Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2025, Vol. 542 Issue (8): 1-18    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
退休年龄、结构转型与人口增长
王钰冰, 郭凯明
中山大学港澳珠江三角洲研究中心/粤港澳发展研究院,广东广州 510275;
中山大学岭南学院,广东广州 510275
Retirement Age,Structural Change and Population Growth
WANG Yubing, GUO Kaiming
Center for Studies of Hong Kong, Macau and Pearl River Delta, Sun Yat-sen University;
Institute of Guangdong,Hong Kong and Macao Development Studies, Sun Yat-sen University;
Lingnan College, Sun Yat-sen University
下载:  PDF (2461KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 劳动者退休年龄延迟是我国老龄化加深进程中的重要趋势。本文从家庭存在隔代抚养和劳动者退休年龄存在性别差异的实际出发,以男女在就业市场和家庭生育中具有的各自比较优势为切入点,研究了劳动者退休年龄延迟对产业结构转型和人口增长趋势的影响。研究发现,退休年龄延迟通过收入增长效应和隔代抚养效应直接影响了人口增长。如果女性在隔代抚养孙辈时更有比较优势,那么女性退休年龄延迟的隔代抚养效应更强,可能降低人口增长率。由于女性在服务业、男性在制造业更有比较优势,当退休年龄延迟使女性劳动相对供给提高时,制造业比重会扩大。本文将就业市场和家庭生育中存在性别差异的新视角与我国隔代抚养文化相结合,深化了关于退休年龄、结构转型和人口增长的相关研究。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王钰冰
郭凯明
关键词:  退休  结构转型  人口增长  性别差异  隔代抚养    
Summary:  In the new development stage, China will undergo a prolonged process of rapid demographic transition and deepening population aging. Whether viewed from the perspective of increasing life expectancy or phased reform of the statutory retirement age policy, the extension of working hours and raising retirement age represent fundamental long-term challenges that China will face in the long term amidst its aging population. Accurately understanding the impact of this trend on structural change and population growth holds significant importance for implementing proactive national strategies addressing population aging and promoting high-quality population development. Based on the facts in China that families are deeply influenced by family grandparenting culture and there is gender difference in the retirement age, we study in this paper the impact of raising retirement age of workers on structural change and the trend of population growth.
We first summarize the distinct economic characteristics of gender difference in market production and household fertility. Then, we incorporate these characteristics into an overlapping generations dynamic general equilibrium model featuring gender difference, grandparenting, endogenous population growth and structural change. We systematically develop a theoretical framework on how men's and women's raised retirement age affect structural change and population growth. Furthermore, we examine the robustness of these mechanisms in contexts featuring social pension funds, intergenerational differences in labor productivity and rising life expectancy.
We propose that: first, raising retirement age directly affects population growth through income growth effect and grandparenting effect. If women hold a comparative advantage in grandparenting, then due to the lower wage rate relative to men, raising retirement age for female workers exerts stronger grandparenting effect but weaker income growth effect, thereby more likely to reduce the population growth rate. Conversely, the opposite holds for raising retirement age for male workers. Concurrently, raising retirement age alters female labor supply relative to males. Given women's comparative advantage in services and men's in manufacturing, increased female relative labor supply raises manufacturing share and widens the wage gender gap, and vice versa. As women possess comparative advantages in childbearing and childrearing relative to men, wage gender gap adjustments induce co-directional changes in household fertility rate and population growth rate. Second, when men's comparative advantage in manufacturing or women's in services strengthens, raising retirement age exerts amplified effects on structural change while leaving impacts on population growth largely invariant. Enhanced female comparative advantage in grandparenting magnifies the impact of raising retirement age for female workers on population growth, and reduces the negative impact of raising retirement age for male workers on population growth, potentially turning them positive. Strengthened female comparative advantage in childbearing and childrearing weakens the impact of raising retirement age for female workers on structural change. Third, raising retirement age maintains robust impacts in contexts featuring social pension funds, intergenerational differences in labor productivity and rising life expectancy. When productivity ratios between elderly and young cohorts widen, raising retirement age amplifies effects on structural change. Under rising life expectancy, raising retirement age for female workers amplifies effects on population growth while modestly attenuating effects on structural change.
We integrate a distinct perspective on gender difference in market production and household fertility with Chinese grandparenting culture, developing theoretical research regarding the systemic interdependencies among retirement age, structural change and population growth. We derive the following policy implications from China's institutional background, featuring deep-rooted family grandparenting culture and gender difference in both market production and household fertility. As raising retirement age, policymakers must proactively refine measures to coordinate population growth with structural change. First, comprehensively protect female workers' rights and interests while substantially reducing household costs for childbirth and childrearing. Second, fully leverage demographic transition and structural change trends to promote coordinated advancement of workforce optimization and industrial upgrading.
Keywords:  Retirement    Structural Change    Population Growth    Gender Difference    Grandparenting
JEL分类号:  O11   O14   O41  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家社会科学基金重大项目“人口结构重大转变对中国收入分配格局的影响研究”(23&ZD044)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  郭凯明,经济学博士,教授,中山大学岭南学院,E-mail:guokm3@mail.sysu.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  王钰冰,经济学博士,科研博士后,中山大学港澳珠江三角洲研究中心、中山大学粤港澳发展研究院,E-mail:wangyb87@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
王钰冰, 郭凯明. 退休年龄、结构转型与人口增长[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 542(8): 1-18.
WANG Yubing, GUO Kaiming. Retirement Age,Structural Change and Population Growth. Journal of Financial Research, 2025, 542(8): 1-18.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2025/V542/I8/1
[1] 封进,艾静怡和刘芳,2020,《退休年龄制度的代际影响——基于子代生育时间选择的研究》,《经济研究》第9期,第106~121页。
[2] 封进和韩旭,2017,《退休年龄制度对家庭照料和劳动参与的影响》,《世界经济》第6期,第145~166页。
[3] 耿志祥和孙祁祥,2017,《人口老龄化、延迟退休与二次人口红利》,《金融研究》第1期,第52~68页。
[4] 耿志祥和孙祁祥,2020,《延迟退休年龄、内生生育率与养老金》,《金融研究》第5期,第77~94页。
[5] 郭凯明,王钰冰和颜色,2023,《劳动力市场性别差距、生产结构转型与人口增长转变》,《金融研究》第1期,第21~38页。
[6] 郭凯明,余靖雯和龚六堂,2021,《家庭隔代抚养文化、延迟退休年龄与劳动力供给》,《经济研究》第6期,第127~141页。
[7] 邱牧远,王天宇和梁润,2020,《延迟退休、人力资本投资与养老金财政平衡》,《经济研究》第9期,第122~137页。
[8] 汪伟和王文鹏,2021,《预期寿命、养老保险降费与老年劳动供给:兼论中国退休政策改革》,《管理世界》第9期,第119~133+157页。
[9] 王丽莉和乔雪,2018,《放松计划生育、延迟退休与中国劳动力供给》,《世界经济》第10期,第150~169页。
[10] 王天宇,邱牧远和杨澄宇,2016,《延迟退休、就业与福利》,《世界经济》第8期,第69~93页。
[11] 严成樑,2016,《延迟退休、内生出生率与经济增长》,《经济研究》第11期,第28~43页。
[12] 严成樑,2018,《延迟退休、隔代教养与人口出生率》,《世界经济》第6期,第152~172页。
[13] 余靖雯,郭凯明和麦东仁,2023,《中国隔代抚养文化、生育年龄选择与人口生育率》,《金融研究》第8期,第189~206页。
[14] 于也雯和龚六堂,2021,《生育政策、生育率与家庭养老》,《中国工业经济》第5期,第38~56页。
[15] 张熠,汪伟和刘玉飞,2017,《延迟退休年龄、就业率与劳动力流动:岗位占用还是创造?》,《经济学(季刊)》第3期,第897~920页。
[16] 邹红,彭争呈和栾炳江,2018,《隔代照料与女性劳动供给——兼析照料视角下全面二孩与延迟退休悖论》,《经济学动态》第7期,第37~52页。
[17] Ehrlich, I. and F. T. Lui, 1991, “Intergenerational Trade, Longevity, and Economic Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 99(5), pp.1029~1059.
[18] Eibich, P. and T. Siedler, 2020, “Retirement, Intergenerational Time Transfers and Fertility”, European Economic Review, 124, 103392.
[19] Etgeton, S., B. Fischer and H. Ye, 2023, “The Effect of Increasing Retirement Age on Households' Savings and Consumption Expenditure”, Journal of Public Economics, 221, 104845.
[20] Fan, X., A. Seshadri and C. Taber, 2024, “Estimation of a Life-Cycle Model with Human Capital, Labor Supply, and Retirement”, Journal of Political Economy, 132(1), pp.48~95.
[21] Galor, O. and D. N. Weil, 1996, “The Gender Gap, Fertility, and Growth”, American Economic Review, 86(3), pp.374~387.
[22] Herrendorf, B., R. Rogerson and Á. Valentinyi, 2013, “Two Perspectives on Preferences and Structural Transformation”, American Economic Review, 103(7), pp.2752~2789.
[23] Ilciukas, J., 2023, “Fertility and Parental Retirement”, Journal of Public Economics, 226, 104928.
[24] Kuhn, M., S. Wrzaczek, A. Prskawetz and G. Feichtinger, 2015, “Optimal Choice of Health and Retirement in a Life-Cycle Model”, Journal of Economic Theory, 158, pp.186~212.
[25] Lagerlof, N. P., 2003, “Gender Equality and Long-Run Growth”, Journal of Economic Growth, 8(4), pp.403~426.
[26] Ngai, L. R. and B. Petrongolo, 2017, “Gender Gaps and the Rise of the Service Economy”, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 9(4), pp.1~44.
[27] Sulka, T., 2023, “Planning and Saving for Retirement”, European Economic Review, 160, 104609.
[28] Zhang, L., J. Gu and Y. An, 2023, “The Optimal Delayed Retirement Age in Aging China: Determination and Impact Analysis”, China Economic Review, 79, 101972.
[1] 罗章权, 郭凯明, 吴红晨. 生产结构转型与生产率——基于全球视角的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 536(2): 1-19.
[2] 王钰冰, 郭凯明, 龚六堂. 结构性就业矛盾、劳动时间配置与人工智能技术革命[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 523(1): 1-18.
[3] 余靖雯, 郭凯明, 麦东仁. 中国隔代抚养文化、生育年龄选择与人口生育率[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 518(8): 189-206.
[4] 卢国军, 崔小勇, 王弟海. 自动化技术、结构转型与中国收入分配格局的演化[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 514(4): 19-35.
[5] 耿志祥, 孙祁祥. 延迟退休、隔代照料与经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 521(11): 188-206.
[6] 郭凯明, 王钰冰, 颜色. 劳动力市场性别差距、生产结构转型与人口增长转变[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 511(1): 21-38.
[7] 郭凯明, 陈昊, 颜色. 贸易成本与中国制造[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 501(3): 1-19.
[8] 颜色, 郭凯明, 段雪琴. 老龄化、消费结构与服务业发展[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 488(2): 20-37.
[9] 耿志祥, 孙祁祥. 延迟退休年龄、内生生育率与养老金[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 479(5): 77-94.
[10] 张斌, 熊婉婷. 经济结构转型与“双支柱”调控框架[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 92-105.
[11] 张斌, 何晓贝, 邓欢. 不一样的杠杆——从国际比较看杠杆上升的现象、原因与影响[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 452(2): 15-29.
[12] 严成樑. 延迟退休、财政支出结构调整与养老金替代率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 51-66.
[13] 彭青青, 李宏彬, 施新政, 吴斌珍. 中国市场化过程中城镇   女性劳动参与率变化趋势[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 444(6): 33-49.
[14] 耿志祥, 孙祁祥. 人口老龄化、延迟退休与二次人口红利[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 439(1): 52-68.
[15] 严成樑, 徐翔. 生产性财政支出与结构转型[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 435(9): 99-114.
[1] 李增福, 张济平, 连玉君. 司法资源配置优化与企业商业信用治理——来自民事诉讼程序繁简分流改革的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 542(8): 93 -112 .
[2] 蔡庆丰, 陈熠辉, 严佳佳. “强省会”的创新外部性——基于省域知识交流与产业分工的研究视角[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 536(2): 132 -149 .
[3] 杨佳, 陆瑶, 葛茜予. 实体企业参控股金融机构的风险防范与化解——基于外部治理的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 542(8): 37 -55 .
[4] 潘玉坤, 杜茜茜, 龚强, 叶奎成. 供应链不确定性与中国企业创新——基于中美供应链微观企业数据的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 542(8): 75 -92 .
[5] 徐细雄, 李万利. 儒家传统与企业创新:文化的力量[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 471(9): 112 -130 .
[6] 罗章权, 郭凯明, 吴红晨. 生产结构转型与生产率——基于全球视角的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 536(2): 1 -19 .
[7] 李贺, 李婧, 姜雪晴. 估值效应对国际收支延迟调整能力的影响研究[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 539(5): 1 -20 .
[8] 马勇, 章洪铭. 庞氏融资、去杠杆与宏观审慎政策[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 535(1): 1 -19 .
[9] 何富美, 刘兵, 欧阳志刚. 通胀预期不确定性的内需效应: 理论机制与经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 537(3): 1 -20 .
[10] 方意, 陈姿羽, 贾妍妍. 实体经济与金融市场的风险监测与调控[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 541(7): 1 -20 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1