(3), pp.1365~1413.
[34] Stein, J. C., 1992, “Convertible Bonds as Backdoor Equity Financing”, Journal of Financial Economics, 32(1), pp.3~21.
[35] Tarantino, E., 2013, “Bankruptcy Law and Corporate Investment Decisions”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(7), pp.2490~2500.
[36] Zhou, Z., X. Zhou, X. Zhang and W. Chen, 2025, “Judicial Waves, Ethical Shifts: Bankruptcy Courts and Corporate ESG Performance”, Journal of Business Ethics, 198(3), pp.537~557.
[1] 解维敏 Download
[1] 许年行, 王崇骏, 章纪超. 破产审判改革、债权人司法保护与企业创新 ——基于清算与破产审判庭设立的准自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 516(6): 150-168.
[2] 王红建, 吴静桦, 曹瑜强. 债权人保护与公司风险承担——基于《破产法》和《物权法》实施的准自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 512(2): 189-206.
[3] 钱雪松, 唐英伦, 方胜. 担保物权制度改革降低了企业债务融资成本吗?——来自中国《物权法》自然实验的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 469(7): 115-134.
[4] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128-142.
[5] 史永东, 田渊博. 契约条款影响债券价格吗?——基于中国公司债市场的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 434(8): 143-158.
[1] 王贤彬, 黄亮雄, 董一军. 反腐败的投资效应——基于地区与企业双重维度的实证分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 67 -82 .
[2] 史永东, 王龑. 职务犯罪是否加剧了银行风险?——来自中国城商行和农商行的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 99 -114 .
[3] 范庆祝, 贾若, 孙祁祥. 寿险供给侧指标对寿险消费的影响——基于寿险供给质量、动能和效率的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 115 -129 .
[4] 茅锐. 企业创新、生产力进步与经济收敛:产业集聚的效果[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 83 -99 .
[5] 黄宪, 黄彤彤. 论中国的“金融超发展”[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 26 -41 .
[6] 王弟海, 崔小勇, 邹恒甫. OLG模型中的多重均衡和经济效率——兼论政府在经济中的作用[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 443(5): 1 -17 .
[7] 曹春方, 陈露兰, 张婷婷. “法律的名义”:司法独立性提升与公司违规[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 443(5): 191 -206 .
[8] 施炳展, 张雅睿. 人民币双边事实汇率制度与中国出口增长[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 434(8): 1 -7 .
[9] 王立章, 王咏梅, 王志诚. 控制权、现金流权与股价同步性[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 431(5): 97 -110 .
[10] 丁志杰, 田园. 论资本项目有管理可兑换[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 428(2): 96 -105 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1