Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2025, Vol. 541 Issue (7): 21-38    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
政策沟通、公众关注与经济不确定性——基于文本大数据的指数构建与实证研究
张同斌, 李媛, 王蕾
东北财经大学经济学院,辽宁大连 116025;
山东工商学院数学与信息科学学院,山东烟台 264005
Policy Communication, Public Attention and Economic Uncertainty: Index Construction and Empirical Research Based on Text Big Data
ZHANG Tongbin, LI Yuan, WANG Lei
School of Economics, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics;
School of Mathematics and Information Science, Shandong Technology and Business University
下载:  PDF (2520KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 公众预期是影响经济政策效果的重要因素,通过政策沟通优化预期管理对推动宏观经济行稳致远具有重要意义。本文运用文本分析方法对政策指数进行测度,并基于预期引导视角讨论不同时点下货币政策和财政政策沟通对宏观经济不确定性的影响及作用路径。研究表明,持续精准的货币政策和财政政策沟通能够有效降低外部负向冲击带来的经济不确定性,且增加沟通频率对于强化沟通效果具有重要意义。机制检验结果显示,政策工具实施机制和公众政策关注机制是政策沟通的重要渠道,即政策沟通通过强化政策工具实施效果和提高公众对政策的关注程度,从而稳定经济增长。此外,完善政策沟通机制并注重政策组合的协同互动,有利于实现经济平稳增长。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张同斌
李媛
王蕾
关键词:  经济不确定性  政策沟通指数  公众关注  文本分析    
Summary:  The complicated economic situation at home and abroad has led to a significant increase in China's economic uncertainty, and maintaining stability while pursuing progress has become the general tone of economic development in China. In this context, studying the impact of monetary policy communication and fiscal policy communication on economic uncertainty is of great practical significance for improving the effectiveness of policy implementation and ensuring the smooth operation of the macroeconomy. In this paper, we empirically examine the impact and mechanism of policy communication on economic uncertainty at three specific time points: the international financial crisis, the European sovereign debt crisis, and the Sino-US trade friction using the TVP-VAR model. The main conclusions are as follows.
Policy communication can significantly reduce economic uncertainty during the international financial crisis, the European sovereign debt crisis, and the Sino-US trade friction. Policy communication can provide the public with an “information advantage”, which is conducive to enhancing the public's acceptance of policy information and guiding public behavior to converge towards policy objectives. In addition, the economic stabilization effect of policy communication is remarkably sustainable. We re-examine the impact of policy communication on economic uncertainty at different time points by changing the calculation method of economic uncertainty and replacing the construction method of the policy communication index, and verify the robustness of the benchmark estimation results.
The results of the mechanism test show that, regarding the policy tools implementation mechanism, the impact of expansionary monetary policy communication leads to an increase in money supply and a decrease in the benchmark interest rate, and active fiscal policy communication sends a policy signal of expanded government spending and reduction of tax burdens. Therefore, policy communication uses the way of strengthening the implementation effects of policy tools to form an effective macroeconomic adjustment. For the public policy attention mechanism, the impact of policy communication on public policy attention is significantly positive, indicating that policy communication can strengthen the public's attention to economic policies and promote the adjustment of public policy expectations in the direction of policy objectives, so as to achieve the unity of policy objectives and economic operation directions.
Compared to the existing research, the possible contributions of this paper are that, first, we discuss the mechanism of policy communication on economic uncertainty from the perspective of expectation adjustment, and form a logical chain of “policy communication to expectation adjustment to economic stability”, which provides empirical evidence for optimizing policy communication and strengthening expectation management. Second, supervised machine learning methods are used to quantify both policy communication and expectation guidance. Specifically, the TF-IDF method is used for text vectorization, Word2Vec for keyword expansion, and support vector machines for text classification, effectively enabling accurate extraction of policy text information. Third, we use a supervised machine learning method to measure the fiscal policy communication index, to achieve the accurate measurement of fiscal policy communication of the Ministry of Finance, which has important reference value for improving the accuracy and effectiveness of fiscal policy.
Based on our findings, the government should pay attention to both the direct adjustment function of policy communication and the role of expectation guidance, and further improve the mechanism of policy communication. In addition, the government should also focus on strengthening the synergistic effect of policy mixes on macroeconomic operations and implement differentiated communication strategies for different policy instruments. Following a holistic and systematic approach, the government should optimize the coordination mechanism of policy communication from different departments which is significant to form economic expectations and achieve stable growth goals.
Keywords:  Economic Uncertainty    Policy Communication Index    Public Attention    Text Analysis Methods
JEL分类号:  H11   E32   C82  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家社会科学基金重大项目(23&ZD062)和辽宁省教育厅高校基本科研项目(LJ112410173080)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  王 蕾,博士研究生,讲师,山东工商学院数学与信息科学学院,东北财经大学经济学院,E-mail:wldufe@foxmail.com.   
作者简介:  张同斌,经济学博士,教授,东北财经大学经济学院,E-mail:tongbinzhang@126.com.
李 媛,博士研究生,东北财经大学经济学院,E-mail:dufe_liyuan@163.com
引用本文:    
张同斌, 李媛, 王蕾. 政策沟通、公众关注与经济不确定性——基于文本大数据的指数构建与实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 541(7): 21-38.
ZHANG Tongbin, LI Yuan, WANG Lei. Policy Communication, Public Attention and Economic Uncertainty: Index Construction and Empirical Research Based on Text Big Data. Journal of Financial Research, 2025, 541(7): 21-38.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2025/V541/I7/21
[1] 陈良源和林建浩,2024,《货币政策预期管理的策略选择:模糊沟通与精确沟通》,《管理世界》第12期,第63~78页。
[2] 陈良源、林建浩、王少林和詹焯扬,2021,《央行沟通对于货币政策实际干预的预测能力研究》,《统计研究》第1期,第38~50页。
[3] 董青马、张皓越、马剑文和尚玉皇,2024,《央行沟通与资产价格——识别“潜在”未预期货币政策信息》,《金融研究》第6期,第40~59页。
[4] 胡春阳和马亚明,2024,《重大事件对经济金融风险溢出水平的持续影响》,《财贸经济》第7期,第57~73页。
[5] 姜富伟、李梦如和孟令超,2024,《调预期、防风险:央行金融稳定沟通效果研究——基于文本分析的视角》,《经济学(季刊)》第6期,第2025~2040页。
[6] 林建浩、陈良源和宋登辉,2019,《如何测度央行行长的口头沟通信息—— 一种基于监督学习的文本分析方法》,《统计研究》第8期,第3~18页。
[7] 宋芳秀和宋奎壁,2024,《公众异质预期、信息成本与货币政策传导》,《金融研究》第7期,第1~19页。
[8] 隋建利和刘碧莹,2020,《未预期货币政策非中性的混频识别:行动与语言的信息效应》,《世界经济》第11期,第176~200页。
[9] 王博和高青青,2020,《中央银行沟通的一致性——来自中国人民银行的证据》,《财贸经济》第7期,第51~66页。
[10] 王辉、朱家雲和胡诣聪,2023,《央行预期引导可以降低银行系统性金融风险吗?——基于市场解读偏离的视角》,《金融研究》第9期,第1~19页。
[11] 王宇伟、周耿、吴曈和范从来,2019,《央行的言辞沟通、实际行动与企业投资行为》,《中国工业经济》第5期,第118~135页。
[12] 王茜和王曦,2021,《货币政策预期管理的优化策略研究》,《财贸经济》第2期,第67~85页。
[13] 王维国和王际皓,2023,《我国经济不确定性、金融不确定性与经济波动》,《统计研究》第11期,第29~39页。
[14] 张一帆、林建浩和樊嘉诚,2023,《新闻文本大数据与消费增速实时预测——基于叙事经济学的视角》,《金融研究》第5期,第152~169页。
[15] 庄芳、庄佳强和朱迎,2014,《我国财政政策和货币政策协调配合的定量效应——基于协整向量自回归的分析》,《金融研究》第12期,第71~85页。
[16] Baker, S. R., N. Bloom and S. J. Davis, 2016, “Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), pp.1593~1636.
[17] Beaudry, P. and F. Portier, 2014, “News-Driven Business Cycles: Insights and Challenges”, Journal of Economic Literature, 52(4), pp.993~1074.
[18] Berger, D., I. Dew-Becker and S. Giglio, 2020, “Uncertainty Shocks as Second-Moment News Shocks”, The Review of Economic Studies, 87(1), pp.40~76.
[19] Bernanke, B. S., 2020, “The New Tools of Monetary Policy”, American Economic Review, 110(4), pp. 943~983.
[20] Blinder, A. S., M. Ehrmann, M. Fratzscher, J.D.Haan Haan and D. J. Jansen, 2008, “Central Bank Communication and Monetary Policy: A Survey of Theory and Evidence”, Journal of Economic Literature, 46(6), pp. 910~945.
[21] Bloom, N., 2009, “The Impact of Uncertainty Shocks”, Econometrica, 77(3), pp.623~685.
[22] Cieslak, A. and A. Schrimpf, 2019, “Non-Monetary News in Central Bank Communication”, Journal of International Economics, 118(5), pp.293~315.
[23] Coibion, O., Y. Gorodnichenko, S. Kumar and M. Pedemonte, 2020, “Inflation Expectations as a Policy Tool?”, Journal of International Economics, 124, p. 103297.
[24] Ehrmann, M. and M. Fratzscher, 2007, “Communication by Central Bank Committee Members: Different Strategies, Same Effectiveness?”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 39(2), pp.509~541.
[25] Gulen, H. and M. Ion, 2016, “Policy Uncertainty and Corporate Investment”, The Review of Financial Studies, 29(3), pp. 523~564.
[26] Jurado, K., S. C. Ludvigson and S. Ng, 2015, “Measuring Uncertainty”, American Economic Review, 105(3), pp.1177~1216.
[27] Larsen, V. H. and L. A. Thorsrud, 2019, “The Value of News for Economic Developments”, Journal of Econometrics, 210(1), pp.203~218.
[28] Liu, Q. and Y. Lu. 2015, “Firm Investment and Exporting: Evidence from China's Value-added Tax Reform”, Journal of International Economics, 97(2), pp.392~403.
[29] Rupert, P. and R. Šustek, 2019, “On the Mechanics of New-Keynesian Models”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 102(4), pp.53~69.
[30] Thorsrud, L. A., 2020, “Words are the New Numbers: A Newsy Coincident Index of the Business Cycle”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 38(2), pp.393~409.
[1] 陈宇, 陈超凡, 李钊, 邓磊. 增值税留抵退税、预期与企业雇佣[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 529(7): 96-114.
[2] 牛晓健, 强皓凡, 吕斌, 王聪. 企业跨界竞争与债务违约风险——基于机器学习与复杂网络方法[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 525(3): 150-168.
[3] 成程, 田轩, 徐照宜. 供应链金融与企业效率升级 ——来自上市公司公告与地方政策文件的双重证据[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 516(6): 132-149.
[4] 张一帆, 林建浩, 樊嘉诚. 新闻文本大数据与消费增速实时预测——基于叙事经济学的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 515(5): 152-169.
[5] 王勇, 窦斌, 宋培睿, 何昕晟. 管理层语调偏离会影响投资者决策吗?——基于我国上市公司文本与财务数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 513(3): 169-187.
[6] 华秀萍, 程思睿, 李婉宁, 王勇. 非正式融资中的文化力量 ——企业文化对商业信用的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 520(10): 186-206.
[7] 阮睿, 孙宇辰, 唐悦, 聂辉华. 资本市场开放能否提高企业信息披露质量?——基于“沪港通”和年报文本挖掘的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 488(2): 188-206.
[8] 李哲, 王文翰. “多言寡行”的环境责任表现能否影响银行信贷获取——基于“言”和“行”双维度的文本分析[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 498(12): 116-132.
[9] 彭红枫, 林川. 言之有物:网络借贷中语言有用吗?——来自人人贷借款描述的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 461(11): 133-153.
[10] 刘海明, 曹廷求. 信贷供给周期对企业投资效率的影响研究——兼论宏观经济不确定条件下的异质性[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 450(12): 80-94.
[11] 彭红枫, 赵海燕, 周洋. 借款陈述会影响借款成本和借款成功率吗?——基于网络借贷陈述的文本分析[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 430(4): 158-173.
[1] 李青原, 喻淼, 董燕飞, 黄炜. 数字基础设施与家庭风险金融资产投资——基于“宽带中国”政策的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 540(6): 133 -151 .
[2] 赵静梅, 何宝露. 企业声誉与违规行为——基于数字经济视角的新考证[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 541(7): 76 -94 .
[3] 邹伟, 鲁元平. 末端基础设施建设与农村包容性增长——兼论快递物流在全国统一大市场建设中的作用[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 541(7): 113 -130 .
[4] 李贺, 李婧, 姜雪晴. 估值效应对国际收支延迟调整能力的影响研究[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 539(5): 1 -20 .
[5] 曹廷求, 庞念伟. 政府白名单的信贷引导效应研究[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 540(6): 114 -132 .
[6] 兰天琪, 陈运森, 赵瑞瑞, 贾宁. 股东诉讼溢出与策略性信息披露[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 539(5): 188 -206 .
[7] 韩亚东, 杨丽梅, 邢春冰, 种聪. 社保降费如何影响企业用工结构?——基于正式用工与劳务外包选择视角的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 541(7): 57 -75 .
[8] 孙波约, 于斌斌, 胡雅静. 算力基础设施建设是否抑制了企业“脱实向虚”?——来自中国地级及以上城市数据中心建设的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 541(7): 95 -112 .
[9] 丁璇, 杨道广, 张新民. 中介机构固定搭配:“合作”抑或“合谋”——基于债券信用评级的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 539(5): 171 -187 .
[10] 翟光宇, 薛严慨, 李静怡. 新一轮个税改革与居民消费潜能——基于综合课征和专项附加扣除的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 540(6): 39 -57 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1