Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2025, Vol. 543 Issue (9): 58-76    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
出口放缓对劳动力市场和家庭行为的影响
潘煜, 徐嫄, 徐铭梽, 马弘
厦门大学经济学院, 福建厦门 361005;
北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院, 北京 100875;
北京大学新结构经济学研究院, 北京 100871;
清华大学经济管理学院, 北京 100084
The Effects of Export Slowdown on Labor Markets and Household Behavior
PAN Yu, XU Yuan, XU Mingzhi, MA Hong
School of Economics, Xiamen University;
Business School, Beijing Normal University;
Institute of New Structural Economics, Peking University;
School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University
下载:  PDF (750KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 2008年后全球需求疲软,我国出口增速随之放缓。本文基于2012年至2018年家庭调查微观数据,构建城市层面出口需求冲击,考察了外需疲软下出口放缓对我国个体劳动力市场表现和家户经济行为的影响。结果表明,在个体层面,出口放缓显著降低了个体的工资水平,增加了低技能工人的失业率,提高了个体从事灵活就业和退出劳动力市场的概率。进一步分析表明,这种负面影响更多地体现在女性、可贸易部门就业人员、低技能工人、中老年群体以及职业社会认知得分较低的人群中。在家户层面,出口减速显著降低了家庭的总收入和享受型消费支出,且家庭倾向于通过减少金融资产投资、增加借贷和延迟还贷的方式来平滑支出。本文的结论为新形势下我国扩大高水平对外开放,巩固外贸基本盘,加快培育外贸新动能提供了理论支持和经验依据。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
潘煜
徐嫄
徐铭梽
马弘
关键词:  出口放缓  劳动力市场表现  家户经济行为  高水平开放    
Summary:  The 2008 global financial crisis triggered a prolonged stagnation in international trade. Weak global demand caused a slowdown in China's exports. Over the past few years, the average export growth rate was only 5%, representing a sharp decline of 20% compared to the pre-crisis period of 2001-2008. China, with the world's largest working-age population, depends critically on exports for job creation. Weak external demand and export slowdown thus pose major economic and social challenges.
This paper examines how export slowdown, driven by weak external demand, affects individuals and households. Using data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) conducted by Peking University Institute of Social Studies Survey and trade data from the General Administration of Customs, we construct city-level export demand shocks to analyze the effects of export slowdown since 2012 on individuals' labor market performance, mental health, and households' economic decisions in China. We employ a shift-share instrumental variable to identify the causal effect. Specifically, to isolate the effects of export slowdown caused by weak external demand from those driven by other domestic factors, we first calculate the changes in exports of each six-digit HS product from the rest of the world (excluding China) to the rest of the world. These product-level demand shocks are then weighted by the initial export structure of each prefecture-level city, and used as an instrumental variable for city-level export shocks.
The empirical results reveal that export slowdown significantly reduces individual wages, increases unemployment among low-skilled workers, induces more individuals to engage in flexible jobs or exit the labor market, and worsens mental health. Moreover, the adverse effects of export slowdown are more pronounced among women, workers in tradable sectors, low-skilled laborers, older individuals, and those with lower occupational social recognition scores.At the household level, export slowdown leads to a significant decline in total household income. Additionally, when facing a negative income shock, households are more likely to reduce financial investments, increase borrowing, and delay debt repayment to smooth expenditures, with no significant change in saving.
Our findings offer valuable policy guidance for expanding high-standard opening-up and advancing high-quality economic development. Meanwhile, we also provide theoretical support and valuable insights for the government to address the increasingly prominent structural challenges in foreign trade. On one hand, it is essential to stabilize the foundation of foreign trade and foster new growth drivers. This includes improving export quality, optimizing export structures, and advancing trade digitization and green transformation to better align with new demands in global development. On the other hand Lastly, given that export slowdown may exacerbate household debt risks, it is advisable to establish a regular household financial monitoring system, and improve temporary social assistance programs.
This paper makes several key contributions to the literature. Firstly, in terms of research focus, this paper shifts the focus from trade liberalization to the underexplored effects of export slowdown following the post-2008 decline in global demand. Secondly, in terms of data, most existing studies on trade impacts rely on industry,region, or firm level data. In contrast, this paper utilizes micro-level individual and household data across multiple dimensions, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the direct effects of negative export shocks and their heterogeneity across different demographic groups. Thirdly, in terms of policy relevance, our findings that export slowdown significantly worsens labor market outcomes and mental health offer actionable insights for policymakers in designing measures to mitigate the adverse effects of negative export shocks. Finally, in terms of methodology, the use of a Bartik instrumental variable regression and extensive robustness checks addresses endogeneity concerns and strengthens the validity of the results.
Keywords:  Export Slowdown    Labor Market Performance    Household Economic Behavior    High-level Opening Up
JEL分类号:  F14   F16   D12  
基金资助: *本文感谢国家社会科学基金重大项目(23&ZD046)、国家自然科学基金面上项目(71973079)、国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(B类)(72322007)、国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(A类)(72425004)、清华大学文科双高计划(2023TSG08102)、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2022NTSS07)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  徐 嫄,经济学博士,副教授,北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院,E-mail: xuyuan@bnu.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  潘 煜,经济学博士,助理教授,厦门大学经济学院,E-mail: panyu@xmu.edu.cn.
徐铭梽,经济学博士,助理教授、研究员,北京大学新结构经济学研究院,E-mail: mingzhixu@nsd.pku.edu.cn.
马 弘,经济学博士,教授,清华大学经济管理学院,E-mail: mahong@sem.tsinghua.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
潘煜, 徐嫄, 徐铭梽, 马弘. 出口放缓对劳动力市场和家庭行为的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 543(9): 58-76.
PAN Yu, XU Yuan, XU Mingzhi, MA Hong. The Effects of Export Slowdown on Labor Markets and Household Behavior. Journal of Financial Research, 2025, 543(9): 58-76.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2025/V543/I9/58
[1]陈安平、刘彩霞和刘启超,2020,《经济增速放缓对个体收入和就业的影响研究》,《产经评论》第6期,第127~144页。
[2]陈道富,2015,《我国融资难融资贵的机制根源探究与应对》,《金融研究》第2期,第45~52页。
[3]陈彦斌、刘哲希和陈伟泽,2018,《经济增速放缓下的资产泡沫研究——基于含有高债务特征的动态一般均衡模型》,《经济研究》第10期,第16~21页。
[4]戴觅、张轶凡和黄炜,2019,《贸易自由化如何影响中国区域劳动力市场?》,《管理世界》第6期,第56~69页。
[5]方昕,2016,《警惕通缩风险,完善宏观调控》,《金融研究》第2期,第121~127页。
[6]葛阳琴、谢建国和李宏亮,2018,《全球贸易减速的影响因素研究——基于增加值贸易的视角》,《国际贸易问题》第2期,第56~69页。
[7]罗楚亮、滕阳川和李利英,2019,《行业结构、性别歧视与性别工资差距》,《管理世界》第8期,第58~68页。
[8]罗长远和刘子琦,2022,《经济增速放缓激发了企业家精神吗——基于2010—2018年中国家庭追踪调查数据的研究》,《学术月刊》第9期,第46~59页。
[9]罗长远、刘子琦和宋弘,2023,《经济增速放缓对国民心理健康的影响——来自中国家户层面的证据》,《经济学(季刊)》第2期,第604~621页。
[10]刘铠豪、臧旭恒和王雪芳,2022,《外部关税减让与家庭消费——来自中国城镇住户调查的微观证据》,《南开经济研究》第5期,第38~62页。
[11]李实、宋锦和刘小川,2014,《中国城镇职工性别工资差距的演变》,《管理世界》第3期,第53~65+187页。
[12]李小帆和孟克,2024,《外需疲软、出口受阻与中国制造业比重下滑》,《财贸经济》第1期,第1~19页。
[13]毛日昇,2009,《出口、外商直接投资与中国制造业就业》,《经济研究》第11期,第105~117页。
[14]秦若冰和马弘,2023,《消费品关税减让的价格效应与福利分析——来自2017—2019年关税改革的经验证据》,《经济学(季刊)》第2期,第409~424页。
[15]王备和钱学锋,2020,《贸易自由化、生活成本与中国城市居民家庭消费福利》,《世界经济》第3期,第69~92页。
[16]王文举和贾辰歌,2024,《关税壁垒对中美贸易及我国就业的影响研究》,《数量经济研究》第15期,第1~23页。
[17]于洪霞和陈玉宇,2010,《外贸出口影响工资水平的机制探析》,《管理世界》第10期,第47~58页。
[18]张川川,2015a,《出口对就业、工资和收入不平等的影响——基于微观数据的证据》,《经济学(季刊)》第4期,第1611~1630页。
[19]张川川,2015b,《“中等教育陷阱”?——出口扩张、就业增长与个体教育决策》,《经济研究》第12期,第115~127+157页。
[20]赵春明、李震和李宏兵,2021,《中国出口增速放缓与区域劳动力市场就业调整》,《财经研究》第1期,第135~152页。
[21]Alfaro, L. and D. Chor, 2023, “Global Supply Chains: The Looming ‘Great Reallocation’”, National Bureau of Economic Research, No. W31661.
[22]Amiti, M. and D. R. Davis, 2012, “Trade, Firms, and Wages: Theory and Evidence”, The Review of Economic Studies, 79(1), pp. 1~36.
[23]Autor, D. H., D. Dorn and G. H. Hanson, 2013, “The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States”, American Economic Review, 103(6), pp. 2121~2168.
[24]Barrot, J. N., E. Loualiche, M. Plosser and J. Sauvagnat, 2022, “Import Competition and Household Debt”, The Journal of Finance, 77(6), pp. 3037~3091.
[25]Bartik, T. J, 1991, “Who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development Policies?”, WE Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
[26]Benguria, F., J. Choi, D. L. Swenson and M. Xu, 2022, “Anxiety or pain? The impact of tariffs and uncertainty on Chinese firms in the trade war”, Journal of International Economics, 137, p. 103608.
[27]Borusyak, K., P. Hull and X. Jaravel, 2022, “Quasi-experimental Shift-share Research Designs”, The Review of Economic Studies, 89 (1), pp. 181~213.
[28]Brandt, L., J. Van Biesebroeck, L. Wang and Y. Zhang, 2017, “WTO Accession and Performance of Chinese Manufacturing Firms”, American Economic Review, 107(9), pp. 2784~2820.
[29]Campante, F. R., D. Chor and B. Li, 2023, “The Political Economy Consequences of China's Export Slowdown”, Journal of the European Economic Association, 21(5), pp. 1721~1771.
[30]Chor, D. and B. Li, 2024, “Illuminating the effects of the US-China tariff war on China's economy”, Journal of International Economics, 150, p. 103926.
[31]Colantone, I., R. Crinò and L. Ogliari, 2019, “Globalization and Mental Distress”, Journal of International Economics, 119, pp. 181~207.
[32]Dai, M., W. Huang and Y. Zhang, 2021, “How do Households Adjust to Tariff Liberalization? Evidence from China's WTO Accession”, Journal of Development Economics, 150, p. 102628.
[33]Dix-Carneiro, R. and B. K. Kovak, 2017, “Trade Liberalization and Regional Dynamics”, American Economic Review, 107(10), pp. 2908~2946.
[34]Eppinger, P., G. J. Felbermayr, O. Krebs and B. Kukharskyy, 2021, “Decoupling global value chains”, CESifo Working Paper, No. 9079.
[35]Erten, B. and J. Leight, 2021, “Exporting Out of Agriculture: The Impact of WTO Accession on Structural Transformation in China”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 103(2), pp. 364~380.
[36]Feenstra, R. C. and C. Hong, 2010, “China's Exports and Employment”, in Feenstra R. C. and S. J. Wei, 2010, China's Growing Role in World Trade, Chicago: University Press, pp. 167~199.
[37]Ferraro, J. K. and E. V. Leemput, 2019, “Long-Run Effects of Chinese GDP from U.S.-China Tariff Hikes”, FEDS Notes, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington.
[38]Han, J., R. Liu, B. U. Marchand and J. Zhang, 2016, “Market Structure, Imperfect Tariff Pass-through, and Household Welfare in Urban China”, Journal of International Economics, 100(5), pp. 220~232.
[39]He, C., K. Mau and M. Xu, 2021, “Trade Shocks and Firms Hiring Decisions: Evidence from Vacancy Postings of Chinese Firms in the Trade War”, Labour Economics, 71, p. 102021.
[40]Jiang, L., Y. Lu, H. Song and G. Zhang, “Responses of exporters to trade protectionism: Inference from the U.S.-China trade war”, Journal of International Economics, 140, pp. 1905~1913.
[41]Kuhn, P. and K. Shen, 2013, “Gender Discrimination in Job Ads: Evidence from China”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(1), pp. 287~336.
[42]Li, B., 2018, “Export Expansion, Skill Acquisition and Industry Specialization: Evidence from China”, Journal of International Economics, 114, pp. 346~361.
[43]Los, B., M. P. Timmer and G. J. de Vries, 2015, “How Important are Exports for Job Growth in China? A Demand Side Analysis”, Journal of Comparative Economics, 43(1), pp. 19~32.
[44]Ma, H., Y. Pan and M. Xu, 2025, “The Criminogenic Consequence of Export Slowdown: Evidence from Millions of Court Judgment Documents in China”, The Economic Journal, ueaf024.
[45]McCaig, B., 2011,“Exporting Out of Poverty: Provincial Poverty in Vietnam and US Market Access”, Journal of International Economics, 85(1), pp. 102~113.
[46] Senik, C., 2008, “Is Man Doomed to Progress?”, Journal of Economic & Organization, 68(1), pp. 140~152.
[47]Sheng, L., H. Song and X. Zheng, 2025, “How did Chinese exporters manage the trade war?”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 153, p. 103300.
[48]Topalova, P., 2010, “Factor Immobility and Regional Impacts of Rrade Liberalization: Evidence on Poverty from India”, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(4), pp. 1~41.
[49]Xu, W., X. Qin, X. Li, H. Chen, M. Frank, A. Rutherford, A. Reeson and I. Rahwan, 2021, “Developing China's Workforce Skill Taxonomy Reveals Extent of Labor Market Polarization”, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), pp. 1~10.
[1] 曹伟, 高洁, 曾利飞. 人民币汇率、创新效应与制造业企业杠杆率[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 537(3): 21-39.
[2] 皮建才, 罗禹涵. 同行业补贴外部性与企业进口贸易的技术结构变化[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 534(12): 116-133.
[3] 魏浩, 封起扬帆. 进口竞争、创新风险与创新质量——基于单一企业和企业集团的再考察[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 533(11): 57-75.
[4] 夏俊杰, 邓尚沅, 徐铭梽. 中小企业发展与银行结构——基于进出口经营权改革的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 533(11): 76-93.
[5] 许家云, 方森辉, 毛其淋. 僵尸企业、信贷约束与中国出口升级[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 516(6): 113-131.
[6] 魏浩, 杨明明, 李实. 共同富裕、贸易开放与中国的代际收入流动性[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 506(8): 74-93.
[7] 毛其淋, 盛斌. 劳动力成本对中国加工贸易规模及转型升级的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 496(10): 59-77.
[8] 许家云, 张俊美, 刘竹青. 遭遇反倾销与多产品企业的出口行为——来自中国制造业的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 491(5): 97-116.
[9] 张杰, 吴书凤, 金岳. 中国金融扩张下的本土企业创新效应——基于倒U型关系的一个解释[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 490(4): 55-72.
[10] 彭红枫, 刘海莹. 双边出口全球价值链实际 有效汇率弹性理论测度及解析[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 488(2): 56-74.
[11] 綦建红, 尹达, 刘慧. 经济政策不确定性如何影响企业出口决策?——基于出口频率的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 479(5): 95-113.
[12] 张夏, 汪亚楠, 施炳展. 事实汇率制度选择、企业生产率与对外直接投资[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 472(10): 1-20.
[13] 张鹏杨, 徐佳君, 刘会政. 产业政策促进全球价值链升级的有效性研究——基于出口加工区的准自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 467(5): 76-95.
[14] 蒋灵多, 陆毅, 陈勇兵. 城市毗邻效应与出口比较优势[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 459(9): 56-73.
[15] 魏浩, 巫俊. 知识产权保护、进口贸易与创新型领军企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 459(9): 91-106.
[1] 梁若冰, 张东荣, 方心, 林细细. 限购政策是否降低了上市房地产企业价值?——基于强度双重差分法的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 494(8): 42 -60 .
[2] 赵岩, 董小琦, 赵留彦. 银点套利与银跨境流动:中国银本位1902—1932[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 515(5): 189 -206 .
[3] 翟光宇, 薛严慨, 李静怡. 新一轮个税改革与居民消费潜能——基于综合课征和专项附加扣除的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 540(6): 39 -57 .
[4] 赵静梅, 何宝露. 企业声誉与违规行为——基于数字经济视角的新考证[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 541(7): 76 -94 .
[5] 邹伟, 鲁元平. 末端基础设施建设与农村包容性增长——兼论快递物流在全国统一大市场建设中的作用[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 541(7): 113 -130 .
[6] 温慧愉, 高昊宇. 碳交易管控的债券定价效应——来自中国碳排放权交易试点的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 541(7): 149 -167 .
[7] 刘晓蕾, 吕元稹, 余凡. 地方政府隐性债务与城投债定价[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 498(12): 170 -188 .
[8] 韩亚东, 杨丽梅, 邢春冰, 种聪. 社保降费如何影响企业用工结构?——基于正式用工与劳务外包选择视角的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 541(7): 57 -75 .
[9] 孙波约, 于斌斌, 胡雅静. 算力基础设施建设是否抑制了企业“脱实向虚”?——来自中国地级及以上城市数据中心建设的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 541(7): 95 -112 .
[10] 方意, 陈姿羽, 贾妍妍. 实体经济与金融市场的风险监测与调控[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 541(7): 1 -20 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1